![]() |
How was this not posted? Gay marriage |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | |
Linus
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: How was this not posted? Gay marriagePosted: 27 May 2009 at 5:15pm |
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gay_marriage
Gay marriage ban in Calif stands, says Calif Supreme Court. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
carl_the_sniper
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky Joined: 08 April 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 11259 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 5:30pm |
|
WOOOOO CIVIL RIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
|
|
![]() |
|
choopie911
Moderator Group
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 5:32pm |
|
Wow, that's surprising and unfortunate.
|
|
![]() |
|
Benjichang
Moderator Group
I pwned Leroy Jenkins! Joined: 03 January 2004 Location: Ohiya Status: Offline Points: 12618 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 5:47pm |
|
Wow, lame.
|
|
![]() irc.esper.net #paintball |
|
![]() |
|
agentwhale007
Moderator Group
Forum's Noam Chomsky Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: Statesboro, GA Status: Offline Points: 12014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 5:49pm |
|
The moral majority rejoices while one of the final steps in American civil rights is pushed back by another decade.
Awesome. |
|
![]() |
|
God
Moderator Group
Pull My Finger Joined: 09 May 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1381 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 5:49pm |
|
It will be on the ballot again next election till it passes, and the marriages that were performed are still legal so I dont see this roadblock to more legal gay marriage in CA lasting very long.
|
|
![]() |
|
Reb Cpl
Moderator Group
Has to say "yes" to "are you a cop?" Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 14210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 6:16pm |
|
This issue is a tough one.
Do we protect the civil rights of the people of California by u[holding their decision? or Do we protect the civil rights of the gay community by overturning a vote that was made by the people of the state? Whom do we protect and whom do we urinate on with a blatant disregard for their rights as American citizens? |
|
|
?
|
|
![]() |
|
Darur
Platinum Member
Stare directly into my avatar... Joined: 03 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 6:35pm |
|
I for one am relatively pleased with this outcome.
I was very displeased that proposition 8 passed, however I would have been more displeased if the courts decided to overthrow the rights of the people. I hope some form of civil unions are made legal to gays come the next election. |
|
|
Real Men play Tuba
[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg"> PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf! DONT CLICK ME!!1 |
|
![]() |
|
Bolt3
Member
What? Joined: 01 February 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 6:44pm |
|
The state should not recognize marriage at all, only civil unions.
|
|
|
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>
|
|
![]() |
|
Darur
Platinum Member
Stare directly into my avatar... Joined: 03 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 6:46pm |
I'm going to also go ahead and second this. |
|
|
Real Men play Tuba
[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg"> PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf! DONT CLICK ME!!1 |
|
![]() |
|
Linus
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 7:08pm |
Cali already does have civil unions... Edited by Linus - 27 May 2009 at 7:10pm |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
choopie911
Moderator Group
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 8:37pm |
|
I still don't get why anyone cares. It would be like asking me to vote whether someone who lives a block away from me could get married. I don't know them, its up to them if they want to be legally bound to one another.
|
|
![]() |
|
Reb Cpl
Moderator Group
Has to say "yes" to "are you a cop?" Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 14210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 8:40pm |
This is a beautiful point. When the fancy words get boiled away, its really just some people making a decision that really doesn't concern them. That being said, it isn't the voter's fault. They were asked, and they registered their opinions. I"m glad that those opinions were upheld in the name of 'democracy' (I know that's a stretch) but on the other hand, I'm shaking my head at the idiots who thought this was something that should be as have been asked in the first place. |
|
|
?
|
|
![]() |
|
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 11:09pm |
|
Yeah I'm glad they didn't overturn it because, what was it 70%?, of the people said and it would be unconstitutional to reject the people's decision.
|
|
![]() |
|
Frozen Balls
Platinum Member
Strike 1, filter dodge, 1.28.10 Joined: 14 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5865 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 11:24pm |
|
Gay marriage shouldn't be allowed. Marriage is a religious thing, and homosexuality is generally not an accepted part of that.
The issue is that religion has become such a pathetically thinned institution. The legal implications of marriage are not a good idea, and should be removed or made equal to civil unions. This issue is much deeper than dudes banging each other. It could become an issue of interaction between the church and state. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 11:27pm |
|
Exactly. The state is interfering too much with religion.
|
|
![]() |
|
Hysteria
Platinum Member
Strike 2 - Language, 9/25 Joined: 02 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4364 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2009 at 11:53pm |
And here I thought it was the governments place to protect the rights of the minority, whatever the majority may think? A majority of the time, the majority has their heads shoved too far up their brown eye to make the right decision. Amendments 13-15 and 19 come to mind. |
|
![]() |
|
Tolgak
Platinum Member
Master of MSPaint and bri's Daddy Joined: 12 July 2002 Location: BEHIND YOU! Status: Offline Points: 1239486 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 12:15am |
If marriage is a religious issue, then the state has no business regulating it unless it poses a demonstrated and direct harm to people (like child sacrifice). To say it shouldn't be allowed is to favor some religions over others by the government, which is UN-FREAKIN-CONSTITUTIONAL! If civil unions are a strictly government thing and marriage is religious, then civil unions must be available equally, and marriage should be up to religious institutions. Considering that there are such institutions that do support gay marriage, the government would be violating the first amendment (which they're already doing by regulating marriage) by disallowing their benefits while giving benefits strictly to straight couples for marriages. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
carl_the_sniper
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky Joined: 08 April 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 11259 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 12:23am |
|
Nevertheless, if marraige were to become a strictly religious controlled thing and civil unions a government, if the church were to disallow marraige to homosexual people, wouldn't the government have to step in on this anyways?
|
|
|
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
|
|
![]() |
|
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3210 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 12:26am |
|
No, because religion is not a corporation, or a business.
Edited by Rofl_Mao - 28 May 2009 at 12:27am |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |