![]() |
Bushs appoitment |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Author | ||
Linus
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Bushs appoitmentPosted: 02 August 2005 at 12:00pm |
|
|
Well, there was no post about this, so I want to know what you guys think about it.
President Bush has named John Bolton as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. The president's announcement came this morning in the form of a so-called "recess announcement" which allowed Mr. Bush to bypass the Senate to install Bolton in the diplomatic post. Now, I think it's a clever way to use a loop hole, no matter how cheap it may seem. Dem's in congress would just have philibustered and wated a ton of time keeping him out of the UN when most of congress would have voted him in if they voted would have started. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007.
Member
Strike 2 - Flaming 9/12 Joined: 13 December 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:02pm |
|
|
Another big mistake.
|
||
|
Hey, nice marmot! ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Cedric
Platinum Member
Unit Joined: 24 November 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:05pm |
|
Yes sir. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:06pm |
|
|
Yeah, what an idotic move to appoint an ambassador that has verbally spoken about his disgust for the UN. Stupid.
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007.
Member
Strike 2 - Flaming 9/12 Joined: 13 December 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:07pm |
|
|
Its like the NAACP making a Klansmen in chagre of relations. |
||
|
Hey, nice marmot! ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:10pm |
|
Unfortunately you're right. If Bush would have looked to see what Voinavich was trying to prove by going against the grain maybe he could have seen Bolton as not the correct pick. But he won't look past his nose. |
||
![]() |
||
reclusivetorrid
Moderator Group
Look at me, I came out of my hole! Joined: 12 June 2002 Location: Austria Status: Offline Points: 2298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:33pm |
|
|
Yup, mention something about the president and you get every wack-job in the forum posting thier opinion...
See, here's a good example, here I am posting MY opinion. So what does that make me? So I guess I better post it then. I think the PRESIDENT'S decision was exremely good. We need not bow to the extreme left UN organization. Screw them, we don't really need um' anyhow.
And the demon-crats are agianst what's happening because it simply loosens thier grip on our lives, and thier desire to controll every decision we make.
Later |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Justice
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Sexual slurs 5/2 Joined: 20 March 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4454 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 12:38pm |
|
|
The democrats lost the prez election, why should they have a say? If this guy is so outspoken about the UN, Good! It's about time we got someone in there with a backbone. We are still the strongest country in the world as far as military so the UN should be on there knees kissing our butts. I say screw, NATO and the UN you harbor terrorists you get a military response.
|
||
![]() |
||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 1:07pm |
|
|
The UN is the only organization keep the US in check these days. It's good to have them, and we should have an ambassador that respects them, not Bolton. Very intelligent responses though, I mean, of course the UN harbors terrorists. Idiots.
|
||
![]() |
||
Cedric
Platinum Member
Unit Joined: 24 November 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4240 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 1:37pm |
|
Everything. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
High Voltage
Platinum Member
Fire in the disco Joined: 12 March 2003 Location: 127.0.0.1 Status: Offline Points: 14179 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 1:51pm |
|
|
meh
not too fond of the UN, diplomacy is a very novel concept, and works well when all are willing to sit down for the tea party. but it's not the last option, and some of the scandals...do we really want to be in the middle of them? ...the Oil for Food scandal...all i can say is follow the money... sad that following the money will hold true for nearly every major decision these days. ![]() Edited by High Voltage |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
holysmartone
Gold Member
1 strike- language in posted image 6/9 Joined: 07 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 1:56pm |
|
I think he meant that if a country harbors terrorists they get a military response, not that the UN harbors terrorists. |
||
![]() |
||
reclusivetorrid
Moderator Group
Look at me, I came out of my hole! Joined: 12 June 2002 Location: Austria Status: Offline Points: 2298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 2:09pm |
|
I'm pretty sure he ment that as well... I'm not an idiot, I'm just an extremist conservative. A theocracy doesn't sound all that bad to me, strangely. And I don't think America NEEDS to be kept in check. Just My Humble Opinion though... |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member
Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 2:19pm |
|
|
I presume you mean by this that a theocracy doesn't sound so bad, SO LONG AS IT HAPPENS TO BE BASED IN YOUR RELIGION. Somehow I don't think you would be a fan of a theocracy led by, say, Osama bin Laden or the Ayatollah Khomeini. They both like(d) theocracies as well. Which is of course the central problem with theocracies... But on point - before we cheer or jeer the Prez on his choice for UN ambassador, perhaps we should consider what we are trying to accomplish? What function do we want this ambassador to serve? How does he fit into our vision for US/UN relations? For that matter, what IS our vision for US/UN relations? Hard to judge merit without a measuring stick. |
||
![]() |
||
Hairball!!!
Moderator Group
Strike #4 Joined: 12 June 2002 Location: Snow (again) Status: Offline Points: 6941 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 2:57pm |
|
Edited by Hairball!!! |
||
![]() |
||
Carrr
Member
Grand Ol’ Man of the Forum Joined: 11 June 2002 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 1614 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 3:27pm |
|
|
Reclusive, get back in your hole! By the way, your right. The UN is so anti USA that it's shameful. Then the socalist bastards want the USA to pay for the costs of running it. Go figure?
|
||
|
"Older than Pic but younger then OS, Pepprdog, Takita, Rock Slide........."
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007.
Member
Strike 2 - Flaming 9/12 Joined: 13 December 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 3:29pm |
|
|
Really, who let reclusive out of his hole? Isnt Rockslide supposed to be in charge of him???
|
||
|
Hey, nice marmot! ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 3:37pm |
|
|
Is it a bad thing that the UN refuses to allow the US to walk all over all other countries? Is it bad that a nation on a power trip needs to be kept in check? No. The UN serves a purpose, unfortunately too many of you have parents that have no idea what the UN actually does and just spews the lack of knowledge down the family ladder. They are weak yes, because we as a country are too arrogant to follow their advice and go about things in a peaceful manner. This ambassador is an dolt, and the president did not pay much attention to even what some republican senators were telling him not to do.
|
||
![]() |
||
Carrr
Member
Grand Ol’ Man of the Forum Joined: 11 June 2002 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 1614 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 3:48pm |
|
I would be willing to bet that I am older then your parents. You, my son are a self hating american that knows not of what you speek. Hello, 3/4th of the world is living out of the dark ages because of USA aid. That's right pal, off the american tax payers back. We built them just so they can turn around and dictate to us on what our way of life should be. I don't think so. |
||
|
"Older than Pic but younger then OS, Pepprdog, Takita, Rock Slide........."
|
||
![]() |
||
DBibeau855
Platinum Member
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK Joined: 26 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 August 2005 at 3:49pm |
|
|
Tell me why he is a dolt. The only thing i know about this guy. Is he LOOKS stupid, he needs to get rid of his mustache. Thats all i know, and the fact that he is an arms dealer. But other than that, why is he a dolt?
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |