wii pwns halo

red steel

http://uk.media.wii.ign.com/media/821/821973/vids_1.html

metroid prime 3

http://uk.media.wii.ign.com/media/748/748547/vids_1.html

far cry

http://uk.wii.ign.com/articles/733/733951p1.html

if you put 500 dollars into an A5 it is still an A5

Nope. Halo multiplayer is still the best thing ever. Story mode sucks.

Seriously, if you are going to say WII pwns Halo.. it should be Wii Owns 360, even though it dosen't, they are VERY different. You should have ATLEAST mentioned.....
SUPER SMASH BROS BRAWL! That is the BIGGEST reason I am gettin' the Wii

T

PC > Wii > 360

Red Steel will be sweet.... honestly, guns and katana's... what's not to love?

X

a5Tpp789 wrote:

Mr. 47 wrote:

......far cry is coming to every system..and this is a very stupid post...Halo 3 has two teams this time.... one focusing on Multiplayer, one on single player... I expect it to be one of the best single\multiplayer games of all time. And why did you bring up those games..? Halo is known as the MULTIPLAYER king, not singleplayer king, Far Cry = Action but bad story (I wouldn't even play Farcry on the Wii anyway I have a 360 for that) Metriod Prime is a single player game, and red-steel is a take at utilizeing the full extent of the Motion-Sensor Remote..however the graphics aren't all that good nor do the physics seem good, I will buy it though because of the how good it seems to be taking advantage of the remote.
If you want 360 game comparsion..
Here are the biggies.
Gears Of War
Too Human
Lost Planet
F.E.A.R.
Mass Effect
Plenty more, just not going to get into it.

do you worship Bill Gates?

No, I just actually look up stuff before posting it... the games you posted, aren't going to hold up to Halo 3 in anyway... and all the ones you listed, SUCK multiplayer wise which is the key to creating a game that will hold interest for along time..Did I not say I am getting a Wii?

Edited by Mr. 47 - 27 September 2006 at 9:23pm

T

Why is it the only thing mentioned on this thread are boring rehashed FPS?

Tae Kwon Do wrote:

Why is it the only thing mentioned on this thread are boring rehashed FPS?

haha I was wondering the same thing. Probably because xbox is mostly thought of as a good FPS system.

Styro Folme wrote:

halo 2 on xbl is horrid at times. sometimes the graphics can't keep up with the connection, so the hit boxes don't follow the actual player... they should have focused on making it more lag-free, rather than making it look flawless...

That's not necessarily in Bungie's control. But, like I said on XBL, SWAT games can be extremely retarded, especially when shotguns are involved.

Edited by hybrid-sniper - 27 September 2006 at 10:29pm

hybrid-sniper wrote:

Styro Folme wrote:

halo 2 on xbl is horrid at times. sometimes the graphics can't keep up with the connection, so the hit boxes don't follow the actual player... they should have focused on making it more lag-free, rather than making it look flawless...

That's not necessarily in Bungie's control. But, like I said on XBL, SWAT games can be extremely retarded, especially when shotguns are involved.

true. i guess it's unfair... but they need to make some changes to fix the connection issues... somehow...

X