Supreme Court overturns campaign spending

 

 

 

What do you guys think, good idea, or bad?

 

Here is a good article about the ruling and effects.

 

 

I'm glad that the SCOTUS got this one right, this is "change" we can believe in. This will make the playing field level. And that will mean the truth will start to come out, instead of the spin that the campaigns put out that is parroted by the MSM.

 

This will have more of an effect on politics than anything in our lifetimes. I can see why Obama hates this ruling, and wants to stop it. Imaging if all the back room deals he has made in the past year and payouts to his causes became public knowledge...

 

holy cow...

 

 

 

 

one and done.

 

If someone is attacking your country they are an enemy combatant. If the terrorist had blown up the plane, (full of people he didn't know, but was attacking the USA). Why would you give him AMERICAN rights?...

 

He should be tried in military court. Period. Anything else damages America's ability to protect itself, as they have to put out there for anyone to see exactly how they "keep us safe"...

 

All of that should be kept private for obvious reasons.

 

This is a different issue. The left wants to silence the right, if you are saying you don't believe that, then what was all the "fairness doctrine" about?

 

Do you really think that PBS is fair and balanced?

 

How about MSM?

 

Remember, I have posted the actual studies that prove my position many times...

 

 

All this does is level the playing field. Instead of the left silencing the critics like they are so apt to do (kevin jennings...) this stuff will get out to the general citizen where they can make a decision based on two sides of an arguement instead of being spoonfed only ONE side...

 

Kind of like your education, where they focused everything on evolution, while ignoring and belittling Creation...

 

As of right now, Obama has taken over GM, and Chrysler. He has restricted their pay, and given the unions stock ownership of Chrysler. He has given the banks money, and now he wants to control those banks...

 

He is using feigned "public outrage" over the income of these bankers to destroy their business.

 

They have no where to turn. They make money off the market by buying and selling stocks, which they use that income to offset things that don't make them as much money.

 

Like your free checking account.

 

Why do you think the bank does that? Because they love to give stuff away?... Nope, they want more customers, and figure that by doing that for free, you might get your next loan from them. They offset the cost of these free checking accounts by the money they make off the stock market.

 

But, if Obama gets his way and forces them to shut down those investment institutions. Guess what. Your free ride will end, and you will start paying the actual cost of that checking account. (around $24 a month).

 

 

That is the "cost" of doing business, which currently is offset by the business system they built.

 

 

Which our "great" leader is trying to destroy. Guess what. NOW they can put ads on tv telling you the truth about this takeover attempt.

 

 

 

 

And this isn't the only one. We are about one major decision away from all of our college loans, and grants coming from the government... Control, deciding WHO gets loans and grants for education... I would love to see what criteria that will turn to in the future...

 

 

wake up and smell the liberal takeover, and destruction of your rights, while opening up our country to more attacks from terrorists... Where exactly is the "hope and change"?...

 

More like "Hubris and Control".

 

My point was more general, as most people are public educated, at some point in their lives. Plus the fact that just about every show on tv takes evolution as fact, and refers to it in any discussion pertaining to history.

 

"Well, Billions of years ago..."

 

As a human, I find it humorous that humans are arrogant enough to say without doubt that things are much older than the human race. When the weren't there so how can they know? Especially when they put so much stock in rocks, that can be generated in a few hours time during a volcanic eruption that when tested "prove" that, the rock is millions of years old, instead of the truth that it is a new rock.