Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > News And Views > Thoughts and Opinions
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

What.the.Hell.New York?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
BARREL BREAK View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Official Jackbooted Thug Moderator

Joined: 08 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10840
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BARREL BREAK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: What.the.Hell.New York?
    Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:41pm
NYtimes

Basically, Ney York wants to ban the use of Trans-fats in returaunts. This is even more retarded than the smoking ban.
Whether or not the trans fats are bad for you shouldn't even be an issue, it's whether the government ought to be able to dictate behavior like this.

EDIT: Please, Digg this story up: Digg

Edited by BARREL BREAK - 27 September 2006 at 3:54pm
Back to Top
Bolt3 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar
What?

Joined: 01 February 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bolt3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:42pm
If it makes all the fat people, less fat. Then I'm game.
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>
Back to Top
MilSimBaller View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar
1 strike, language. 6/7

Joined: 30 May 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MilSimBaller Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:44pm
umm...yea thats the most rediculous thing I've ever heard.  Goverment regulating our fat intake? HA.  America's more fat then I thought.
Back to Top
High Voltage View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Fire in the disco

Joined: 12 March 2003
Location: 127.0.0.1
Status: Offline
Points: 14179
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote High Voltage Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:45pm
rofl, cranio-rectally-inverted fo sho
Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:50pm
While I'm definitely not a proponent of gubmint telling me everything I can and cannot do... I do feel something really needs to be done about it.
Whether tobacco or trans-fat, it affects you and me. In the wallet.

Even if it doesn't pass into law... I'm hoping at the very least it starts pressing the public to demand restaurants volunarily swap it out.

My health insurance premiums are frikken ridiculous. And I'd bet a major contributor of the high costs are all the unhealthy (by lifestyle) folks and their subsequent problems and expense.

If you aren't paying health insurance premiums right now, my take on it means nothing to you. I personally feel smokers and the obese (and lawyers - sorry Rambino ) are much of the reason why I'm paying so much. And as of 2007, my rates go up another 33%. Ridiculous.

If not passed as a law, at the very least use it as a platform for [forced via public pressure] voluntary measures.
Back to Top
*Stealth* View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Watermarked

Joined: 31 October 2002
Location: Ethiopia
Status: Offline
Points: 10717
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote *Stealth* Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:50pm
Libertarian party FTW damnet.
WHO says eating pork is safe, but Mexicans have even cut back on their beloved greasy pork tacos. - MSNBC on the Swine Flu
Back to Top
BARREL BREAK View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Official Jackbooted Thug Moderator

Joined: 08 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10840
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BARREL BREAK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 3:50pm
Originally posted by Bolt3 Bolt3 wrote:

If it makes all the fat people, less fat. Then I'm game.
So, if, by some chance, Mexican people in my area commit more crimes per capita, we should just get rid of the mexicans?

EDIT: Shorty - Exactly, public will, market forces, that is what ought to be making the decision here. You don't want it? Don't eat it.

Edited by BARREL BREAK - 27 September 2006 at 3:52pm
Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 4:01pm
Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

EDIT: Shorty - Exactly, public will, market forces, that is what ought to be making the decision here. You don't want it? Don't eat it.

Actually... I'd like one step beyond that. While I do like the freedom of choice... if you leave it up to Joe [Ignorant] Public, it'll never get done. It's a non-issue to Joe Public. Beyond simply choosing not to purchase from a restaurant... I'd prefer to see public pressure make those restaurants CHANGE.

So not a simple decision process of eat or not eat... a pro-active movement to remove the trans-fat, without having an actual law dictate it.

Mind you... this is not a matter of taking food off the market. It's simply changing an ingredient. You'd still get your fatty foods... they just would have a different fat content. You and I would still get our beloved fries and deep battered [fill in blank]
Back to Top
*Stealth* View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Watermarked

Joined: 31 October 2002
Location: Ethiopia
Status: Offline
Points: 10717
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote *Stealth* Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 4:06pm
Originally posted by ShortyBP ShortyBP wrote:

deep battered [fill in blank]



What if I want deep battered trans fat!?
WHO says eating pork is safe, but Mexicans have even cut back on their beloved greasy pork tacos. - MSNBC on the Swine Flu
Back to Top
636andy636. View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar
Guested 10/24/07: Inappropriate Word Use

Joined: 09 December 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 2437
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 636andy636. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 4:39pm
Wow, NY will not have any fast food restaraunts anymore.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v291/anthonymartinez/402cdjo-1.gif">
Back to Top
Brian Fellows View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
That’s MISTER Fellows to you...

Joined: 29 December 2005
Location: Neutral Zone
Status: Offline
Points: 3489
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brian Fellows Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 4:56pm
Originally posted by *Stealth* *Stealth* wrote:

Libertarian party FTW damnet.

Boo Libertarians!  Hooray for the US becoming Singapore!
Back to Top
pbdude985 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Dude! Sweet! Dude! Sweet! Dude! Sweet!

Joined: 13 July 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6876
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pbdude985 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 6:41pm
yea i saw that in our paper today
Back to Top
ShortyBP View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

A G F Y

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5034
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ShortyBP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 7:14pm
Originally posted by 636andy636. 636andy636. wrote:

Wow, NY will not have any fast food restaraunts anymore.
I thought Wendys already dropped trans-fat?
Back to Top
TEHGANGSTER View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar
Guested - Dodging

Joined: 26 January 2006
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 2415
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TEHGANGSTER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 7:23pm
its a good idea, people will be a lot less fat,,,,,,

I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar.
Back to Top
Skillet42565 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1: Taunting Mods on Facebook

Joined: 25 December 2004
Location: Liechtenstein
Status: Offline
Points: 9556
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skillet42565 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 7:24pm
Originally posted by TEHGANGSTER TEHGANGSTER wrote:

its a good idea, people will be a lot less fat,,,,,,


I dont like the idea of the government telling me what I can and cannot eat.
Back to Top
blackdog144 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 June 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3786
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blackdog144 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 8:13pm
America is slowly changing...why should they care if i eat 20 boxes of oreos a day?

Edited by blackdog144 - 27 September 2006 at 8:14pm



Back to Top
Pate View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar
Ladyboy

Joined: 03 March 2004
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1653
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pate Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 10:54pm
Already a law in most European Countries. Smart if you think about it. There banning fattening food.

It feels good to be a gangster
Back to Top
BARREL BREAK View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Official Jackbooted Thug Moderator

Joined: 08 September 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10840
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BARREL BREAK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 10:58pm
Originally posted by Pate Pate wrote:

<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: courier new,courier,mono;">Already a law in most European Countries. Smart if you think about it. There banning fattening food.</span>

It'd also be exceedingly 'smart' to ban alcohol, tobacco, TV (except news/PBS), all entertainment on the internet, and anything else that has a harmful effect on people.
More to what you just said, then why not ban all food that is fattening/non healthy, and enforce subsistence diets?

Edited by BARREL BREAK - 27 September 2006 at 10:59pm
Back to Top
Tae Kwon Do View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Best Forumer of the Year 2006

Joined: 30 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6120
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tae Kwon Do Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 10:59pm
It hurts people. It should be regulated.

Back to Top
Pate View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar
Ladyboy

Joined: 03 March 2004
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 1653
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pate Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 September 2006 at 11:01pm
Why not ban all fattening food? beacause its not possible. We would be eatting salad all damn day. What im saying is its not a bad idea to try and make fast food a little bit more healthier since so many people eat it so often.

And any age person can buy fast food. Little kids eat happy means and stuff, starting young on that fat. Atleast with tobacco and alcohol you have to legally wait til a certain age to use/purchase.


Edited by Pate - 27 September 2006 at 11:02pm

It feels good to be a gangster
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.688 seconds.