Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > News And Views > Thoughts and Opinions
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Water/Hydrogen powered vehicles

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
impulse418 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
off the hook four days early <3 <3 <3

Joined: 25 November 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 3361
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote impulse418 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Water/Hydrogen powered vehicles
    Posted: 02 May 2011 at 6:57pm
Why are we still using petroleum to power our vehicles? Why can auto manufactures only produce vehicles that get maybe 40 MPG?

You are telling me, Joe Schmoe, can watch a youtube video. Buy a drill press, some good bits, and the components from any Home Depot . And in a few hours build a hydrogen generator in their garage? But the big 'ol auto manufactures cannot? Give me a break. But people will spends thousands on a new hybrid vehicle, that only gets a measly 50 mpg. When they could of spent $200, and got the same gas mileage out of the vehicle they already owned.

How expensive does gas have to get, for us to finally say enough is enough.

(inb4 conspiracy theories)
Back to Top
usafpilot07 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth

Joined: 31 August 2004
Location: Tokelau
Status: Offline
Points: 4626
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote usafpilot07 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 7:01pm
Originally posted by impulse418 impulse418 wrote:



How expensive does gas have to get, for us to finally say enough is enough.



$6.23


Give or take a nickel.
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
Back to Top
Donald Blake View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 May 2011
Location: Family Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald Blake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 8:30pm
Originally posted by impulse418 impulse418 wrote:


You are telling me, Joe Schmoe, can watch a youtube video. Buy a drill press, some good bits, and the components from any Home Depot . And in a few hours build a hydrogen generator in their garage? But the big 'ol auto manufactures cannot?


Build a "hydrogen generator?"  Sure.  Build a hydrogen generator and associated hydrogen-fueled vehicle that is actually energy efficient?  That's another matter entirely.  Not to mention a hydrogen-powered vehicle that is safer than a 1975 Ford Pinto.

And even if "they" built it, there would need to be an entire refueling infrastructure built up...

Hydrogen cars are a waste of time.
Back to Top
GroupB View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1255
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GroupB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 8:51pm
Originally posted by usafpilot07 usafpilot07 wrote:

Originally posted by impulse418 impulse418 wrote:



How expensive does gas have to get, for us to finally say enough is enough.



$6.23


Give or take a nickel.

It's not an exact science
Back to Top
impulse418 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
off the hook four days early <3 <3 <3

Joined: 25 November 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 3361
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote impulse418 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 9:22pm
Originally posted by Donald Blake Donald Blake wrote:

Originally posted by impulse418 impulse418 wrote:


You are telling me, Joe Schmoe, can watch a youtube video. Buy a drill press, some good bits, and the components from any Home Depot . And in a few hours build a hydrogen generator in their garage? But the big 'ol auto manufactures cannot?

.  Not to mention a hydrogen-powered vehicle that is safer than a 1975 Ford Pinto.



You are regurgitating that BS?
Back to Top
Donald Blake View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 May 2011
Location: Family Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald Blake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 9:27pm
Which BS in particular?  That hydrogen is more volatile than gasoline?  Or that gases are more difficult to contain than liquids?
Back to Top
impulse418 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
off the hook four days early <3 <3 <3

Joined: 25 November 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 3361
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote impulse418 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 9:32pm
Originally posted by Donald Blake Donald Blake wrote:

Which BS in particular?  That hydrogen is more volatile than gasoline?  Or that gases are more difficult to contain than liquids?


The construction of hydrogen tanks being thousands of times stronger than gasoline tanks. Ever worked with a gasoline tank, its made of pot metal.

Or the fat that hydrogen will out run the flame. While gasoline will pool on the ground and burn you alive.


Back to Top
Donald Blake View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 May 2011
Location: Family Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald Blake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 9:49pm
... and gasoline tanks cost about $20 to make. 

... and hydrogen may outrun the flame in the open, but not so much in an enclosed space.

Here is a picture of hydrogen "outrunning the flame:"


Back to Top
impulse418 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
off the hook four days early <3 <3 <3

Joined: 25 November 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 3361
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote impulse418 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 May 2011 at 10:07pm
If you have a car that is covered in canvas, and built a century ago. You have bigger problems.

I like pictures too!






Back to Top
*Stealth* View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Watermarked

Joined: 31 October 2002
Location: Ethiopia
Status: Offline
Points: 10717
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote *Stealth* Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 1:58am
Those Hydrogen generators actually take more energy out of the system then they put in. By consuming the electricity required in hydrolysis from the current circuit, you make the engine work harder and the overall benefit of the hydrogen is rendered mute.

Look it up if you like. 
WHO says eating pork is safe, but Mexicans have even cut back on their beloved greasy pork tacos. - MSNBC on the Swine Flu
Back to Top
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 2:06am
Originally posted by usafpilot07 usafpilot07 wrote:

Originally posted by impulse418 impulse418 wrote:



How expensive does gas have to get, for us to finally say enough is enough.



$6.23


Give or take a nickel.

$3.50

<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
Back to Top
oldsoldier View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Crazy old guy

Joined: 10 June 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 6725
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldsoldier Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 2:54am
DOT will never let hydrogen tanks out there unless they were so armor plated the weight would be too much for power ratio. DOT would not even allow the Peterbilt Class 8 semi with a small diesel 100hp motor turning an alternator to charge batteries and a full electric drive just as rail locomotives use. The DOT reasoning was the amount of batteries and battery chemicals even when housed in between the massive frame rails, was as they called it, an explosive/spill risk. The hydrogen gas released from battery charging I guess. Now consider the DOT reasoning of a full tank of hydrogen even the size of a propane tank going 'BOOM' in a test collision, don't see the tech going far, potential yes, but not at today's tech level.
Back to Top
Kaine_777 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 01 May 2011
Location: with your wife
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kaine_777 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 2:57am
gas is like $4.25 in my town.
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Forum's Noam Chomsky

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 12014
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 9:22am
Originally posted by *Stealth* *Stealth* wrote:

Those Hydrogen generators actually take more energy out of the system then they put in. 

To be fair, every combustion machine takes more energy to perpetuate than what is put towards propulsion.

But yeah, if we're talking about the "Garage science" guy, he did something a thousand other people have done before. You buy the hydrogen kit out of a magazine, attach it to your car either using the alternator or another carried battery sources, crank your car, and think you've invented the wheel.  

Catch is that the car almost never has enough power to actually move. But hey, the headlights work. 
Back to Top
tallen702 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Hipster before Hipster was cool...

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: Under Your Bed
Status: Offline
Points: 11856
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tallen702 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 9:31am
Man, impulse is doing a troll roll recently!
Back to Top
Skillet42565 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1: Taunting Mods on Facebook

Joined: 25 December 2004
Location: Liechtenstein
Status: Offline
Points: 9556
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Skillet42565 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 9:42am
Electric motor running an alternator.  Profit.
Back to Top
SSOK View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
The Savior of Christmas

Joined: 01 September 2005
Location: PRNJ
Status: Offline
Points: 5919
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SSOK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 11:59am
Originally posted by Skillet42565 Skillet42565 wrote:

Electric motor running an alternator.  Profit.

Not quite. 

Anyway, hydrogen is junk. With all of the modern amenities, if the auto manufacturers wanted to make 40+ MPG cars, they can and would. Europe has gazillions of them around. A 1972 Pacer would get  an upwards of 30+ MPG, and that was with three-speed autos and carburetors.

Just like how if I really wanted to and had some extra space, I could make my own fuel if I wanted. (Ethanol, anyone?). 

IMO, if I were to design my own fleet of eco-cars, they would consist of electric cars with a diesel generator. Fuel shortage? No problem, use grease.
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Forum's Noam Chomsky

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 12014
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 12:41pm
I'm not really as down on hydrogen as our lovely new other-worldly friend, but I do recognize that functional hydrogen vehicles are a lot farther off than most people think they are. 

I think they'll get there eventually, but for now, electric and electric/hybrid are a better first-step. 
Back to Top
scotchyscotch View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Truly a shining example to you all.

Joined: 09 October 2006
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1987
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scotchyscotch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 12:56pm
Whale, I can't stop staring at your sig and hearing  "doop, doop doop...etc"
Back to Top
Donald Blake View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 May 2011
Location: Family Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Donald Blake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2011 at 2:38pm
Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

DOT will never let hydrogen tanks out there unless they were so armor plated the weight would be too much for power ratio. DOT would not even allow the Peterbilt Class 8 semi with a small diesel 100hp motor turning an alternator to charge batteries and a full electric drive just as rail locomotives use. The DOT reasoning was the amount of batteries and battery chemicals even when housed in between the massive frame rails, was as they called it, an explosive/spill risk. The hydrogen gas released from battery charging I guess. Now consider the DOT reasoning of a full tank of hydrogen even the size of a propane tank going 'BOOM' in a test collision, don't see the tech going far, potential yes, but not at today's tech level.


This.  Sure, we can (and do) build safe hydrogen containers, but they are too bulky and/or expensive to be functional with consumer vehicles.  We can use a $20 tin can for a gas tank because gasoline isn't all that volatile.  Hydrogen requires extraordinary containment measures.

But more to the point, why bother with hydrogen?  It's just a battery, and not a particularly good one.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.626 seconds.