![]() |
Any avid downhill skiers here? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Lightningbolt ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() PHAT and PLAT Joined: 10 July 2002 Location: bumping up Status: Offline Points: 5055 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 March 2012 at 9:12pm |
I quit skiing years ago due to Colorado skiing making Michigan seem real boring. I'm looking for some ski/binding combo advise on some old Atomic Beta Race 9.28's
|
|
![]() |
|
tallen702 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11856 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sheesh, almost a decade and a half late to the party huh?
Are you actually going to be racing GS in these? Or just using them for an all-mountain alternative? I've always liked Look when it comes to bindings, but that's mainly because I've skied Dynastar for the past 10 years. If you can get a good pair of Look 13's for a decent price, I'd go for them. They've got a great DIN range AND excellent pivot mechanics in both the toe and heel to keep you locked in even in the tightest of turns. I've been skiing my '04/'05 Dynastar Ski-Cross 10's with Look 13's for almost a decade now, and they're still great. |
|
![]() |
|
Lightningbolt ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() PHAT and PLAT Joined: 10 July 2002 Location: bumping up Status: Offline Points: 5055 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OMG ararr arrarr rarrarar spam bot says "jooo don't talk about skiing ok it is naughty and stuff araarararararraarararrrrarar!"
|
|
![]() |
|
Lightningbolt ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() PHAT and PLAT Joined: 10 July 2002 Location: bumping up Status: Offline Points: 5055 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As an explaination for the ski choice, I spend all of my time directly on the fall line and here in Michigan it takes me half of the hill to reach speed and about 3 turns to complete a run. It seems that these skis run warp speed and chew up ice which is what I'm looking for and don't care for shape skis determining the arc of my turns. I've seen people ski in shape skis and what I see makes me want to yack in my mouth. The bindings currently on the skis are a one piece binding where the front and back parts are bridged together with a base thing. One half of one binding is missing so do I need to put a one piece binding on these skis or can I use the two piece type? The word liter_ally blocked my post
Edited by Lightningbolt - 12 March 2012 at 9:56pm |
|
![]() |
|
tallen702 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11856 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They're of the proper age to accept a 2-piece type. Also, shaping doesn't necessarily determine the arc of your turn. You're just getting used to watching poor skiers. I run a pretty aggressively shaped ski for all-mountain use link and can still determine my own line and arc without any dramatic adjustment to my style. In fact, my turning arc is so slight that I really don't do much to slow myself down when I make my tight, quick turns for control. Don't take my word point blank on the 1vs2 piece binding on your skis though. Never dealt with many Atomics, but as I said, they're from around the time when 2 piece bindings became the norm. Edited by tallen702 - 12 March 2012 at 10:39pm |
|
![]() |
|
Lightningbolt ![]() Platinum Member ![]() ![]() PHAT and PLAT Joined: 10 July 2002 Location: bumping up Status: Offline Points: 5055 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We need to hook up and make some runs. A proper set of skis have a way of accelerating you when you lay them on edge if you can flex them enough.
|
|
![]() |
|
rednekk98 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I run the 9.34's at (195 or 198cm) with bindings on a riser plate (will check brand whenever I remember to retrieve them from work, they are early riser-plate style and the brakes are a bit short, I think Atomic bought them out a year or so later. I've run a few shaped skis I really liked, but these are about my favorite skis ever for going stupid fast and handling ice. I'm still on the mountain skiing and bone dry when my friends are soaking wet and bruised from dumping. People know it's me coming down long before they can make out what I'm wearing. They don't get chattery at speed and it's like skiing on rails.
|
|
![]() |
|
tallen702 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11856 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Redneck, running GS at 195cm, "stupid fast" is about your only option now isn't it?
Here in the mid-atlantic, the long runs aren't really in existence, so GS skis are just a waste for my typical day on the mountain unless I'm hitting Cupp Run at Snowshoe. |
|
![]() |
|
rednekk98 ![]() Moderator Group ![]() ![]() Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8995 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can still turn them plenty quick. By moving the bindings forward and back on the riser and playing with the adjustments to boot-stiffness I can get them to behave nicely. It's a workout though.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |