QUUUEEESTTION! 98c related

ok so i have a stock for me 98c, i want to put an LPK on it but the stock gets in the way of the rear cocking mech now...i dont want to take my stock off and i rreeeeeaaaaalllllyyy need that LPK...any words of wisdom?

my friend did that exact thing and it didnt work cuz the extension was rubbing on the hole, he didnt want to make the hole any bigger either cuz of water and sand (obvious)...unless you drill a PERFECTLY straight hole, it will end up rubbing and screwing up

EEEEEEEEEEEWWWWW t-stocks are the ugliest dam things...nooooo thank you, id rather carry a whole nother HPA tank then get a T-stock

Do what your friend did (and I suggested ), widen the hole to prevent  friction, and get a BT SBS or rocket cock to cover up the hole again. Problem solved.

Monk wrote: A picture would help.

QFT. Don't expect much help without pics.

when did he say he was snake? some people just like stocks...

I stand corrected!
Snake, please, fire away!
Really. This is a worse case then I've seen in some time.
I didn't feel like reading the whole thread, was DeTrev successful?

macgyver wrote:      You can always lighten the factory rear bolt and put a lighter spring in it so that it will act just like the LPK rear bolt does.

QFT.

You could also drill a hole into the side of the LPK bolt for a cocking handle, but that might make it too light.

Ace_Of_Spades wrote: snake, are you going to ridicule me for the rest of my forum life just cuz im a decent sniper? honestly, you must have been hit alot by them at an early age to be THIS pessamistic over this

yes he is going to haunt you for the rest of your fourm life, untill some one gives up first. 

Ace_Of_Spades wrote: snake, i hvae a problem, why dont you help me instead of being an ASS trying to get your posts up

um i see you getting your post count up with your useless comments, by putting in your 0.02 with your bs comments that help in no way what so ever.

and allso you got a serious hardon for hammerhead and warsensor barrels <- and no one cares. and by the way snake know's everything more then you and is pointless to try and win an argument against him.

You are not a sniper. You are what spec-ops has led people to believe is a sniper. Spec-ops did not invent paintball. They simply created their so-called player positions as a way to sell people horribly overpriced equipment that they "need" to be a sniper, or rifleman, or whatever it is they feel. Spec-ops are a business, and no matter what they claim, they don't love the sport. As people, maybe they do. But their company has not done anything to help. You are NOT a sniper. The word sniper has existed before paintball. It has a definition. I'm not talking about the "concealed shooter" definition. I'm talking about the meaning of sniper that involves range. You aren't one. Noone is in paintball. Call yourself a sharpshooter. Call yourself a marksman. Don't call yourself a sniper. I'm not trying to insult YOU. I'm just saying that you have bought into a business strategy. Spec-ops are by no means an official governing body.

P.S. That entire post is based around the Spec-ops sniper definition, which is what everyone seems to base things on. Pardon the assumption if it's incorrect.