Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Paintball Equipment > Which Gun is Best
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

alpha black

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
nightstalker1 View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 24 February 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote nightstalker1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: alpha black
    Posted: 28 February 2008 at 7:35pm
does anyone know of any problems with the alpha black.
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2008 at 7:43pm
Yeah. They're Tippmanns.

But if you're new they're just fine (by what I know).

Edited by jerseypaint - 28 February 2008 at 7:43pm
Back to Top
SSOK View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
The Savior of Christmas

Joined: 01 September 2005
Location: PRNJ
Status: Offline
Points: 5919
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SSOK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 February 2008 at 11:29pm

It's a Tippmann. It wont break.

'Nuff said.

Back to Top
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 March 2008 at 11:49am
Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Yeah. They're Tippmanns.

But if you're new they're just fine (by what I know).
What's wrong with tippmanns?
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 March 2008 at 12:20pm
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Yeah. They're Tippmanns.

But if you're new they're just fine (by what I know).
What's wrong with tippmanns?

I'm talking compared to the "mid-end" and high-end markers. Tippmann's are obviously low-end due to the fact they are sear trippers, blow backs, and heavier than most markers available. I'm not trying to suggest Tippmann's are even supposed to compete with higher end markers, because they have their own market.
Back to Top
StormyKnight View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3129
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote StormyKnight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 March 2008 at 1:49am

Nobody was asking for anyone to draw comparisons.  You were asked what was wrong with Tippmanns. 

On a side note, I've competed quite nicely against people that have mid to high-end markers with my Tippy.

Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 March 2008 at 6:42pm
Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

Nobody was asking for anyone to draw comparisons. You were asked what was wrong with Tippmanns.


On a side note, I've competed quite nicely against people that have mid to high-end markers with my Tippy.


Doesn't mean your marker compares.

If he was asking seriously what is wrong with Tippmanns I would say that its a blow-back, sear tripper (as previously stated). Its operation makes it prone to break down (I know you can hit them with a sledge hammer, but more moving parts does mean it has more opportunity for something going wrong) and inefficient. Its shell is about 400lbs and the stock parts are very lack luster. I also can't stand that the A-5 cannot have it hopper swapped out and that the 98c requires some home-mod work for centerfeed.

But again, Tippmanns don't need to own up to these standards for they are advertised for the low-end market.
Back to Top
StormyKnight View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3129
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote StormyKnight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 1:24am

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Doesn't mean your marker compares.

Doesn't mean that it doesn't either. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

If he was asking seriously what is wrong with Tippmanns I would say that its a blow-back, sear tripper (as previously stated). Its operation makes it prone to break down (I know you can hit them with a sledge hammer, but more moving parts does mean it has more opportunity for something going wrong) and inefficient.

Which is nullified by Tippmann's customer support.  One of the best in paintball.  If something goes wrong even outside the warranty, all you have to pay is for the parts and S/H.  No labor charges.  I will grant you that the Tippmanns aren't the most efficient marker out there.  But there are some electros out there that aren't super efficient either.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Its shell is about 400lbs

Nice exaggeration.  You just have to remember.  Nothing is heavy.  You're just not strong enough to lift it. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

and the stock parts are very lack luster.

Ah, a jab at color aesthetics?  You can always buy an old metallic green Spyder instead.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

I also can't stand that the A-5 cannot have it hopper swapped out

Sure you can.  You can get different after-market hoppers for the A-5.  I wouldn't recommend the Ricochet.  Mine broke the first day I played with it.  Chintzy piece of crap that thing was. I'm thinking about switching to the X-7 lower profile hopper myself.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

and that the 98c requires some home-mod work for centerfeed.

No argument there.  I was most disappointed that the Platinum series came without a centerfeed option.  The RD Centerfeed Kit looks disappointing to me since it's made of plastic. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

But again, Tippmanns don't need to own up to these standards for they are advertised for the low-end market.

Some of their markers are, yes, but not all of them.  They cover a wide range of prices from $99 - $299+.  You don't have a particularly high opinion for Tippmann markers, where I do.  Tippmann markers are good markers.  Very reliable and durable.  They are decently priced for the performance you receive.  And as I've said before, you can't beat their customer service.  



Edited by StormyKnight - 04 March 2008 at 1:26am
Back to Top
Evil Elvis View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Crusher of Dreams

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4250
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Evil Elvis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 6:33pm
Can we get back on Topic here.

The Alpha Black have the reliable Tippmann inline bolt system (98 custom). I have fired about 300 rounds in my basement and when it's nice outside.

The Alpha Black E grip is being released in June as well as the Cyclone. But if your crafty enough it's not that hard to Mod a 98 Custom Cyclone.
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 6:42pm
Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

Doesn't mean that it doesn't either.

When your Tippmann compares to a Cyborg, you come tell me.

Quote Which is nullified by Tippmann's customer support. One of the best in paintball. If something goes wrong even outside the warranty, all you have to pay is for the parts and S/H. No labor charges. I will grant you that the Tippmanns aren't the most efficient marker out there. But there are some electros out there that aren't super efficient either.

Customer support doesn't make the problem not happen, just fixes it. I rather not have any breakdowns than know that when it does happen I'll have good customer service. This isn't saying Tippmann Customer Service isn't the best around, but it doesn't prevent the marker from breaking-down.

Quote Nice exaggeration. You just have to remember. Nothing is heavy. You're just not strong enough to lift it.

No. Markers do get heavy. Especially if you are playing all day, sprinting around. Its not about strength, its about fatigue. Hold an Ego in one hand and an A-5 in another, run around for a little and tell me which arm feels more tired.

Quote Ah, a jab at color aesthetics? You can always buy an old metallic green Spyder instead.

No. I wasn't talking about color, I was talking about the stock parts and how they aren't the best quality. Right off the bat you need stock barrel replacing, there is no reg (unlike most high-ends), and the top speed it can achieve is about 3-5bps.

Quote Sure you can. You can get different after-market hoppers for the A-5. I wouldn't recommend the Ricochet. Mine broke the first day I played with it. Chintzy piece of crap that thing was. I'm thinking about switching to the X-7 lower profile hopper myself.

You can change the container that holds the paint, but you are still using the cyclone feed. I'm talking about changing it from cyclone to a Halo or any other hopper. The only available choice is the Q-loader which if you are going to need alot of paint, can be a pain.

Quote Some of their markers are, yes, but not all of them. They cover a wide range of prices from $99 - $299+. You don't have a particularly high opinion for Tippmann markers, where I do. Tippmann markers are good markers. Very reliable and durable. They are decently priced for the performance you receive. And as I've said before, you can't beat their customer service.

All Tippmanns are low-end now. All of them, price does not make them any better. Now, I never said they aren't good markers, but only for their field (low ends), compared to "mid-ends" and high-ends, they are pretty bad. And yes, they are reliable and durable, and you do get what you pay for, sometimes (I think the A-5 and similar markers are overpriced). Lastly, yes, they have awesome costumer service. I would think the best in the industry.
Back to Top
StormyKnight View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3129
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote StormyKnight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 8:39pm

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

When your Tippmann compares to a Cyborg, you come tell me.

While we're comparing apples to oranges, show me a Cyborg that can shoot off of a non-modified C02 cylinder. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Customer support doesn't make the problem not happen, just fixes it. I rather not have any breakdowns than know that when it does happen I'll have good customer service. This isn't saying Tippmann Customer Service isn't the best around, but it doesn't prevent the marker from breaking-down.

So, in other words, there are markers out there with no moving parts where wear and tear won't be a problem? 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

No. Markers do get heavy. Especially if you are playing all day, sprinting around. Its not about strength, its about fatigue. Hold an Ego in one hand and an A-5 in another, run around for a little and tell me which arm feels more tired.

Wrong.  Nothing is heavy.  You either do or do not have the required strength to move, lift or otherwise affect an object.  But, you probably haven't lifted weights, so the concept is lost on you.  I've run around the woods all day with my A-5 as well as my Ion.  I can't say either way I felt much of a differene.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

No. I wasn't talking about color, I was talking about the stock parts and how they aren't the best quality.

I disagree.  The stock internal components don't need replacing.  If you're going to fling a lot of paint with the Cyclone feeder, you do need to replace those internals.  In the 6 years I've been using my A-5, all I've had to replace so far is the sear.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Right off the bat you need stock barrel replacing

No arguement there.  The stock barrels that come on Tippmanns are appalling.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

there is no reg (unlike most high-ends),

Regulators on Tippmanns are optional and not always necessary.

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

and the top speed it can achieve is about 3-5bps.

With the 68 Special, Pro/Am and Pro/Lite, I slightly agree with you that you might be lucky to get 6bps out of those.  With the 98s, A-5 and X-7s, you can get 8 or better stock without electronics or R/T. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

You can change the container that holds the paint, but you are still using the cyclone feed. I'm talking about changing it from cyclone to a Halo or any other hopper. The only available choice is the Q-loader which if you are going to need alot of paint, can be a pain.

That isn't what you said.  You said specifically, the hopper, not the feed system.  You also forgot to mention the Warp Feed.  Neither the Warp Feed or the Q-Loader hold any attraction for me.  I like the Cyclone Feeder.  It is one less (set of) battery(ies) I'd have to worry about. 

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

All Tippmanns are low-end now. All of them, price does not make them any better. Now, I never said they aren't good markers, but only for their field (low ends), compared to "mid-ends" and high-ends, they are pretty bad. And yes, they are reliable and durable, and you do get what you pay for, sometimes (I think the A-5 and similar markers are overpriced). Lastly, yes, they have awesome costumer service. I would think the best in the industry.

This is where it just comes down to opinion.  You feel that Tippmanns are low end markers because they don't share the same inner workings as your mid to high end markers.  They don't have eyes, they sear-trip, they have too many moving parts.  I get and understand your arguments.  I agree with some of your points and disagree with others.  I've played with and against guys that have mid and high end markers and some have underestimated me because I use a Tippmann.  The meat of the matter is preference.  I couldn't afford a mid or high end marker when I bought my A-5.  I had other expenses to take care of (home, cars, motorcycle, loans, bills).  Over the years I slowly upgraded while I could afford it.  Now, I can throw as much or almost as much paint as these mid to high end markers.

So, basically what we come down to is agreeing to disagree.



Edited by StormyKnight - 04 March 2008 at 8:40pm
Back to Top
thejudge View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 24 April 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1658
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote thejudge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 8:48pm

Umm I carry around an A5 and i used to go on gun and the weight never bothered me.  The last time I checked a cyborg was alot more than any gun we are talking about. I have NEVER had a part break on my A5 and i have had it for about 4 years now and put more paint through it than I want to think about.  As for the hopper the joy of the cyclone is you dont need a Halo.  You can upgrade the internals and get about 25 bps.  You dont need more than that.  My A5 was much faster than 3-5 bps when I bout it,  More like 15 bps which, for me, is more than enough. As for not being as good as higher end markers the marker is only as good as the player.  I have played against people with high ends and I used my A5 and emerged victorious.  Its all about prefference.  Personally I dont want a DM#, Ego, Cyborg, etc. 

 

As for the Alpha it looks to be a good solid gun so far.  Once the e grip comes out lemme know how it performs. 

And as for switching out the hopper to the X7 hopper Stormy I would recomend it.  I bought one and love it.

Stay low, run fast, and hope that paintball doesn't hit your...
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2008 at 9:15pm
Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

While we're comparing apples to oranges, show me a Cyborg that can shoot off of a non-modified C02 cylinder.

Would you like me to use a Blazer as an example? Then you would have no argument.

Quote So, in other words, there are markers out there with no moving parts where wear and tear won't be a problem?

Not no moving parts. But very few as to minimize the opportunity of a break down.

Quote Wrong. Nothing is heavy. You either do or do not have the required strength to move, lift or otherwise affect an object. But, you probably haven't lifted weights, so the concept is lost on you. I've run around the woods all day with my A-5 as well as my Ion. I can't say either way I felt much of a differene.

Jumping to assumptions huh? I do lift weights thank you, and I have used an A-5 as a primary marker for about two years. And though I have not felt much fatigue at all, doesn't take away from the fact that the A-5 is undoubtedly heavier than high-ends and therefore heavy when compared.

Quote I disagree. The stock internal components don't need replacing. If you're going to fling a lot of paint with the Cyclone feeder, you do need to replace those internals. In the 6 years I've been using my A-5, all I've had to replace so far is the sear.

When I say stock parts, I mean barrel and firing operation (trigger and such).

Quote Regulators on Tippmanns are optional and not always necessary.

Regs are always a plus and key for good consistency and efficiency. Having them come stock is a huge perk

Quote With the 98s, A-5 and X-7s, you can get 8 or better stock without electronics or R/T.

8bps with a single trigger and no R/T or E-grip. I don't think so.

Quote That isn't what you said. You said specifically, the hopper, not the feed system. You also forgot to mention the Warp Feed. Neither the Warp Feed or the Q-Loader hold any attraction for me. I like the Cyclone Feeder. It is one less (set of) battery(ies) I'd have to worry about.

The hopper is the feed system. Last I checked, the cyclone and the warp-feed are the only ones that separate the components.

Quote This is where it just comes down to opinion. You feel that Tippmanns are low end markers because they don't share the same inner workings as your mid to high end markers. They don't have eyes, they sear-trip, they have too many moving parts. I get and understand your arguments. I agree with some of your points and disagree with others. I've played with and against guys that have mid and high end markers and some have underestimated me because I use a Tippmann. The meat of the matter is preference. I couldn't afford a mid or high end marker when I bought my A-5. I had other expenses to take care of (home, cars, motorcycle, loans, bills). Over the years I slowly upgraded while I could afford it. Now, I can throw as much or almost as much paint as these mid to high end markers.


So, basically what we come down to is agreeing to disagree.



It's not opinion. Tippmanns are low-end. Doesn't matter how good the user is and whether he could afford a better marker or not. They are still low-end. And you can upgrade it to hell, but it won't be high-end. It will just be a really good, modded low-end marker.

And if you still disagree I guess that is what we come down to. But I don't know how you can disagree with the fact that Tippmanns don't compare to markers that are better than them.
Back to Top
Rambino View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
I am even less fun in person

Joined: 15 August 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 16593
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rambino Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 11:22am

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

When your Tippmann compares to a Cyborg, you come tell me.

Compare how?

I have an Angel, some Mags, some Cockers, and a bunch of other stuff, but my A-5 is still the most fun to shoot.

Sure, the Angel is more consistent and quiet, but I love me my A-5.

And since I play for fun, I'd say the Tippmann wins in my book.

[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 12:02pm
Originally posted by Rambino Rambino wrote:

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

When your Tippmann compares to a Cyborg, you come tell me.


Compare how?


Compare in performance.
Back to Top
Rambino View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
I am even less fun in person

Joined: 15 August 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 16593
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rambino Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 12:33pm

My point being that "performance" is not the only measure for most people, and it should not be.

If you are playing competitively that is one thing, but most of us play for fun.  Therefore "fun" should be the most important measure.  "Performance" may be part of that, but certainly not the only part, nor the most important part.

[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
Back to Top
StormyKnight View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 28 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3129
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote StormyKnight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 1:57pm
Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:

Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

While we're comparing apples to oranges, show me a Cyborg that can shoot off of a non-modified C02 cylinder.

Would you like me to use a Blazer as an example? Then you would have no argument.

Quote So, in other words, there are markers out there with no moving parts where wear and tear won't be a problem?

Not no moving parts. But very few as to minimize the opportunity of a break down.

Quote Wrong. Nothing is heavy. You either do or do not have the required strength to move, lift or otherwise affect an object. But, you probably haven't lifted weights, so the concept is lost on you. I've run around the woods all day with my A-5 as well as my Ion. I can't say either way I felt much of a differene.

Jumping to assumptions huh? I do lift weights thank you, and I have used an A-5 as a primary marker for about two years. And though I have not felt much fatigue at all, doesn't take away from the fact that the A-5 is undoubtedly heavier than high-ends and therefore heavy when compared.

Quote I disagree. The stock internal components don't need replacing. If you're going to fling a lot of paint with the Cyclone feeder, you do need to replace those internals. In the 6 years I've been using my A-5, all I've had to replace so far is the sear.

When I say stock parts, I mean barrel and firing operation (trigger and such).

Quote Regulators on Tippmanns are optional and not always necessary.

Regs are always a plus and key for good consistency and efficiency. Having them come stock is a huge perk

Quote With the 98s, A-5 and X-7s, you can get 8 or better stock without electronics or R/T.

8bps with a single trigger and no R/T or E-grip. I don't think so.

Quote That isn't what you said. You said specifically, the hopper, not the feed system. You also forgot to mention the Warp Feed. Neither the Warp Feed or the Q-Loader hold any attraction for me. I like the Cyclone Feeder. It is one less (set of) battery(ies) I'd have to worry about.

The hopper is the feed system. Last I checked, the cyclone and the warp-feed are the only ones that separate the components.

Quote This is where it just comes down to opinion. You feel that Tippmanns are low end markers because they don't share the same inner workings as your mid to high end markers. They don't have eyes, they sear-trip, they have too many moving parts. I get and understand your arguments. I agree with some of your points and disagree with others. I've played with and against guys that have mid and high end markers and some have underestimated me because I use a Tippmann. The meat of the matter is preference. I couldn't afford a mid or high end marker when I bought my A-5. I had other expenses to take care of (home, cars, motorcycle, loans, bills). Over the years I slowly upgraded while I could afford it. Now, I can throw as much or almost as much paint as these mid to high end markers.


So, basically what we come down to is agreeing to disagree.



It's not opinion. Tippmanns are low-end. Doesn't matter how good the user is and whether he could afford a better marker or not. They are still low-end. And you can upgrade it to hell, but it won't be high-end. It will just be a really good, modded low-end marker.

And if you still disagree I guess that is what we come down to. But I don't know how you can disagree with the fact that Tippmanns don't compare to markers that are better than them.

Jersey, I have actually been pretty conciliatory to you in this little debate.  I've conceded some points where you haven't.  You have an obvious prejudice towards Tippmann, that much is clear.  If I told you that I could get my A-5 to fire as fast as a Cyborg, or an Angel, or a Blazer, you'd come back and say, "Yeah, but not as efficiently", or, "It's still a sear-tripper", or the like.  You don't give or budge on anything.  That's too bad.  It must be very stressful for you to 'have to be right' all the time.



Edited by StormyKnight - 05 March 2008 at 1:58pm
Back to Top
jerseypaint View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3649
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jerseypaint Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 7:27pm
Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

Jersey, I have actually been pretty conciliatory to you in this little debate. I've conceded some points where you haven't. You have an obvious prejudice towards Tippmann, that much is clear. If I told you that I could get my A-5 to fire as fast as a Cyborg, or an Angel, or a Blazer, you'd come back and say, "Yeah, but not as efficiently", or, "It's still a sear-tripper", or the like. You don't give or budge on anything. That's too bad. It must be very stressful for you to 'have to be right' all the time.


I'm not prejudice at all. If a new player is asking for a marker to play some outlaw every so often, I would certainly recommend the 98c first out of all else. The reason is I don't budge is because I don't need to. From the start I said that Tippmanns don't compare to "mid-end" and high-end markers, but they don't need to because their market doesn't require them to. I don't see anything wrong with my statement. And yes, it is very stressful.

And Rambino, fun should be taken into consideration, but that falls into personal preference. Again, I'm talking straight performance comparison. I've had some of the most fun experiences of my paintball career playing with my BE BladeII, but I'm not going to be recommending it to people asking, "which is better A-5 vs BE Blade" just because I found the Blade more fun.

Edited by jerseypaint - 05 March 2008 at 7:28pm
Back to Top
ammolord View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Started from the botttom, not there yet

Joined: 06 July 2007
Location: Minot, ND
Status: Offline
Points: 1850
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ammolord Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 7:39pm

wow, childish bickering, grow up guys. basicly its all opinions and that gets turned into a fight.

I dont have an alpha black but i heard that they work just like the 98C.

PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~
Back to Top
Rambino View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
I am even less fun in person

Joined: 15 August 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 16593
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rambino Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2008 at 10:46pm

Originally posted by jerseypaint jerseypaint wrote:


And Rambino, fun should be taken into consideration, but that falls into personal preference. Again, I'm talking straight performance comparison. I've had some of the most fun experiences of my paintball career playing with my BE BladeII, but I'm not going to be recommending it to people asking, "which is better A-5 vs BE Blade" just because I found the Blade more fun.

Understood and agreed - but the two are not always so easy to separate.

In order for me to play with my Angel, for instance, I have to make sure that the battery is charged, I have to make sure the hopper has fresh batteries, I have to make sure the hopper is securely fastened so it won't fall off, I have to make sure that my precariously set debounce works with this particular paint.  With my cockers I have to make sure that my ultra-performance timing hasn't slipped, I have to make sure that I have the correct barrel insert, and I have to take care not to snag anything as I bellycrawl along.

With my A-5, I slap on a tank and I am pumping out 15 bps of fun and excitement, all in a package that is lower profile than my other guns and will never run out of batteries.

Under perfect circumstances, yes - the Angel will "out-perform" the A-5 (if electronic modes are permitted, that is - my finger isn't that fast - otherwise I shoot faster with the A-5, if not as accurately), but I have never walked off the field because my A-5 wasn't working.  I cannot say that for the Angel.  The battery door on my hopper breaks?  I'm out.  Forgot to charge?  I'm out.  Branch rips the hopper off?  I'm out.  Trigger gets a little bounce-happy?  I'm out.

A-5?  I just play.  No hassle, no fuss, no muss.  Now THAT is what I call performance.

[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.563 seconds.