Well! This guy’s as good as dead!

Freedom of speech, let him write what he wants . . .

 . . . But I still wouldnt mind much if he wound up in a ditch


Edited by Darur

Darur wrote: Freedom of speech, let him write what he wants . . .  . . . But I still wouldnt mind much if he wound up in a ditch

Man, he lives like 40 mins from my base...

and the point is not whether he has freedom of speech.

listen what i'm trying to say is that if you can band porn and all the good stuff, why can't you band anti-patrioticslur....aren't both considered poison to a good american mind?


i also strongly believe one has to earn their right to theirfreedoms....in one way or another....and bashing the people who do the lions share of that work is a sure ticket to get beat up in heaven(cuz all hippy's go there).

Strife_17 wrote: he wants us to boycott metallica? even if i did agree with what he was saying(which i dont) i would find thta site a disgrace for even suggesting that i boycott metallica THats the kind of GUy that should get shot and then have to pay for the bullet. or perhaps the worst punishment of all enlist him... but he'd probably pull a full metal jacket

Hahaha. They want Metallica boycotted because of the One video..

That guys a retarded moron. He should be shot or end up dead in a ditch somewhere.

Edited by ScarFace22

Website wrote: ]Even more entertaining is this photo of a dead US soldier. It's entertaining, because there's something called owning your actions. He chose his path, and now we as a country have to pay his survivors benefits and pay for his burial, not to mention the fact that a chaplain still has to go out and tell the blubbering widow, which is another waste of resources, and that is just disgusting. He chose to join, and because of that, Forsake The Troops strongly feels that he should just be thrown in a ditch somewhere and left to rot. This soldier was not a victim of anything else but his own poor choices. Forsake The Troops spits on him and all other "veterans" who died because of something that they chose to do. No sympathy here.

That guy is sick. I hope someone sends him a mailbox bomb....

So, wait.  [Some of] You guys are saying that because this guy is saying something really obnoxious that he should be killed or somesuch?

I expected this from Thor, who repeatedly shows his complete lack of understanding of the concept of "freedom of speech", but I must say I expected more from the rest of you.

Popular speech doesn't need protection.  The first amendment exists specifically to protect government criticism and other unpopular speech.  This website should be entitled to the highest protection available under the law.

That guy should be shot close-range with a hollow tip. And then left for dead.

Clark Kent wrote: So, wait.  [Some of] You guys are saying that because this guy is saying something really obnoxious that he should be killed or somesuch? I expected this from Thor, who repeatedly shows his complete lack of understanding of the concept of "freedom of speech", but I must say I expected more from the rest of you. Popular speech doesn't need protection.  The first amendment exists specifically to protect government criticism and other unpopular speech.  This website should be entitled to the highest protection available under the law.

It only needs the highest level of protection because he seems to be ticking off a lot of people.

I love those who try not to be bothered by what he says by stating the constitution protects him. We all know that. It also protects us as well, so anyone on this forum has the right to say what they want without being criticized, right clark?

It would appear that these people have no respect for their country or the lives lost to give them the ability to spread their propaganda. I think that the design of this site is to be more inflamatory then logical. It's all about attention.

I see it necessary to have a "devils advocate" perspective, and would defend their right to have this site.