Abortion/ Goverment power debate. |
Post Reply | Page <1 1011121314> |
Author | |||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ok, I can't stay out of it anymore.
Here's my opinion, and there is no changing it. Abortion should only be allowed in 2 cases. One- The girl was raped. Two- The baby would be born with some sort of disease (Down Syndrome, etc)or it threatens the mother BUT if the girl gets preg. from consentual sex, then it's her fault. If you're old enough to decide to have sex, you're old enough to live with the consenquences. "But the condom broke" "But the pills didn't work" So what, you still chose to do it, and you chose to accept the risk of doing it. End of story. (Thanks Impulse, forgot about that part. yes if it would have some sort of detrimental health defect for the mother too.) Edited by Linus |
|||
|
|||
impulse!
Gold Member Guested - Repeat Offender Joined: 05 September 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1715 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
What if the birth threatens the life of the mother?
|
|||
|
|||
cadet_sergeant
Platinum Member More power to deflector shields, Scotty! Joined: 23 November 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
isnt there some kinda law or something that Bush Sr. started, then Clinton vetoed it, then Bush Jr. brought it back? it was something like "the new mexico [something]" Edited by cadet_sergeant |
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So this isn't about the life of the child - it's all about the actions of the mother?
|
|||
aGUYnamedLARRY
Member Joined: 04 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Catholics are encouraged to have sex, they don't have TRY and have kids everytime they want some action (lol) Just cause the church doesn't want people having sex BEFORE marriage doesn't mean they don't want people having sex at all. I wasn't saying that it was stupid of her to have sex, I was saying that trying to bear a child when you're that old is taking it a little bit to far. As far as I know this "old momma" still gets it on everynight. Personaly, I'd rather not think of old people.... *pukes* I know several old catholic couples that are still lovin at 65- 73 years of age. *pukes again* And the church never said that was bad. People take the teachings of the catholic church and stretch the truth. Then they get people like you who think that the church trys to stop everybody from having sex. They just don't want it before marriage is all. Fine, I'll go back and read up these posts that you said if I read them they'll make more sense. Then I'll find something better to do. |
|||
In a world where everyone has gone mad, only the lunatic is truly sane.
|
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Having sex = "trying" At least if you are a practicing Roman Catholic, as the church prohibits the use of birth control. And, judging by your demographic summary, so does your local community. That was my point: If you condemn birth control, condemn abortion, and condemn people for having children in their 40s, then you are pretty much cutting off sex (or limiting the nature thereof) for most people most of the time. You still haven't told me how you feel about cats. |
|||
Zesty
Platinum Member Guested - 3 Strikes and hes out Joined: 05 October 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6050 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If your opinions on major issues don't change from the time you are 16 years old, you have failed to grow up. |
|||
cadet_sergeant
Platinum Member More power to deflector shields, Scotty! Joined: 23 November 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2538 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
i thought we established eirlier that the mental copasity of young teens was limited to the present and not so much the future, meaning that they think about the action there doing rather than "if i do this i might be a dad/mother". now that i've been threw court for blood testing my opinion has changed on the subject of abortion. when i was 15 my girlfriend was with child, it tore me apart, i became quite ill and lost nearly 20 pounds form throwing up. it made me grow up quick. she had the baby on my 16th birthday 7-10-04 at 11pm, i got a call around 3am with her telling me she had a healthy little girl, i was half asleep but i remember that conversation. the next morning i woke up and went to the hospital, i held that child for nearly 4 hours. well time passed and we ended up in court, i had to take a 3 hour class at a college about parenting and crap. anyways i took a blood test, waited 7 and a half weeks, i remember where i was the day my mom called me and told me the news from the lawer, i was not the father, i was in D.C. standing in line to buy a t-shirt, i thought i may have wet myself, i was so excited. since then my opinion on abortion has changed i also have not been sexualy active in over 25 months. just my story for the day. i used to think just the way you do linus, guess that experiance changed my opinion on that, life does things like that.... Edited by cadet_sergeant |
|||
oreomann33
Platinum Member Can you say ... ZAZZy? Joined: 11 March 2004 Location: Turkey Status: Offline Points: 8100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So it's some sort of punishment for doing a natural thing? It's every womans right to have or not to have a child and thats her decision, not the goverments. |
|||
|
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's the word I was looking for - "punishment". There is a very definite sense from some pro-lifers that bearing a child to term is somehow "punishment" for some perceived behavior. On the other hand, if you are a good person, we will make the problem go away.
|
|||
djrock
Gold Member Guested - Filter Dodge 01/13/06 Joined: 31 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I am surprised so many people are pro-choice. I could post some 500 reason to support my side but I won't. This should be a poll. To see how the numbers really add up. |
|||
It's been changed jackass. |
|||
Tae Kwon Do
Platinum Member Best Forumer of the Year 2006 Joined: 30 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Please, post some of these reasons. |
|||
|
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There was a poll - mods closed it. Not that internet polls mean anything anyway... |
|||
djrock
Gold Member Guested - Filter Dodge 01/13/06 Joined: 31 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
It would just be a way to see the correct how many people support pro-life. It wouldn't be a poll to see which is right, just to see some numbers.
|
|||
It's been changed jackass. |
|||
Da Hui
Platinum Member Guested, 9/13 Inappropiate post content Joined: 06 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If your paying for it you should know about it.
|
|||
|
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's what I meant - internet polls are not a meaningful measure of opinions. |
|||
Tae Kwon Do
Platinum Member Best Forumer of the Year 2006 Joined: 30 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
We are on a forum of:
|
|||
|
|||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I never said I was 100% pro-choice. I put in the occasions that there should be abortion, but beyond that i disagree. Zesty-17- Yes, there is the possibility that in general, my ideas will change over time, but not this. Cadet- 'we' may have established that, but my opinion stands. If you think you're old enough for sex, then you should be old enough for the consenquences. Saying thats wrong is like saying a kid is ready to drive but shouldn't have to abide by the consenquences if he runs someone over and kills them. Edited by Linus |
|||
|
|||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
And somebody please explain to me how having an abortion is not accepting the consequences... It's an affirmative decision, followed by an affirmative action. Sounds a lot like accepting the consequences. Perhaps more so than just waiting around for the baby to show up.
|
|||
Linus
Platinum Member Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Clark, this 'accepting the consenquences' is as bad as getting a slap on the wrist if you steal something. Except instead of more physical, its more mental.
|
|||
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 1011121314> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |