Tippmann Paintball Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > News And Views > Thoughts and Opinions
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

What are your thoughts on DUI check point

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011 12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 1:08am
Originally posted by Sammy Sammy wrote:

Well I can guarantee that there are terrorists amongst the 300 million Americans. Does that make it justified to tap all Americans phones because there are some terrorists? Not hardly..
Quote <span ="article">A three-year study by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration shows that DUI roadblocks — and
corresponding publicity — help reduce the incidence of DUI around the
times they are set up. But the effect is often limited.A much more useful method involves "conducting more frequent waves of enforcement," the report states.
Pensacola News Journal
Quote </span>COLUMBUS, OH (2007-11-19) Ohio is one of 40 states that use sobriety
checkpoints to screen for drunk drivers. But a group representing the
restaurant industry says Ohio's sobriety checkpoints are ineffective.
The American Beverage Institute says checkpoints caught fewer than one
percent of people driving under the influence. They say saturation or
roving police patrols are far more efficient.The
American Beverage Institute analyzed statistics gathered by the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Sarah Longwell is the
beverage institute's managing director."Only one-third of one
percent of drivers stopped at sobriety checkpoints were actually
charged with DUIs," Longwell says. "It hardly justifies the tax dollars
spent on them every year."


Funny, but the people that were saved from those .33 of a percent being off the roads didn't factor into that statistic.

Furthermore, that second one seems to take a more economical standpoint to the issue. A third of a percent is probably not bad compared to the percent of people who were actually driving drunk.

it also didn't cover the people who knew there would be a check and decided not to drive home drunk.

Edited by carl_the_sniper - 03 December 2007 at 1:11am
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
Back to Top
Sammy View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: 20 July 2002
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 4076
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sammy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:57am
Well I can guarantee that there are terrorists amongst the 300 million Americans. Does that make it justified to tap all Americans phones because there are some terrorists? Not hardly..

Quote A three-year study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shows that DUI roadblocks — and corresponding publicity — help reduce the incidence of DUI around the times they are set up. But the effect is often limited.

A much more useful method involves "conducting more frequent waves of enforcement," the report states.

Pensacola News Journal

Quote COLUMBUS, OH (2007-11-19) Ohio is one of 40 states that use sobriety checkpoints to screen for drunk drivers. But a group representing the restaurant industry says Ohio's sobriety checkpoints are ineffective. The American Beverage Institute says checkpoints caught fewer than one percent of people driving under the influence. They say saturation or roving police patrols are far more efficient.

The American Beverage Institute analyzed statistics gathered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Sarah Longwell is the beverage institute's managing director.

"Only one-third of one percent of drivers stopped at sobriety checkpoints were actually charged with DUIs," Longwell says. "It hardly justifies the tax dollars spent on them every year."
Back to Top
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:50am
Originally posted by Sammy Sammy wrote:


Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

Originally posted by gardy90 gardy90 wrote:

if you havent done anything wrong then dont worry about it. would you rather have a mild delay or be dead...


Honestly, what makes you think you'd be any more dead than if there were no checkpoints? You're more likely to be involved in a car crash not on the highway, but on surface roads. I've never seen a checkpoint on a sidestreet.

I really think it's funny that every time someone gets killed by a drunk driver, it's automatically the drunk person's fault. Shouldn't whoever pulled out in front of the drunk guy and got t-boned have been paying attention to other traffic on the road?
I'm not justifying drunk driving or anything, but people really just need to pay more attention while driving. When you stop at a light, look both ways. I don't care if the light turn green, that doesn't mean some jackass isn't flying down the road with his lights off, running red lights.

The "If you're doing nothing wrong, then don't worry about it," is BS.
I make sure I obey all traffic laws specifically so I don't have to talk to the police. Why? Because I don't trust them not to come up with some BS charge and throw it at me. Even if it is just an inconvenience and you're on your way... Why? I shouldn't be inconvenienced by those who are put there to protect me.

If you see some guy driving drunk, pull him over. Don't stop hundreds of people in hopes of catching 1-2 people (who most likely wouldn't have crashed into anyone anyways).


I've never seen a checkpoint on a highway, only service roads.

Generally, it is the drunk driver's fault (and by generally, I mean almost all the time)

Seriously, I really don't know why you care about something that usually takes less than 10 minutes.

If pulling over hundreds to arrest two gets both those drivers off the road, I believe that it is well worth it.

Your perception of police officers is wrong. They are not all crooked.



I don't like that mentality. Should we phone tap 300 million Americans to catch a few terrorists? No. Should we check every single driver on a road because there MIGHT be a drunk driver? No


Might be a drunk driver?
The fact is that there ARE drunk drivers.

Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

Hrm...
Looks like that's why Carl didn't want to hook it up with some statistics...


First thing, I don't give a crap about that for these reasons:

-Either coincidence or other reasons but the actual statistic part of that quote sounded iffy at best.

-It was proclaimed ineffective by the american beverage institute. That's about as reliable as a department of cattle farmers claiming that shooting cows to death doesn't hurt them.

-It was a one year trend and was probably a fluke.


Secondly: I said that statistics weren't necessary and they aren't.

Do you think that they don't catch drunk drivers?
Do you think that drunk driving doesn't kill?
Do you not think that there are drunk drivers on the road?

Go ahead, answer yes to any of those questions.

Finally: Don't act like I was trying to dodge the question. I answered it straight up when you asked it and I stand by my answer.



<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
Back to Top
Bunkered View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
What AM I smoking?

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bunkered Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:31am
Hrm...
Looks like that's why Carl didn't want to hook it up with some statistics...
Back to Top
Sammy View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member


Joined: 20 July 2002
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 4076
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sammy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:24am
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

Originally posted by gardy90 gardy90 wrote:

if you havent done anything wrong then dont worry about it. would you rather have a mild delay or be dead...


Honestly, what makes you think you'd be any more dead than if there were no checkpoints? You're more likely to be involved in a car crash not on the highway, but on surface roads. I've never seen a checkpoint on a sidestreet.

I really think it's funny that every time someone gets killed by a drunk driver, it's automatically the drunk person's fault. Shouldn't whoever pulled out in front of the drunk guy and got t-boned have been paying attention to other traffic on the road?
I'm not justifying drunk driving or anything, but people really just need to pay more attention while driving. When you stop at a light, look both ways. I don't care if the light turn green, that doesn't mean some jackass isn't flying down the road with his lights off, running red lights.

The "If you're doing nothing wrong, then don't worry about it," is BS.
I make sure I obey all traffic laws specifically so I don't have to talk to the police. Why? Because I don't trust them not to come up with some BS charge and throw it at me. Even if it is just an inconvenience and you're on your way... Why? I shouldn't be inconvenienced by those who are put there to protect me.

If you see some guy driving drunk, pull him over. Don't stop hundreds of people in hopes of catching 1-2 people (who most likely wouldn't have crashed into anyone anyways).


I've never seen a checkpoint on a highway, only service roads.

Generally, it is the drunk driver's fault (and by generally, I mean almost all the time)

Seriously, I really don't know why you care about something that usually takes less than 10 minutes.

If pulling over hundreds to arrest two gets both those drivers off the road, I believe that it is well worth it.

Your perception of police officers is wrong. They are not all crooked.




I don't like that mentality. Should we phone tap 300 million Americans to catch a few terrorists? No.

Should we check every single driver on a road because there MIGHT be a drunk driver? No

Quote

The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration in August released data on alcohol-related deaths in 2003 and 2004. Last year saw a decline in fatalities, and most of the drop occurred in states that don't use sobriety checkpoints.

That led the American Beverage Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based restaurant industry group, to proclaim checkpoints as an ineffective method in preventing alcohol fatalities.

"There were 411 fewer deaths in 2004, 394 of which were in nonroadblock states," said John Doyle, executive director of ABI. "It's a startling finding when you look at it through that filter."

California is one of 39 states that use checkpoints to prevent and catch drunken drivers. It also had 14 more fatalities in 2004 than 2003. All 11 states that don't use checkpoints -- among them Oregon and Washington -- reported a decrease in alcohol-related deaths.

Back to Top
stratoaxe View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
And my axe...

Joined: 21 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stratoaxe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:11am
Ah, Democracy.

It's give and take-safety and freedom. All of these threads, be it gun crime, drugs, auto accidents, privacy, it all comes down to swapping freedom and safety.

The thing is, there's nothing wrong with sacrificing a little freedom for a little security. There are just too many drunk drivers out there to rely on one or two police officers, and ANY lives lost to a drunk driver is a complete waste of human life. Drinking is the choice of the person doing it, the law is clear and simple for me.  If a checkpoint saves some innocent child from being hit by a drunk driver, I'll give up a few minutes of my day.
Back to Top
Bunkered View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
What AM I smoking?

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bunkered Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 December 2007 at 12:02am
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

I didn't say they all were.
Just enough to make me want to talk to them as little as possible.
The limited contact I've had with them (only been pulled over once) has shown me that even the ones who are straight are major assholes on a powertrip.
The only time I've had a cop be civil (not nice, civil) was when he rear-ended me in his cruiser when I made a completely legal left turn with my blinker on. Even then, he tried to tell me it was my fault ("What'd you stop so fast for?"). I stuck up for myself because I knew I did nothing wrong, and he cut me a check for the damages plus some for me to not file a report. Sounds pretty straight, eh?


So either:

You had some coincidential bad experiences

or

American police are really crooked


And how is some officer wanting to keep it quiet even close to someone making up wrong charges? Did you accept his cheque for the extra money? If so, you have nothing to say.


I may have done wrong to accept the money, but I told him to just give me $300. Then I bought a bag and fixed it myself... True story.

But aside from that, it would have put me in a really akward position if I did go and file the report. Police look out for each other, they don't want their partner to have to deal with some lawsuit, and I used to drive a very recognizable vehicle (especially for the week or so after he hit me, as the star from his bumper was dented into the back).
It doesn't seem like a good idea to piss off a cop/the department because the Michigan State Police station is like 5 miles from my house, and they could just pull me over incessantly. Believe me, they're bored enough to do that where I'm from.
Back to Top
Hysteria View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 2 - Language, 9/25

Joined: 02 February 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4364
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hysteria Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 11:23pm
Blue lights flashing, they had traffic stopped 
And Highway 11's done turned into a permanent road block
I wasn't driving, my wife was my D.D.
And she hadn't drank a drop, still got hassled by the J.P.D.
And I said hey dude can't you just leave her alone
She ain't done nothin' wrong man and we just want to go home
Woah-woah

And I was mad as hell, thinking <screw> the po-po
and they wonder why folks don't trust 'em no more
Woah-hoah
And I'm not gonna let this go, so I'm singing <screw> the po-po
Back to Top
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 11:22pm
Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

I didn't say they all were.
Just enough to make me want to talk to them as little as possible.
The limited contact I've had with them (only been pulled over once) has shown me that even the ones who are straight are major assholes on a powertrip.
The only time I've had a cop be civil (not nice, civil) was when he rear-ended me in his cruiser when I made a completely legal left turn with my blinker on. Even then, he tried to tell me it was my fault ("What'd you stop so fast for?"). I stuck up for myself because I knew I did nothing wrong, and he cut me a check for the damages plus some for me to not file a report. Sounds pretty straight, eh?


So either:

You had some coincidential bad experiences

or

American police are really crooked


And how is some officer wanting to keep it quiet even close to someone making up wrong charges? Did you accept his cheque for the extra money? If so, you have nothing to say.
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
Back to Top
Bunkered View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
What AM I smoking?

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bunkered Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 11:16pm
I didn't say they all were.
Just enough to make me want to talk to them as little as possible.
The limited contact I've had with them (only been pulled over once) has shown me that even the ones who are straight are major assholes on a powertrip.
The only time I've had a cop be civil (not nice, civil) was when he rear-ended me in his cruiser when I made a completely legal left turn with my blinker on. Even then, he tried to tell me it was my fault ("What'd you stop so fast for?"). I stuck up for myself because I knew I did nothing wrong, and he cut me a check for the damages plus some for me to not file a report. Sounds pretty straight, eh?
Back to Top
carl_the_sniper View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky

Joined: 08 April 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 11259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carl_the_sniper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 11:08pm
Originally posted by Bunkered Bunkered wrote:

Originally posted by gardy90 gardy90 wrote:

if you havent done anything wrong then dont worry about it. would you rather have a mild delay or be dead...


Honestly, what makes you think you'd be any more dead than if there were no checkpoints? You're more likely to be involved in a car crash not on the highway, but on surface roads. I've never seen a checkpoint on a sidestreet.

I really think it's funny that every time someone gets killed by a drunk driver, it's automatically the drunk person's fault. Shouldn't whoever pulled out in front of the drunk guy and got t-boned have been paying attention to other traffic on the road?
I'm not justifying drunk driving or anything, but people really just need to pay more attention while driving. When you stop at a light, look both ways. I don't care if the light turn green, that doesn't mean some jackass isn't flying down the road with his lights off, running red lights.

The "If you're doing nothing wrong, then don't worry about it," is BS.
I make sure I obey all traffic laws specifically so I don't have to talk to the police. Why? Because I don't trust them not to come up with some BS charge and throw it at me. Even if it is just an inconvenience and you're on your way... Why? I shouldn't be inconvenienced by those who are put there to protect me.

If you see some guy driving drunk, pull him over. Don't stop hundreds of people in hopes of catching 1-2 people (who most likely wouldn't have crashed into anyone anyways).


I've never seen a checkpoint on a highway, only service roads.

Generally, it is the drunk driver's fault (and by generally, I mean almost all the time)

Seriously, I really don't know why you care about something that usually takes less than 10 minutes.

If pulling over hundreds to arrest two gets both those drivers off the road, I believe that it is well worth it.

Your perception of police officers is wrong. They are not all crooked.



<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
Back to Top
Bunkered View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
What AM I smoking?

Joined: 10 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5708
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bunkered Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 10:59pm
Originally posted by gardy90 gardy90 wrote:

if you havent done anything wrong then dont worry about it. would you rather have a mild delay or be dead...


Honestly, what makes you think you'd be any more dead than if there were no checkpoints? You're more likely to be involved in a car crash not on the highway, but on surface roads. I've never seen a checkpoint on a sidestreet.

I really think it's funny that every time someone gets killed by a drunk driver, it's automatically the drunk person's fault. Shouldn't whoever pulled out in front of the drunk guy and got t-boned have been paying attention to other traffic on the road?
I'm not justifying drunk driving or anything, but people really just need to pay more attention while driving. When you stop at a light, look both ways. I don't care if the light turn green, that doesn't mean some jackass isn't flying down the road with his lights off, running red lights.

The "If you're doing nothing wrong, then don't worry about it," is BS.
I make sure I obey all traffic laws specifically so I don't have to talk to the police. Why? Because I don't trust them not to come up with some BS charge and throw it at me. Even if it is just an inconvenience and you're on your way... Why? I shouldn't be inconvenienced by those who are put there to protect me.

If you see some guy driving drunk, pull him over. Don't stop hundreds of people in hopes of catching 1-2 people (who most likely wouldn't have crashed into anyone anyways).
Back to Top
procarbinefreak View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Budget Medical Procedures Available

Joined: 12 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 12920
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote procarbinefreak Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 10:32pm
never seen one... i'd like to say i wouldn't mind, but it'd be really annoying.  Although I do on occasion call 911 to report a potential drunk driver.  
Back to Top
gardy90 View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar
Strike 1 - Filter Dodge, 4/14

Joined: 17 July 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 150
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gardy90 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 10:19pm
if you havent done anything wrong then dont worry about it. would you rather have a mild delay or be dead...
"FIRST THERE"


a-5
16" J&J ceramic
polished internals
X7 low profile hopper
costom painted 20 oz tank
Back to Top
CarbineKid View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 19 June 2002
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3168
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CarbineKid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 9:37pm
Originally posted by +DreX+ +DreX+ wrote:

Sucks dudedown here in RHode ISland [yeah ur little armpit cousin ] They ramped up the amount of po-po's outside..They have like an increase of 45% at night, so now i cant drive fast :(

I also live in RI and DUI check points are illegal here. For once the ACLU did something right here. I think reading everyones response here is interesting, and im honestl not sure if I like the idea or not. Im just glad I wasn't there.      
Back to Top
Dye Playa View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Guested- Reposted Inapropiate Link.

Joined: 21 June 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3209
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dye Playa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 7:05pm
Originally posted by Mephistopheles Mephistopheles wrote:

People eating and driving are a cause of accidents and deaths. Thus food should be banned in America. We need checkpoints to assure that there is no food in their system. Fascism is acceptable so long as it's hidden behind the guise of protecting us from us, and safety for our children.

There's a reason why all of our rights are eroding faster than Niagara Falls. Idiotic people saying "Well if you aren't doing anything illegal you have nothing to hide" and just bend over willingly. The ignorant masses are so eager to hand over their rights for the illusion of safety that simply isn't there.

This is just another example of showing how you have no rights. You are only allowed to be "free" until they want to **** with you, then you have to take it.

Brilliant. Food doesn't affect your ability to drive, alcohol does. Eating WHILE driving, then you might have a case, but that paragraph of ramble was absolutely idiotic.
Back to Top
JohnnyCanuck View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
In soviet Canuckistan...

Joined: 08 July 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1463
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JohnnyCanuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 6:57pm
Originally posted by Mephistopheles Mephistopheles wrote:

People eating and driving are a cause of accidents and deaths. Thus food should be banned in America. We need checkpoints to assure that there is no food in their system. Fascism is acceptable so long as it's hidden behind the guise of protecting us from us, and safety for our children.

There's a reason why all of our rights are eroding faster than Niagara Falls. Idiotic people saying "Well if you aren't doing anything illegal you have nothing to hide" and just bend over willingly. The ignorant masses are so eager to hand over their rights for the illusion of safety that simply isn't there.

This is just another example of showing how you have no rights. You are only allowed to be "free" until they want to **** with you, then you have to take it.

I think you need to live in a 3rd world country for a period of time if you think you have no rights in the USA, I think you're getting rights mixed up with privilege's. Driving is a privilege, if you don't obey the laws, that privilege is revoked.
Imagine there’s a picture of your favourite thing here.
Back to Top
choopie911 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Commie Canuck

Joined: 01 June 2003
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 30773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote choopie911 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 5:10pm
Originally posted by Mephistopheles Mephistopheles wrote:

People eating and driving are a cause of accidents and deaths. Thus food should be banned in America. We need checkpoints to assure that there is no food in their system. Fascism is acceptable so long as it's hidden behind the guise of protecting us from us, and safety for our children.

There's a reason why all of our rights are eroding faster than Niagara Falls. Idiotic people saying "Well if you aren't doing anything illegal you have nothing to hide" and just bend over willingly. The ignorant masses are so eager to hand over their rights for the illusion of safety that simply isn't there.

This is just another example of showing how you have no rights. You are only allowed to be "free" until they want to **** with you, then you have to take it.


HAHHAHAHA, wow....

So if you were driving along, and a drunk driver hit you. Regardless of how much damage he does, you wouldn't be the slight bit pissed if he could have been stopped by a checkpoint, but they didnt have any?

Seriously, your argument is so daft it's unbelievable.   
Back to Top
Gatyr View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member

Strike 1 - Begging for strikes

Joined: 06 July 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Status: Offline
Points: 10300
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gatyr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 5:05pm

Originally posted by Mephistopheles Mephistopheles wrote:

People eating and driving are a cause of accidents and deaths. Thus food should be banned in America. We need checkpoints to assure that there is no food in their system. Fascism is acceptable so long as it's hidden behind the guise of protecting us from us, and safety for our children.

There's a reason why all of our rights are eroding faster than Niagara Falls. Idiotic people saying "Well if you aren't doing anything illegal you have nothing to hide" and just bend over willingly. The ignorant masses are so eager to hand over their rights for the illusion of safety that simply isn't there.

This is just another example of showing how you have no rights. You are only allowed to be "free" until they want to **** with you, then you have to take it.

lol

Back to Top
choopie911 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Commie Canuck

Joined: 01 June 2003
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 30773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote choopie911 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 December 2007 at 5:04pm
I'm absolutely fine with them. Drunk driving is so dumb, I'm in favour of check stops. Even if it makes me late for something, I'm ok with it, and it's a decent excuse.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011 12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.328 seconds.