CQB pro VS A5 |
Post Reply |
Author | |
SpyderMilsigFilipino
Member Joined: 26 July 2010 Location: Hamilton, ON Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 26 July 2010 at 9:11pm |
so now what im comparing is the Milsig Cqb pro and the Tippmann A5 . my local field owner is stating to me and all my friends that come to play here that Tippmann is superior in every way compared to a milsig, she even said that the A5 was better than mine ( i wanted to smack her so hard lol ). But the problem is that mechanicly the A5 is similar to the milsig, it even accepts barrels, stocks, body kits etc.... so i tried to tell her that its basicly the same thing underneath ( minus the mag fed option ), but she kept going on that tippmann would never allow such a thing to happen blah blah blah, made me feel bitter about the field since i have been playing there for 3 years and she is so ignorant. I have tried a A5 and own a milsig, i love the a5 but the milsig just seems superior built, and less plastic. im actually thinking about getting a a5 as a back up for when ever or for my gf to use when we go out to play. but tell me, is there any real connection between milsig and tippmann ?
|
|
Milsig CQB pro
Spyder E-mr1 Spyder Mr1 Kingman Training Eraser Vforce Profilers S.E yellow/black |
|
BIGBOSS_202
Member Joined: 23 July 2010 Location: Fort Lauderdale Status: Offline Points: 43 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well the stocks and barrels as you said are inter changeable. The Milsig I will say has a slight edge as far as reload time goes but the A5 can carry more ammo and is very versatile for CQB games because it was make to look like an MP5K
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |