Print Page | Close Window

HPA or not?

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: Paintball Equipment
Forum Name: Upgrades and Customizing
Forum Description: Trick it out!
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=114947
Printed Date: 19 February 2026 at 6:19am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: HPA or not?
Posted By: slacker guy
Subject: HPA or not?
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 8:32pm
Asyou can see from my list of stuff on my gun down below
would anyone recomend HPA or Nitro or should i stick with co2

-------------




Replies:
Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 8:41pm
Tippmanns run smoother on C02, so Stick with C02.

-------------


Posted By: 98c - baller
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 8:41pm
ummm no ^

every gun on the market today will run better on HPA


Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 8:49pm
^ and what info. do you have to proove me wrong?

-------------


Posted By: 5ptcontingency
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 10:18pm
Originally posted by Panda Man Panda Man wrote:

^ and what info. do you have to proove me wrong?


I have info.
My 98 works better on HPA than it did on CO2.
This may not prove you wrong, but you are also not completely correct.

With that said, I must also say that my gun worked satisfactorily with CO2. Ultimately, I don't think it matters much whether CO2 or HPA is used.


Posted By: Boydster
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 11:02pm
Of course HPA is recommended. That doesn't mean you have to buy it. Put it this way. If you were going to be given an HPA tank or a CO2 tank for free, go with the HPA. Tippmanns don't 'demand' HPA like an Autococker would but it does help a little. I don't know if this little performance upgrade is worth 200 bucks though.

-------------
Video: http://pbvids.gamesxposed.com/files1/RTP.1116548567.wmv - My Automag RT Pro

::: http://boydsters-pics.mypicgallery.com/ - My Gallery :::


Posted By: sugarfree
Date Posted: 02 October 2004 at 11:16pm
Originally posted by Boydster Boydster wrote:

Of course HPA is recommended. That doesn't mean you have to buy it. Put it this way. If you were going to be given an HPA tank or a CO2 tank for free, go with the HPA. Tippmanns don't 'demand' HPA like an Autococker would but it does help a little. I don't know if this little performance upgrade is worth 200 bucks though.
Well put.

-------------
Signatures are **edited**


Posted By: warbeak2099
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 7:17am
Right, any gun will work better on HPA. Tippmanns are known for tolerating co2 very well. Their performance would be much better with HPA however. It's your call. Are there HPA fill stations around you? To what psi do they fill? Would you be better off spending $100+ for an HPA tank or buying paint and admission for a month?

-------------
MIDN 2/C, US Navy

LCE-SpyderMag | G-Force Pneumatic Mag | '99 RF Sniper II


Posted By: slacker guy
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 8:32am
yeah thanks but money is no object here the tank is goin on my
christmas list

-------------



Posted By: warbeak2099
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 9:05am
In that case go for it.

-------------
MIDN 2/C, US Navy

LCE-SpyderMag | G-Force Pneumatic Mag | '99 RF Sniper II


Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 9:11am
Fine. I'll Agree with 1 Thing. a Tippmann with a Electro-pneumatic kit in it will work better on HPA then C02. Yet. I will Still stand where I am on a Mech Tippmann will work Better one c02 then HPA...

-------------


Posted By: Boydster
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 10:08am

You might want to look into the Palmer Stabilizer. That would help your gun out a lot. It will almost make CO2 equivalent to nitrogen in terms of consistency. You would have to take the x-chamber off though. Here's a Christmas list I would want if I were you...

- http://www.countypaintball.com/product_description.asp?item=2469 - Palmer Stabilizer

- http://www.countypaintball.com/product_description.asp?item=1781 - Response trigger

- http://www.countypaintball.com/product_description.asp?item=2056 - A new, better trigger

- http://www.countypaintball.com/product_description.asp?item=3008 - And the Rocket Cock II



-------------
Video: http://pbvids.gamesxposed.com/files1/RTP.1116548567.wmv - My Automag RT Pro

::: http://boydsters-pics.mypicgallery.com/ - My Gallery :::


Posted By: Ken Majors
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 11:10am
If you play a lot in cold weather then HPA is a good choice. I went with HPA because I play in cold weather quite a bit and I also get free HPA fills. So it was a no brainer for me to get HPA. My 98 custom worked very well on CO2, but in cold weather the R/T got a little finicky. With HPA it performs flawlessly. I can shoot full auto until the tank goes empty if I want. I couldn't do that with CO2.
I agree with some of the above posts. A Palmer stab will make CO2 more consistent and also works well with HPA. I still have the expansion chamber on my 98 even though it doesn't do diddly for HPA it does no harm either.
CO2 is a wet, dirty gas, and HPA is dry and clean. So theoretically it is "better" for your gun to shoot HPA. That being said...a Tippmann will shoot CO2 with no problems for as long as you want it to.

-------------
RLTW


Posted By: pballer1504
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 11:48am
i just ordered my hpa tank(crossfire 92ci 4500psi) from paintballgear and when i went to play the first game after it arrived, all i could say was WOW! it is SOOOOOO much more consistent than co2. doesnt get cold, absolutly NO SNOW whatsoever. you get way more shots on my tank than a 20oz co2 and its cheaper to fill. now its starting to be getting fall temperatures up here and this is when my hpa will shine! cant wait to play in teh cold against teh co2 players that will only get like 500 shots froma 20oz

-------------
Shocker-stock,for now
Xbox Live Gamer Tag: Godfather1504
mostly play halo 2
favorite quote: "for those who said this day would never come, what are they to say now."


Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 12:40pm

Anti-Siphon + palmer Stabalizer = Same concitency for 1/2 the price of HPA.



-------------


Posted By: pballer1504
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 12:58pm
Originally posted by Panda Man Panda Man wrote:

Anti-Siphon + palmer Stabalizer = Same concitency for 1/2 the price of HPA.

but still not hpa, much heavier, and your tank will get cold and its more expensive to fill

-------------
Shocker-stock,for now
Xbox Live Gamer Tag: Godfather1504
mostly play halo 2
favorite quote: "for those who said this day would never come, what are they to say now."


Posted By: ItalianoGuy04
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 1:06pm
dude stay co2.. if you change your gonna have to ditch expansion chammber/ remote or they'll blow up i think ( i kno remote will, i not sure bout expansion chamber)...

-------------

Supe'd up Spyda Victor, don't like it, don't care


Posted By: NitroNick
Date Posted: 03 October 2004 at 1:18pm
Originally posted by ItalianoGuy04 ItalianoGuy04 wrote:

dude stay co2.. if you change your gonna have to ditch expansion chammber/ remote or they'll blow up i think ( i kno remote will, i not sure bout expansion chamber)...


You wont even need an expansion chamber with HPA.. and most remotes can run Co2 and HPA.


Posted By: Boydster
Date Posted: 04 October 2004 at 12:06am

I say get an HPA tank for Christmas

or

get a Palmer and some other little stuff.



-------------
Video: http://pbvids.gamesxposed.com/files1/RTP.1116548567.wmv - My Automag RT Pro

::: http://boydsters-pics.mypicgallery.com/ - My Gallery :::



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net