Print Page | Close Window

KKK in democrat heartland? Sigh,

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=119193
Printed Date: 07 March 2026 at 2:38pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: KKK in democrat heartland? Sigh,
Posted By: new002
Subject: KKK in democrat heartland? Sigh,
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 8:37am

Moan, As if there aren’t enough problems to deal with.

 

The wife said that although her husband remained furious about the cross-burning, she felt that discussing the incident could help to prevent a recurrence.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/22/nyregion/22cross.html?ei=5006&en=afd9377348d45e27&ex=1101790800&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position= - http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/22/nyregion/22cross.html?ei=5 006&en=afd9377348d45e27&ex=1101790800&partner=AL TAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=




Replies:
Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 8:43am
Bunch of mask wearing pansies who can't even stand in the open for what they supposedly believe. They don't even rate.

-------------



Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 9:37am
Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

Bunch of mask wearing pansies who can't even stand in the open for what they supposedly believe. They don't even rate.


<>  That is exactly right.  All of a sudden you have something in common with Mimount Bousakla (Muslim) age 32.  She is also critical of extremists.

  The difference she has gone into hiding for saying so. I doubt you are going to need to do the same. 

  This is what the leftist (BadSmitt's) of this forum don't get; places like Iraq (pre-democracy, pre-rule of law without security ie; police) don't offer any protections to critics. Criticism is silenced, if you want to stop extremists, democracy is your best long term solution. 

Democracy gives voice to the critics of extremism.



Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 9:47am
I see acts like this as thinly veiled threats and not even the first amendment protects threats. On another forum where this was brought up there is a woman arguing that they should be allowed to burn their crosses on people's lawns because she sees it the same as religious right. She also hopes that my refusal to accept that gets me a burning cross on my lawn too, because I guess that would make her right and justify their hate and ignorance towards other races. I don't see how religion plays into it at all. Politics aside, this is just wrong.

-------------



Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 10:02am
Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

I see acts like this as thinly veiled threats and not even the first amendment protects threats. On another forum where this was brought up there is a woman arguing that they should be allowed to burn their crosses on people's lawns because she sees it the same as religious right. She also hopes that my refusal to accept that gets me a burning cross on my lawn too, because I guess that would make her right and justify their hate and ignorance towards other races. I don't see how religion plays into it at all. Politics aside, this is just wrong.


  Yeah, I agree it is just wrong and fortunately it is not politically correct to defend these kkk rats in the U.S. anymore.

  You do agree with my points about democracy enabling people to critise extremists by giving critics more protections to do so?




Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 10:05am
Allowing for the widest variety of opinions to be voiced while protecting all of society's members is the ideal situation. Unfortunately, we as human beings are not that good at it.

-------------



Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 10:09am
Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

Allowing for the widest variety of opinions to be voiced while protecting all of society's members is the ideal situation. Unfortunately, we as human beings are not that good at it.


 yeap, well said.
   I know its been said a million times, "but I can't think of anything better then democracy."

  anyhow, have to get back to work.
Have a good day.
Later;



Posted By: hashi2008
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 10:58am
 I am from Louisiana, and my great great uncle was in KKK, and even I disagree with them.  At first, theyy started helping women who lost their husbands in the civil war, but somewhere along the line they started trying to influence laws and instilling fear into black by killing them infront of their own houses.  The masks were to hide their identity because they were huge and respected member of the community.  Then KKK just flat out turned into an anti-black group that hung blacks just 'cause.  Now they are just an anti-black and also anti "anyone who isn't from America", which is rediculous because there are no true "Native Americans".  The only true "native" people are belived to be the first humans in africa or the middle east.

-------------
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 11:05am
Are you all familiar with Emmitt Till? If not, go take a look around the internet. We saw a movie about him in history and they showed him in his open casket. They left him just as he was, beaten and mutilated, so people would see the result of hate. All he did was whistle at a white woman.

We've come a long way, but we have a long way to go.

-------------



Posted By: hashi2008
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 11:28am

 Thats pretty messed up, but are you sure that it is the whole story.  He might have said "I can whistle at your **** *** woman if I want so get the **** outa my ****** ******* face before I whoop your ****** ******* arse." But I doubt he said that.  I fell sorry that people did that a while back.  I saw a shirt one day that made a whole lot of sense, and was really funny IMO, but I'm not trying to be racist so just think of the true/humorous side.  It said "If we knew they was gonna be this much trouble, we'd have picked our own cotton."  But in reality, we made the trouble ourselves (whites).



-------------
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 11:31am
No, I'm pretty sure he just whistled at her. At that time it was enough. They pulled him out of his bed to take him and do that to him. The men were just recently formally found to be guilty, but sadly it was just weeks after Emmitt's mother passed away.

-------------



Posted By: hashi2008
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 11:53am

 yeah it's pretty sad.  It sucks that people were like that, but even here in the deep south, I can't think of a single person today that would do that, and I know some pretty racist people.  Saddly, black people are not affraid to be racist down here, like the white people are.  They will turn everything into a racial issue.  Recently there was an NAACP protest at McDonalds because a white manager was hired and she fired one black person becasue she was realy lazy and didn't do her job.  So now it is sorta the other way around, just not as extreme.  The NAACP is really active (for no reason IMO) and there is a lot of anti-white feelings by the people in that group.  Even sadder, members of this radical NAACP divison are my teachers and even my Vice Principal.  White kids are suspened immediatly for the smallest things (such as being in a fight but not throwing any punches, Ill explain at the bottom.) yet black kids can go around calling their sisters whores and causeing a huge ordeal, and all he said was "don't say that again."

 As I was saying about the fights, a white boy that is my brother's age (17) was in the luch room standing in line with his friends.  He said "I'm gonna tear up some of that watermelon," and, accidentaly,  some spit came out of his mouth and got on this black kids neck who has already been busted for weed at school.  The kid got all pissed off and the white kid said "You'll be alright." 

 Well, as soon as the white kid was walking out of the lunchroom after eating lunch, he was hit across the face.  He never saw it comming.  The black kid had hit him and ran away after throwing the one hit.  The white kid was pretty pissed, so he threw his water bottle ate him and hit him in the back.

 When the whitnesses were called into the office, only black kids who were friends of the one who hit him (and all potheads) were called in. There were plenty of whitnesses who weren't friends of the black kid, both white and black, but none were called in. So some of the white kids friends who were there to see it went to the office in his deffense on their own.  The white kid was suspended for 3 days for "involuntarily instigating" the fight.  3 days was the same as the black kid. Ohh, and by the way, the black kid refused to go to the office, and the teacer on duty (another NAACP member) didn't make him go to the office, instead, he talked to him for a while, then sat down, then made im go about 10 minutes and 4 calls over the PA later.



-------------
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 12:01pm

While there certainly is much black/white racism out there, don't be fooled into thinking that there isn't also loads of white/black racism...

Sometimes it is just harder to see because you are in the middle of it.  Some examples from my personal life: 

White guy in Southern Mizzourah tells friends and family he is getting married.  One family friend, knowing something about the groom's acquaintances, has only one thing to say:  "She's not black, is she?  I ain't coming to the wedding if she's black."

Black woman in Houston shopping at Wal-Mart with her very white-looking daughter.  She is challenged by a complete stranger with "what are you doing with that white child?!"

White men who consistently refer to rap as "**edited**er noise" and low-end crap work as "**edited**er work".

The thing about racism is that you ALWAYS notice when it is directed at you.  It is much harder to see, unless it involves a beat-down, when it is not directed at you.

EDIT - I guess it was too much to hope that the filter would let that go...    :/



Posted By: hashi2008
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 12:40pm

 Well, I notice that alot about the N-music, but when you think about it, the N word is always in that music.  It's wrong to call it that, but thats not a real big issue.  What really pisses me off is when one race does physical discremination against someone, like a white person not giving a black person a job, or a black person tries to make everything racial and gets to taking things to court and makes stupid protests.  Also, black people do the exact same things to white people as you described, Clark.  They call rock "Cracker Music" (I know black people who call it that, just like I know white people who call rap N music".

 However, my point is that it is a lot worse to the white people here.  You'd have to live hear to even belive me.



-------------
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 12:57pm


-------------



Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 1:14pm
Originally posted by new002 new002 wrote:


Yeah, I agree it is just wrong and fortunately it is
not politically correct to defend these kkk rats in the
anymore.

You do agree with my points about democracy enabling people to critise extremists by giving critics more protections to do so?


Whoah whoah. I missed this the first time I read through this thread. While it is not legal to burn a cross on someone else's lawn because it is considered a hate crime and vandalism. I see nothing wrong with someone burning a cross on their own lawn to make a statement. The KKK and all the other extremest in America have the right to voice their opinion. If this were to ever change I would be sorely dissapointed with the Supreme Court and government. It is called Free Speech! And it is prefectally PC to stand up for these groups, they have every right to say what they say. Just because it is not the popular or even correct opinion, it is allowed to be voiced.

-------------



Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 1:48pm
Exactly. While I don't care for what they say, they have the right to say it. We must protect that right of theirs, but we also must protect others, so burning a cross on somebody elses lawn is a national no-no.

-------------



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:03pm

Burning a cross in someone else's lawn is seen as a threat, inciting violence. That is one main reason it is illegal. If those idiots want to burn a cross on their lawn, then it's up to them.

New002, once again you have to attack "leftists." If you want to complain about the article you posted, do so and lay off attacking liberals for a while.

It is very offensive to call it N-music. Racism is a two way street and should always be looked at in that way.

Anyways, the KKK have their rights, regardless of whether or not you disagree with them. They can say what they want, but if they threaten violence, it's illegal.

 



Posted By: fractus.scud
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:11pm
so hades we need to respect their rights? so that means I can put up a huge sign on my front lawn saying kill the Jews and thats ok because it's my opinion? I don't think so. They have no right to be burning crosses just as I have no right to put a mural on my house saying kill the jews. I think it has to do with their neighbors view, you can't have somthing offensive near someones house. Like you can't play super loud music in an apartement.

-------------

Benny go home!


Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:13pm
You can infact put that sign on your front lawn. You cant play loud music because that invades your neighbors space...

     
disturbing the peace:
n. upsetting the quiet and good order particularly through loud noise, by fighting or other unsocial behavior which frightens or upsets people. It is a misdemeanor, punishable by fine or brief term in jail.


-------------



Posted By: pballa j.r.
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:20pm
I live in GA and while the whites may be more racist, the blacks are way more open about it so it seems that more black people are rasist here then the white people.


-------------


Posted By: fractus.scud
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:25pm
it's like that here. They call themselves the n word and girls bi*****. I have some african american friends, very goof friends infact and they are also upset with other african americans who act this way. It bothers me that they call themselves this but if we even look at them the wrong way it's all "You want me to jump you son"

-------------

Benny go home!


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:25pm

You cannot actually put a sign in your yard that say's kill anything. That incites violence. You can put a sign that say's "jews are scum" because that is your opinion.

Regardless of who is more open about it or what, Clark has a good point that every race has racial tendencies, it is just easier for people to act like the victim's rather than to acknowledge all racism.

Some african americans use that word, not all. The problem occurs with generalization, which is very obvious.



Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:35pm
Whoops, yes. Dune is correct. Wasnt thinking along those lines.

Threats are also not protected by free speech.

-------------



Posted By: pballa j.r.
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 2:57pm
Why do they have the need to call themselves "african americans"?  I dont go around saying "HEY!  I am not white.  That was a racist remark!  I am Italian American."

-------------


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:01pm
It's just like using the term Native Americans. It is what they would like to be called, therefore we should do so out of respect. I'm sure if there was a large movement to call white people European Americans then we would want that respect shown to us.


Posted By: pballa j.r.
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:05pm
No, we call Indians, Native Americans... becase .... well they are.  They are the only true "americans"  Both names are terms we gave them, im sure they have their own name for their race.

-------------


Posted By: jjclown23
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:06pm
all of these lame politcal posts are getting old really quick

-------------
A-5
Response Trigger
DOP Blade Trigger
Polished Internals
X-Chamber
Custom Paint
14" J&J


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:07pm

That is the title in which they want to be called. Therefore, out of respect that is what we call them. Their roots are from america, therefore they are native. African American's roots are from Africa, therefore we refer to them as African Americans. Why complain about their title if you aren't one of them?



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:08pm

"They" don't need anything.  Many black people are perfectly happy being called "black."  Others prefer "african american," and others still prefer "dude."  Some still like the old-school "colored."

Different PEOPLE have different preferences and needs.  Once we generalize those preferences and needs to entire groups we are doing ourselves all a great big disservice.

Me, I hate being called "dude".  Annoys the heck out of me.  Generalizing that to all people who look like me would be both incorrect and unhelpful.

There is no "they."



Posted By: fractus.scud
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:08pm
it's not being racist, they are really African Americans just as some are Italian Americans and my grandpa is a Puerto-Rican American.

-------------

Benny go home!


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:09pm
It all depends on what the individual considers themself and wants to be acknowledged as.


Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:11pm

Originally posted by Hades Hades wrote:

Originally posted by new002 new002 wrote:


Yeah, I agree it is just wrong and fortunately it is
not politically correct to defend these kkk rats in the
anymore.

You do agree with my points about democracy enabling people to critise extremists by giving critics more protections to do so?


Whoah whoah. I missed this the first time I read through this thread. While it is not legal to burn a cross on someone else's lawn because it is considered a hate crime and vandalism. I see nothing wrong with someone burning a cross on their own lawn to make a statement. The KKK and all the other extremest in America have the right to voice their opinion. If this were to ever change I would be sorely dissapointed with the Supreme Court and government. It is called Free Speech! And it is prefectally PC to stand up for these groups, they have every right to say what they say. Just because it is not the popular or even correct opinion, it is allowed to be voiced.

   I think Dune picked it up, when he said it was inciting hatred to burn a cross on your property. I agree with Dune.



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:19pm
I still believe it is their right to speak how they want. If they want to bash then they can, but they must be able to take people criticisizing them as well. It is only when they threaten that they need to be silenced.


Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 3:26pm

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

I still believe it is their right to speak how they want. If they want to bash then they can, but they must be able to take people criticisizing them as well. It is only when they threaten that they need to be silenced.

Well said.



Posted By: 636andy636
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 5:41pm
dave ellis.

post kappen klean!


Posted By: Frozen
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 5:45pm
My school isn't very diverse, and we aren't a racist bunch. Good ol' Fairfield County.


Posted By: untouchable555
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 5:58pm
I am not racist but "african americans" are whiny as hell. They have black pride month or something like that, what would they do if we"cacausions" had white pride month?

-------------
Tippmann 98c
20 ounce Co2 tank


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 5:59pm

"I'm not a racist, but now I am going to make a racist statement."

gg



Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 6:03pm
Originally posted by untouchable555 untouchable555 wrote:

I am not racist but "african americans" are whiny as hell. They have black pride month or something like that, what would they do if we"cacausions" had white pride month?


This has to be up there with one of the dumbest posts, I have ever read.

I celebrate my heritage every day, by not making an ass of myself to the public.

-------------



Posted By: untouchable555
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 6:20pm

Originally posted by Hades Hades wrote:

Originally posted by untouchable555 untouchable555 wrote:

I am not racist but "african americans" are whiny as hell. They have black pride month or something like that, what would they do if we"cacausions" had white pride month?


This has to be up there with one of the dumbest posts, I have ever read.

I celebrate my heritage every day, by not making an ass of myself to the public.

I get bored and post stupid **edited**.



-------------
Tippmann 98c
20 ounce Co2 tank


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 22 November 2004 at 6:21pm

Yeah, that's an excuse.

:/

 



Posted By: hashi2008
Date Posted: 23 November 2004 at 1:02am
 On the news one day (it was about that NAACP protest at McDonalds that I mentioned earlier) they interviewed the members, then they talked to a white girl. She said "We should have a Caucasion club" an NAACP member immediatly said "that's racist!".

-------------
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


Posted By: Slimz.357
Date Posted: 23 November 2004 at 10:55am

^^^ A valid point.

Look, the bottom line is this:

  1. Racism is as big as we make it. When you expect to see racism, you will see racism wether there is any or not. This is why a lot of black people seem whiny, etc... to others; they tend to take many things racialy when they were not intended that way.

  2. Fighting racism causes racism. Groups like the NAACP who fight racism completly defeat themselves. Whatever thier intention is or was, their effect is to cause black people to be oversensitive to racism (See #1), and to alienate others and make them more apt to dislike black people. Racism CANNOT be fought, it can only be ignored. If you refuse to acknowledge racism, if you refuse to attribute certian behavior to racist prejudices, then there will be no racism.

  3. Racism cannot be generalized. Each and every person on this planet has a different defenition of what racism is. One thing would be considered a compliment by one person, and a racist attack by another. It personal and it's hard to see ahead of time. If and when (because we probably all will at one time or another) say or do something that is taken racially by someone around you, don't be like "oh, you're one of those people", just laugh it off. Apologize, and don't make a big deal out of it.

  4. Racial differences aren't. We are all humans. There are no real African-Americans unless they were born in Africa. Racial labeling in the name of political correctness causes racism. You are white he is black. He does things and says things that you don't. He doesn't think the way you do. SO WHAT!?! The minute you become afraid to talk about your differences because "it might be taken racialy" you are causing racism.

You have the choice: To cause racism or to not. To treat someone differently because thier skin doesn't look like yours, or to see them for what they are: a person, and maybe, just maybe, a freind.

 



-------------
"If you make it idiot proof, they'll make a better idiot."
http://www.tippmann.com/players/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=125287&PN=1&TPN=1 - REQUIRED READING


Posted By: new002
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 4:21am
Originally posted by Slimz.357 Slimz.357 wrote:

^^^ A valid point.

Look, the bottom line is this:

  1. Racism is as big as we make it. When you expect to see racism, you will see racism wether there is any or not. This is why a lot of black people seem whiny, etc... to others; they tend to take many things racialy when they were not intended that way.

  2. Fighting racism causes racism. Groups like the NAACP who fight racism completly defeat themselves. Whatever thier intention is or was, their effect is to cause black people to be oversensitive to racism (See #1), and to alienate others and make them more apt to dislike black people. Racism CANNOT be fought, it can only be ignored. If you refuse to acknowledge racism, if you refuse to attribute certian behavior to racist prejudices, then there will be no racism.

  3. Racism cannot be generalized. Each and every person on this planet has a different defenition of what racism is. One thing would be considered a compliment by one person, and a racist attack by another. It personal and it's hard to see ahead of time. If and when (because we probably all will at one time or another) say or do something that is taken racially by someone around you, don't be like "oh, you're one of those people", just laugh it off. Apologize, and don't make a big deal out of it.

  4. Racial differences aren't. We are all humans. There are no real African-Americans unless they were born in Africa. Racial labeling in the name of political correctness causes racism. You are white he is black. He does things and says things that you don't. He doesn't think the way you do. SO WHAT!?! The minute you become afraid to talk about your differences because "it might be taken racialy" you are causing racism.

You have the choice: To cause racism or to not. To treat someone differently because thier skin doesn't look like yours, or to see them for what they are: a person, and maybe, just maybe, a freind.

 

Bravo, very well said.



Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:26am

I am going to start the NAAWP so white people can call non-white people racist and have them go to jail for nothing.

hey, it works for the NAACP

 

 



-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:32am
Please provide an example of where the NAACP has had somebody go to jail for nothing.


Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:36am
Originally posted by pressroom.com pressroom.com wrote:

In the United States today, about four to five million Americans receive criminal records every year. Roughly one in five U.S. citizens has a criminal record. In a society severely stratified by race and class, most of those who are pushed into the penal system are not unexpectedly black, brown and poor. One third of all prisoners were unemployed at the time of their arrest, with the others averaging less than $15,000 annual incomes in the year prior to their arrest. About one half of the 1.8 million people in federal and state prisons and jails are African Americans.

As researcher DOW. Mason noted, "The proportion of black men in prison-about 6 percent-is approximately 20 times the corresponding rate for white men ... In Baltimore, 56 percent of black men are in prison or jail, out on bail, on probation or parole, or being sought on an arrest warrant. At least 90 percent of black men can expect to be arrested and jailed for a non-traffic offense at some point of their lives." Although the majority of black prisoners are young men in their twenties and thirties, the fastest growing sector of the penal population consists of men fifty-five years old and above.

...

In effect, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which guaranteed millions of African Americans the right to the electoral franchise, is being gradually repealed by state restrictions on ex-felons from voting. A people who are imprisoned in disproportionately higher numbers, and then systematically denied the right to vote, can in no way claim to live under a democracy.



-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: boomstick
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:37am
Why all of these threads?

-------------
YONK~!~
http://www.espew.com/cgi-bin/spew/475411/At_The_Drive_In-Pattern_Against_User.mp3 - Check This Out


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:37am

Ok...

Are you going to post an example?

 



Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:37am

Originally posted by boomstick boomstick wrote:

Why all of these threads?

To prove a point.



-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: boomstick
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:39am
Originally posted by travis75 travis75 wrote:

Originally posted by boomstick boomstick wrote:

Why all of these threads?

To prove a point.


But why? Points are over-rated.


-------------
YONK~!~
http://www.espew.com/cgi-bin/spew/475411/At_The_Drive_In-Pattern_Against_User.mp3 - Check This Out


Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:43am
Originally posted by boomstick boomstick wrote:

Originally posted by travis75 travis75 wrote:

Originally posted by boomstick boomstick wrote:

Why all of these threads?

To prove a point.


But why? Points are over-rated.

Which point are you talking about?



-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:47am
Originally posted by travis75 travis75 wrote:

I am going to start the NAAWP so white people can call non-white people racist and have them go to jail for nothing.

hey, it works for the NAACP

Never mind.

Already been done.

http://www.naawp.com/ - http://www.naawp.com/



-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:49am
It's people that think white people do not already have their organizations that make me laugh. I mean, hell, every private golf club only lets blacks be their caddies. There's no reason for a NAAWP, so why complain about needing one.


Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:50am

Originally posted by <font color='#0000FF'>http://www.naawp.com/</font> - <FONT color=#800080>http://www.naawp.com/</FONT> http://www.naawp.com/ - http://www.naawp.com/ wrote:

]

What image do you have of racial violence in the U.S.? What type of person do you think commits interracial or "hate" crime? If you get your information from the mass media (TV, radio, major newspapers, and popular magazines), you probably have an image of a vicious, ignorant, gun-loving, hate-filled, skinhead, Klansman, or militiaman - all white of course, that is a completely false stereotype. The truth is exactly the opposite!

The media, protected class minorities, and anti-white politicians expect you to twist in anguish over black-on-black crime or the rare but well-publicized white-on-black crime, but they never mention the much greater amount of black-on-white crime? Yes, blacks commit more crime against whites (1.58 million crimes per year) than they do against other blacks (1.34 million crimes per year)! It's a virtual war of black criminals and white victims!

---

  • Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
  • Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
  • Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites in 1992.
  • In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and non-violent crimes against whites.
  • Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than whites under 18.
  • About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
  • Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites, although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
  • On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than whites.
  • Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white neighborhoods.
  • Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by whites against blacks.
  • Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
  • Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million) are black against white.
  • In the past 20 years, violent crime increased four times faster than the population.
  • In the last 30 years (1964-94), more than 45,000 people were killed in interracial murders compared to 38,000 killed in Korea and 58,000 in Vietnam.


  • Posted By: Clark Kent
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 10:51am

    So what's your point, travis?

     



    Posted By: Dune
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 12:53pm
    Too bad these are only reported crimes and cleared cases. If he knew anything about UCR and NCVS statistics, especially statistics involving race, then he wouldn't waste his time posting that nonsense. Of course, robbing and stealing have nothing to do with the extreme number of poor, urban minorities just fighting to survive. Just because blacks kill more whites does not mean that racism and hate crimes are still more prevelant for blacks to commit.


    Posted By: Hades
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 12:57pm
    Exactly. You are right on Dune.

    -------------



    Posted By: new002
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 3:29pm

    Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

    I mean, hell, every private golf club only lets blacks be their caddies.

      It’s truly sad to see you think that way.

     



    Posted By: Dune
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 5:02pm
    Originally posted by new002 new002 wrote:

    Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

    I mean, hell, every private golf club only lets blacks be their caddies.

      It’s truly sad to see you think that way.

     

    Wow, and someone is too blind to see sarcasm.



    Posted By: P!NK panther
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 6:59pm

    what a bunch of dink holes yeah a burn crosses im reall cool. what a bunch of fudge packers



    -------------
    http://www.theimagehosting.com">


    Posted By: hashi2008
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 8:03pm
     How come black people can make jokes about white people, but if a white person makes a joke about black people it is a huge disaster of law suits?

    -------------
    Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


    Posted By: Hades
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 8:20pm
    Because someone cant take a joke?

    -------------



    Posted By: hashi2008
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 8:31pm
     LOL, I think we should start an outcry about racist jokes, but then again Chapels Show is too funny for that.

    -------------
    Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.


    Posted By: new002
    Date Posted: 24 November 2004 at 8:46pm
    Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

    Originally posted by new002 new002 wrote:

    Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

    I mean, hell, every private golf club only lets blacks be their caddies.

      It’s truly sad to see you think that way.

     

    Wow, and someone is too blind to see sarcasm.



      lol.  I just noticed I didn't put the sign at the bottom of that post.
     
      oops. 


    Posted By: Slimz.357
    Date Posted: 29 November 2004 at 1:31pm
    Just drop the thread. The more you talk about it, the mre of an issue it's going to become (See earlier threads).

    -------------
    "If you make it idiot proof, they'll make a better idiot."
    http://www.tippmann.com/players/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=125287&PN=1&TPN=1 - REQUIRED READING


    Posted By: Dune
    Date Posted: 29 November 2004 at 2:48pm

    It was dropped, until you bumped it.




    Print Page | Close Window

    Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
    Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net