Print Page | Close Window

War Protesters

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=128750
Printed Date: 06 May 2024 at 1:48am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: War Protesters
Posted By: oldsoldier
Subject: War Protesters
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:13am
Again we go thru what many generations of Americans endure, the court of public opinion.

I was branded a "baby killer" in my day, I did what my country by law of the time required, and was and will allways be seen in the light of public opinion a "baby killer" by many of my generation, and now as history is revised, by future generations.

I show none of the hatred toward those who accuse me, and in many cases convicted me and those like me in thier court of public opinion, yet many of my generation will immediately to this day recoil from me when they find out I was in Vietnam, they after all these years still many show that hatred bred all those years ago.

Our War Protesters do serve a function in our society, yet many if not all have ever seen a war thru a soldiers eyes, they feel they can judge todays soldiers, sailors, airman and marine along with us veterans by what our media tells them, not by what we as veterans of war quietly put into our closet of memories we care not to open again.

I am disappointed in the Smitty's attacks on the soldiers and again the "baby killer" brand again placed by agenda on those who like myself are only doing what they as volunteers under the laws of our country are sent to do.

Did we brand our Grandfathers, murderers, or baby killers as they bombed German and Japanese cities and killed upwards of 50,000 civilians in one raid (research the civilian deaths of Hamburg,Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki)no then they were seen as heros, fighting the evil Nazi, or Japanese.

Only recently has this trend of treating the individual soldier as a criminal based on a political agenda been seen as correct.

For all who feel safe and who use thier protected rights here in America to protest, a right many Americans have in the past died to protect, just take a moment during thier protest to realize that somewhere else in the world someone else wants to protest thier governments actions, and thier governments soldiers are sent to ensure they do not exercise that right, while we American soldiers still stand guard to ensure and protect your right to do so.

So until the day comes where American War Protesters point their anger at all who see war as an answer, from North Korea, to Radical Islam, to Communist China, as well as many other wars and nations who use war across our world, we veterans will continue to question your morality, is it a true anti war protest, or just an anti American protest based on a political agenda.

Opinion brought to you by a convicted by the court of public opinion "baby killer" of a war long ago and far, far away, and in the eyes of many of his generation sentenced to life.



-------------



Replies:
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:24am
Although i haven't gotten anything like baby killer called to me....i have walked into the grocery store in my uniform and had people ask me how many innocent taliban i've killed....and i a canadian soldier.

I don't have your experience OS, nor am i one of the war hopeful kids.....i just wish more respect would get dished out for the fighting man.


as they say"Innocent people sleep soundly in their beds only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."

Good post OS

-------------
A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:34am

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


I am disappointed in the Smitty's attacks on the soldiers and again the "baby killer" brand again placed by agenda on those who like myself are only doing what they as volunteers under the laws of our country are sent to do.


Explain this comment before I earn my first strike for flaming you very, very thoroughly.

You're in a dream world. I AM PROTESTING Saturday, but it isn't the soldiers, it is the war in Iraq itself. I am also one of the guest speakers. I am supporting my brothers by making sure the government doesn't get too comfy with the daily body count as long as the Halliburtons and Carlisles get rich. You evidently value following your political party's agenda more than the troops.

I wrote this letter, it should explain my position pretty thoroughly:

Editor, the Gazette:

March 19 marks the second anniversary of the war in Iraq. The country is as divided about the war as it is about many political issues. Some people have agreed with the war from the start. Others of us have protested.

The war is not a political debate. Let us be united in one wish, to get it over with and bring our soldiers home. Top level government officials from the CIA to the Army have said we are no closer to ending this quagmire than when it started two years ago. We need to send a message to the president we will not tolerate another Vietnam.

On March 19, Circleville Friends (Quaker) Worship Group and People for Peace will read the names and hometowns of the 1,500 Americans killed in Iraq from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Pickaway County Courthouse in Circleville. I am a former Army captain who served in a combat zone, and there will be numerous veterans at this peaceful protest, right along with true pacifists. If you are afraid of some stigma of protesting, you could not ask to be in finer company whatever your political leanings. I ask you to support the troops and honor the fallen in this peaceful demonstration.

goodsmitty



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:14am

OS, you truly are the master of revisionist history and selective memory.

Well done.



Posted By: tippmannboy2
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:40am
I think that the war in Iraq was a worth while war, although now that they have their own goverment i think that we should pull out most of our troops and keep a small reserve to watch over the country and build up THEIR military. I also believe that you werent a "baby killer" OS you are and were a very brave man that answered the call of duty and stood up for our country and our countries rights and beliefs. In my eyes OS you are and will never be called a "baby killer" or a man that went in to the military to kill kill kill. Just last week my science teacher said that I am going in to the marines when i get out of highschool so i kill people for the fun the kill. That really really made me mad and got me in deep trouble. But no, you arent a "baby killer" you answered the call of duty and protected your right to speak freely, PROTEST, and do what ever you damn well please if you want to.

I honor you and your curage and all the brave men and women in the service and i pray to god that we will have none of them killed in action. You have the right to protest the war, please protest the war\, but never never call our brave soldiers "baby killers" for protecting your rights and our freedoms that we have in the United States of America.

-------------
Long Live The Confederacy

I am an AMERICAN AND IM PROUD OF IT!


Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 10:00am

Old soldier, I would just like to be the first to thank you for serving your country. My generation needs to be more thankful for what  men like you ( and in many cases women) do so that we can enjoy freedom. My father is over in Iraq fighting right now and every time I see protesters saying bad things about our troops it makes me sick, they are all ungrateful and undeserving of the blood that has been shed in order to protect their freedom.



-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 10:09am
Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

Old soldier, I would just like to be the first to thank you for serving your country. My generation needs to be more thankful for what  men like you ( and in many cases women) do so that we can enjoy freedom.



Posted By: techietaichi
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 10:28am
I am a veteran as well and have had names flung at me too. Not a Vietnam era soldier as Oldsoldier is, but just the same we did what our duties called for. Answered the call to arms to defend the interests of our country and leaders. I didn't always agree with the reasoning behind what we were tasked to do, but I did my job, I did what I took an oath to do. Soldiers do not live to go to war, we live to preserve peace. Like it or no, it is what it is. It is easy to berate another, but how easy is it to dawn the uniform and charge the hill? How easy is it to look down the barrel of a gun that will spit lead and split your wig in two? How easy is it to see a buddy fall in battle? Ignorance begets ignorance as these "Hippies" have demonstrated. What would you do if the "enemy" landed in your backyard? Make em' pancakes? I think not. You would call us, if we weren't already on the wall securing the perimeter. Have a care and have respect for if it were not for soldiers, the soil you stand on may not have been as free as you know it. Soldiers shed their blood and risked their lives to make these lands free, period. As always I salute you Oldsoldier and those that have, will and are serving this country of ours. The only thing I'll ever call you is "Brother".

-------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCZWhJCF6Ig">


Posted By: rancidpnk13
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 11:03am
Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=4>Old soldier, I would just like to be the first to thank you for serving your country. My generation needs to be more thankful for what <SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>men like you ( and in many cases women) do so that we can enjoy freedom. My father is over in <?:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Iraq</st1:place></st1:country-region&g t; fighting right now and every time I see protesters saying bad things about our troops it makes me sick, they are all ungrateful and undeserving of the blood that has been shed in order to protect their freedom.



i have nothing but respect for veterans and for soldiers, however, just because you are a U.S. Soldier does NOT make you free from punishement because of YOUR individual actions, ex Torture of Prisoners. Just like in Nazi Germany, following your officers commands does not make you any less responsible IF you did something wrong.
And just because you protest the war doesn't mean you dont support our soldiers or hate them. I also don't approve of any other nations going to war for unjust reasons, I would protest if I was in Britian, or China, etc. etc.

-------------


Posted By: bluemunky42
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 11:38am
i remember in first blood in the end rambo was yelling about how when he got back from 'nam the protesters at the airport were calling him baby killer and "all other sorts of vile crap" good movie. i appreciate all the soldiers over there. i saw a video of a dead soldier being filmed by an iraqi insurgent at a news station and i felt like kicking him in his ass

-------------

http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity - http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity



Posted By: LastShot0330
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 12:26pm

OS, I agree with u 100%

People claim that D.C. is full of nothing but hipocrites but infact We are all hipocrites because certain wars are celebrated and revered as heroic while others are looked upon as unjust and immoral.

I am not Anti-War nor Pro-War...I am Pro America.

-I'm Out



-------------
[IMG]http://www.zmachars.com/emb%20patches/The-Used-Logo_P-752_small.jpg">


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 1:06pm
Once again, I see the grouping of all protesters as the same hippie calling everyone "babykillers." While on the other hand I see the same grouping of everyone of our soldiers as an "American Hero." In fact their are some really stupid protesters out there, just like there are some real "babykillers" out there too. Making this a black and white issue that respect must be paid to our troops is ludicrous. I personally don't believe that dropping that A-bomb was the right thing to do. Also, I don't believe that calling many of our Vietnam vets "babykillers" proved anything either.


Posted By: Enos Shenk
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 2:57pm
What kind of idiot hates the soldier for a war they disagree with? Soldiers follow orders. I blame the politicians. I disagreed with the war in iraq, but once we were in it, of course i was all for the soldiers. The sooner done, the sooner they can come home and avoid being blown up by some religious fool.

Whats the point of protesting anyway? Nobody listens, or you get locked up for some nonsense charge (Republican National Convention)




-------------


Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:23pm
Why Military Force Is Sometimes Needed.
Here's what you can do when you happen upon one of those stupid, naive, idiots that just can't seem to understand why force is sometimes needed:

1) Find the person involved in "no retaliation" type discussion.

2) Engage him in brief conversation, then ask if military force is appropriate.

3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"

4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."

5) When he's in mid-sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.

6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."

7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.

8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time


-------------
A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:27pm

You know, that story is obviously intended to show how stupid pacifism is, but it actually does a pretty good job of doing the opposite. 

The problem is that the people who need to understand the place of pacifism will never be able to extract that lesson from this story because they are too locked in their mindset, which is too bad.



Posted By: Frozen
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:27pm
Originally posted by Thor Thor wrote:

Why Military Force Is Sometimes Needed.
Here's what you can do when you happen upon one of those stupid, naive, idiots that just can't seem to understand why force is sometimes needed:

1) Find the person involved in "no retaliation" type discussion.

2) Engage him in brief conversation, then ask if military force is appropriate.

3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"

4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."

5) When he's in mid-sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.

6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."

7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.

8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time


I don't totally agree with you, but that was absolutely hilarious.


Posted By: MattyJ
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:29pm

Originally posted by Thor Thor wrote:

Why Military Force Is Sometimes Needed.
Here's what you can do when you happen upon one of those stupid, naive, idiots that just can't seem to understand why force is sometimes needed:

1) Find the person involved in "no retaliation" type discussion.

2) Engage him in brief conversation, then ask if military force is appropriate.

3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"

4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."

5) When he's in mid-sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.

6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."

7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.

8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time

Excellent idea my friend. Let their "non-agressiveness" protect them from getting knocked on their asses!

And OS, as I've said before, I have nothing but respect for you and any soldier (past, present, and future) that serves our country. I've got best friends in the Marines and the Air Force who are overseas in Afghanistan and Germany, respectively, and I pray for their safe return every day. But if they do not return, they will have died with honor.

So to OS, and any other vets/soldiers: Thank You.



-------------
98 Custom
HK G36C Appearance
70/4500 Dye Throttle
Ricochet AK
Polished Internals
Aluminum Power Tube
Dye Sticky 3 Grips

Next on the list:
???


Posted By: The Guy
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:34pm
Well said Thor.

I agree with Enos for the most part. Support the troops, protest your government.

While I support the war, I also support the Bill of Rights. So go have you fun protesting, see if anyone listens. Take a guess at how many you can piss off.

Just as people are gonna come support you as a speaker, you have to understand that there will be people supporting the troops, and the government.

Originally posted by Goodsmitty Goodsmitty wrote:

] You evidently value following your political party's agenda more than the troops.


Very nice hypocratic statement right there. What do you call your protest group other than a party trying to get their say in politics. AKA, a political party. It doesn't have to have a title to be a political party.


-------------
http://www.anomationanodizing.com - My Site


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 3:54pm
I agree with Clark and Enos, however I do not see a reason to thank every troop that I come across. There are plenty of other people out there perpetuating freedom and safety, as well as education among the citizens of America. So thank your teachers and police officers...unless you're the type that just complains about them for doing their jobs. So why can't I complain about the job of a solider?


Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 4:16pm

/Yawn/

I just woke up getting ready for another night shift to find an nice, heated debate ensuing. Better get my shots in before work.

1. The typical closed mind of Cletus and Lulubelle Sixpack cannot see the difference in protesting the government's policies, but still supporting the soldiers. sad, but typical.

2. Right wingers (OS for example) use this fact to effectively label any protester as "un-American, hippie, pinko", etc.

3. The movement of disgruntled soldiers returning from the war is growing, are they "hippies?"

At some point in time when we have lost enough lives and spent enough $billions on this war that will accomplish nothing more than it has to date, the American people will start to call for its end. Maybe it's 10,000 lives, or $500 billion dollars, but I've always been on the left side of the bell curve, so I'll be protesting this Saturday.

How ironic it is that I (a veteran army officer who served in Bosnia) will be insulted on Saturday by non-veteran couch commandos who believe that the yellow ribbon on their trunk is an adequate display of their patriotism and valor.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: The Guy
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 4:21pm
wow, i didn't realize words were flexible enough to be bent into a 180*.

Your also rather closed minded to think that we are only in this war to make other people rich.


-------------
http://www.anomationanodizing.com - My Site


Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 4:45pm

Originally posted by The Guy The Guy wrote:

wow, i didn't realize words were flexible enough to be bent into a 180*.

Your also rather closed minded to think that we are only in this war to make other people rich.

You are naive to think that we aren't. Look up Halliburton's wonderful history.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: HITMAN 4 HIRE
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 4:55pm

I'm in our high school's JROTC program and plan on joining the armed services.  I have gotten to the point where I have no respect for hippies who criticize soldiers for doing their job and following their orders... it just down right pisses me off.  The Iraq War is a very important war too me.  I salute the veterans.  Thank you.

 



-------------
http://img56.imageshack.us/my.php?image=27278mo.jpg"> Because I can.


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 4:57pm

Wow, offended by those protesting and trying to keep you from dying for someone else's freedom. I personally don't feel anymore free because of this war.

I appreciate that Goodsmitty understands my view and holds no offense to me not supporting this war, nor supporting troops more than any other civil service worker in the states.



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 5:00pm

Originally posted by HITMAN 4 HIRE HITMAN 4 HIRE wrote:

I'm in our high school's JROTC program and I have gotten to the point where I have no respect for hippies who criticize soldiers for doing their job and following their orders...

Thank you Eric Cartman.

Now, please - who are these people who are criticizing the soldiers?

 



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 5:30pm
Originally posted by HITMAN 4 HIRE HITMAN 4 HIRE wrote:

I'm in our high school's JROTC program and plan on joining the armed services.  I have gotten to the point where I have no respect for hippies who criticize soldiers for doing their job and following their orders... it just down right pisses me off.  The Iraq War is a very important war too me.  I salute the veterans.  Thank you.

I am a veteran protesting the war (spelled w-a-r, not s-o-l-d-i-e-r-s). Where do I fall into your cut and dry logic?



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: rypaintball2
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 5:55pm
i think good smitty has nothing to do in his life so he finds some way to make something contraversial in his life by protesting the war, oldsoldier well done in this post im with you 100% and to those opposing the war in iraq we told sadam that we would wage war if he didnt cooperate and he didnt and none of the other UN were willing to back that up, however bush did and becasue of that we are taken more seriously by countries and we are ridding the world of a terroroist nation or trying to.


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:12pm
Terrorist nation? That's new. Africa...well nevermind, I guess this administration just bypasses them.


Posted By: Hella Cool
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:46pm
Originally posted by rypaintball2 rypaintball2 wrote:

i think good smitty has nothing to do in his life so he finds some way to make something contraversial in his life by protesting the war, oldsoldier well done in this post im with you 100% and to those opposing the war in iraq we told sadam that we would wage war if he didnt cooperate and he didnt and none of the other UN were willing to back that up, however bush did and becasue of that we are taken more seriously by countries and we are ridding the world of a terroroist nation or trying to.


Yeah he should have just cooperated and given us the nukes he didn't have. Also, congrats on guestage.


Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 6:56pm

Oooh oooh oooh, I go fishing for one afternoon and find myself being accused of calling soldiers babykillers.  I think maybe I should change my mind and demand more war so you young outspoken patriots can have your turn in the meat grinder.  Before I do this please consider:

1.  From your posts I see that few of you could pass the vocabulary portion of the ASVAB.  This will limit your ability to be an ARMY Ninja Warrior.

2.  When you get used like a two dollar prostitute by your government who will trump up a war like the current one, you can find solace in the fact that veterans from lost causes will be outspoken in keeping you in the meat grinder and that Lula Bell and Cletus will buy a Chinese made yellow magnet sticker to put on their car because they support you in your war in a place that they couldn't find on a map if the Iraqi Walmart's were highlighted on a map for them. <--- WOW!

3.  I'll let the rest of the veterans at the protest know that they are hippies and that they should be ashamed for calling themselves baby killers and not supporting the troops which they are or were.   

 



Posted By: rypaintball3
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:15pm
thanks o wait im not a guest now o well no prob by the way it wasnt nukes we were looking for its called chemical weapons that he has used before and we didnt say hand over your weapons we siad let us look wherever we want for them so if he would have let us look wherever we wanted to, there would be no war good job tho its a good thing u have ur facts straight.

PS: we didnt know what he had becasue he didnt let us look i have a feeling even tho thats basically what i said above u cant figure it out...

(directed at user hella cool)doubt that


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:18pm
I wonder if we would let another superpower nation, such as China, look at our stockpile of nuclear arms??


Posted By: rypaintball3
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:18pm
badsmitty join the army and see if ur views are the same


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:19pm
Hahahaha...too late.


Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:20pm

Originally posted by rypaintball3 rypaintball3 wrote:

badsmitty join the army and see if ur views are the same

Yep, they're the same.



Posted By: Burnt Fingers
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:20pm
Originally posted by HITMAN 4 HIRE HITMAN 4 HIRE wrote:

I'm in our high school's JROTC program and plan on joining the armed services.  I have gotten to the point where I have no respect for hippies who criticize soldiers for doing their job and following their orders... it just down right pisses me off.  The Iraq War is a very important war too me.  I salute the veterans.  Thank you.

I am beginning to hate you ultra-patriotic war lovers for not allowing people to have different views. I dont hate the soldiers, I hate what they are doing.



-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/worldchampion29/?chartstyle=sideGrey">


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:22pm
I wonder if these pro-war people hate the Gestapo and the Elite Japanese soldiers for the atrocities they committed during WWII. I wonder if they hate the VC soldiers for their torture techniques. My answer is yes....however, they were just following orders.


Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:23pm
Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

1.  From your posts I see that few of you could pass the vocabulary portion of the ASVAB.  This will limit your ability to be an ARMY Ninja Warrior.

[random thought]

I got a 62 on Word Knowledge and a 65 on Paragraph Comprehension on my ASVAB. I refused to put any contact info on the forms for it other than my name though. I still manage to get crap mail from the armed services, all of which I just dump back in the outgoing mail box and see how many times I can make it go-round (I have one of those community mailbox things)

[/]



-------------



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:27pm
Originally posted by Tae Kwon Do Tae Kwon Do wrote:

Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

1.  From your posts I see that few of you could pass the vocabulary portion of the ASVAB.  This will limit your ability to be an ARMY Ninja Warrior.

[random thought]

I got a 62 on Word Knowledge and a 65 on Paragraph Comprehension on my ASVAB. I refused to put any contact info on the forms for it other than my name though. I still manage to get crap mail from the armed services, all of which I just dump back in the outgoing mail box and see how many times I can make it go-round (I have one of those community mailbox things)

[/]

They want you for the ARMY Ninja Warrior program.



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 7:28pm

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

I wonder if these pro-war people hate the Gestapo and the Elite Japanese soldiers for the atrocities they committed during WWII. I wonder if they hate the VC soldiers for their torture techniques. My answer is yes....however, they were just following orders.

And....It was unpatriotic to question...



Posted By: The Guy
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:10pm
the legitimate points are getting lost in the incoherent ramblings of others.

-------------
http://www.anomationanodizing.com - My Site


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:14pm
Common problem around here.   Why don't you restate/summarize your points?


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:15pm
Only in response to OS's first post.
(can't be bothered with the rest)

The protesting of the war is not to do with the soldiers, we, meaning myself and all others whom I know who do the same, support the troops, and thank them when we see them. We are not the uninformed bandwagon kids who yelled baby-killer and spat upon veterans, that image is one we need to put aside as another generations foolishness. We disagree with the war on it's own terms.


Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:17pm
Such need to bicker?

i think we need the view of a canadian peacekeeper(me)

To those who support the war and your troops: awesome, some respect is shown for those who are fighting for whatever they and their country believe in.

To those who protest:awesome, without protesting, it's hard for people to see what freedoms they get to exercise on a daily basis.

and to that one idiot who said he didn't feel any free'er becuase of this war. Well, my unenlightened friend, you need to realize you are already free.

It's like being in the pool and someone has put the hose on you and your saying you don't feel wetter.

There is a strange division between the two aforementioned factions. And i understand it, i used to be pro military and war is necessary evil and all that....but then i actually spent two years(a relatively short amount of time)in the canadian military(you laugh, and i will destroy you), and i noticed both factions are co-dependant. You can't protest without soldiers and you can't soldier properly without protest. I know it sounds conflicting, but it isn't.

What does burn my bottom, in this and many other examples. is that extremely brave men such as OS, have fought because the country said so, and caught flak from cowards....i loathe this fact, but it comes with the territory i guess.

Be good guys, or the canadians will show up at your doorstep with their LAV's and C7's and peacekeep the hell out of the states.


MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

p.s. anyone remember the gnome wars?

-------------
A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:22pm

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

Get off the "every troop deserves respect" wagon and realize that it all depends on the person, the actions, and the war.



Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:26pm
who said your more free, i guess the analogy was wrong, because i was saying your just as free, just someone said they don't feel more free.....that's because your as free as you can get...

why do i bother?

-------------
A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.



Posted By: The Guy
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 8:28pm
mmmmmmm..... gnome wars....

-------------
http://www.anomationanodizing.com - My Site


Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 9:16pm
I think it's awesome that we kick everyone's asses. There's a part of me that wants to control an Apache/Cobra and mow down everything. I'd like to pwn that way.

-------------
Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind.


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 9:19pm
You should look into video games...


Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 9:20pm
Yes.

-------------
Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind.


Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 9:52pm

Originally posted by rypaintball2 rypaintball2 wrote:

i think good smitty has nothing to do in his life so he finds some way to make something contraversial in his life by protesting the war, oldsoldier well done in this post im with you 100% and to those opposing the war in iraq we told sadam that we would wage war if he didnt cooperate and he didnt and none of the other UN were willing to back that up, however bush did and becasue of that we are taken more seriously by countries and we are ridding the world of a terroroist nation or trying to.

I spoke to one of my best friends still in the army last month. Out of his group of seven buddies from VMI class of 95, he is the only one left alive. I am not at the point that I need to make up reasons to despise this war.

 



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 9:54pm

Originally posted by rypaintball3 rypaintball3 wrote:

badsmitty join the army and see if ur views are the same

He was an army combat medic when you were crawling around in Pampers Cruisers and regurgitating breastmilk.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: BuffaloSolda1
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 10:06pm
Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:


Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

<p ="Msonormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Old
soldier, I would just like to be the first to thank you for serving
your country. My generation needs to be more thankful for what <span style=""> </span>men like you ( and in many cases women) do so that we can enjoy freedom.


I have heard the same stories from my uncles in Vietnam. Thank you for your service OS.

-------------
TK by PB4MS.COM


Posted By: rockerdoode
Date Posted: 17 March 2005 at 11:28pm

Originally posted by Enos Shenk Enos Shenk wrote:

What kind of idiot hates the soldier for a war they disagree with? Soldiers follow orders. I blame the politicians. I disagreed with the war in iraq, but once we were in it, of course i was all for the soldiers. The sooner done, the sooner they can come home and avoid being blown up by some religious fool.

Whats the point of protesting anyway? Nobody listens, or you get locked up for some nonsense charge (Republican National Convention)


nice post.  i'd have to say i agree.

Now about OS.  I'm sorry people have called you that.  You, as well as many other people who answered the call of duty shouldn't have to be subjected to negative remarks like that.  That isn't anti-american or anti-war, its a hate crime.  You don't deserve to be insulted for protecting innocent lifes whom you've never met, or will meet.  You put your life on the line for unknow people, who will never truly understand the sacrafice many soldiers have and will continue to make to save innocent lifes. 

Baby killer, I should say not.  Anyone who wants to complain about what happens in a war should go to war, then try to speak for their origonal prospective.  Untill then, they can shut the **edited** up.

Thanks OS.  Everyone here, and everyone else in the entire country owes you, and every single serviceman a thank you every day for the freedom you've given us every day.  Thanks.

Tommy



-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata


Posted By: TheUnknown.
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 12:18am
Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

 

We didn't go into this war to free ourselves nimwit, we went into it to a.) Free the oppressed and downtrodden iraqi people. b.)Remove of Terrorist groups, so that they do not have the ability to commit terrorist acts in our nation.

Unlike other nations like Japan, China, Iran, ect... and obviously yourself, the president and those around him are greatly interested in other thing than themselves.



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 12:28am
Originally posted by TheUnknown. TheUnknown. wrote:

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

 

We didn't go into this war to free ourselves nimwit, we went into it to a.) Free the oppressed and downtrodden iraqi people. b.)Remove of Terrorist groups, so that they do not have the ability to commit terrorist acts in our nation.

Unlike other nations like Japan, China, Iran, ect... and obviously yourself, the president and those around him are greatly interested in other thing than themselves.

Cletus and Lulabelle history 101....

No, we went to disarm them of WMD, destroy the al-Qaeda training camps on every block, and stop the imminent attack on our soil from Iraqi nuclear weapons. As those things were all fiction, we have chosen to liberate much Iraqi oil.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 12:31am
Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by TheUnknown. TheUnknown. wrote:

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

 

We didn't go into this war to free ourselves nimwit, we went into it to a.) Free the oppressed and downtrodden iraqi people. b.)Remove of Terrorist groups, so that they do not have the ability to commit terrorist acts in our nation.

Unlike other nations like Japan, China, Iran, ect... and obviously yourself, the president and those around him are greatly interested in other thing than themselves.

Cletus and Lulabelle history 101....

No, we went to disarm them of WMD, destroy the al-Qaeda training camps on every block, and stop the imminent attack on our soil from Iraqi nuclear weapons. As those things were all fiction, we have chosen to liberate much Iraqi oil.

Exactly. Freedom of Iraqi's was 4th on the long list of lies. Anyways, what do you tell the people that claim these soldiers are fighting for our freedom? Yeah right. I don't feel the need to thank every soldier I come across because I know there are hundreds and thousands of civil service workers that deserve the same thanks.



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:04am
Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by TheUnknown. TheUnknown. wrote:

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

 

We didn't go into this war to free ourselves nimwit, we went into it to a.) Free the oppressed and downtrodden iraqi people. b.)Remove of Terrorist groups, so that they do not have the ability to commit terrorist acts in our nation.

Unlike other nations like Japan, China, Iran, ect... and obviously yourself, the president and those around him are greatly interested in other thing than themselves.

Cletus and Lulabelle history 101....

No, we went to disarm them of WMD, destroy the al-Qaeda training camps on every block, and stop the imminent attack on our soil from Iraqi nuclear weapons. As those things were all fiction, we have chosen to liberate much Iraqi oil.

Exactly. Freedom of Iraqi's was 4th on the long list of lies. Anyways, what do you tell the people that claim these soldiers are fighting for our freedom? Yeah right. I don't feel the need to thank every soldier I come across because I know there are hundreds and thousands of civil service workers that deserve the same thanks.

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:16am
Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by TheUnknown. TheUnknown. wrote:

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

Haha, you're telling me I'm more free? Nope. Maybe the Iraqi's are, but not myself. I would have had the same freedoms before and after the war.

 

We didn't go into this war to free ourselves nimwit, we went into it to a.) Free the oppressed and downtrodden iraqi people. b.)Remove of Terrorist groups, so that they do not have the ability to commit terrorist acts in our nation.

Unlike other nations like Japan, China, Iran, ect... and obviously yourself, the president and those around him are greatly interested in other thing than themselves.

Cletus and Lulabelle history 101....

No, we went to disarm them of WMD, destroy the al-Qaeda training camps on every block, and stop the imminent attack on our soil from Iraqi nuclear weapons. As those things were all fiction, we have chosen to liberate much Iraqi oil.

Exactly. Freedom of Iraqi's was 4th on the long list of lies. Anyways, what do you tell the people that claim these soldiers are fighting for our freedom? Yeah right. I don't feel the need to thank every soldier I come across because I know there are hundreds and thousands of civil service workers that deserve the same thanks.

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

Haha, I know and if I was as articulate as you then you'd see that I am saying exactly the same you are. I never agree that anyone should get "their due" when it comes to death, only acknowledgment. You and I both are on the same page, I just don't say it as well.

You are truly an inspiration to those who have been through it and want to express their feelings against the politicians.



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:36am

^^^Haha. Sometimes I choose eloquence, sometimes confrontation. Neither changes anybody's mind on this forum, and confrontation is more fun, so confrontation usually wins.

I will choose eloquence this Saturday when I take the podium, I assure you.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:39am
I applaud and hope you see where I'm coming from.


Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 2:14am

Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

I applaud and hope you see where I'm coming from.

Absolutely. The height of the hypocrisy was the Jessica Lynch fiasco. She was a "hero" because she cowered in the back of a Humvee and lived to tell about it. What was particularly sad was that another soldier in her unit killed 9 Iraqis in that battle before being killed himself and received zero recognition.

I am fed up with this ultra-patriotism that considers any oversight of soldiers on the battlefield as being distrusting and insulting. The same ultra-patriots consider any who question the motives of the government as unpatriotic or downright treason. We are living in 1928 Nazi Germany right now, my friend-cart all arabs off to prison and deny them a trial (Guantanamo Bay), allow the government to spy on the people (the Patriot act), and scare the people to death (the terror warning system, which evidently overheated around Nov 2004 and hasn't worked since the election).

"Revisionist history" is a popular term these days. Try history, I say.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 5:10am

Wow Dune and goodsmitty.  This is just the most heartwarming thing watching you two bond.  It reminds me of George Bush and Jeff Gannon embracing.  I think that from now on I'll have Barbara Steisand's song Memories playing in the background when I read your posts. 



Posted By: Ejp414
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 6:50am
...not "babykiller" but rather "agitator"--possibly even "troll." It really doesn't matter how long you have been here.

-------------
__________________
__________________



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 8:13am
Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

Wow Dune and goodsmitty.  This is just the most heartwarming thing watching you two bond.  It reminds me of George Bush and Jeff Gannon embracing.  I think that from now on I'll have Barbara Steisand's song Memories playing in the background when I read your posts. 

Let's see, you and I have like, one ally on this forum, so don't insult him please.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: MattyJ
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 8:30am

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.



-------------
98 Custom
HK G36C Appearance
70/4500 Dye Throttle
Ricochet AK
Polished Internals
Aluminum Power Tube
Dye Sticky 3 Grips

Next on the list:
???


Posted By: rancidpnk13
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:22am
What i'm frustrated most by is the lack of responses to the posts. This seems to be a habit of OS's(and others) forum topics. At least let's make this a discussion, not just "I'll whine and cry about liberals and not listen to damn word that anyone tells me unless he is sucking up to me."

-------------


Posted By: techietaichi
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:47am
In addition to an earlier reply I made in this thread I mentioned that I followed my orders and did my job. Yes, soldiers do what they're told, however it is also our duty to make sure that our actions during a time of conflict/crisis does not go against human morality/ethics as those few Marines demonstrated in Iraq, treating those Iraqi's as they did. Frankly I believe they and those charged with the responsibility of monitoring their troops should burn for it. Those Iraqi's were Prisoners of War, interrogation was good enough, but being defiled as they were was wrong. Hands down. I know that our troops being defiled by the Iraq's wasn't right, it was heinous, but why stoop to their ignorance? Two wrongs don't make a right and if it were so, this planet would be in constant battle and as we all know, there are no winners in War, it aint a sport. Unfortunately, those few Marines are the reasons why the names are flung and assumptions made. Peeps need to understand that the majority of the military are good men and women that only want to serve their country and make their families proud. The small band of rabble rousers in uniform is a reflection of the civilian sector, they were once civies too. I dont hate Hipsters and I don't always disagree with what they say. They have some valuable points to make too, but don't raz a soldier. Raz the politicians.


Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:56am
Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.

I don’t know where you are from but where I live it is common knowledge that “Cop” is just another word for Police Officer. And what in the world does the fact that everybody commits some kind of small crime ( example: speeding) including cops, have to do with cops and firemen during 9/11 giving their lives just doing their jobs! I don't care what they did in the past, all of them are heros.



-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: MattyJ
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 10:49am
Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.

I don’t know where you are from but where I live it is common knowledge that “Cop” is just another word for Police Officer. And what in the world does the fact that everybody commits some kind of small crime ( example: speeding) including cops, have to do with cops and firemen during 9/11 giving their lives just doing their jobs! I don't care what they did in the past, all of them are heros.

Wow, you missed the entire point of my post. Perhaps you failed reading comprehension in grade school? First off, I was in no way implying that "cop" and "police officer" were at all different. Second, I'm from NJ, and a lot of NJ police and firefighters lost their lives in the 9/11 attacks. But that doesn't mean that all cops are saints. Goodsmitty said that some soldiers are downright criminals. I agree with this, because there are some soldiers that cross the line. But I was just wanted to make sure that it was understood that all of the groups that are considered heros have some bad apples in them. It doesn't mean we should look down on the group as a whole, but we need to know the difference between a few bad apples and a corrupt system. I think that goodsmitty feels as I do in this matter, but I just wanted to clarify it.



-------------
98 Custom
HK G36C Appearance
70/4500 Dye Throttle
Ricochet AK
Polished Internals
Aluminum Power Tube
Dye Sticky 3 Grips

Next on the list:
???


Posted By: bluemunky42
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 10:57am
Originally posted by Thor Thor wrote:

Why Military Force Is Sometimes Needed.
Here's what you can do when you happen upon one of those stupid, naive, idiots that just can't seem to understand why force is sometimes needed:

1) Find the person involved in "no retaliation" type discussion.

2) Engage him in brief conversation, then ask if military force is appropriate.

3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"

4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."

5) When he's in mid-sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.

6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."

7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.

8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time

ive heard those steps before...did u get that off a website?

-------------

http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity - http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity



Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:52am
Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

Wow Dune and goodsmitty.  This is just the most heartwarming thing watching you two bond.  It reminds me of George Bush and Jeff Gannon embracing.  I think that from now on I'll have Barbara Steisand's song Memories playing in the background when I read your posts. 

Hahaha it's true. However, I don't think you can compare me to Gannon. I really doubt I am limber and flexible as he is.



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:26pm
Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.

I don’t know where you are from but where I live it is common knowledge that “Cop” is just another word for Police Officer. And what in the world does the fact that everybody commits some kind of small crime ( example: speeding) including cops, have to do with cops and firemen during 9/11 giving their lives just doing their jobs! I don't care what they did in the past, all of them are heros.

Wow, you missed the entire point of my post. Perhaps you failed reading comprehension in grade school? First off, I was in no way implying that "cop" and "police officer" were at all different. Second, I'm from NJ, and a lot of NJ police and firefighters lost their lives in the 9/11 attacks. But that doesn't mean that all cops are saints. Goodsmitty said that some soldiers are downright criminals. I agree with this, because there are some soldiers that cross the line. But I was just wanted to make sure that it was understood that all of the groups that are considered heros have some bad apples in them. It doesn't mean we should look down on the group as a whole, but we need to know the difference between a few bad apples and a corrupt system. I think that goodsmitty feels as I do in this matter, but I just wanted to clarify it.

Roger. We are saying the same thing. They all deserve our respect, but they are not above the law. Everyone, and I mean everyone needs oversight from somone.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 1:28pm
Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

Wow Dune and goodsmitty.  This is just the most heartwarming thing watching you two bond.  It reminds me of George Bush and Jeff Gannon embracing.  I think that from now on I'll have Barbara Steisand's song Memories playing in the background when I read your posts. 

Let's see, you and I have like, one ally on this forum, so don't insult him please.

And I will shoulder your insult because it includes a negative reference to our president. The crosses I bear.



-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: -ProDigY-
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 2:51pm
Through...Through

-------------


Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 3:46pm

Originally posted by Thor Thor wrote:

Why Military Force Is Sometimes Needed.
Here's what you can do when you happen upon one of those stupid, naive, idiots that just can't seem to understand why force is sometimes needed:

1) Find the person involved in "no retaliation" type discussion.

2) Engage him in brief conversation, then ask if military force is appropriate.

3) When he says "No," ask, "Why not?"

4) Wait until he says something to the effect of, "Because that would just cause more innocent deaths, which would be awful and we should not cause more violence."

5) When he's in mid-sentence, punch him in the face as hard as you can.

6) When he gets back up to up to punch you, point out that it would be a mistake and contrary to his values to strike you, because that would, "be awful and he should not cause more violence."

7) Wait until he agrees that he has pledged not to commit additional violence.

8) Punch him in the face again, harder this time

If you see me at a peace rally, by all means see if that works. 



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 3:48pm
Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.

I thought that COP meant Consumer Of Pastries.  Are there any who do not?



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 3:51pm
Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Originally posted by Badsmitty Badsmitty wrote:

Wow Dune and goodsmitty.  This is just the most heartwarming thing watching you two bond.  It reminds me of George Bush and Jeff Gannon embracing.  I think that from now on I'll have Barbara Steisand's song Memories playing in the background when I read your posts. 

Let's see, you and I have like, one ally on this forum, so don't insult him please.

And I will shoulder your insult because it includes a negative reference to our president. The crosses I bear.

You know, you guys are right and I'm way wrong.  The song is actually "The way we were."  Sorry about that.



Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 4:49pm
Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by MT. Vigilante MT. Vigilante wrote:

Originally posted by MattyJ MattyJ wrote:

Originally posted by goodsmitty goodsmitty wrote:

Why not thank them all? Any public servant who risks their lives (police, fire fighters, EMS, and soldiers) deserve our respect. In peace time, soldiers suffer far fewer casualties than police officers, and vice versa in war.

I don't agree with your show of disdain for soldiers just because they are getting their due (insert smiley of choice here, you know I'm your pal). Firefighters and police officers got their due after hundreds lost their lives in the world trade center collapse. But I absolutely agree that not all soldiers are boy scouts, and some are downright criminals.

I'm not going to enter into this debate, because neither side will ever agree, nor will either side convince the others to embrace their beliefs (yes, I am including myself in this group.) However, one thing you said jumped out at me and I just need to clarify something. You're not advocating that all police officers are cops, are you? The majority of cops have broken at least one law (no matter how major or minor) that they are charged to enforce, simply because there was nobody to stop them. Just wanted to clarify that with you.

I don’t know where you are from but where I live it is common knowledge that “Cop” is just another word for Police Officer. And what in the world does the fact that everybody commits some kind of small crime ( example: speeding) including cops, have to do with cops and firemen during 9/11 giving their lives just doing their jobs! I don't care what they did in the past, all of them are heros.

Wow, you missed the entire point of my post. Perhaps you failed reading comprehension in grade school? First off, I was in no way implying that "cop" and "police officer" were at all different. Second, I'm from NJ, and a lot of NJ police and firefighters lost their lives in the 9/11 attacks. But that doesn't mean that all cops are saints. Goodsmitty said that some soldiers are downright criminals. I agree with this, because there are some soldiers that cross the line. But I was just wanted to make sure that it was understood that all of the groups that are considered heros have some bad apples in them. It doesn't mean we should look down on the group as a whole, but we need to know the difference between a few bad apples and a corrupt system. I think that goodsmitty feels as I do in this matter, but I just wanted to clarify it.

I did not understand because you worded it badly so that it sounded like you were saying what I said it sounded like. Now that you have clarified what you said, I completely agree with you.



-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 8:15pm
Wonderfull little debate, problem is I have heard it all before, 35 or so years ago......

Do we feel any better or safer, for most probably not for many here, or our "brave" protesters never saw first hand how in thier mind glorious "Peoples Liberation Armies" or "National Liberation Fronts" or whatever the tyrant of the day cares to claim his force is called treats his own peoples who may thru a moment of freedom not agree with the resident tyrants minions. Many of you have no idea what a true attrocity is, never smelled death a klick away as you approach a ville, never seen a victim of a mass rape, or a disembowled village elder, or a dismembered child, in you mind a true attrocity is only a stack of naked Iraqis where the intent of the exercise is to remove the only thing we could thier dignaty, and if you do not understand the methodology that in itself shows the ignorance and blindness of the pacifist. And by the way never saw a news man or camaraman takin any pictures of any of these Vietnamese villes, or Honduran villes, because even then it did not meet the agendas of the time.

As for the "babykiller" reference, you two smitty"s need to review your past postings...and I quote...."But our entire nation calls little dead children in Iraq "collateral damage." Are our little white American fetuses more precious than little brown Iraqi ones?" veiled referance but the point is American servicemen still intentionally kill "little dead children". And another true anti-war or anti-violence statement from our resident leftists,"Woot! Getting ready for the March 19 protests! I even have a few extra days off in case I get arrested. I hope I get to do a pre-emptive strike on those Protest Warrior fools if they show up."

And where was all the rightious indignation while the Democratic hero Mr Clinton was bombing "aspirin factories", "babyfood plants" and even a real honest to god "Chinese Embasy" with real Chinese inside, and all the deaths of innocent Serb children killed by the bombings, oh we were too worried on the vast right wing conspiricy while Mr Clinton was getting ......skys.....

At least be consistant folks......protest all wars, acts of aggression, attrocities, not the ones the DNC decides may get them back into power again.

And maybe, just maybe if these protestors actually did some true investigating instead of hoping on the popular bandwagon, many of these DNC talking points may be questioned, but by their agenda, they prefere not to for the true point of the exercise is as usual an attack on President Bush, and his administration....no true Democratic ideas to spout other than Bush is wrong.

Ask the Danes, Belgians, Norwegians, French how they were told Herr Hitler was no threat and their will be "Peace in our Time", and until the end there were French protestors to a "criminal" war, right up until the French Surrender in May 1940.

Not revisionist history, just history in its cycle of repeating itself again....65 years later....Radical Islam and its individual and or nation state supporters are no threat to the west..........








-------------


Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 8:44pm

I'm not sure if it is selective memory, or just selective observation in the first place.  Hard to tell the difference sometimes.

Another interesting phrase:  "Effort justification."



Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 8:59pm
Bowling for Columbine.

Good movie.

Go watch it.

Americans kill eachother with guns thousands more times than other countries and our friendly neighbors to the north.

Amercians are violent people.

It's not the soldiers faults' but their leaders.


-------------
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:12pm
The gospel according to Micheal Moore, Americans are not violent, every socirty has those who for thier own personal gratifacation inflict pain on others.

If you want to point blame, how about violent video games that glorify killing......desensitize youth to what shooting someone actually does, no reset button....
Violent and graphic movies......and the list goes on...and of course it is your right to view this.....care to compare the youth violent crime rate pre video game era to today...may shock you

-------------


Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:19pm
Yes, but don't they have the EXACT same things in other countries? Don't most of those things actually come from other countries?

/me only 14 so don't beat me up.


-------------
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>


Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:20pm
I disagree that it is the video games causing the violence.

Most youth/people are aware that video games are fiction and fantasy only.

Video games and movie violence are the scapegoats because the real problems are being ignored.

The same video games (even more violent in some cases) are being played in other nations and their crime rates have not increased...

-------------



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:21pm

Originally posted by Bolt3 Bolt3 wrote:

Bowling for Columbine.

Good movie.

Go watch it.

Really annoying/boring/stupid movie.

 

Originally posted by OS OS wrote:

.....care to compare the youth violent crime rate pre video game era to today...may shock you

Good reason why correlational statistics should be kept out of the hands of the underinformed.

 

BTW, OS, not to get picky or anything, but a sig complaining about idiots works a lot better with proper spelling.  You might want to fix that.

Originally posted by OS's Sig OS's Sig wrote:

My motto is: Never argue with idiots, they will drag you down to thier level and beat you with expierience.

Although at least you aren't calling people "retarted", unlike some of our members...



Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:21pm
Just a case point....not a proven fact on violence rates......but in the Columbine shooting did not the shooters use a movie as the basis of their motive?

-------------


Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:24pm
Their MAIN motif was society looking down upon them.

They were the kids always called "**edited**s" and "**edited**" and things like that.

All they wanted was revenge and how society is degrading. Look at Rome.

Great empire until they had to much. Couldn't handle it, and they died out.

Isn't that what America is becoming?


-------------
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>


Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:29pm
In my opinion, it was a stretch by the media. I believe in a home video one of them was taped saying that they were going to shoot up and kill just.."just like in Doom." [Doom being a popular video game at the time.]

In this instance this could have been an influence on the 2 boys, but for the millions of others that played the game, they figured out that the game was strictly fanasty. Also in that particular video game, the player shoots aliens, not humans.

-------------



Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:32pm
^^^^  Demons.  In Doom the Marine shoots demons, not aliens.  Get your classic FPS right - sheesh!


Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:37pm
Gahh! Your right! I was so busy whipping through the game that I didnt pay any attention to the story line. Plus, I dont think that my laptop from back then had a sound card.

-------------



Posted By: Frozen
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:48pm
Our computer labs all have Doom 95 mysteriously present...

It even has online multiplayer.


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 9:53pm

I protest all wars, I'm consistent.

Anyways, it seems too much of a scapegoat to blame movies and video games. I guess that's what happens when people don't feel the need to take responsibility for themselves and their children.



Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:33pm
Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

Do we feel any better or safer, for most probably not for many here, or our "brave" protesters never saw first hand how in thier mind glorious "Peoples Liberation Armies" or "National Liberation Fronts" or whatever the tyrant of the day cares to claim his force is called treats his own peoples who may thru a moment of freedom not agree with the resident tyrants minions.

OS, way to put words into our mouths, no one was trumpeting how great Saddam was, hell We agree, evil man. So why don't you just shove those lies right up in there?

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


As for the "babykiller" reference, you two smitty"s need to review your past postings...and I quote...."But our entire nation calls little dead children in Iraq "collateral damage." Are our little white American fetuses more precious than little brown Iraqi ones?" veiled referance but the point is American servicemen still intentionally kill "little dead children".

Hmm, and yet more masterful word twisting, great, for propogandist agitation, not so great for honest debate. No one is insinuating that soldiers are deliberatly killing iraqi children (IE baby killers), this is to compare the right wings enormous concern over a few aborted fetuses to their apathy towards tens of thousands of innocent iraqi's.

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


And where was all the rightious indignation while the Democratic hero Mr Clinton was bombing "aspirin factories", "babyfood plants" and even a real honest to god "Chinese Embasy" with real Chinese inside, and all the deaths of innocent Serb children killed by the bombings, oh we were too worried on the vast right wing conspiricy while Mr Clinton was getting ......skys.....

It was right here... (Not as much as the current one, but that was because I was around 11 at the time.)

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


At least be consistant folks......protest all wars, acts of aggression, attrocities, not the ones the DNC decides may get them back into power again.

We do, all the ones that make no sense.

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


And maybe, just maybe if these protestors actually did some true investigating instead of hoping on the popular bandwagon, many of these DNC talking points may be questioned, but by their agenda, they prefere not to for the true point of the exercise is as usual an attack on President Bush, and his administration....no true Democratic ideas to spout other than Bush is wrong.

Yeah, some just jump on the bandwagon, but the real instigators and the ones who keep going are only supporting THEIR Ideals, not the DNC. The democratic party is dead, its a slightly less conservative Republican party.

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:


Not revisionist history, just history in its cycle of repeating itself again....65 years later....Radical Islam and its individual and or nation state supporters are no threat to the west..........

What about radical American nationalism and movement away from a free society? What about our imperialist expansion?






[/QUOTE]


Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:38pm
Dont beleive anything Micheale More says... god.. hes such a snake.

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:42pm
Who are you going to believe? Faux news?

Anyway, many people do not get the point of Bowling for Columbine, its about how America lives in a culture of fear, which breeds the violence. But lets not get into that in this thread.


Posted By: goodsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:43pm

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

Wonderfull little debate, problem is I have heard it all before, 35 or so years ago......

Do we feel any better or safer, for most probably not for many here, or our "brave" protesters never saw first hand how in thier mind glorious "Peoples Liberation Armies" or "National Liberation Fronts" or whatever the tyrant of the day cares to claim his force is called treats his own peoples who may thru a moment of freedom not agree with the resident tyrants minions. Many of you have no idea what a true attrocity is, never smelled death a klick away as you approach a ville, never seen a victim of a mass rape, or a disembowled village elder, or a dismembered child, in you mind a true attrocity is only a stack of naked Iraqis where the intent of the exercise is to remove the only thing we could thier dignaty, and if you do not understand the methodology that in itself shows the ignorance and blindness of the pacifist. And by the way never saw a news man or camaraman takin any pictures of any of these Vietnamese villes, or Honduran villes, because even then it did not meet the agendas of the time.
So even though your logic is horrible, and your history erroneous, your life experiences make you correct?


As for the "babykiller" reference, you two smitty"s need to review your past postings...and I quote...."But our entire nation calls little dead children in Iraq "collateral damage." Are our little white American fetuses more precious than little brown Iraqi ones?" veiled referance but the point is American servicemen still intentionally kill "little dead children". And another true anti-war or anti-violence statement from our resident leftists,"Woot! Getting ready for the March 19 protests! I even have a few extra days off in case I get arrested. I hope I get to do a pre-emptive strike on those Protest Warrior fools if they show up." I think he was saying that the same "fundamentalist" Christians that got Bush elected for some reason don't shed a tear for the 100k Iraqis dead from misplaced bombs and mistaken intelligence. The reason bibles today put Jesus quotes in red is so Christians can ignore what he said easier.

And where was all the rightious indignation while the Democratic hero Mr Clinton was bombing "aspirin factories", "babyfood plants" and even a real honest to god "Chinese Embasy" with real Chinese inside, and all the deaths of innocent Serb children killed by the bombings, oh we were too worried on the vast right wing conspiricy while Mr Clinton was getting ......skys.....

At least be consistant folks......protest all wars, acts of aggression, attrocities, not the ones the DNC decides may get them back into power again. That is your problem in a nutshell, you have to be all for something or against it. Here's how it works: Vietnam, bad idea. WWII, good idea. Desert Storm good idea. Operation Iraqi [insert latest justification], bad idea. See how I pick and choose what to protest, and my brain didn't melt or anything!


And maybe, just maybe if these protestors actually did some true investigating instead of hoping on the popular bandwagon, many of these DNC talking points may be questioned, but by their agenda, they prefere not to for the true point of the exercise is as usual an attack on President Bush, and his administration....no true Democratic ideas to spout other than Bush is wrong. Dear God, how many times do I have to justify why I think this war is wrong? Why do you keep repeating the same Rush Limbaugh garbage over and over?

Ask the Danes, Belgians, Norwegians, French how they were told Herr Hitler was no threat and their will be "Peace in our Time", and until the end there were French protestors to a "criminal" war, right up until the French Surrender in May 1940.

Not revisionist history, just history in its cycle of repeating itself again....65 years later....Radical Islam and its individual and or nation state supporters are no threat to the west..........
Now we are about to repeat Vietnam, where a bunch of soldiers wind up dead, and we lose. I read history too.







-------------
"Reading this thread, I'm sad to say that the only difference between the average American and the average Taliban is economic status."
-Zesty



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 18 March 2005 at 11:49pm

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

The gospel according to Micheal Moore, Americans are not violent, every socirty has those who for thier own personal gratifacation inflict pain on others.

If you want to point blame, how about violent video games that glorify killing......desensitize youth to what shooting someone actually does, no reset button....
Violent and graphic movies......and the list goes on...and of course it is your right to view this.....care to compare the youth violent crime rate pre video game era to today...may shock you

Video games made Bush invade Iraq?  Yeah, I see the logic.



Posted By: Badsmitty
Date Posted: 19 March 2005 at 12:10am

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

As for the "babykiller" reference, you two smitty"s need to review your past postings...and I quote...."But our entire nation calls little dead children in Iraq "collateral damage." Are our little white American fetuses more precious than little brown Iraqi ones?" veiled referance but the point is American servicemen still intentionally kill "little dead children". And another true anti-war or anti-violence statement from our resident leftists,"Woot! Getting ready for the March 19 protests! I even have a few extra days off in case I get arrested. I hope I get to do a pre-emptive strike on those Protest Warrior fools if they show up."

1.  No veiled reference to calling anyone a babykiller.  Save that word twisting crap for the weak minded.  There are dead Iraqi civilians.  No use of the word babykiller from me.  Deal with your own conscience if you need to.

2.  If you assume I am a pacifist, you are wrong.  I was a soldier, too.  Just not legendary like yourself.      

3.  Lieutenant Dan off of Forrest Gump just keeps coming to mind when I read your posts....  

 C38962



Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 19 March 2005 at 7:14am
There are simularities in our approaches to todays world issues. Many here spout thier talking points, Haliburton, no WMD's, civilian casuality rates, and those of us who spout ours, freeing a people, eliminating a despot, finding evidense of WMD's.....

The exception is one group has a very defined objective, the "overthrow" or impeachment or whatever of our President, the other supports the president.

The masters of word spinning on both sides (myself included) spin thier facts to suit thier cause. Again an exception I do not disect their posts to meet my needs, the ideas are based on each views, teachings, and opinions on past history.

The one side blames and defames "Faux News" for not reporting the "truth", the one network that dares to sway from the conformist views of the other major networks with thier evident bias, even as one of thier anchors stepped down because of a proven false "truth" that met the biased agrenda. And the reseached data that in the election process more than 65% of all reporting was very anti-bush by these major networks, who by thier own admission were pro Kerry. The idea is to report the news, in a balanced fashion, not to create it to meet an agenda, as seems to be the case with the major networks.

The "War Protest" of March 19th is a needed function in our society, and I support your right to protest, go at it, have fun, show us how "peacefull" you truely are. But as I said in the initial post, just remmember in the back of your minds, that somewhere out there in the world, another youth wishes he could do the same against his government, but knows his moment of freedom of speech will land him in prison, or a mass grave.
And it is people like myself, for whatever "misguided" reason we do it, once commited, try to spread the freedoms we have to those who before we stood in thier streets to protect that freedom, could only dream of it.

So in a fair and balanced way in you protest, make sure you also show the newly rebuilt schools, the newly rebuilt water systems, books, school supplies, toys, and all that some americans see as a good thing to do for these people, but alas, none of this will be included in the March 19 protest, only what meets the agenda of the protestors, a true Anti-Bush rally plain and simple.   

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net