http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20050706%2F1348839194.htm&photoid=20050705CARF104&ewp=ewp_news_0505missing_toddler - http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/ 0001%2F20050706%2F1348839194.htm&photoid=20050705CARF104 &ewp=ewp_news_0505missing_toddler

im not talking about like the story cause its kinda old but the people who do this are really wierd. I think that rotting in jaill isnt good enough for them.  Discuss

No QuarterEverytime this happens it turns out to be a repeat offender. They should have their manhood removed with a pair of dull sheep shears, before being let back into society, and that's only after they have baby raper branned to their foreheads. [/QUOTE wrote:  couldnt have said it better myself

 couldnt have said it better myself

Dye Playa wrote: yea i agree. their man hood should be removed and they should be branded. i think jail is too easy, and so is the death penalty. they should slowly cut away an inch of them every few hours, sew it back up and repeat the process. and after everyday's worth of cutting, make them swim in a mixture of lemon juice and salt. thats my opinion

Better idea-ever see that type of castrator that's a big piece of rubber with a tiny hole in the middle? You stretch it out, until the hole...well you get the picture. Then, it turns black and rots off. Then, put them in the cell with Jimbob and a broomstick with nails from top to bottom.

At that point, life in prison would suit this man fine.

I'm not being a jerk, Hades, so don't take this the wrong way, but wanking little kids and beating their families to death is a little on the inhumane side as well. There are way too many kids getting molested out there. Maybe a better punishment would be to put the little kids' dads in a solitary cell with the molestor for a few days...assuming he wasn't killed by the sick freak.

Hades wrote: I dont care if your a jerk So your of the eye for an eye philosophy? Rape isnt a sex crime, it is a crime of violence, so shouldnt the hands be cut off and not the testicals?

Actually, I wasn't being totally serious....totally. But when we're talking a small child, it makes things far more sick and disgusting. And there's no amount of revenge that will cure what one person has done to this child. He'll more than likely die...fifteen or twenty years from now. In the meantime, this little girl might resort to drugs and alcohol to get over what he's done to her. I hope she doesn't, but needless to say many lives were either affected, ruined, or ended in this one freakshow's lifetime. So honestly de-balling this sick man won't really do anything but give me a warm fuzzy feeling of justice. It won't bring a family back or give this girl her innocence back.

I'd like to chemically castrate this sicko...I happen to own a device capable of such

An injection of aproximately an ounce of element 82 on the periodic table would quickly render his genitlia permanently inefective

Bango wrote: My dog has this little micro-chip inside of her so if she ever gets stolen, we can find out where she is. If they can put them in dogs, they should be able to put them in sex-offenders. Then, they could have counter-microchips placed in public places like schools or amusement parks and whenever a microchip-equiped sex-offender goes near it, the public place could be alerted or whatever.

tahts exactly what i was thinking about, then we should put a tamper device with arsenic in it so that if he tries to pull it out, sayonara (sp)

Hades wrote: stratoaxe wrote: Actually, I wasn't being totally serious....totally. But when we're talking a small child, it makes things far more sick and disgusting. And there's no amount of revenge that will cure what one person has done to this child. He'll more than likely die...fifteen or twenty years from now. In the meantime, this little girl might resort to drugs and alcohol to get over what he's done to her. I hope she doesn't, but needless to say many lives were either affected, ruined, or ended in this one freakshow's lifetime. So honestly de-balling this sick man won't really do anything but give me a warm fuzzy feeling of justice. It won't bring a family back or give this girl her innocence back. Good job on the dramatic conclustion that exists only in your head... Exactly nothing you do to the offender will correct the past offense therefore revenge does nothing.

I have no idea what you're talking about when you say "dramatic conclustion that exists in my head". I was saying that I was simply expressing my disgust towards sex offenders in general, and that all the torture on earth wouldn't reverse what he had done. So you just agreed with me in an attempt to argue. Nice.

I was making the point that her life and mental state are probably near ruined-and I believe I said this might happen, but hopefully wouldn't happened. I was using that as an illustration to my point- there's nothing that can be done to take away what this man has done. And I know alot of people that were molested and turned out normal-to an extent. But you show how narrow your view really is-the effects that cause alcohol and drug abuse are still there, whether that person resorts to those things or not.

The people I know that have been sexually abused for the most part show no outward signs of any trauma-but it's the secret phone calls, and the private times where it shows. If you think that drama only exists on the Lifetime Channel, you need to grow up. There are grown men that are iron workers, or whatever that probably have times where they stay up at night with nightmares of what happened to them as a child. So they might move on, but they rarely fully recover, and often times the happy life they live is an outward covering for pain they hide on the inside.  

i think there shouldnt be any bale for people that do really bad things like him because as some1 said b4 he was released with 15,000$.  then he went an did it again.  in most child rape cases they dont just get cought once an then stop. If they get out it happens agian.

even on other things like murder or somthing like that there shouldnt be a bale.  there should be a bale for small things that arent that bad like MAYBE robing like a store an not hurting some1 or anything like that.

Hades wrote:   Other than your guessing what do you have that backs up your statement? Your opinion doesnt translate to fact just because you think it is possible. Just because my house might be swallowed by an earthquake doesnt mean it will.

Um, she was raped-? Unless she's mentally deficient, I'm sure she was somehow bothered by this. If not now, at some point "My family was wiped out and I watched my brother raped, at which point I was raped" will probably pop into her mind. I would want to hope that if you were dragged out, watched your family murdered, then was forced into a sexual act with another human being that you might remember that now and then.

That's all still aside from the point-you can't erase scars, and you won't bring this family back. I'm sure that at some point she'll have counseling, and more than likely she'll go to school and live a normal life. But that doesn't take back what this man did-after all, the act is over, now it's time to look at the perpetrator. Whatever you're arguing, he still needs to pay some price. Obviously it's not legal to torture him, but I feel that chemical castration is perfectly humane in light of what he has done.

As far as your eye for an eye comment, that's what justice is. The punishment is supposed to suit the crime. It's equality in justice.

Hades wrote: stratoaxe wrote: Whatever you're arguing, he still needs to pay some price. Obviously it's not legal to torture him, but I feel that chemical castration is perfectly humane in light of what he has done. As far as your eye for an eye comment, that's what justice is. The punishment is supposed to suit the crime. It's equality in justice. Who says the offender needs to "pay a price?" and an eye for an eye is not "justice" it is revenge. If your of the Christian faith isnt that God's job to dish out the punishemnt? If your not of that faith ignore the question it is otherwise irrelivant.

You're trying to keep me up all night, aren't you Hades ?

Well for starters-I'm taking that question as sarcasm, I am however going to give you a response-

The Bible clearly says that power is given to governing bodies. So your question is irrelevent. 

And an eye for an eye is what our justice system is based on-that's why we have varying degrees of punishment. So I don't guess I get what you're saying. Justice is half rehabilitation, and half revenge. You spank a child to teach them not to do bad things that hurt them, but also to give a sense of consequences. So there have to be consequences to drug use, not just rehabilitation. So either I've missed your point, or you have very strange philosophies regarding law in general.