LPK and Response TRigger
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: Paintball Equipment
Forum Name: Upgrades and Customizing
Forum Description: Trick it out!
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=140754
Printed Date: 23 February 2026 at 5:22pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: LPK and Response TRigger
Posted By: elrono
Subject: LPK and Response TRigger
Date Posted: 25 August 2005 at 11:18pm
|
I was going to buy a response trigger kit for my A-5 but the guy who sales told me that the presure varyes a lot, and he would`nt let me play in his field If I assisted with this Upgrade. Is this True? If I buy a LPK, would that solve the problem he talks about? (Ofcourse in case of being true)
thanks |
Replies:
Posted By: SuzukiRider987
Date Posted: 25 August 2005 at 11:21pm
|
That's pretty wierd. I don't think the r/t would make your pressure vary any more than if you didn't have one. ------------- http://www.macdev.net - MacDev Militia http://www.alienpb.com - Alien - Because winning is more fun. |
Posted By: Halo
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 12:45am
|
What?!?!? That sounds like a bit of BS to me. I use an RT and have not noticed any major difference in shot to shot velocity. There is the normal differences if you are using co2 and no expansion chamber or reg.
Options to appease the dork at your field. Get a HPA air tank. high pressure output. No real need to go with the low pressure kit. This route will take care of any velocity problems. Option two is to stay CO2 and get a Palmer Stabilizer. This will also take care of most of your velocity flucuations. This is the cheapest route, and works well. Then option three is getting a low pressure kit. But that is the most expensive route. The price of a HPA tank with low presure out put, then the LPK, and then the secondary reg (Palmers Stabilizer works good). Personally, I would look for another field to play. Not sure I would want to be on a field run by a dim wit. ------------- Halo CDPaintbal.com One of the oldest running scenario fields in the southeast. |
Posted By: elrono
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 2:33pm
|
Posted By: Giblin
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 2:48pm
What he said |
Halo wrote:Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 4:38pm
| Why does everyone think you need HPA to run a LPK? You can use co2. It wouldn't be worth it but you can. |
Posted By: JediJak
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 4:42pm
|
thats not what theyre talking about rossy read the posts ------------- Tippmann Chameleon M98 Upgrades: 14in. Teardrop Barrel GTA Expansion Chamber 20oz. Co2 Pollished Internals Tape Mod Spring Mod Pic: http://img244.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tippy3qe.jpg |
Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 26 August 2005 at 4:47pm
|
Posted By: Halo
Date Posted: 27 August 2005 at 12:39am
|
Why use CO2 with a LPK? Not saying you cant run it off CO2, even thou I have never heard anyone doing that.
No offense meant. I am not wasting $119 for an LPK and another $50 to $90 for a secondary reg to run CO2. Like Larry the Cable Guy says, "It's like wipping before you poop, it just dont make since." ------------- Halo CDPaintbal.com One of the oldest running scenario fields in the southeast. |