War Or No War
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=141283
Printed Date: 19 November 2025 at 2:45pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: War Or No War
Posted By: Aggie
Subject: War Or No War
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:19pm
|
Who here is for the war like me? If you ain't, tell me why. ------------- Make It Happen |
Replies:
Posted By: Hades
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:21pm
|
If it gets me cheaper gas prices, I am for it.
[/please note sarcasm.] ------------- 
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:21pm
|
Yes i am for the war. But im against colon cancer.
Dune, it raised our gas prices.  ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors"> 
|
Posted By: Trogdor2
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:21pm
|
I'm not crazy about it, but I guess it's alright.
------------- Something unknown is doing we don't know what. That is what our knowledge amounts to. - Sir Arthur Eddington |
Posted By: cdacda13
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:23pm
| Kill um, Kill um all. |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:30pm
| Which war? |
Posted By: lester98c
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:32pm
| here we go again with another 1 of these |
Posted By: agentwhale007.
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:33pm
------------- Hey, nice marmot!  |
Clark Kent wrote:Posted By: blackdog144
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 3:34pm
|
huuuuuuuuhhhh im for it
------------- http://imageshack.us">  
|
Posted By: Aggie
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 4:19pm
|
The War On Terror, or the street battles in Iraq. ------------- Make It Happen |
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 4:43pm
|
Im with hades, without the sarcasm. If it helps me with cheaper gs prices, nuke the bastards and take the oil.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Predatorr
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 4:53pm
| I could care less really. Last thing we need is some more terrorists, so i guess ill change that to im all for the war. Final answer. |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 4:58pm
|
Is that a question or an answer? |
Posted By: TRC1040
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:03pm
|
I am for the war, but i think that it should get done really soon. it would be easier if more than 3 other countries actually cared about it ------------- http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img23741qy5.jpg"> 
|
Posted By: TruePaintballer
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:07pm
|
i dont car about it...unless Gas Prices suddenly decrease ------------- http://www.freewebs.com/outlawspaintball/index.htm - Outlaws *Sponsors* http://www.abrika.ca - Abrika |
Posted By: mutt98
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:20pm
|
i say bazooka them bimbos ------------- i was at a barbeque the other day and there was this chick. her hair was on fire. but she was all about herself. you know the type. "help ME! put ME out!" |
Posted By: Dan db09
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:26pm
You cant just nuke then take the oil.... Notice that nukes put big holes in the ground... It would pretty much waste the oil... Unless you plan to biohazardly nuke them.... which could damage the oil also?? but i could be wrong there |
Posted By: TRC1040
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:33pm
|
i say just drop a hydrogen bomb, then we will have the buildings and the oil rigs. nothing will be touched ------------- http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img23741qy5.jpg">
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:38pm
|
Err... http://www.google.com - www.google.com
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:44pm
|
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar all of the time! In the shaddows of the New York
skyline! We grew up to fast! Falling apart! Like the ashes of american
flags.
------------- 
|
Posted By: bluemunky42
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 5:56pm
if we nuke them the oil will all burn up and we will be screwed twice and again
i'm against it because i don't think we are getting anywhere. we got Saddam out, we helped the Iraqis build a government, now let's leave before we lose another thousand soldiers. what else are we trying to accomplish? ------------- 
http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity - http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity |
Posted By: southernboy51
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:05pm
I am for the war them towel heads are crazy
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:06pm
|
Go back to your trailer.
-------------
|
Posted By: Hella Cool
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:10pm
|
There isn't just one war overseas right now, if you didn't notice. Afghanistan was a success, except losing that bin Laden guy, but overall good. Iraq was a mistake and we need to get out as soon we're sure the country won't implode on itself. |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:18pm
|
I thought that was the whole point to the Afghanistan invasion...? We actually issued a demand to the Afghani government - turn over bin Laden "or else". Had they turned over bin Laden (and his people), I don't believe we would have invaded... Failing at your primary objective doesn't make a mission a success, just because you happened to hit a couple of targets of opportunity, I would think. No? |
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:21pm
|
You ever go to the beach and beat against the waves? It seems thats basicaly what we did.
Take a glass of water, shoot it, break it, whatever. Glass of water is broken, the water is spread out, but its deffinatly still there. Same with the terrorists. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Dye Playa
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 6:53pm
|
^^^^^^^^^ good analogy ------------- 
|
Posted By: bluemunky42
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:05pm
i concur. -------------
http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity - http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity |
Posted By: Bounty
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:12pm
| Im not so much for the war in Iraq but I support our troops and always will. |
Posted By: FoRenSiC
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:18pm
Bin Laden is probably dead, the passed videos that were issued were said to not have Bin Laden present but to have another guy(the leader after bin laden). And I am for the war because Iraq was a total disaster but now might be about the time to get out of there?? |
Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:29pm
|
The "War" is crap.
------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules> |
Posted By: bluemunky42
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:31pm
that's probably their evil plan: make us think bin Laden is dead, we pull our troops out, they blow us up again. -------------
http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity - http://www.freewebs.com/hazedinsanity |
Posted By: iXteam
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:37pm
| "War" what is it good for |
Posted By: xteam
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:52pm
-------------  |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 8:53pm
|
100% for it, even though it took forever to finish it. c'mon, 13+ years? Shoulda just displaced him the first time. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Enos Shenk
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 10:40pm
Exactly, that is why people asked "which war" Those are 2 different things, deserving of 2 different answers. ------------- 
|
Posted By: deadeye007
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 11:05pm
If the sun doesn't rise We'll replace it with an H-bomb explosion A painted jail cell of light in the sky Like three-mile-island nightmares on TVs that sing us to sleep They burn on and on like an oil field Or a memory of what it felt like To burn on and on and not just fade away All those nights in the basement, the kids are still screaming On and on and on and on BRad ------------- Face it guys, common sense is a form of wealth and we're surrounded by poverty.-Strato |
Posted By: Fat Stalin
Date Posted: 05 September 2005 at 11:26pm
|
For.
------------- 
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 1:57am
|
Iraq: Never should have went, can't leave now. WoT: An absolutely good thing that is being half-assed and lost. Our only hope with Iraq is to get rid of King George and get someone that the world doesn't hate, that way maybe we can get some more help and fix things quicker. Right now all we can do is equip and support untill the job is done. I just wish some justice would be done around here and someone would be held accountable for us ever going in. -------------  |
Posted By: Hella Cool
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 2:52am
Mary Poppins says: A spoonful of sarcasm makes our failures seem ok, our failure seems ok. |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 9:15am
| :) |
Posted By: whack-a-mole
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 12:02pm
|
I have mixed feelings about the war. But bottom line we are there so we need to support our troops and president. ------------- NASA and the Americans spent millions of dollars and hundreds of hours to develop a pen that would write in space.....The Russians used a pencil. |
Posted By: Lightningbolt
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 1:53pm
|
War suck's but I can't confidently say that our government is more wrong/right than the people that they are after. |
Posted By: Jinxed
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 1:55pm
|
I am for the war because the towel heads are gonna keep <and buh-bye to you. complaining about the "towel heads" is not forum appropriate. come back after you have read the rules.> ------------- Confidence is good, but never be arrogant. |
Posted By: Lightningbolt
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 1:58pm
|
Scarcify? For some strange reason scarcify reminds me of hypmotize |
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 2:02pm
Right or Wrong is ultimatly in the eye of the beholder. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: RedLion56
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 2:11pm
|
i say we end this war because the reason for this war is not good enough for us to sacrifice our own lives and family and also soldiers as for america taking all the oil no offence but i think it's just greedy america already takes up to 50% of the worlds recources and is the main reason for global warming and the U.S.A doesen't seem to be doing anything at this moment.So if you want to take the gas prices down the use less fuel ------------- A5 12"Bigshot Pure energy 20ozCo2x2/AntiSyphon 32 degrees Black X_chamber Pen spring mod Polished Internals |
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 2:23pm
|
Using less fuel wont drive down gas prices. But quitting the war would. Gas prices always skyrocket during times of war. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: RedLion56
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 2:43pm
|
that's because tanks and navy ships and other military vehichles are not very fuel efficient ------------- A5 12"Bigshot Pure energy 20ozCo2x2/AntiSyphon 32 degrees Black X_chamber Pen spring mod Polished Internals |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 7:52pm
Last I checked we were fighting Al-Queda among other forces over in Iraq right now. Al-queda is a terrorist group, is it now? We are fighting people that target civilians and government officals. They are people who try and scare people fromliving as normal of a life as you can over there. Now, doesn't that definition mean terrorist? IF this isn't a battle in the war on terror, then neither was Afghanistan. We went there to displace their current government as well, did we not? -------------
|
Posted By: Baroque-Urban
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 8:54pm
oh yeah  ------------- 
Not sure what to buy...hmm |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 8:56pm
|
But we could have set up camp anywhere, and Al-Qaeda would have come to us - they always come to us. We could have invaded Toronto and we would be fighting Al-Qaeda right now. Going into Iraq in the first place was not motivated by Al-Qaeda at all. |
Posted By: ArmySyko
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 9:11pm
I voted 'no' and I don't think I have to qualify it for any of
you. I've served with pride for 12 years and I'm ready to call it
quits after two deployments including "the box". Live by what the
vets that came home after Vietnam and that opposed the war would do: |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 9:59pm
|
Clark, you're point is only mildly true.
Al-Queda is in force in iraq becasue they consider that land holy. Saying that wthye would have gone ot canada to fight a 'jihad' is just mollarky. Yes, they would, and have, attacked us anywhere, but not in the same concentration, not with the same vigor, as they are in iraq. -------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 10:12pm
| No, I agree - we made it easier for them to get lots of recruits by providing an excellent excuse for the local malcontents to hate us and join Al-Qaeda. |
Posted By: theShocker
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 10:18pm
|
"I will not send American boys; to do a job that Asian boys otta be doin for themselves" LBJ NO WMD at all, not event the ones we gave them back in the day. NO ties to Al Queda, none whatsoever. Freedom and democracy!? Not with 3 groups that can't agree on anything but hate agianst the US. If anyone can post a good, logical reply as to why we should be at war I would like to hear it. If you want lower gas prices, you go die for them....
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 06 September 2005 at 10:32pm
Exactly. We made Iraq into a WoT front. It's like if the bloods and the crips came to your house for a gun fight. You had no love for either but your house is the one gettin shot up. We difinately are fighting the WoT there but the initial invasion had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism. That is why I make the distinction. Not to mention some of those insurgents actually are Iraqis fighting for what they think their country should be, not just against the US. We're in the middle of a whole separate civil war on top of the AQ threat....Not that AQ isn't trying to sway the civil war but yeah... And I really do think that we'd be fighting AQ in Toronto if we had invaded....Assuming NATO didn't get in on it first....lol... ------------- |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 9:10am
|
Shocker, you ask and you shall recieve.
"No WMD's" Keep telling yourself that. He had them in the first Gulf War, did he not? He used them on the kurds in the 90's after the Gulf War, did he not? He never gave proof that he got rid of them, did he? He didn't lt the weapons inspectors do their jobs like he was required to, did he? He only let them go to certain places AFTER atleast a 2 week notice, didn't he? He threatened to use chemicle weapons on us when we first started sending troops into Kuwait, didn't he? He launched SCUD missles at us when were were bases in Kuwait, did he not? I'll give you some time to get back to me on those questions. "No connections to terrorist" Really? http://college.hmco.com/currentconflict/students/terrorism/timeline.html - No connections at all, huh? http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp - Here "Freedom and Democracy" Umm, correct me if I'm wrong shcoker, but don't we ALSO have 3+ groups vying for power? Republicans, Dems, Green party, etc etc Have a nice time with that one, I'm off to school and football. -------------
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:59am
|
The http://www.politicalgateway.com/news/read.html?id=3396 - President's own commission said that our intelligence was WRONG, as has been reported consistently for the last six months.
Allow me first to point out what shocker said:
"Terrorists" =/= "Al-Qaeda" Now, as to your point - yes, Saddam had dealings with terrorists. Yes, Saddam had dealings with Osama. A more accurate statement would have been that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. But yes, Saddam did like to hang out with terrorists on occasion. But if guilt by association is the standard, we should be invading Washington, D.C., no? After all, Washington created, trained, and equipped both Saddam AND Osama, and was involved in the installation of the Taliban as well. Yes, Saddam is a bad man. But isn't that is a rather shaky and arbitrary standard to go invading countries? Especially when we, and most of our allies, do the same thing all the time? ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 11:44am
|
True that Ramb, there are a lot of countrys out there that are worse
than Iraq ever was, North Korea for one, not to mention Iran and our
beloved Saudi Arabia.... And yeah, Saddam had dealing with terrorists including Osama but you also have to understand that Osama hated Saddam as much as we did. He called him a communist and said he was going to hell for running a secular government. I bet Osama was dancing when we invaded.... And I'd like to see a photocopy of that memo.... ------------- |
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 12:34pm
|
In order to be more PC in this forum, I guess I must go no war (as long as Bush is President).
Yes, in order to justify the next phase in this "war on terrorism" we should pull out of Iraq, and any and all other theaters of counter terror operations and allow any and all terrorist organizations to wage thier war against America, here in America. American isolationism would serve many missions, first rid the world of American Occupations, provide safe and secure locations for radical Islam to claim thier initial victory against America, recruiting would be greatly enhanced based on thier victory, training would be uninterupted, and would provide a more extensive as well as safe logistical base for their war on the Great Satan. And to please many we here in America will no longer call it a war, but a criminal prosecution. Our legal as well as media proffesions would be delighted. Would be easier to justify a apprehension of these criminals, we could then try them in our courts, use the American taxpayer dollars defending thier civil rights to hate America, quell a lot of the political debate, but we may have to suffer the loss of American civilian lives and maybe even some personal freedoms, while we battle on our streets and in our courts, against those who would do harm against Americans here in America. Many in America prefere it that way, as thier heads stay buried in the sand, and blame America (really George Bush) as the worlds only terrorist. Or, we can wait for a Democrat to get into the White House, then the war on terrorism throughout the world will be instantly justified as legacy building. ------------- 
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 12:35pm
| Huh? |
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 12:59pm
|
Oh shut up....OS, you're partisanship gets more mind boggling everytime I read it... Yeah man, us liberal commie terrorist lovers sure do want this war to come to the US...that would make all of us feel a lot better. You know it. God, how ignorant... ------------- |
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 1:05pm
|
As well as the partisanship of all our resident leftests is mind boggling to me. What would out left leaning factions prefere in the current world situation.
We are not allowed to fight them over there, so where is this war to happen, choice is limited to there or here. -------------
|
Posted By: Lightningbolt
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 1:29pm
|
It's really a "which came first, the chicken or the egg" argument. Did our intervention overseas create their feelings twords the US or does their terrorist actions warrant our intervention? I feel that it's a little of both but mostly the later. Like it or not someone has to "police" this rock we call Earth. I truely believe that our government's intention's are more right than wrong.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 2:52pm
|
I do not accept this soundbyte as evidence that we are in a binary solution set. International power politics just aren't that simple, and I will not be lulled into accepting what amounts to a children's limerick as the foundation of our foreign policy. I understand that Bush needs clever one-liners to punctuate his policies, and that's fine. What is not fine is when people start taking those one-liners as literal truth. That is nothing short of a blot on the claim of America as a land of rational thought. We are better than this.
|
Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 3:27pm
You beat me to it Clark, come on! |
Posted By: ArmySyko
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 4:17pm
|
We got totally upset over a couple thousand people. Many more
people have died in nations like Bosnia, Rwanda and Israel just to
start. Has the US intervened? Yes, but only have a wide media
spread was put out there. We didn't need to be there. Now it's too late to do much about it. It'll be our generations' Germany. Don't just worry about a majority of you pre-18's that are out there. You'll see the draft but our children will see the draft too. People aren't flocking to the military with the huge bonuses. 2 out of 30 soldiers in my unit are looking at the bonuses but haven't accepted them yet. Good luck to all-y'all and your Selective Service cards. ------------- 
|
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 4:35pm
|
Would be interesting to see an actual idea from you two except your standard "anyone who thinks or believes differant than I is wrong, and this is why" approach. Just one idea from our freinds on the left, an actual plan to resolve these issues, a workable, fundimental peace plan, where man will finally respect his brother, and not desire what he has.(2000 plus years still hasn't happened)
I accept the fact that I did not spend my time nor have the opertunity, on getting all that formal education from our higher learning liberal establishments, and the repeated jabs on my grammer and writting skills are reflective of the "understanding" of my fellow man. But it is still fun watching, reading and learning from the enemy, thier ideas, their believes and the way the belief in my fellow mans weakness has not diminished, as those who ridicule still believe they are superior in thought, mind and deed. BTW, per my new disability (100% disabled per VA for both knee replacement), DOT disqualified, I am enrolling full time at the University of Nebraska Lincoln, per VA job retraining, 4 years, full paid with $1000 per month expenses on top of my retirement and disability. Broadcast Journalism or Law Enforcement (Parole, Probation Officer), so maybe one day I too can write and talk like all the more learned among you. Keep paying those taxes, I am looking at a large cost of living adjustment. -------------
|
Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:00pm
| Once again why were you giving your name back after being guested? I'm trying to follow your arguments, but I can't find the points. |
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:08pm
|
Just proof that there is not justice for all, as in everything in the world, Real Life 101. My job is being the right wing agitator to combat the leftist indoctrination of the young here on the forum. To give them the other view, to balance the equation. Someone has to take up the cause and the mission, to voice the opposite view based on expierience and age. And yes, someone in the upper reaches believes it is a valuable asset to this forum.
And of course you can not follow, argue or find any points, for you only see the world through the limited prism of your own personal belief, just as inflexable as mine, only the foundations of our beliefs come from totally differant expieriences. -------------
|
Posted By: Jim Paint
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:11pm
Silly man. The only reason man fought each other is because there was no democratic party back then. ------------- 
saepe fidelis |
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:17pm
|
I will presume that I am one of "you two". Well, OS, here is a suggestion: Open your mind. That, and read more before posting. I am going to say this loud and clear, because apparently you missed it the first 1,000 times I posted this: I SUPPORT THE WAR IN IRAQ. I SUPPORTED THE WAR IN IRAQ FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. I WAS HOPING THAT BUSH WOULD INVADE IRAQ.
So, OS, I actually AGREE with you on many of your substantive points. And if you consider me "on the left", then you are someplace to the right of Hitler. I hold many views that no Democrat would ever admit to, and even most Republicans will not voice in public. If you actually read what I type, you would know this. BUT - just because I agree with many of your conclusions does NOT mean that I have to accept your crappy reasoning and inane quasi-logic, and certainly does NOT mean that I have to accept your simplistic black-and-white view of the world.
I will not apologize for the occasional jab at your spelling. Welcome to the internet. But more importantly, I am usually not jabbing at your spelling - I am usually jabbing at your simplistic worldview and faulty logic, as well as your revisionist history.
Again - this is the kind of "us vs. them" arrogant tripe that causes the ridicule. And, believe me - when I am calling you arrogant, you have a problem. Just because we are calling your bluff doesn't mean that we are wrong, or even that we disagree. |
Posted By: agentwhale007.
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:21pm
|
Well its clear from what I can see that you hate America, Clark Kent. I suggest you get out, and go live in France. God Bless America. ------------- Hey, nice marmot! |
Posted By: ArmySyko
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:23pm
Wow, I hope there is sarcasm attached to this. Religion existed long before government did. -------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 5:24pm
| I think you can safely assume that anything posted by Jim Paint or Whale is heavily coated in sarcasm... |
Posted By: Enos Shenk
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 6:28pm
Ill support the troops, you can support that scumbag all you want. -------------
|
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 6:41pm
|
"scumbag"?, ye who maketh thy rules, follow not? Disappointment, in a moderator. -------------
|
Posted By: Jim Paint
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 6:47pm
Once again. I <3 Clark -------------
saepe fidelis |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 7:17pm
-------------
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 7:22pm
Who the hell says that anymore? -------------
|
Posted By: Jim Paint
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 7:40pm
Linus -------------
saepe fidelis |
Posted By: MoNkeY Hunter
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 7:48pm
Im for the war on bad folks but i DONT A GREE with us still over there and for the person incharge of this country, Gas cost way to much and to many people are dying so i suport the troops but not the War. The price of stuff is way to much.... not cool
|
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 7:55pm
Re read what you just posted. And we didn't go over there for gas like so many liberals claim.
 -------------
|
Posted By: djrock
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 8:40pm
This a funny topic. Usually people on the internet are 100% against the war, and are huge Bush haters. ------------- 
It's been changed jackass. |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 8:44pm
|
Yes, I agree, Bush isn't the best president we've had, but he's better then CLinton.
Plus, atleast Bush sticks by his decsions no matter who is against him. That's admirable and honorable IMO. -------------
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 8:47pm
|
Terrorists decided to stick to their plans and kill innocent people. Is that admirable and honorable?
-------------
|
Posted By: Jim Paint
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 8:48pm
Also admitting when you're wrong. -------------
saepe fidelis |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 8:53pm
|
Cedric, your ignorance astounds me sometimes.
Never take place in political discussion, you don't know how to. -------------
|
Posted By: djrock
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 9:06pm
 -------------
It's been changed jackass. |
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 9:59pm
|
Linus: Whatever, I personally don't like party politics and I hardly
ever argue that way. I argue against the Bosh administration and the
things they are doing that I view as wrong. That doesn't make me
partisan.... OS: Even if it was "over there or over here" did ya ever think there might be better "over there"s out there to spend American blood and treasure on? Ya know, some we might have been justified in invading, like Iran or Syria or North Korea for instance? ------------- |
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:35pm
Hahahahahahahahhahahaahahahahhahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahaha. Jesus, that was good. -------------
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:37pm
Please explain how on Earth you managed to extract what you posted from my statement.
------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:40pm
|
I agree with Cedric because flip-floppers will analyze things and make
strategic adjustments rather than zerg rush until the game's over
(which will take a long time and will cost several poor little zergling
lives).
------------- Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind. 
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:43pm
-------------
|
Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 07 September 2005 at 10:45pm
------------- Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind.
|
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 08 September 2005 at 7:18am
-------------
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 08 September 2005 at 9:29am
|
I read what you quoted. Now please answer my question - how did you manage to arrive at your conclusion from my post? Please explain your thought process. ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 08 September 2005 at 2:35pm
|
Well geez maybe it's because Al-Qaeda are terrorists and that Osama is the Al-Qaeda leader. ------------- Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind.
|
Posted By: Geoduck
Date Posted: 08 September 2005 at 2:35pm
|
*shrinks away* PLZ DON'T BAN ME
------------- Calling Bush dumb is like calling a headless man blind.
|