My Hero
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=146824
Printed Date: 07 February 2026 at 2:26pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: My Hero
Posted By: mbro
Subject: My Hero
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:41pm
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/19/bush/index.html#wiretappin - Praise the lord, I feel safer
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Replies:
Posted By: bluemunky
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:43pm
I've always been a supporter of Bush until this.
-------------

|
Posted By: Justice
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:44pm
I guess Cedric better be careful from now on.
-------------
-JUSTICE
http://www.myspace.com/outkastpaintball - Outkast Myspace
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:44pm
What's wrong with spying on our enemies? Heck, it's not like we're cutting THEIR heads off or anything......
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:47pm
|
Uhh... He's spying on Americans. In the USA.
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:50pm
So if anyone thinks this is a good idea, you need help.
-------------
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 2:55pm
They can do this anyway. Wire taps and whatnot. Its not like anything is changed by this. Police use wire taps all the time, they subpena phone bills and what not.
This is nothing new, been going on for years and years.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:04pm
I know it's going on in America, but they're thought to be connected to
Al Queda, making them (at least my) enemy. And I'm willing to bet most
of them aren't American citizens anyway.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:06pm
DBibeau855 wrote:
They can do this anyway. Wire taps and whatnot. Its not like anything is changed by this. Police use wire taps all the time, they subpena phone bills and what not.
This is nothing new, been going on for years and years. | You need a warrent for that.
Uberhamster wrote:
I know it's going on in America, but they're thought to be connected to
Al Queda, making them (at least my) enemy. And I'm willing to bet most
of them aren't American citizens anyway.
| Then why not just obtain a warrent, it's not like they're hard to come by and then we'd know who's being spied on.
You are not an american.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:06pm
Thats really not the issue. Its just a US government funded terrorist factory. Abu Massab goes in their as a kindly old farmer than had stinger missles in his barn, he was told to hide them or his family would be killed. And he leaves wanting to hurt the great satan(the great advirsary) so bad its like acid in his mouth.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:09pm
Mbro, yes I am an American. And why should we obtain a warrant when we
don't have to? The only people that think the President broke ANY law
are treehuggers like you. Move to China **edited**.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: WGP guy2
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:09pm
Clark Kent wrote:
Uhh... He's spying on Americans. In the USA. |
So if we found out an American in teh USA was contacting osama you wouldn't want us to tap their phone for information?
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:10pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Mbro, yes I am an American. And why should we obtain a warrant when we
don't have to? The only people that think the President broke ANY law
are treehuggers like you. Move to China **edited**.
| THEY'RE SPYING ON AMERICANS!!
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shallnot be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the placeto be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Tree hugger? How about a constitution hugger. Have you ever even seen the constitution?
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:11pm
mbro wrote:
[QUOTE=DBibeau855] They can do this anyway. Wire taps and whatnot. Its not like anything is changed by this. Police use wire taps all the time, they subpena phone bills and what not.
This is nothing new, been going on for years and years. | You need a warrent for that.
From what i understand all these OPs go to a sort of judge to see if they have probable cause. I was halfway listening to it today on the radio.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:12pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Mbro, yes I am an American. And why should we obtain a warrant when we
don't have to? The only people that think the President broke ANY law
are treehuggers like you. Move to China **edited**.
|
You sir, are an ass.
So...he's a treehugger and a communist because he doesn't think the
government should spy on us? Oh wait, I'm sorry I called you an ass, I
totally see your logic.
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:14pm
Uberhamster wrote:
The only people that think the President broke ANY law
are treehuggers like you. Move to China **edited**.
| I'm a treehugger, you're a facist
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:16pm
Is there any proof that the people we're spying on are American CITIZENS? How am I a Fascist? Because I support our president?
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:19pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Is there any proof that the people we're spying on are American CITIZENS? How am I a Fascist? Because I support our president?
| http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&q=bush+admits+spying+on+us+citizens&btnG=Search+News - Let's see if google news has any proof, not like bush has ADMITTED IT or anything
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:21pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Is there any proof that the people we're spying on are American CITIZENS? How am I a Fascist? Because I support our president?
| You support the goverment spying on its citizens and taking away freedoms
fas·cism Audio pronunciation of "Fascism" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fshzm)
n.
1. often Fascism
1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:22pm
Sounds good to me. And if our citizens are contacting terrorists,
they're traitors anyway, therefore they have no constitutional rights.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:23pm
I have a feeling tha uberhampster has a long, and very happy future in this forum, no wait, that was just a fart.
-------------
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:24pm
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:27pm
You think i rwally care about what you people think about me? It's obvious I don't like assholes anyway.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:29pm
Speaking of assholes, did you know George Bush is a personal friend of the Saudi Royal Family, uberhamster? So, maybe we should all tap his phone, since he calls terrorists just to check up.
-------------
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:29pm
I'm just gonna back out of this thread and let you treehuggers talk amongst yourselves now......
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:30pm
You are 100% alright with the government doing whatever they please, keeping tabs on your whole life without you knowing?
It's obvious you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:30pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
I'm just gonna back out of this thread and let you treehuggers talk amongst yourselves now...... |
Translation:
"I cannot back up the asinine opinions I have anymore, so I will call you all a name that really makes no sence in context, and I will leave"
-------------
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:31pm
Tae Kwon Do wrote:
Uberhamster wrote:
I'm just gonna back out of this thread and let you treehuggers talk amongst yourselves now...... |
Translation:
"I cannot back up the asinine opinions I have anymore, so I will call you all a name that really makes no sence in context, and I will leave" |
ZING!
-------------
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:32pm
Way to coward out Uberhamster
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:32pm
|
DBibeau855 wrote:
From what i understand all these OPs go to a sort of judge to see if they have probable cause. I was halfway listening to it today on the radio. |
Specifically at issue here are wiretaps WITHOUT warrants. Bush says he didn't want to take the time to get warrants. Cynics translate that into "didn't have probable cause".
I don't anybody is griping about wiretaps WITH warrants.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:33pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Sounds good to me. And if our citizens are contacting terrorists, they're traitors anyway, therefore they have no constitutional rights.
|
Translation: "I am a fascist"
You do realize that you sound EXACTLY like Saddam Hussein, right?
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:34pm
Clark Kent wrote:
Uberhamster wrote:
Sounds good to me. And if our citizens are contacting terrorists, they're traitors anyway, therefore they have no constitutional rights.
|
Translation: "I am a fascist"
You do realize that you sound EXACTLY like Saddam Hussein, right?
|
Clark, why do you hate America?
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:36pm
|
Because of all the fascists that live here?
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:38pm
It's my right to be a fascist, as it's your right (sadly) to be
**edited**. And I assume you've heard Saddam Hussein talk specifically
to you about his ideas? I think not.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:39pm
I thought it would have been the treehuggers.
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:40pm
It may your right to have facist ideals but it's NOT the goverments right to take facist actions such as spying on citizens without warrents.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:41pm
|
Sure - be fascist all you want. Just be honest with yourself, and the company you keep: Hitler, Stalin, Saddam, Castro, Uberhamster.
Here is the company I keep: Elton John, Richard Simmons, Ellen DeGeneres, Portia deRossi.
My people > your people.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:41pm
Coward out? I've had MANY conversations online with people like you and
NO ONE ever wins the arguments, so why even waste our time?
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:42pm
Dont forget me, Dune, The Smittys, .Ryan
-------------
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:43pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Coward out? I've had MANY conversations online with people like you and NO ONE ever wins the arguments, so why even waste our time? |
Translation:
"I am out of facts, and mommy and daddy are not here to ask what Rush said today."
-------------
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:43pm
That made me LOL SOOOO HARD Clark!
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:43pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Coward out? I've had MANY conversations online with people like you and NO ONE ever wins the arguments, so why even waste our time? |
On the contrary - people win the argument all the time. It's just that some people don't realize that they are losing.
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:44pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Coward out? I've had MANY conversations online with people like you and
NO ONE ever wins the arguments, so why even waste our time?
|
I thought you were leaving this thread o' treehuggers?
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:44pm
Tae, why are you even talking? No ones even on your side here, you're bashing both sides.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:45pm
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:45pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Coward out? I've had MANY conversations online with people like you and
NO ONE ever wins the arguments, so why even waste our time?
|
Because, 12 year olds who pretend to know something about the way government runs (aka. YOU), have nothing better to do?
-------------
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:45pm
Tae Kwon Do wrote:
Uberhamster wrote:
Tae, why are you even talking? No ones even on your side here, you're bashing both sides. |
Pardon?
|
Someone is oblivious to sarcasm.
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:46pm
PlentifulBalls wrote:
Tae Kwon Do wrote:
Uberhamster wrote:
Tae, why are you even talking? No ones even on your side here, you're bashing both sides. |
Pardon?
|
Someone is oblivious to sarcasm.
|
Well, the sarcasm glad wont mature untill the age of 14...
-------------
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:46pm
I came back because you all thought I was 'cowarding out' and no no one
ever wins these. Some has a funny sig, I can't remember who tho... It
says: Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics,
even if you win, you're still retarded.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:47pm
Uberhamster wrote:
I came back because you all thought I was 'cowarding out' and no no one
ever wins these. Some has a funny sig, I can't remember who tho... It
says: Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics,
even if you win, you're still retarded.
| Fine, if you'd like to win this argument, show legal justification for spying on american citizens
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:47pm
I'm well older than 14, you people amaze me. Do you have any personel experience about how gov. runs? I think not.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: PlentifulBalls
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:48pm
Uberhamster wrote:
I came back because you all thought I was 'cowarding out' and no no one
ever wins these. Some has a funny sig, I can't remember who tho... It
says: Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics,
even if you win, you're still retarded.
|
Your amount of retardation just doubled because you used that quote.
And from the sound of things, the average 3 toed sloth has more government experiance than you.
-------------
sporx wrote:
well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:48pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
I came back because you all thought I was 'cowarding out' and no no one ever wins these. Some has a funny sig, I can't remember who tho... It says: Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded. |
Oldest Internet Cliche Ever.
And yes, some debates on here can be won.
This seems to be one of them. We have the side of rational thought which is still around waiting for some good reasons to let groups use wiretaps sans warrants, and you, who cannot bring up a valid point and therefore decides that arguing on the internet is dumb.
-------------
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:49pm
Ok, they were contacting OUR ENEMIES. Do you need anymore? They could
have been planning an attack for your hometown, your whole family could
have been killed. If that happened you would all be blaming the Pres.
for NOT spying.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:50pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
I'm well older than 14, you people amaze me. Do you have any personel experience about how gov. runs? I think not. |
Are you ever going to present a decent argument as to why taps should be used sans warrant or just keep using cliches and useless semantics?
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:50pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Do you have any personel experience about how gov. runs? I think not. |
Actually, plenty.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:51pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Ok, they were contacting OUR ENEMIES. Do you need anymore? They could have been planning an attack for your hometown, your whole family could have been killed. If that happened you would all be blaming the Pres. for NOT spying. |
Ok, "they" are contacting our enemys. That is probobal cause.
Why not get a legal warrant?
-------------
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:51pm
O please, tae if anyone's a Fascist here, it's you... Go look at the thread "Does this bother anyone else?"
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:52pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
O please, tae if anyone's a Fascist here, it's you... Go look at the thread "Does this bother anyone else?" |
So I am going to guess you dont have a decent rebuttle?
-------------
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:54pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Ok, they were contacting OUR ENEMIES. Do you need anymore? They could
have been planning an attack for your hometown, your whole family could
have been killed. If that happened you would all be blaming the Pres.
for NOT spying.
| Well then I'm sure a warrent would be justified. I'm willing to risk an attack being planned on my town to protect the rights of many. The goverment has laws that they must follow.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Uberhamster
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:55pm
Maybe because getting a warrant TAKES TIME. There's no winning against
you democrats anyway, I really am wasting my time. I don't give a crap
if you think I'm a coward, thank me later when you're not wearing a
turban in 5 years.
------------- Stiffy2008- 'wat is a noob?'
Yep, I lied about getting a Trans Am.
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:56pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Maybe because getting a warrant TAKES TIME. There's no winning against
you democrats anyway, I really am wasting my time. I don't give a crap
if you think I'm a coward, thank me later when you're not wearing a
turban in 5 years.
| Actually warrents under the FISA act are very easy for the goverment to get any time of the day, there's one judge that does just that and she very rarely refuses to give a warrent.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:57pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Maybe because getting a warrant TAKES TIME. There's no winning against you democrats anyway, I really am wasting my time. I don't give a crap if you think I'm a coward, thank me later when you're not wearing a turban in 5 years. |
Translation:
"I cannot defend my stance, so I will use overused, Rush Limbaugh style attacks. Becuase you like freedom, you must be a Democrat. I will also throw in another useless cliche to finish it all off"
-------------
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:57pm
Uberhamster wrote:
Maybe because getting a warrant TAKES TIME. There's no winning against
you democrats anyway, I really am wasting my time. I don't give a crap
if you think I'm a coward, thank me later when you're not wearing a
turban in 5 years.
| You need to learn to think for yourself for once. Weak minds always give into the propaganda the easiest.
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:59pm
|
Uberhamster wrote:
Maybe because getting a warrant TAKES TIME. |
Ok, an actual argument. Now if you can put some meat on that (other than repeating Bush's "faster and quicker"), we might have a real discussion.
There's no winning against you democrats anyway |
If you mean "democrat" as in believer in democracy, then I find it telling that you exclude yourself from the group.
If you mean "Democrat" as in member of the Democratic Party, then you are (again) jumping to unfounded conclusions. I am certainly no Democrat, and there are several prominent Republicans (like Arlen Specter) who are outraged at Bush's spying.
thank me later when you're not wearing a turban in 5 years. |
Thank YOU? What have you done to keep the evil turbans away from me?
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 3:59pm
Wearing a turban in 5 years? You are probably the most ignorant person to post in this thread.
-------------
|
Posted By: Jim Paint
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:03pm
Skillet42565 wrote:
Speaking of assholes, did you know George Bush is a
personal friend of the Saudi Royal Family, uberhamster? So, maybe
we should all tap his phone, since he calls terrorists just to check
up.
|
Yea for Michael Moore facts!
-------------
saepe fidelis
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:26pm
Jim Paint wrote:
Skillet42565 wrote:
Speaking of assholes, did you know George Bush is a
personal friend of the Saudi Royal Family, uberhamster? So, maybe
we should all tap his phone, since he calls terrorists just to check
up.
|
Yea for Michael Moore facts!
|
I never saw Farenheit 9/11.
-------------
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:27pm
Uberhamster wrote:
thank me later when you're not wearing a
turban in 5 years.
|
YOU FAILED
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:29pm
-------------
|
Posted By: Whazuuup!
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:44pm
I haven't really taken a stance yet, but I have a question.
What happens when the government can tap your phone lines without a warrant? How does that screw you over? It's not like they're recording your conversations and putting them all over the internet...
-------------
http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=20098193 - Free ipod! Yay!
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:50pm
|
Would it hurt you if the Sheriff came over once a week and went through your stuff? Doesn't take anything (unless he found evidence of a crime), and not an inconvenience.
Does that bother you?
|
Posted By: Hairball!!!
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:52pm
|
I'm pretty sure the government did not need a warrant to tap overseas phone calls, only in-country calls.
|
Posted By: Whazuuup!
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 4:59pm
Clark Kent wrote:
Would it hurt you if the Sheriff came over once a week and went through your stuff? Doesn't take anything (unless he found evidence of a crime), and not an inconvenience.
Does that bother you? |
If he did it instantaneously and put everything where it was originally
and didn't tell anyone what stuff I had (unless it was crime evidence), no. I really wouldn't care.
But maybe I'm just a tool like that, right Mbro?
-------------
http://ipods.freepay.com/?r=20098193 - Free ipod! Yay!
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 5:55pm
Yes actually, you are a tool
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: Strife_17
Date Posted: 19 December 2005 at 6:03pm
perhaps i can try to properly defend the poorly constructed statement
hampster boy was trying to make( won't be easy with the majority here
is obviously democrats but i'll give it a go)
Alright, I will raise 3 points here that support the presidents Patriot
act and then try to point out some flaws and how they can be correctly
handled.
1) Warrants do take time and sometimes there are situation that time is
not a thign authorites have on thier side. By eliminating the
beurocracy involved (before) placing a wire tap we essentially allow
those assigned to protect American lives to take action where and when
nessecary.
2) Terrorism of all sort comes from within the United States. Contrary
to popular beleif Middle Easterners are not the only ones who can
commit act of terrorism. It is nessecary to moniter what certain
American "threats" do TO AN EXTENT.
3) With the rise of the computer and other forms of modern technology
it makes it increasingly simpler to organize and plan out an attack
against not only American but everyone and there for the governemnt
should be permitted to moniter the sources of potential threats TO AN EXTENT
In the above i have stated that in which uberhampster obviously had a problem trying to. Now as promised I the problems.
Obviously none of us want our rights as American Citizens violated so
in part we all must think is this the right direction to proceed in.
Like all government run operations this program needs to be monitered
and while warrants would not be required to place the wire tap(in time
restricted situation) they should at least be approved by a responsible
senior officer. When they are used information should be presented to a
Judge or whomever to say that the tap was used, why it was used, and
what information was gained by using it. If this begins to be used
inappropriatly of course should not go unpunished. In review I think
that while a warrant may not be be nessescary to start the wiretap when
the appropriate time comes the appropriate authority shoudl be notified
that it was done and should make a ruling on whether or not it was
justified.
Well its not perfect but i must say i did a better job than our rodent freind.
|
|