x-chamber vs pps
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: Paintball Equipment
Forum Name: Upgrades and Customizing
Forum Description: Trick it out!
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=149981
Printed Date: 12 October 2026 at 2:59pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: x-chamber vs pps
Posted By: trado
Subject: x-chamber vs pps
Date Posted: 10 February 2006 at 5:50am
|
My son is thinking of getting an GTA X-chamber for his A-5. I have seen posts to buy a Palmers instead. My question is why? What is the difference in what it is doing? Will a remote line work with either or will that affect it?We use co2. I know HPA would be better but that is not an option. Thanks
|
Replies:
Posted By: Snake6
Date Posted: 10 February 2006 at 8:50am
|
The Palmers is a Regulator, Along with making the Liquid CO2 expand into gas(what an X-Chamber does) it also regualtes the pressure of the air going into the marker, thus making it more consistant. The Palmers also works with HPA, as well as CO2 making it more veristile.
|
Posted By: cus98tom
Date Posted: 10 February 2006 at 11:28am
|
Yes the Palmers is very good (the best) at blocking the liquid CO2 from getting into the marker, this will make for a more consistant marker .
|
Posted By: SuzukiRider987
Date Posted: 10 February 2006 at 4:49pm
^^Yuppers. And if you got the extra $ to spend, I'd highly suggest that you spend it (or your son), and get the Stabalizer.
-------------
http://www.macdev.net - MacDev Militia
http://www.alienpb.com - Alien - Because winning is more fun.
|
Posted By: You Wont See Me
Date Posted: 10 February 2006 at 4:53pm
Palmers would be best, but there nothin wrong with just getting the
expansion chamber if you live in a fairly warm climate and wont be
shooting too fast. I use an x-chamber, and I live in the midwest, so it gets fairly cold here.
-------------
A-5
E-Grip
JCS Dual Trigger
DOP X-CORE 8 stage x-chamber
Lapco Bigshot 14" Beadblasted
Optional setup:
R/T
Dead on Blade trigger
|
|