China
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=152126
Printed Date: 16 May 2026 at 3:19pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: China
Posted By: choopie911
Subject: China
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 4:33pm
Does the Chinese government really sketch anyone else out these days.
Most of you are already aware of the crazyness with censoring the internet that they're all stoked about, and I was reading about this the other day:
http://www.filmstew.com/content/article.asp?ContentID=13432 - ZOMG
So, classics like Marry Poppins are a no-no now, because of the trachery that is actors and animated characters IN THE SAME MOVIE!!!!!
Seriously, like, is someone in power there going insane, or do they just drink and make laws?
|
Replies:
Posted By: procarbinefreak
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 4:40pm
|
ZOMG NO ROGER RABBIT!?!!!???
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 4:46pm
I'd shoot someone if Space Jam were outlowed here.
-------------
|
Posted By: Dead_George52
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 6:15pm
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 6:20pm
China wrote:
The same film board has made some mysterious decisions before…China banned the movie Babe claiming that they were saving viewers from confusion because animals can't talk. |
Well thank god for that..
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 6:30pm
|
Yeah, seriously......what?
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 6:32pm
I can picture some poor guy trying to get his pig to do farm chores and screaming in the middle of the feild, a la streetcare named desire.. "WARNER BROTHERS LIED TO MEEEEE!!"
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: the flanker
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:30pm
I think China is stupid and that we should take their stuff then nuke it [ we are in the middle on the taking their stuff stage].
-------------
perhaps the greatest movie ever
|
Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:34pm
the flanker wrote:
I think China is stupid and that we should take their stuff then nuke it [ we are in the middle on the taking their stuff stage]. | I hate how every 14 year olds' plan to deal with any foreign power consists of 'nuke 'em and take their stuff.'
Don't be an idiot.
-------------
 irc.esper.net #paintball
|
Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:34pm
meh? I don't mind china.
-------------
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:35pm
Basicaly.
If you think your so smart, start your own country.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:37pm
imagination is not allowed
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:39pm
the flanker wrote:
I think China is stupid and that we should take their stuff then nuke it [ we are in the middle on the taking their stuff stage]. |
God you're stupid, leave.
|
Posted By: oreomann33
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:42pm
LOL NUKE ITZ!
-------------
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 21 March 2006 at 7:49pm
oreo, seeing your sig, that band will be at the music festival here in may. they worth seeing?
-------------
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 1:02am
The scary part about China is the fact that they're well on their way to becoming more powerful than us, geopolitically speaking. Did anyone hear that crap about them holding military operations in South America? They're taking over where we stopped going because of stupid free trade treaties and their lack of signatures. I wont be supprised if they start working on expanding their boarders a bit sometime this decade. I read an essay on the Sino-Russian Superpower thats forming in Asia a while back. Pretty interesting even though the author used a rather large portion of his paper talking about future conflict between China and Russia, therefore somewhat negating his overall point...Still, pretty scary stuff....
ps
I believe there's gonna be a special on the new Rise of China on Discovery Times at like 8pm on the 10th....might check that out....
-------------
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 1:04am
Per capita they are doing better economicly than we are. The japanese called us a sleeping giant.
To me china is the sleeping giant here.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 1:10am
Yeah, historically speaking, we weren't really sleeping back then, we basically pushed Japan into attacking us. But yeah, China definately fits the bill. I'd be doing the same thing though, we're all worried about this other bull crap in Iraq, it's their perfect opportunity to get away with stuff...not to mention we owe them ungodly amounts of money.....But hey, look at is this way, if stuff gets hot with China, at least we've got a good old-fashioned State vs. State war to focus on instead of this stupid terrorist crap...lol....
-------------
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 3:50pm
No we wouldnt go state to state with china.. Their man power would over run us with sheer numbers. What we would do though, is cyber warfare and bombings. An extensive bombing campagne most likely.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 4:34pm
Nah, they couldn't get their troops to North America. Any conventional land war would be a stalemate- neither side could get sufficient troops into the other's country.
Take off and nuke the place from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. :P
------------- "Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."
-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.
Yup, he actually said that.
|
Posted By: whack-a-mole
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 4:47pm
Wow! It's always the smart ones isn't it............?
------------- NASA and the Americans spent millions of dollars and hundreds of hours to develop a pen that would write in space.....The Russians used a pencil.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 4:48pm
Nah it would be like korea, human waves just over running our positions. We couldnt enter a conventional war with china. Decades of comunist "I dare you to try and stop me" provado and machismo have built up their arms to a disgusting amount. The military is compulsary and huge. So every male citizen has a military back ground.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 4:57pm
their military is larger than the entire us population. but again if they start marching through the US half of us already own guns there would be ambushes like crazy. we would also probably nuke chin a like crazy if they sent guys over here. its a fair fight in ways. we have more money, they have more men, but we are better trained and better equiped. we also have allies that would help us out like britain maybe spain and alot of european countries. and if russia really hates china then they will help also. so in the end we would win, numbers dont always matter.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:00pm
No.. We dont have more money that china. We have better techknowledgy, but we dont have more money. A land war, they would mop the floor with us.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:02pm
|
China's censorship is absolutly retarded. It's blended the most efficient features of communist and capitalist ideas to create a situation where the people can be made to work for pennies and the government can accept all kinds of foreign investment and get filthy rich while screwing the general population.
I can see China with it's booming economy wanting to secure resources in the future, and probably using military force to do so. There are a few Islands in the south pacific that multiple countries have disputed claims over, the islands aren't a big deal, all the oil under them is.
Fortunatly, at this time China's military isn't very modern, and their ability to launch an amphibious assault is limited.
As horribly pissed off as I was at Bush for the Indian nuclear deal in light of the Iranian situation, when taken in the context of China, it'd be nice to have a really big friend. The world's most populace democracy with a population that's one fith of humanity kinda fits that description. Besides, India has something of a navy as well, and with them less reliant on petroleum, the US and China have more to feed themselves on. I'm glad to see developing countries like that trying to bypass petroleum dependancy all together.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:05pm
Exactly, the chinese governments dealings with other countries isnt comunist at all. Its capitalism through and through, so they get rich, but the people are still under a comunist system. The only country that is self sufficient anymore is North Korea, and 95 percent of the country and starving. So..
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:06pm
they would not mop the floor with us the government wont have enough transportation to send all their troops over here at once. we would be ready with men att the coasts and nock them off the face of the earth. the chinese gov would also find a way to get food and supplies here without a problem and that is not going to happen. so again we would win.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: Jack Carver
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:08pm
I think what's Dbib's trying to say is that if we invaded, we would lose.
But I agree, if they invaded, they would lose too. So fighting a land war would get nothing done except decrease the population.
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:11pm
yea i guess, unless we just nuked them. which would never happen because that would destroy the earth.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 5:14pm
|
Since when do we fight only land wars? As has been shown in Iraq, our airpower can quickly decimate(figurative term, decimate implies killing 1 in 10, this would be more like 8/10) massed divisions.
I think if China ever got agressive, between the US, UK India, maybe even Russia would put them in their place quickly. The deal is, we probably wouldn't need to take the entire country over in a situation like that, just send them packing back across the border and wreck their warmaking capabilities.
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 7:03pm
NOW we r talking. now thats a great idea.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:13pm
If we did something like level beijing, that would calm them down, i think a lot of the infrastructure is centered around their capital. It would make sense, comunist countries like to show off that way.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:20pm
|
Doesn't China have over 100 cities with populations of over one million? I think we have around ten. we'd need to wreck more than Bejing.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:22pm
I dont know much about china at all. Im just speculating. But to win we would need an EXTENSIVE bombing capagne. It would be a lot of psyops to mess with population and basicaly an extermination rather a block to block war like were fighting right now.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:24pm
yea but the us just wouldnt bomb them, they would think about how many civilians would die. but in a war sometimes that doesnt matter. like wen we nuked japan.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:29pm
|
The Chinese could really care less about casulties. Also, as for propaganda, the peasants are horrible under educated, how are psy-ops going to work when they don't have radios and can't read? I mean, they need to be told pigs can't really talk.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:31pm
I doubt thats why the chinese did that.
And if they have a tv or radio running, we can get to them.
They arent as backward as you think.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Gabster08
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:32pm
yea most of china is like that. its sad. they are all poor and uneducated while their gov getss richer and richer. i feel bad for them, in ways.
------------- Setup:
Super Blue Nexus Ego
Ul barrel
45/45 pmi
vlocity
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 9:37pm
What are you nuts? They are in the middle of a huge social revolution.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 22 March 2006 at 10:21pm
America > China
-------------
|
|