racial profiling
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=158737
Printed Date: 16 March 2026 at 10:29am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: racial profiling
Posted By: battlefreak
Subject: racial profiling
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 9:43pm
should they do it? they as in security at airports
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 9:44pm
|
im for it. i dont care what people say
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 9:44pm
GI JOES SON wrote:
im for it. i dont care what people say |
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:02pm
|
Who are "they", what do you mean "do", and what do you mean by "racial profiling"?
You're going to have to be a lot more specific...
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:04pm
GI JOES SON wrote:
im for it. i dont care what people say |
Why?
-------------
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:11pm
|
Gatyr wrote:
GI JOES SON wrote:
im for it. i dont care what people say |
Why?
|
now im by no means a racist or a bigot. in fact i have friends of certain decents. and yes by decents i mean middle eastern. however, short of a few incidents one including tim MCveigh, look at every terrorist attack since the WTC in 93. I'm sorry, but im just for it. actually, i think every single passenger should be screened, but some more than others.
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:27pm
GI JOES SON wrote:
now im by no means a racist or a bigot. in fact i
have friends of certain decents. and yes by decents i mean middle
eastern. however, short of a few incidents one including tim MCveigh,
look at every terrorist attack since the WTC in 93. I'm sorry, but im
just for it. actually, i think every single passenger should be
screened, but some more than others. |
So, you arent racist, but you believe that a group of people identified
by their skin color are going to inherently act different, and be more
deadly than others?
Makes sense. Admit it. You are a racist. Like it or not, if you didn't
lie in that post about what you believe, then you are a racist.
Congratulations.
-------------
|
Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:39pm
|
I don't think it is right. You can't stereotype people by their skin color. People of all races do horrible things.
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:45pm
|
gatyr, i know i sound racist, but i do have friends who are middle eastern decent, but i mean you have to go by the numbers.
|
Posted By: Sammy
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:49pm
rossy11223 wrote:
I don't think it is right. You can't stereotype people by their skin color. People of all races do horrible things. |
But if statistically one race has committed more horrible things along those lines, it's not right to watch them more?
That's like saying that even though pit bulls probably bite more people than shi tzus, you shouldn't be extra careful around them because you are judging all pit bulls.
|
Posted By: DracoPlasm
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:51pm
Sammy wrote:
rossy11223 wrote:
I don't think it is right. You can't stereotype people by their skin color. People of all races do horrible things. | But if statistically one race has committed more horrible things along those lines, it's not right to watch them more? That's like saying that even though pit bulls probably bite more people than shi tzus, you shouldn't be extra careful around them becauseyou are judging all pit bulls. |
I was trying to think of a good way to word it and you hit it dead on
-------------
|
Posted By: paintbusta
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:55pm
i like people
-------------
|
Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:59pm
Sammy wrote:
rossy11223 wrote:
I don't think it is right. You can't stereotype people by their skin color. People of all races do horrible things. |
But if statistically one race has committed more horrible things along those lines, it's not right to watch them more?
That's like saying that even though pit bulls probably bite more people than shi tzus, you shouldn't be extra careful around them because you are judging all pit bulls.
|
What I'm saying is that we should be careful around the pit bulls and shi tzus in order not to get bitten.
|
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:02pm
I'm not a racist but I do believe in profiling to some extent. For time reasons I won't go into that right now but tommorow when I have more time I shall go in depth on my opinion in this matter.
-------------
|
Posted By: Sammy
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:04pm
Hhhmmm

Or
The cute fury little ewok
 AKA Shi Tzus
|
Posted By: Boss_DJ
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:12pm
who looks more prone to hijack a plane

this woman
or this guy

-------------
|
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:20pm
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:23pm
|
im not trying to sound racist, and to be honest i guess i shouldnt be focused on middle easterners. its really any islamic fundamentalist, its the fundamentalists that are crazy enough to do this stuff
hell i think the catholics were wrong with 'white mans burden'. im not trying to sound racist, and i know i do sound like one. but, we have to look at who took down the towers, who targeted those flights from london, ect.
all im trying to do is make sure no more innocent people die, to be honest. i really dont want to see another 9-11, and had those flights been actually hit, the same number of people probably wouldve died.
10 planes times 200-300 people=2000-3000 people.
|
Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:33pm
|
Just pretend you are in the shoes of a person of Middle Eastern decent. You're not a terrorist, you know you aren't a terrorist, yet you are treated like you are a terrorist. It is just my opinion that racial profiling does not work and just stirs up controversy.
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:35pm
Im all for it.
But ile explain myself by giving you a breif lesson in MI. 10% of all muslims are shiite, 90% are sunni.
What is the goal of racial profiling? Its to give our government a leg up in recognizing iregularities in the populace that would stick out.. The different sects of Islam have different names that are asociated with them. Racialy, if a man dressed like a sunni, and his name is Hussain, we know something is up, because a sunni would never be named hussain, that would be like naming a Jew Adolf. Culturaly it isnt done, so you would segregate this person and search him thoroughly and ask him a couple questions.
What we are doing isnt so much racial as it is ethnic profiling. And isreal has been doing it for decades. And it works.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:38pm
rossy11223 wrote:
Just pretend you are in the shoes of a person of Middle Eastern decent. You're not a terrorist, you know you aren't a terrorist, yet you are treated like you are a terrorist. It is just my opinion that racial profiling does not work and just stirs up controversy.
|
thats what i was saying n my last post, its the fundamentalists that are the issue
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 17 August 2006 at 11:39pm
It still bugs me when I read in the paper or hear on the radio something like "there were 12 suspects arrested, two of which were islamic"
SO WHAT?! Why do they feel the need to point out that 2 of the 12 were islamic? What if the other 10 were catholic...thats the majority of the group, but no-one cares?. Islam is a religion of peace, and a pretty nice one at that. It's the extremists (as with any religion) that screws it up for everyone by screaming about their faith and blowing stuff up.
|
Posted By: Jack Carver
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:00am
Clark Kent wrote:
Who are "they", what do you mean "do", and what do you mean by "racial profiling"? |
lol, classic clark. and everybody else knows what he's talking about...
I personally don't have a problem with it, and I truly believe that if i were Middle-Eastern, I would not be bothered by the fact that people see me as more dangerous/risky than everybody else.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:06am
|
Actually, I repeat my question. Everybody in this thread so far is being vague and general, and probably aren't talking about the same thing.
Are we talking about automatic extra screening for brown people at the airport? Or locking the car door when the black guy walks by? Or NOT screening white folks? Or arresting every black/brown person nearby when there is a crime nearby? Or what?
"Profiling" is uselessly vague. A meaningful discussion requires better definition.
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:09am
Clark Kent wrote:
Actually, I repeat my question. Everybody in this thread so far is being vague and general, and probably aren't talking about the same thing.
Are we talking about automatic extra screening for brown people at the airport? Or locking the car door when the black guy walks by? Or NOT screening white folks? Or arresting every black/brown person nearby when there is a crime nearby? Or what?
"Profiling" is uselessly vague. A meaningful discussion requires better definition.
|
well first i need someone to define what the word 'is' means
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:21am
DBibeau855 wrote:
Racialy, if a man dressed like a sunni, and his name
is Hussain, we know something is up, because a sunni would never be
named hussain, that would be like naming a Jew Adolf. Culturaly it isnt
done, so you would segregate this person and search him thoroughly and
ask him a couple questions.
|
That isn't racial profiling. That is categorizing known peculiarities
that have a much higher potential for causing something bad.
Boss_DJ wrote:
who looks more prone to hijack a plane

this woman
or this guy

|
A reply someone at Fox News would be proud of.
To continue with the picture examples, Racial profiling would categorize subject A:

with this person:

Based on nothing more than thier skin color. Makes sense. I've been
wondering when Condi will whip out her Sawed-off and rob a convinience
store, only to shoot the clerk point blank in the head.
-------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:28am
|
I'm sure we're only days away Gatyr...I mean look at her skin..LOOK AT IT!
|
Posted By: Boss_DJ
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:29am
Gatyr wrote:
DBibeau855 wrote:
Racialy, if a man dressed like a sunni, and his name
is Hussain, we know something is up, because a sunni would never be
named hussain, that would be like naming a Jew Adolf. Culturaly it isnt
done, so you would segregate this person and search him thoroughly and
ask him a couple questions.
|
That isn't racial profiling. That is categorizing known peculiarities
that have a much higher potential for causing something bad.
|
haha
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:46am
|
More to the point, most of the terrorist acts in the US have been committed by white Americans...
That'd be one heck of a profiling effort.
|
Posted By: Sammy
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:59am
Posted By: Destruction
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 2:20am
Nurture, not nature. If any human grew up in a crime-ridden neighborhood, they'd be seven or eight times more likely to commit a crime.
Let's look at serial killers now...they're almost always white. Honestly, I'm more afraid of some guy drugging and murdering me than I am of getting blown to hell by a terrorist. They manipulate and trick people. They're usually very intelligent, and have some sort of psychologicl disorder. Serial killers are most often like this by NATURE. Gacy, Ed Gein, Dennis Lynn Rader (BTK killer), David Berkowitz (Son of Sam), Charles Manson, Jack the Ripper (most likely white), Jeffrey Dahmer, and Ted Bundy...just to name a small percentage.
Then there's the KKK, a TERRORIST organization. But somehow people seem to be blind to that. They preach just as much hate and prejudice and violence as extremist muslims. For christ sake, some members dragged a man by a rope from the end of their truck. In my opinion, that's equally as bad as cutting someone's head off (micahel berg).
Then there's the Nazis and Neo-Nazis, do I even have to go into it?
I, being white, would be very angry if I were singled out as a suspected serial killer, Nazi, or KKK member because of the fact that I'm white. I don't imagine it's any better for non-whites being accused of terrorism, crime, or any other illegal acts.
In summation, I'm against racial profiling. We're far past that. Like Whale said, didn't we stop treatment like this in the 50's?
------------- u dont know what to do ur getting mottor boatted
Men are from Magmar, women are from Venusaur.
|
Posted By: Hitman
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 8:45am
My dad has a beard and is pretty tan. Everytime I've flown with him they take him aside and ask questions.
Racial profiling is also done to black people when police pull them over more often just for being in a nice car.
------------- [IMG]http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/4874/stellatn8.jpg">
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 9:37am
|
Sammy wrote:
But those terrorist attacks did not take place at airports where they were screened. It's not logical to search a race that has committed the least amount of major attacks in a certain section of transportation *aviation*. The attacks in which people are searched have been committed predominantly by people of "brown" skin. |
Ok, now we are getting somewhere. So by "racial profiling" we mean "screening selection at airports based on apparent race?"
Because here is another kind of racial profiling, that might also be logical based on your chart: A crime is committed. The police immediately round up all the blacks in the area for questioning. Logical? Appropriate?
|
Posted By: Rico's Revenge
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 9:58am
|
Jeff Gordon's Raceial Profile
Birthdate: Aug 4, 1971
Birthplace: Vallejo, CA
Height: 5'7''
Weight: 150
Marital Status: Single
- Four-time NASCAR Cup Series Champion (1995, 1997, 1998, 2001)
- 73 Career NASCAR Cup Victories (as of 5/20/05)
- Three-time Daytona 500 winner (1997, 1999, 2005)
- Four-time Brickyard 400 winner (1994, 1998, 2001, 2004)
- Five-time Southern 500 winner (1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2002)
- 1997 Winston Million winner
- Four-time Winston No Bull 5 winner
- Three-time champion of The NEXTEL All-Star Challenge (1995, 1997, 2001)
- Holds a record eight road course victories
Four-time NASCAR Cup Series champion. Three-time Daytona 500 winner. Four-time Brickyard 400 winner. And the list goes on. Jeff Gordon has combined determination, hard work and decades of experience to achieve an unparalleled roster of victories. His fans expect only the best from him, and they are rewarded at every turn with Gordon's racing agility that defines the skill of the sport.
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 10:50am
lol Rico
------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 10:53am
If they get BET how come we dont get WET?
WHITE COLLEGE FUND NOW!
|
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 11:27am
Destruction wrote:
Then there's the KKK, a TERRORIST organization. But somehow people seem to be blind to that. They preach just as much hate and prejudice and violence as extremist muslims. For christ sake, some members dragged a man by a rope from the end of their truck. In my opinion, that's equally as bad as cutting someone's head off (micahel berg).
Open your eyes, you think white people are the only ones to have hate groups? Just for an example African-Americans have just as many, if not more. The Black Panthers, the ABCN, the Nuwaubian group, the Republic of New Africa, hell, there's even a Black Hate Radio.... Check out the "Melanin Theory."
All you are doing is proving that the only profiling that is hurting ANYONE nowadays is REVERSE profiling.
Then there's the Nazis and Neo-Nazis, do I even have to go into it?
I, being white, would be very angry if I were singled out as a suspected serial killer, Nazi, or KKK member because of the fact that I'm white. I don't imagine it's any better for non-whites being accused of terrorism, crime, or any other illegal acts.
Yet you do the same thing by ignoring the fact that there are Black hate groups? Hispanic Gangs that want to get rid of the "white people that are keeping them down?" Ever hear of Sur/Sir 13?
In summation, I'm against racial profiling. We're far past that. Like Whale said, didn't we stop treatment like this in the 50's?
But again, you target only the white race for being prejudice. Open your eyes, our race has members that act really *edited* towards others, but the favor is far from not being returned. |
It's thoughts like this that prevent us from getting past rascism. Everyone wants to blame ONE group. Islamists for blowing up airplanes, Blacks for robbing liquor stores, Whites for having the KKK, Hispanics for bringing drugs into the country. Well the real story is EVERYONE is responsible for crimes, sure maybe one race is statistically "more likely" to rob a liquor store, or cut someones head off. What do you propose we do about it? Make a seperate line at the airport for Arabs (And blacks I might add as a large portion of American Muslims are Poor African-Americans), make Black people use a drive through at the ABC store, arrest every Hispanic you know, and make all the white people stay under constant psychological evaluations? It's just not feasible.
/rant.
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 11:30am
|
Hitman wrote:
My dad has a beard and is pretty tan. Everytime I've flown with him they take him aside and ask questions.
Racial profiling is also done to black people when police pull them over more often just for being in a nice car.
|
im dont think we need racial profiling with people and cars, to be honest i dont care much about that, although there have been incidents with vans, but thats all i would really care about. a black guy driving a mercedes doesnt bother me
im talking about additional screening at airports and other security points where foreigners enter the country.
|
Posted By: Boss_DJ
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:06pm
it isn't just freakin
profiling someone on the account of their skin color...a middle eastern
man with a turban on and full out super allah gear looks a lot more
suspicious than a...let's say "amercianized" middle eastern wearing
jeans and a t shirt with a clean shave...a black man in business attire
and speaks politely isn't as suspicious as to be driving a nice car as
a 20 year old black kid with chains around his neck, diamonds in his
ears, a backwards yankee hat, and fubu out the ying yang
-------------
|
Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:10pm
Posted By: JohnnyCanuck
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 12:13pm
|
Britain is considering this very thing,..
http://www.kxmb.com/getARticle.asp?ArticleId=34243 - http://www.kxmb.com/getARticle.asp?ArticleId=34243
------------- Imagine there’s a picture of your favourite thing here.
|
Posted By: Mateo
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 1:13pm
|
i think you just need to pick out the crazy people. like the kkk, some guy from maine named chad who wears holister isnt probaly racist, but jim bob with his jeff foxworthy shirt and confederate hat most likely is. black:any balck man either gangstar or in a suit are mostly likely not racist. but a guy with all african dress all that suff might be. if any body looks a little suspicous screen them,arrest them, give them the works
|
Posted By: Predatorr
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 1:47pm
racial profiling is alive just as it was long ago, to some extent at least. I went to busch gardens in williamsburg with one other friend that was white, and two that are indian, but both born and raised in america. My other friend who was white and i, walked through the gate and the man told us, you do NOT need to have your bags searched, have a nice day at busch gardens. Two indian friends are next. " You NEED to have your bags searched today. Now we're only 15 and 16 and american, not terrorists. We had a laugh about it, but it was complete racial profiling. It's everywhere we go. I'll admit that when I see someone who looks middle eastern, or is wearing traditional clothing from the middle east, or clothing from america that isnt anywhere near what we were today, i feel apprehensive, i steer clear of them, racial profiling? Not really, more of being cautious. Again, when I'm out late at night, I see a group of black kids from the neighborhood, i ride my bike a little faster, regardless of their skin color, I don't want to get jumped, it wouldnt matter if they were white or black.
In Conclusion, people should be cautious around people who's "races" have a tendancy for X thing. Should we search everyone? That's all up to the company, or airline, and unless we have something to hide, why not let our bags be searched?
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 2:39pm
Boss_DJ wrote:
it isn't just freakin
profiling someone on the account of their skin color...a middle eastern
man with a turban on and full out super allah gear looks a lot more
suspicious than a...let's say "amercianized" middle eastern wearing
jeans and a t shirt with a clean shave...a black man in business attire
and speaks politely isn't as suspicious as to be driving a nice car as
a 20 year old black kid with chains around his neck, diamonds in his
ears, a backwards yankee hat, and fubu out the ying yang
|
Thats
not racial profiling, thats simply sterotyping...which I have mixed
feelings on. It's more acceptable than "OMG NEGRO! KILL IT B/C HE
PROBABLY JUST ROBBED A CHURCH'S CHICKEN"
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 2:50pm
|
Boss_DJ wrote:
it isn't just freakin profiling someone on the account of their skin color...a middle eastern man with a turban on and full out super allah gear looks a lot more suspicious than a...let's say "amercianized" middle eastern wearing jeans and a t shirt with a clean shave... |
GI JOES SON wrote:
^^thats very true |
Actually, I believe that is very false.
How stupid do you think the terrorists are? My recollection may be a little shaky, but I do not believe that even one of the 9/11 hijackers were decked out in "super allah gear". On the contrary, they were generally dressed quite American, and had rather modest beards if any at all.
If you were going to commit a terrorist act in the US, don't you think you would leave the super allah gear at home?
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 3:03pm
im talking bout the whole airport thing with the middle easterners so gatyr ure wasting your time..anyway wats worse? causing middle eastern looking people inconvenience or oh i dont kno something like 911 happen all over were 300 to 3000 inoccent people die....
-------------
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 3:07pm
|
battlefreak wrote:
..anyway wats worse? causing middle eastern looking people inconvenience or oh i dont kno something like 911 happen all over were 300 to 3000 inoccent people die.... |
Clearly you aren't fully understanding the basics of the US constitution.
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 4:22pm
abount invading peoples privacy? i think thats justified if u save hundreds of lives
-------------
|
Posted By: White o Light
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 5:05pm
Mateo wrote:
i think you just need to pick out the crazy people. like the kkk, some guy from maine named chad who wears holister isnt probaly racist, but jim bob with his jeff foxworthy shirt and confederate hat most likely is. black:any balck man either gangstar or in a suit are mostly likely not racist. but a guy with all african dress all that suff might be. if any body looks a little suspicous screen them,arrest them, give them the works |
"Gangsta'" Black people are some of the most racist people around these parts of the woods.
-------------
|
Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 5:14pm
Posted By: TEHGANGSTER
Date Posted: 18 August 2006 at 7:44pm
hmm, i think its very wrong, but it kinda makes sense, i think it should be done subtley(sp?)
-------------
I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar.
|
Posted By: God Of War
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 2:33pm
lol idk y but this thread makes me think of malibu's most wanted when the arab pulls the rocket launcher out of the car
------------- Semper Fi
98custom
14" Proggressive barrel
20 oz C02 tank
R/T kit
EmpireII auto hopper
|
Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 4:05pm
Tae Kwon Do wrote:
If they get BET how come we dont get WET?
WHITE COLLEGE FUND NOW!
|
YA!!
IM WHITE IM ENTITALED TO THESE THINGS.

|
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 4:42pm
Mateo wrote:
i think you just need to pick out the crazy people. like the kkk, some guy from maine named chad who wears holister isnt probaly racist, but jim bob with his jeff foxworthy shirt and confederate hat most likely is. black:any balck man either gangstar or in a suit are mostly likely not racist. but a guy with all african dress all that suff might be. if any body looks a little suspicous screen them,arrest them, give them the works |
You're an idiot. Read please.
usafpilot07 wrote:
Destruction wrote:
Then there's the KKK, a TERRORIST organization. But somehow people
seem to be blind to that. They preach just as much hate and prejudice
and violence as extremist muslims. For christ sake, some members
dragged a man by a rope from the end of their truck. In my opinion,
that's equally as bad as cutting someone's head off (micahel berg).
Open your eyes, you think
white people are the only ones to have hate groups? Just for an
example African-Americans have just as many, if not more. The Black
Panthers, the ABCN, the Nuwaubian group, the Republic of New Africa,
hell, there's even a Black Hate Radio.... Check out the "Melanin Theory."
All you are doing is proving that the only profiling that is hurting ANYONE nowadays is REVERSE profiling.
Then there's the Nazis and Neo-Nazis, do I even have to go into it?
I, being white, would be very angry if I were singled out as a
suspected serial killer, Nazi, or KKK member because of the fact that
I'm white. I don't imagine it's any better for non-whites being accused
of terrorism, crime, or any other illegal acts.
Yet you do the same thing
by ignoring the fact that there are Black hate groups? Hispanic Gangs
that want to get rid of the "white people that are keeping them down?"
Ever hear of Sur/Sir 13?
In summation, I'm against racial profiling. We're far past that.
Like Whale said, didn't we stop treatment like this in the 50's?
But
again, you target only the white race for being prejudice. Open your
eyes, our race has members that act really *edited* towards others, but
the favor is far from not being returned. |
It's
thoughts like this that prevent us from getting past rascism. Everyone
wants to blame ONE group. Islamists for blowing up airplanes, Blacks
for robbing liquor stores, Whites for having the KKK, Hispanics for
bringing drugs into the country. Well the real story is EVERYONE is
responsible for crimes, sure maybe one race is statistically "more
likely" to rob a liquor store, or cut someones head off. What do you
propose we do about it? Make a seperate line at the airport for Arabs
(And blacks I might add as a large portion of American Muslims are Poor
African-Americans), make Black people use a drive through at the ABC
store, arrest every Hispanic you know, and make all the white people
stay under constant psychological evaluations? It's just not feasible.
/rant.
|
I was actually hoping to get Clark's thoughts on what I had written.
|
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 7:02pm
|
I generally agree with your rant - but I am a little unclear on your position on specific applications of profiling...
|
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 7:17pm
Clark Kent wrote:
I generally agree with your rant - but I am a little unclear on your position on specific applications of profiling... |
Well, I was just pointing out some of the stupid generalizations that had been pointed out in the thread. Even if one race, gender, religion, etc. is slightly more statistically "prone" to commit a certain type of crime, does not mean that you can put barriers across that particular "genre" of person's life.
|
Posted By: Roll Tide
Date Posted: 19 August 2006 at 7:41pm
White o Light wrote:
Mateo wrote:
i think you just need to pick out the crazy people. like the kkk, some guy from maine named chad who wears holister isnt probaly racist, but jim bob with his jeff foxworthy shirt and confederate hat most likely is. black:any balck man either gangstar or in a suit are mostly likely not racist. but a guy with all african dress all that suff might be. if any body looks a little suspicous screen them,arrest them, give them the works | "Gangsta'" Black people are some of the most racist people around these parts of the woods. |
------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 12:18am
battlefreak wrote:
abount invading peoples privacy? i think thats justified if u save hundreds of lives |
You seem to be getting basic constitutional rights and security mixed up.
Is it worth it to wait in line a couple more minutes at the airport to feel more safe? Yes.
Is it worth security singling out a single race based on nothing more
than their skin and not giving them the basic rights promised by the
document that makes the US better than Canadia? You should move if you
say yes.
-------------
|
Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 12:29am
|
It's obvious:
Blacks rob convenience stores that are always run by plane-jacking Arabs, who's brother is a conspiring techie for Microsoft, consoling the innocent white bystander who just got his computer jacked by an obviously illegal Mexican which was mowing his lawn.
Duh.
------------- Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
Posted By: God Of War
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 6:16pm
DeTrevni wrote:
It's obvious:
Blacks rob convenience stores that are always run by plane-jacking Arabs, who's brother is a conspiring techie for Microsoft, consoling the innocent white bystander who just got his computer jacked by an obviously illegal Mexican which was mowing his lawn.
Duh.
|
that was extremly racist....extremly
------------- Semper Fi
98custom
14" Proggressive barrel
20 oz C02 tank
R/T kit
EmpireII auto hopper
|
Posted By: Destruction
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 6:18pm
God Of War wrote:
DeTrevni wrote:
It's obvious:
Blacks rob convenience stores that are always run by plane-jacking Arabs, who's brother is a conspiring techie for Microsoft, consoling the innocent white bystander who just got his computer jacked by an obviously illegal Mexican which was mowing his lawn.
Duh.
|
that was extremly racist....extremly |
You're extremely bad at picking up a joke...extremely.
------------- u dont know what to do ur getting mottor boatted
Men are from Magmar, women are from Venusaur.
|
Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 6:22pm
Only whites should be allowed on planes.
-------------
|
Posted By: DBibeau855
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 6:25pm
It works. Ask Isreal.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/DBibeau855/?chartstyle=myspacecolors">
|
Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 7:17pm
Cedric wrote:
Only whites should be allowed on planes.
|
What about Sam Jackson?
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 8:31pm
lmfao
-------------
|
Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 9:14pm
|
battlefreak wrote:
im talking bout the whole airport thing with the middle easterners so gatyr ure wasting your time..anyway wats worse? causing middle eastern looking people inconvenience or oh i dont kno something like 911 happen all over were 300 to 3000 inoccent people die.... |
This train of thought scares me.
|
Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 20 August 2006 at 10:29pm
God Of War wrote:
DeTrevni wrote:
It's obvious:
Blacks rob convenience stores that are always run by plane-jacking Arabs, who's brother is a conspiring techie for Microsoft, consoling the innocent white bystander who just got his computer jacked by an obviously illegal Mexican which was mowing his lawn.
Duh.
|
that was extremly racist....extremly | 
------------- Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 7:02pm
Gatyr wrote:
battlefreak wrote:
abount invading peoples privacy? i think thats justified if u save hundreds of lives |
You seem to be getting basic constitutional rights and security mixed up.
Is it worth it to wait in line a couple more minutes at the airport to feel more safe? Yes.
Is it worth security singling out a single race based on nothing more
than their skin and not giving them the basic rights promised by the
document that makes the US better than Canadia? You should move if you
say yes.
| lmfao u need to move because your the biggest idiot ive ever seen, it would make it alot safer, it is worth it i dont really care what u say
-------------
|
Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 7:45pm
|
battlefreak wrote:
Gatyr wrote:
battlefreak wrote:
abount invading peoples privacy? i think thats justified if u save hundreds of lives |
You seem to be getting basic constitutional rights and security mixed up.
Is it worth it to wait in line a couple more minutes at the airport to feel more safe? Yes.
Is it worth security singling out a single race based on nothing more than their skin and not giving them the basic rights promised by the document that makes the US better than Canadia? You should move if you say yes.
| lmfao u need to move because your the biggest idiot ive ever seen, it would make it alot safer, it is worth it i dont really care what u say |
Sorry buddy, but Gatyr has a point. In fact, Clark has even challenged and owned you a few times. You might want to back off.
|
Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 8:57pm
|
Gatyr>you.
Battlefreak, you have many times gotten into such arguments, and each time, you never proved your point, but instead resorted to namecalling and slander.
GTFO
------------- Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 9:15pm
no ive made my points and i guess i dont make myself clear enuf but sometimes i get ticked lol , im just a vary short temperd person my bad but u are right i should stop lookin at these stupid posts i just get angery
-------------
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 9:18pm
battlefreak wrote:
lmfao u need to move because your the biggest idiot
ive ever seen, it would make it alot safer, it is worth it i dont
really care what u say |
Then I am sure you would agree communism is a whole lot safer than our
government. Or a strict totalitarian-goverment type rule? I'm sure when
armed guards are forcing
everyone to abide by the rules or be shot, you would feel much safer
than wher someone has a constitutional right to have their privacy.
I'm the one trying to uphold the constitution, and you tell me to leave the country.
who was it that said something about whoever is willing to give up
their freedoms for a little bit of safety deserve neither freedom nor
safety? Ben Franklin sounds right, but I dont know exactly.
-------------
|
Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 9:28pm
i see what u say u have a good point i give u that (and i just said i was gonna back off..) but i dont belive in that, ure makeing a generalization wen u say that but so am i, anyway i just think if people looking to be of middle eastern decent should be checked more throughly then others with all the conflict and the iranian president saying he wants to wipe the US and isreal off the map, and thats my point and obviously ure not gonna change my mind and im not gonna change ures so have a nice day
-------------
|
Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 10:05pm
*You. *Your. *You're. *Yours.
|
Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 10:18pm
|
*There. *Their. *They're.
|
Posted By: Viper323
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 10:30pm
|
Not to be rascist or anything but seriously, if you see a family that is going to disney land and two guys named Muhammad yelling Allah, who are you going to be more suspicious of?
|
Posted By: rossy11223
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 10:36pm
|
battlefreak wrote:
I see what you say, you have a good point. I give you that, and I just said I was going to back off. But I don't believe that you're making a generalization when you say that, but so am I. Anyway, I just think if people looking to be of Middle Eastern decent should be checked more thoroughly than others with all the conflict and the Iranian president saying he wants to wipe the US and Isreal off the map. And that's my point and obviously you're not going to change my mind and I'm not going to change yours, so have a nice day.  |
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 21 August 2006 at 10:45pm
Viper323 wrote:
Not to be rascist or anything but seriously, if you see
a family that is going to disney land and two guys named Muhammad
yelling Allah, who are you going to be more suspicious of?
|
I dont konw about you, but I hear plenty of white people yell "GOD",
does that mean I have reason to believe that the said white people are
going to kill thousands of people in his name? What about when they
yell "JESUS CHRIST"?
I gess we have to suspect half of the US. Jesus Christ.
>_>
<_<
-------------
|
|