Print Page | Close Window

PS3 Gran Turismo Sucks

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=160846
Printed Date: 02 June 2026 at 7:18pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: PS3 Gran Turismo Sucks
Posted By: choopie911
Subject: PS3 Gran Turismo Sucks
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:47am
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3153775 - http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3153775

Whoo, lets buy a $60 game with JUST menu's!!!!!



Replies:
Posted By: Clark Kent
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:50am
I'm liking the XBox 360 more and more.


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:52am
I just cant wait to play $975 for a full game.


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 5:32am
heh, no vibrate still?

-------------


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 6:00am
Of course not HV. Vibrate = gone, for its leet revolutionary motion sensing...




Posted By: ¤ RaVeN ¤
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 7:04am
bye bye sony

-------------

ions are like mustangs...alot of people have them but not many know how to use them...


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 7:39am
well if you dont remember the 360 release games... had so much cutt out of them im suprised anyone bought them

-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: Kristofer
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 8:00am
i dont think anyone will buy that game.


Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 8:04am
Gran Turismo 4 > all.

-------------
Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"



Posted By: mjicmike
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 8:14am
what are these guys thinking of ???    who would go for that ?

-------------
A5 Rfs Dwg triggr
Ricochet R5
8"Lapco Bigsht/14"CP Classic
Palmers Stab.
Lapco uni-mount
DOP bullet drop fwd
PMI 88/4500

Woods
Flatline/14"Lapco Bigsht
CMI Thunder pig reg.
Remote adj. stk


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 8:17am
honestly do you think they will even release a game like this... there is no point no one would ever buy this. If sony had half a brain not a single disc of this game would ever be made. Why on earth would they think someone would spend 500-900 bucks for a game. So basically you could beat the game based on how big your wallet is not skill makes no sense on why they would even discuss this as a game

-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: pntbl freak
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 8:17am
Originally posted by Clark Kent Clark Kent wrote:

I'm liking the Wii more and more.


-------------


Posted By: procarbinefreak
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 11:27am
holy god... that's ridiculous.  


Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 11:33am
Baahaahahhaha!! Sony wasted so much damn money building the PS3, then destroying the units already built, to put NEW stuff into them, that they are running SO low on $$$ that they have to charge you INGAME... what fun. What's next? Each match in Counter-Strike you have to pay $1.50? I'll stick with my 360 

-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 11:37am
I'll take a nintendo wii thank you.

-------------

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Posted By: Tae Kwon Do
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 12:08pm
How in the hell does Sony get off charging for stuff in a game?




-------------



Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 12:29pm
Not a bad idea, just poorly executed.

If they would have made it cheaper, say...a dime per car or track, or a set of cars or track for the listed price, then the customer loyalty would have backed them enough so that they buy the game and a moderate amount of tracks and cars, and sony would have made a butt load of money.

Thank god they werent smart about this though. Otherwise Microsoft or Nintendo would have followed thinking it was a good idea.


-------------


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 2:06pm
See, even if it was really cheap to buy new cars, I still wouldn't want to deal with that. It's just more of a pain in the ass. If I spend $60 on a game, I want everything included in it without having to go around and buy more content for it.

Halo 2 tried this with downloadable content from XBL, and that actually wasn't too bad, especially when it all became free eventually anyway.


-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 2:08pm
Sadly I think this is a look at the future. It's sporadic now, with small payments for extra maps or bonus content, like the horses in Oblivion, or the cars and tracks in this game. It'll get more common.

-------------



Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 2:42pm
Ok... there is a difference with Oblvion and Halo.. you don't NEED those downloads, you only download them if you want more content, levels, etc. This is a game that REQUIRES you to download levels and cars... you don't  have a decision. If you just buy the game well.. you have no tracks, or cars, what are you going to do? Spectate? WoOO! And if you friend buys a different track....how are you going to play him on it if you don't pay for that track? 

-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: dmp4892.
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 2:55pm
Originally posted by RicWhic414 RicWhic414 wrote:

well if you dont remember the 360 release games... had so much cutt out of them im suprised anyone bought them


what the hell are you talking about?


Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 2:59pm
Yeah, what the hell ARE you talking about? I don't remember any game that had anything "CUT" or anything like that....Ricwhich, you constantly battle for the PS3, but you don't seem to know a damned thing any other console.

-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: Pate
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:19pm
Sony is pretty much screwing themselves with this system. I dont think its possible to screw it up any more...

*waits for next thread about PS3.....*


-------------

It feels good to be a gangster


Posted By: Hairball!!!
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:34pm
There's no way that'll work. If they actually go through with that, they're toast.


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:43pm
well off the top of my head madden had about half the game cut out

-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:44pm

Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Gran Turismo 4 > all.

3 was 100X better



-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:45pm
Originally posted by RicWhic414 RicWhic414 wrote:

well off the top of my head madden had about half the game cut out
Proof?

-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:46pm
get a copy of madden 06 for xbox then for xbox 360 you will see
*edit*
cant even challenge plays thats a big part of the nfl
from gamespot.com

The Bad: Many of the unique gameplay features of the last couple of Madden games are missing; lots of missing modes--all you get is a husk of a franchise mode and online play; some unsightly animation and graphical hang-ups that stick out all the more on a next-gen console; you can't challenge plays.




-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:46pm
...But they're differenct games...

-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:50pm
but they are the same game made by the same company with the same title.... if you play madden 06 on ps2 to xbox you will not see any difference in game other then different controls and graphics

*edit* http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/sports/maddennfl2006/review.html - LINK
thats the rest of the review


-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:52pm

madden 05 was the best football game ever made, i have not liked any since that. especially that coach game... one month after it came out i saw it in the value bin for $20 cdn.

and the decision to make gt like this will prove a mistake. bty what r they charging for the core game?



-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by RicWhic414 RicWhic414 wrote:

get a copy of madden 06 for xbox then for xbox 360 you will see
*edit*
cant even challenge plays thats a big part of the nfl
from gamespot.com

The Bad: Many of the unique gameplay features of the last couple of Madden games are missing; lots of missing modes--all you get is a husk of a franchise mode and online play; some unsightly animation and graphical hang-ups that stick out all the more on a next-gen console; you can't challenge plays.




Ricwhic.. I hate to be down-right rude.. but what you just said, argumental wise, was the stupidest thing I have ever seen. The 360 version is exact same as the other versions. Second, That was not a launch title. Launch titles were... Condemned, Perfect Dark Zero, Quake 4, Call Of Duty 2, Kameo, and there were a couple more. The only title, out of all of those, that I hated, was Quake 4. You're not going to be able to back-up what you said... so I suggest stopping now. Nothing was ever "cut" from a 360 game. Nor did they "Require" you to pay extra after buying the game to be able to play.


-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 3:57pm
http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/641/641086p1.html - LINK ill help you these are the launch titles and about half of them did not come out on the launch date which makes them not launch games like quake 4 came out i think a week or two after launch... and i already did back up what i said go read the review on gamespot.com if you are going to quote someone make sure you read what they say first

k well maybe im wrong about quake cuz i just double checked that but the rest is true


-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:05pm
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Gran Turismo 4 > all.

3 was 100X better

You're kidding right? 4 isn't just greater, it fish-slaps 3! The graphics are beyond anything I thought a PS2 could do, the physics have been improved, there are many more tracks and cars, the B-Spec is a Godsend for those endurance races, more rally options, there are tuner accessories, and FRICKEN MUSCLE CARS! WOO!

The only thing bad about 4 is lack of online play! (and drag racing).

I compared my times on the tracks to Motor Trend tests, and they were bleedin' close! GT4 is one of my favorite games, and the BEST racing game I've played!



-------------
Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"



Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by RicWhic414 RicWhic414 wrote:

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/641/641086p1.html - LINK ill help you these are the launch titles and about half of them did not come out on the launch date which makes them not launch games like quake 4 came out i think a week or two after launch... and i already did back up what i said go read the review on gamespot.com if you are going to quote someone make sure you read what they say first

k well maybe im wrong about quake cuz i just double checked that but the rest is true


That's funny, because I picked up COD2, Quake 4, and Kameo on launch day.... that launch post lists even Saints Row, which came out about 5 months later...so that list is not valid. I read what Gamespot said, but have you played both versions? Nothing is cut out or different between them besides graphics. You were saying "ZOMG I'm suprised anyone bought 360 (GAMES) because so much was cut out)... well, nothing was. And you also, in that little sentence, put all of the 360 launch titles on the table. You said GAMES, not ONE game. Either way, after you buy the game, you can play, on the game we are discussing here, you buy it.. then have to pay extra to play. You're argument was flawed.


-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by reifidom reifidom wrote:

Sadly I think this is a look at the future. It's sporadic now, with small payments for extra maps or bonus content, like the horses in Oblivion, or the cars and tracks in this game. It'll get more common.
Yup, sadly micro-payments are the way of the future, and it sucks.


Posted By: a5Tpp789
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:25pm
after reading the sony article we are all dumber

-------------
if you put 500 dollars into an A5 it is still an A5


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:25pm
ok w/e you win this is pointless to even try to talk to you... 

-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:30pm
Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Gran Turismo 4 > all.

3 was 100X better

You're kidding right? 4 isn't just greater, it fish-slaps 3! The graphics are beyond anything I thought a PS2 could do, the physics have been improved, there are many more tracks and cars, the B-Spec is a Godsend for those endurance races, more rally options, there are tuner accessories, and FRICKEN MUSCLE CARS! WOO!

The only thing bad about 4 is lack of online play! (and drag racing).

I compared my times on the tracks to Motor Trend tests, and they were bleedin' close! GT4 is one of my favorite games, and the BEST racing game I've played!

i dunno would still disaggree

-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Davy Jones
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 4:40pm
Originally posted by RicWhic414 RicWhic414 wrote:

ok w/e you win this is pointless to even try to talk to you... 


You're right, it is. The way you stated that, was complety wrong, you threw all of the 360 launch titles out. And we are talking here, on the new GT, which you pay $60, then you have to pay even more for cars\levels to be able to actually PLAY.

There is NO, I repeat, NO, 360 game, that requires you to pay extra money to be able to PLAY. You said there was, there wasn't. Then you said stuff was cut from Madden NFL 360.. well, there wasn't. The exact same stuff was gone on the PS2 Version and so forth.. therefore, it's not the 360, it is all systems. You are one of the many Sony Fanboys, that really, really, REALLY, pisses me off.


-------------
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?"


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 5:02pm
are you joking me READ the review... please
I never said that 360 games you had to pay like this gt game is supposed to be like... altho alot of 360 games have upgrades like maps and such like that... that some you have to pay for and others you dont... but not as much as this game is supposed to be like (if this game ever happens)
and no im not a sony fanboy i have a gamecube a ps2 and xbox... i just hate the 360 because microsoft could have done so much more to it to make it a WOW system... nintendo did it with the wii or so its said and for the ps3 im not sure what to think about it anymore


-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 5:05pm

yes but those upgrades are just extras for an allready complete game.

the wii is the only system i would buy now... ill stick with my xbox



-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 5:06pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

I just cant wait to play $975 for a full game.


-------------


Posted By: RicWhic414
Date Posted: 19 October 2006 at 5:08pm
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

yes but those upgrades are just extras for an allready complete game.

the wii is the only system i would buy now... ill stick with my xbox


yes i no this its crazy that this game would even come out... if this is for real it would make me not even want to buy a ps3



-------------
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net