Print Page | Close Window

Observations on insurgent videos...

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=160885
Printed Date: 24 August 2026 at 2:02am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Observations on insurgent videos...
Posted By: rednekk98
Subject: Observations on insurgent videos...
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 10:53am

I'm sure most of you have heard the news reports about sniper attacks in Iraq becoming an increasing threat, mainly due to a video that was released by the insurgent media. It's an edited propaganda peice so you can't take it at face value. However there are definatly lessons to be learned here.

The insurgents are very aware of how to use the media against us. they are better propagandists that we are. This video was all over the net before the major news outlets caught on due to it's shocking content. It definatly delivers the desired effect of making the viewer cringe. it's frustrating to see someone get shot while out interacting with Iraqi children and trying to win hearts and minds. Still, the way it's edited gives clues as to what the insurgents are hiding. For one thing, the camera cuts away in many of the cases almost immediatly after the shot. Some of the body armor out there now is pretty good, and many of these shots are from long distances, so the bullets aren't moving all that fast and they need to aim for center mass. I doubt all of the soldiers hit in these videos were killed, and in some cases, even hit squarley. Same is true of the roadside bomb clips in the video, they cut away right after the explosion and it's impossible to tell if the actually disabled a vehicle. There are plenty of vidioes out there showing vehicles hauling ass right through bombings. The timing of this video along with the increased level of violence also shows that they are trying to effect the outcome of our elections.

As for tactical lessons, the snipers seem to usually target lone soldiers who are usually looking the other way. If you aren't alone and look alert you're probably in better shape. In one video a soldier had his helmet off and was targeted as he was trying to put it back on. Again, they go for the most vulnerable target. Keeping your kevlar on at all times is a great idea. Also, from the news report last night I noticed that in a picture of a soldier killed by a sniper, he was wearing one of the new helmets the army issues. These are almst twice as strong as the older ones and can stop a 7.62mm AK round, which would probably still knock you the hell out. The problem with these helmets is that they're designed for a different kind of fighting. Light, mobile stuff, so the back of your neck and ears are exposed for better mobility and hearing. It's defintly not a good choice for standing around gaurding  checkpoint. It's a bad idea to push this gear on all infantry. I say give it to special ops guys on missions where they need it. The marines seem to have a better approach to this, using the stronger kevlar with the old pattern helmet with more coverage. This should definatly help survivability especially with shrapnel.

The faster we learn from this stuff the better. We might as well use the information they give us against them.




Replies:
Posted By: impulse!
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 10:56am
Video?

-------------


Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 10:58am
No way in hell I would post it on the forum, but I can PM you  the link.


Posted By: pntbl freak
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 11:01am
Can you PM me the link?

gracias


-------------


Posted By: ¤ RaVeN ¤
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 12:53pm
pm me the link please

-------------

ions are like mustangs...alot of people have them but not many know how to use them...


Posted By: tecumseh
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 6:23pm
pm link

-------------
what?


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 6:29pm
The US media is all too willing to help out the terrorists.   


Posted By: *Stealth*
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 6:29pm
Nice work spreading the propaganda Rednekk.

-------------
WHO says eating pork is safe, but Mexicans have even cut back on their beloved greasy pork tacos. - MSNBC on the Swine Flu


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 6:54pm
Heres the CNN video played last night. Its edited, and doesn't show anything too graphic. I guess if its good enough for CNN to show, its okay for it to be posted here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfOy_ul5VWw - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfOy_ul5VWw
If you ask me this is close to treason, but CNN has show what side it was on a long time ago.


Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 7:41pm
This is why our snipers have m107's .50, the regular round can pierce 4-6 inches of concrete, the explosive round is known to take out light armour.

-------------


Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 7:47pm

Curiosity prevails.

PM link someone?



-------------
Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"



Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 8:17pm
The boys taking off they're PPE and not pating attention are the boys and girls who get you killed out here.

A lot of these deaths(excluding IED's) are pretty preventable...

-------------
A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.



Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 8:20pm
What an OS-esque thread. 

-------------


Posted By: Kristofer
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 8:21pm
I dont know how the other branches operate. But I know in the Marine we have the buddy program. You go somewhere your buddy goes with you. You are never alone. And in training we never remove protective gear ever. So I'm suprised that a soldier would take his kevlar off. (We call helmets Kevlars). Thats just shocking to me. I couldnt imagine taking mine off in training. Especially Iraq. unless I was in the FOB in doors or something.


Posted By: estcstpnt
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 8:24pm
PM link.

-------------
Thinking about it...


Posted By: travis75
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 9:53pm
pm link please

-------------
Hey MPAA, Guess what?

09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0!


Posted By: Squishey
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 10:49pm
pm link please.

and is it just me or would you not see the guy stickin out the window shooting, because he is not shooting through the glass. ibut then again i know nothing about war. except that it sucks.


-------------
Canadians do it on top.


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 20 October 2006 at 11:08pm
good thread made me think differantly

-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Roll Tide
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 12:06am
Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Curiosity prevails.


PM link someone?



-------------
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 12:13am
ive seen some there really not what you'd expect

-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 10:40am

Originally posted by Squishey Squishey wrote:

pm link please.

and is it just me or would you not see the guy stickin out the window shooting, because he is not shooting through the glass. ibut then again i know nothing about war. except that it sucks.
  The tactic used here is similar to the beltway sniper's a few years ago. They cruise around in cars with modified trunks, then shoot and scoot. The cameraman is often the spotter and is usually closer to he target than the sniper.

If they were to fire out of a window and weren't retarded, they'd stay considerable back from the window, and probably in a darkened room so they'd be harder to spot. There are a whole bunch of ways to camoflauge yourself while shooting out of a building.

Snipers in Iraq are getting better mainly because the dumb ones have mostly been killed off by now. Coalition forces have killed a whole crapload of them. I remember a few years ago seeing a translation of an online training manual for insurgent snipers that presented scenarios and ranked targets in order of importance. Coalition snipers were right up there with Paul Bremer. They obviously have a healthy respect for the tactic.

On the flip side the US military uses quite a few snuff films for propaganda purposes. Mainly to instill confidence in equipment. I remember being shown one of a group of insurgents milling around and one guy with a dragunov being targeted with a .50 The other insurgents seemed just a bit freaked out that a hole the size of a basketball had suddenly appeared in the guys chest.  



Posted By: Squishey
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 2:07pm
oh, i thought it meant the sniper and the spotter where like sitting in a car shooting people, when you say modified trunks, you mean a sniper hides in a trunk shoots out of a hole in the side panel or something right?

-------------
Canadians do it on top.


Posted By: dmp4892.
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 5:04pm
PM link to video please.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 5:13pm

pm me the link, please. Im curious

BTW

At least they're not smart enough to target the snipers usuall people, commanders, then communications guys, then manned weapons like machine guns.

It still sucks that they're killing our troops, but they're not using very effective meathods to do it.



-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: Squishey
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 7:04pm
sneaky dont give them any hints, they could be reading as we type. 

-------------
Canadians do it on top.


Posted By: HOInfantry
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 7:35pm

Originally posted by battlefreak battlefreak wrote:

This is why our snipers have m107's .50, the regular round can pierce 4-6 inches of concrete, the explosive round is known to take out light armour.

 

Which under the laws of land warfare, cannot be used.

Update- I mean against a human target.



-------------
"HO is right..."

- Procarbinefreak


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 21 October 2006 at 10:22pm
Originally posted by HOInfantry HOInfantry wrote:

Originally posted by battlefreak battlefreak wrote:

This is why our snipers have m107's .50, the regular round can pierce 4-6 inches of concrete, the explosive round is known to take out light armour.


 


Which under the laws of land warfare, cannot be used.


Update- I mean against a human target.


Terrorists are not human. So we an put them down like the dogs they are


Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 22 October 2006 at 7:03pm
Originally posted by HOInfantry HOInfantry wrote:

Originally posted by battlefreak battlefreak wrote:

This is why our snipers have m107's .50, the regular round can pierce 4-6 inches of concrete, the explosive round is known to take out light armour.

 

Which under the laws of land warfare, cannot be used.

Update- I mean against a human target.

  I've heard you "aim for the kalashnikov" but that was recruit training.

And sneaky, the online training thing went through machinegunners, officers, NCOs, and comm guys. in the video it's mostly track commanders and machinegunners being targeted.




Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net