Print Page | Close Window

Will it happen? Approve, Disapprove

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=164815
Printed Date: 04 February 2026 at 7:26pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Will it happen? Approve, Disapprove
Posted By: welcome guest
Subject: Will it happen? Approve, Disapprove
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 6:59pm
SJM 8016 - 2007-08
Requesting an impeachment investigation into actions by President Bush and Vice President Cheney.

Mar 1  Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Government Operations & Elections at 3:30 PM

Government Operations & Elections -  03/01/07  3:30 pm

Senate  Full Committee
Senate Hearing Rm 2
J.A. Cherberg Building
Olympia, WA

http://www.leg.wa.gov/legislature/showagenda.aspx?id=11660&Acronym=GO - http://www.leg.wa.gov/legislature/showagenda.aspx?id=11660&a mp;a mp;Acronym=GO

THIS IS NO JOKE!

-------------
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml - http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.



Replies:
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 7:02pm
Meh.

*awaiting smitty posts*


-------------


Posted By: *Stealth*
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 7:09pm
The real question is...



... Do they float?


Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 7:11pm
I don't think they will get impeached, nor do I want them to. I do not agree with Bush, but I feel he should serve out the rest of his term.

-------------



Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 7:12pm

Heh heh...

Originally posted by The Site The Site wrote:

Public Hearing:

  1. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2007&bill=8003 - SJM 8003 - Calling for no escalation in Iraq.
  2. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2007&bill=8016 - SJM 8016 - Requesting an impeachment investigation into actions by President Bush and Vice President Cheney.


Other business.

"What are you doing today Bob?"

"Well, the usual buisness, hearings, meetings, impeachment of the president..."

And no, it won't happen.

The impeachment talk is just hot air in an attempt to further throw around power. It's not that easy to impeach a president.



-------------


Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 7:29pm
They both deserve it, but I doubt it'll happen....

-------------



Posted By: battlefreak
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 9:33pm
I seriously doubt it.

-------------


Posted By: phil_stl
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 9:39pm
Bush and Dick will be gone soon enough. 

I don't think its going to happen.


Posted By: Tolgak
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 9:46pm
Just remember, impeachment doesn't mean getting kicked out, it pretty much means a hearing to see if they get should kicked out or not. So even if the impeachment trial is performed, there's no guarantee that the monkey's getting the boot.

-------------


Posted By: STOcocker
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 9:52pm
I'm pretty sure that there has NEVER been a president removed from office by impeachment. I believe that Nixon was the closest, but he resigned before the process could finish.

So no it won't happen.


Posted By: Shub
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 10:43pm
Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

Meh. *awaiting smitty posts*


Posted By: Gasdrinker
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:18pm
No one cares about the USA.

-------------
Tippmann A-5/Zeus G1
E-Grip /w APE board
QEV
Vortex
Flatline
Dye UL 14 in.
R5 Hopper
Lapco offset rail with Tac Light/Scope
OpsGear MP5 Sliding Stock
OpsGear MP5 Mag kit
SpecOps Front grip


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:21pm
Not enough time left to matter.


Posted By: GI JOES SON
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:21pm
at this point it seems useless.....its 2007 already


Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:27pm
Originally posted by Gasdrinker Gasdrinker wrote:

No one cares about the USA.


You're an idiot. American politics and foreign policy have a very significant impact on us here at home.


-------------
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."

-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.

Yup, he actually said that.


Posted By: ANARCHY_SCOUT
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:30pm
Originally posted by phil_stl phil_stl wrote:

Bush and Dick will be gone soon enough. 

I don't think its going to happen.
I just realized Bush and Dick.......


-------------
Gamertag: Kataklysm999


Posted By: Evil Elvis
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:36pm
Originally posted by Shub Shub wrote:

Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

Meh. *awaiting smitty posts*


we need a smithy signal...


-------------


Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:38pm
Originally posted by Evil Elvis Evil Elvis wrote:

Originally posted by Shub Shub wrote:

Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

Meh. *awaiting smitty posts*


we need a smithy signal...



But we already have something better.





-------------
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."

-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.

Yup, he actually said that.


Posted By: Evil Elvis
Date Posted: 28 February 2007 at 11:44pm
Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Still nothing drives the point home like the post copied and stamped. It's the Internet board equivalent of the backhand.

-------------


Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 12:02am
Originally posted by Evil Elvis Evil Elvis wrote:

Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Still nothing drives the point home like the post copied and stamped. It's the Internet board equivalent of the backhand.


That makes me feel special. I'm glad my stamp is so well received.


-------------
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."

-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.

Yup, he actually said that.


Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 12:08am
It aint gonna happen. That simple.

-------------


Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 1:14am
Originally posted by STOcocker STOcocker wrote:

I'm pretty sure that there has NEVER been a president removed from office by impeachment. I believe that Nixon was the closest, but he resigned before the process could finish.

So no it won't happen.

Andrew Johnson.


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 1:29am
Originally posted by Brian Fellows Brian Fellows wrote:

Originally posted by STOcocker STOcocker wrote:

I'm pretty sure that there has NEVER been a president removed from office by impeachment. I believe that Nixon was the closest, but he resigned before the process could finish.

So no it won't happen.

Andrew Johnson.


He was first to be impeached, he wasn't thrown out of office.

What everyone forgets is impeached does not mean thrown out.  Impeached means you are tried, and then either acquitted or convicted.

EDIT : And lets not forget, just because there is a proposal, doesn't mean its going anywhere necessarily.  If that were so we'd have the draft.

DOUBLE EDIT: Also, Nixon was NOT impeached, he resigned before impeachment, only Clinton and Johnson were and both were acquitted.


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 11:58am
I don't know. I want them to get what they deserve to a rather high degree, but I almost hope it isn't pushed. I think I'd rather see them accomplish other, vastly more important, things with their time....Bush Co. being there will fix itself soon enough, other stuff actually requires action....so yeah. 

-------------



Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by brihard brihard wrote:

Originally posted by Gasdrinker Gasdrinker wrote:

No one cares about the USA.


You're an idiot.


Indeed. If not just because you would say that on a forum populated heavily by US citizens.

People like gasdrinker here are the reason EVERYONE hates Canada.


-------------


Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 3:35pm
I don't think it will happen, Look at Nixon, he was the nearest to be impeached and he left,  Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.  People really just dont like him because he will not take troops out of Iraq.

-------------


Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 4:27pm
Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

I don't think it will happen, Look at Nixon, he was the nearest to be impeached and he left,  Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.  People really just dont like him because he will not take troops out of Iraq.


Bingo. Bush won't be impeached for the simple fact that they don't have a very good case against him, dispite what some people whould like to believe, he actually hasn't done anything illeagal. And congress won't impeach somone just because they don't like them, it doesn't look good.

-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: welcome guest
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 4:40pm

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.

Whats wrong with these reasons.

1. He lied us into war in Iraq. According to the U.S. media-ignored British "Downing Street Memo," he "fixed" intelligence around a pre-determined policy of preemptive war. Results: 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths; about 1800 U.S. soldiers dead in two wars, 100s of thousands wounded and traumatized.

2. Under his watch, the U.S. suffered its worst terrorist attack on its soil. He opposed an official investigation, then stalled for months on testifying before a hand-picked committee. Finally testified behind closed doors.

3. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2000.

4. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2004.

5. He has approved (and his Attorney General Gonzales has re-defined) torture at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram and elsewhere, while simultaneously opposing the International Criminal Court established to check such abuses. According to Amnesty International, the United States has established a Soviet-style "gulag" of torture around the world.

6. He failed to support the Kyoto Protocols, reducing greenhouse gases, but worked to open up Alaska's ANWR to drilling-despoiling an eco-system and increasing greenhouse gases.

7. He chose Halliburton toady Dick Cheney to be his running mate-twice.

8. He has attempted to pack the courts with ideologue-judges intent on overthrowing Roe v. Wade, and institutionalizing the police-state abuses of Patriot Acts I and II.

9.His "No Child Left Behind" education policies have replaced learning with testing and allowed military recruiters access to our schools, cajoling our children with military options before their minds have had a chance to open, question and challenge.

10.He is attempting to dismantle the Social Security system that has ensured "peace and freedom" for tens of millions of working Americans for seven decades ("peace" of mind and "freedom" from economic crises)-- rights hard-won by Labor and Progressives in decades-long struggles.

11. He has allied himself with Right-wing ideologues to curtail or abolish stem-cell research vital to the conquest of debilitating and fatal diseases.

12. He has failed to develop a coherent energy policy-except to prosecute wars for other peoples' resources. He fails to acknowledge the reality and impending disasters of Global Warming.

13. He has continued the Globalization project of his predecessors: outsourcing jobs, hollowing our middle class.

14. He has undermined the legitimate protective protocols of the C.I.A., politicizing the agency, awarding positions on the basis of ideological orthodoxy rather than merit and astute analysis.

15. He has subjugated his Administration to Neocon ideologues like Richard Perle, William Kristol and Douglas Feith; men who have endorsed the "settlement," expansionist and Wall-them-in policies of Ariel Sharon, sowing the seeds of anti-Arab racism, war and destruction in the Middle East for generations to come.

16. In spite of his rhetoric about freedom and democracy, he has allied himself with dictators in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Egypt and elsewhere. He has increased the flow of arms to these states and others, fomenting instability, turmoil and war.

17. He chose Rumsfeld as DoD Secretary twice, in spite of Rumsfeld's obvious failure to adequately plan for the post-Saddam era in Iraq, inducing massive "collateral damage," the looting of ancient treasures, and infrastructure destruction in a country we were legally and morally bound to rehabilitate.

18. He endorses the weaponization of space, "Rods from Gods," and other exotic, Star-Wars technologies to establish a twenty-first century American global empire that is doomed to create an arms race with China and other opposing coalitions, sowing discord and wasting the resources of the world.

19. He has presided over the most egregious media consolidation in the nation's history. While we have had "yellow journalism" and other media abuses throughout our two centuries of Republic/Empire, we have never suffered the consolidation of power that we have today. He has presided over the emasculation and cowering of PBS, while his disinformation troops have peddled fraudulent stories and comments to "reporters" like Judith Miller, Armstrong Williams and Jeff Guckert-"Gannon," poisoning the well of information, adding to the general confusion and Goebbelsization of our news.

20. He lied about, misled, or misunderstood the astronomical costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He continues to do so, diverting tax money for education, health care, the EPA, transportation and social infrastructure into war-making and destruction.

21. He has continued and enlarged the depraved Clinton policy of using depleted uranium on the battlefield; a policy bound to cause massive suffering and death to Americans and others for generations to come.

22. He has alienated our traditional allies and more than a billion Muslims around the world. He has ransacked the good will extended to the nation after the 9/11 attacks, leading a crusade of vengeance and reprisal, most often against innocents, judging without sufficient evidence, arrogating to himself a crooked, self-righteous Texas sheriff's power to execute without justice.

23. Under his watch, millions more Americans have been added to the ranks of the uninsured while health-care costs have exploded. His answer to these and other pressing social problems appears to be faith-based charities-in other words, preaching to the choir while stealing from the pews.

24. Under his watch, the North Koreans have, apparently, developed eight nuclear weapons and Israel has continued to increase and refine its arsenal-now estimated as high as five hundred.

25. He has murdered the English language.

26. Bush texas land deal equal to clinton whitewater

How many times has the Clinton Admin. gone up against the grand jury? Its only fair G.W.Bush gets his. 



-------------
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml - http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 5:18pm
Originally posted by welcome guest welcome guest wrote:

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.

25. He has murdered the English language.





-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 5:25pm
Most of your points welcomguest are opinionated and based in no fact at all.

For example: in point No.1; you discredited yourself imediatly when you said ..."Acording to US media..."

Point no.4: Bush did infact win the majority vote in 2004, quit whining you soar loser.

And point no.9: Recruiters have always been in the schools, its nothing new, and quite frankly, how is it any different than letting somone else for a buisiness come talk in the schools. Do you have somthing against those who serve?

Point no.14: I can tell you from experience, the CIA has alwayse been politicized, and it becaime that way all on its own.

Point no.22: The muslims ( or at least the muslims that sided with al-qeada) kinda alienated themselves when they flew those planes into the twin towers and the pentagon.

I don't think Bush is the greatest president, but at least try to see beyond your own hate and bias in order to make well informed and reasond statements.

:) I don't mean to sound angry or insulting. Please don't take it that way.

-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: Belt #2
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 5:32pm

Originally posted by STOcocker STOcocker wrote:

I'm pretty sure that there has NEVER been a president removed from office by impeachment. I believe that Nixon was the closest, but he resigned before the process could finish.

So no it won't happen.

Nope.

Andrew Jackson was closer, he came one vote away from being removed.

(or was it andrew johnson? i forget)



-------------
Most importantly - People suck.


Posted By: MT. Vigilante
Date Posted: 01 March 2007 at 5:43pm
Originally posted by Belt #2 Belt #2 wrote:

Originally posted by STOcocker STOcocker wrote:

I'm pretty sure that there has NEVER been a president removed from office by impeachment. I believe that Nixon was the closest, but he resigned before the process could finish.

So no it won't happen.

Nope.

Andrew Jackson was closer, he came one vote away from being removed.

(or was it andrew johnson? i forget)


Johnson ....

...Lol, that reminds me of a line from a movie...

''It looks like a giant...

Johnson! Get over here...''

-------------
Join the XP Re-Revolution!


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 02 March 2007 at 3:39am
Originally posted by welcome guest welcome guest wrote:

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.

Whats wrong with these reasons.

1. He lied us into war in Iraq. According to the U.S. media-ignored British "Downing Street Memo," he "fixed" intelligence around a pre-determined policy of preemptive war. Results: 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths; about 1800 U.S. soldiers dead in two wars, 100s of thousands wounded and traumatized.

2. Under his watch, the U.S. suffered its worst terrorist attack on its soil. He opposed an official investigation, then stalled for months on testifying before a hand-picked committee. Finally testified behind closed doors.

3. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2000.

4. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2004.

5. He has approved (and his Attorney General Gonzales has re-defined) torture at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram and elsewhere, while simultaneously opposing the International Criminal Court established to check such abuses. According to Amnesty International, the United States has established a Soviet-style "gulag" of torture around the world.

6. He failed to support the Kyoto Protocols, reducing greenhouse gases, but worked to open up Alaska's ANWR to drilling-despoiling an eco-system and increasing greenhouse gases.

7. He chose Halliburton toady Dick Cheney to be his running mate-twice.

8. He has attempted to pack the courts with ideologue-judges intent on overthrowing Roe v. Wade, and institutionalizing the police-state abuses of Patriot Acts I and II.

9.His "No Child Left Behind" education policies have replaced learning with testing and allowed military recruiters access to our schools, cajoling our children with military options before their minds have had a chance to open, question and challenge.

10.He is attempting to dismantle the Social Security system that has ensured "peace and freedom" for tens of millions of working Americans for seven decades ("peace" of mind and "freedom" from economic crises)-- rights hard-won by Labor and Progressives in decades-long struggles.

11. He has allied himself with Right-wing ideologues to curtail or abolish stem-cell research vital to the conquest of debilitating and fatal diseases.

12. He has failed to develop a coherent energy policy-except to prosecute wars for other peoples' resources. He fails to acknowledge the reality and impending disasters of Global Warming.

13. He has continued the Globalization project of his predecessors: outsourcing jobs, hollowing our middle class.

14. He has undermined the legitimate protective protocols of the C.I.A., politicizing the agency, awarding positions on the basis of ideological orthodoxy rather than merit and astute analysis.

15. He has subjugated his Administration to Neocon ideologues like Richard Perle, William Kristol and Douglas Feith; men who have endorsed the "settlement," expansionist and Wall-them-in policies of Ariel Sharon, sowing the seeds of anti-Arab racism, war and destruction in the Middle East for generations to come.

16. In spite of his rhetoric about freedom and democracy, he has allied himself with dictators in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Egypt and elsewhere. He has increased the flow of arms to these states and others, fomenting instability, turmoil and war.

17. He chose Rumsfeld as DoD Secretary twice, in spite of Rumsfeld's obvious failure to adequately plan for the post-Saddam era in Iraq, inducing massive "collateral damage," the looting of ancient treasures, and infrastructure destruction in a country we were legally and morally bound to rehabilitate.

18. He endorses the weaponization of space, "Rods from Gods," and other exotic, Star-Wars technologies to establish a twenty-first century American global empire that is doomed to create an arms race with China and other opposing coalitions, sowing discord and wasting the resources of the world.

19. He has presided over the most egregious media consolidation in the nation's history. While we have had "yellow journalism" and other media abuses throughout our two centuries of Republic/Empire, we have never suffered the consolidation of power that we have today. He has presided over the emasculation and cowering of PBS, while his disinformation troops have peddled fraudulent stories and comments to "reporters" like Judith Miller, Armstrong Williams and Jeff Guckert-"Gannon," poisoning the well of information, adding to the general confusion and Goebbelsization of our news.

20. He lied about, misled, or misunderstood the astronomical costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He continues to do so, diverting tax money for education, health care, the EPA, transportation and social infrastructure into war-making and destruction.

21. He has continued and enlarged the depraved Clinton policy of using depleted uranium on the battlefield; a policy bound to cause massive suffering and death to Americans and others for generations to come.

22. He has alienated our traditional allies and more than a billion Muslims around the world. He has ransacked the good will extended to the nation after the 9/11 attacks, leading a crusade of vengeance and reprisal, most often against innocents, judging without sufficient evidence, arrogating to himself a crooked, self-righteous Texas sheriff's power to execute without justice.

23. Under his watch, millions more Americans have been added to the ranks of the uninsured while health-care costs have exploded. His answer to these and other pressing social problems appears to be faith-based charities-in other words, preaching to the choir while stealing from the pews.

24. Under his watch, the North Koreans have, apparently, developed eight nuclear weapons and Israel has continued to increase and refine its arsenal-now estimated as high as five hundred.

25. He has murdered the English language.

26. Bush texas land deal equal to clinton whitewater

How many times has the Clinton Admin. gone up against the grand jury? Its only fair G.W.Bush gets his. 



I stopped reading after your 4th "point" when I realized you were saying nothing intelligent.

You cant be impeached for not being a stand up guy.

Further more, to your comments about torture. Its bad, yes, but its nothing new. Do you really think our military and government have been loving, understanding father-figures to all the suspected terror suspects and spies from other governments?  Its safe to assume since the birth of the CIA, or even the military for that matter, men, and maybe even women, have been tortured and murdered without any protection by our government.  Its not a pleasant thing, but its going to happen.  We just happened to find out about it in this case.

On a related note, you can hardly say the President lied about the war.  To lie is to say things are true, which you know for a fact are false.  The president receives daily briefings about everything going on in the world.  What he hears may be very different from what we all hear, his job is to act on it.

And finally, impeachment is NOT when you are tossed out of office, its when you are put on trial to decide if you should be tossed out of office.  Johnson was the closest to being convicted, spared by 1 vote, not the closest to being impeached.

Nixon was very close to being impeached, but he was not, he resigned before he was.  He was not convicted of anything, he was not even charged with anything.  Impeached does not equal convicted.


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 02 March 2007 at 1:46pm
Originally posted by welcome guest welcome guest wrote:

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.

Whats wrong with these reasons.

1. He lied us into war in Iraq. According to the U.S. media-ignored British "Downing Street Memo," he "fixed" intelligence around a pre-determined policy of preemptive war. Results: 100,000 Iraqi civilian deaths; about 1800 U.S. soldiers dead in two wars, 100s of thousands wounded and traumatized.

Complete rhetoric. There is far too much controversy surrounding the US intelligence on Iraq to support the theory that Bush somehow "fixed" anything. And WMD's were not the only reason we went to war in Iraq.

2. Under his watch, the U.S. suffered its worst terrorist attack on its soil. He opposed an official investigation, then stalled for months on testifying before a hand-picked committee. Finally testified behind closed doors.

Nice...blame a president for a terrorist attack just because "it happened under his watch".

3. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2000.

More mindless left wing rhetoric.

4. He was "elected" under dubious circumstances in 2004.

Same.

5. He has approved (and his Attorney General Gonzales has re-defined) torture at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, Bagram and elsewhere, while simultaneously opposing the International Criminal Court established to check such abuses. According to Amnesty International, the United States has established a Soviet-style "gulag" of torture around the world.

I dare say every war time president has approved under the table treatment of prisoners. I don't feel like going into that debate, but it's something that happens in war.

6. He failed to support the Kyoto Protocols, reducing greenhouse gases, but worked to open up Alaska's ANWR to drilling-despoiling an eco-system and increasing greenhouse gases.

Um, okay? The Kyoto Protocols were ridiculous.

7. He chose Halliburton toady Dick Cheney to be his running mate-twice.

And who the hell cares? Dude, these points make less sense as you go on.

8. He has attempted to pack the courts with ideologue-judges intent on overthrowing Roe v. Wade, and institutionalizing the police-state abuses of Patriot Acts I and II.

I'll agree with you on the Patriot Acts, however that's still not reasoning for impeachment.

9.His "No Child Left Behind" education policies have replaced learning with testing and allowed military recruiters access to our schools, cajoling our children with military options before their minds have had a chance to open, question and challenge.

Your points are questionable on this. I see nothing wrong with exposing kids to military options...our country is built around its military.

10.He is attempting to dismantle the Social Security system that has ensured "peace and freedom" for tens of millions of working Americans for seven decades ("peace" of mind and "freedom" from economic crises)-- rights hard-won by Labor and Progressives in decades-long struggles.

You need to read up on that.

11. He has allied himself with Right-wing ideologues to curtail or abolish stem-cell research vital to the conquest of debilitating and fatal diseases.

That's a moral issue-a large portion of Americans feel that stem cell research is wrong. So once again, you've stated a fact, but not neccessarily a negative one.

12. He has failed to develop a coherent energy policy-except to prosecute wars for other peoples' resources. He fails to acknowledge the reality and impending disasters of Global Warming.

And we get to more mindless left wing rhetoric. "Impending diasasters? That's once again a matter of debate.

13. He has continued the Globalization project of his predecessors: outsourcing jobs, hollowing our middle class.

HA HA. Seriously, nice.

14. He has undermined the legitimate protective protocols of the C.I.A., politicizing the agency, awarding positions on the basis of ideological orthodoxy rather than merit and astute analysis.

Not even really sure on that one.

15. He has subjugated his Administration to Neocon ideologues like Richard Perle, William Kristol and Douglas Feith; men who have endorsed the "settlement," expansionist and Wall-them-in policies of Ariel Sharon, sowing the seeds of anti-Arab racism, war and destruction in the Middle East for generations to come.

I'll have to read up on that one.

16. In spite of his rhetoric about freedom and democracy, he has allied himself with dictators in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Egypt and elsewhere. He has increased the flow of arms to these states and others, fomenting instability, turmoil and war.

 

Sometimes you have to form strange bedfellows to combat the bigger threat. It's called life.

17. He chose Rumsfeld as DoD Secretary twice, in spite of Rumsfeld's obvious failure to adequately plan for the post-Saddam era in Iraq, inducing massive "collateral damage," the looting of ancient treasures, and infrastructure destruction in a country we were legally and morally bound to rehabilitate.

That's debatable.

18. He endorses the weaponization of space, "Rods from Gods," and other exotic, Star-Wars technologies to establish a twenty-first century American global empire that is doomed to create an arms race with China and other opposing coalitions, sowing discord and wasting the resources of the world.

Debatable.

19. He has presided over the most egregious media consolidation in the nation's history. While we have had "yellow journalism" and other media abuses throughout our two centuries of Republic/Empire, we have never suffered the consolidation of power that we have today. He has presided over the emasculation and cowering of PBS, while his disinformation troops have peddled fraudulent stories and comments to "reporters" like Judith Miller, Armstrong Williams and Jeff Guckert-"Gannon," poisoning the well of information, adding to the general confusion and Goebbelsization of our news.

Dude what the hell are you talking about? Our media is, for the most part, incredibly biased against the war.

20. He lied about, misled, or misunderstood the astronomical costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He continues to do so, diverting tax money for education, health care, the EPA, transportation and social infrastructure into war-making and destruction.

Again, debatable.

21. He has continued and enlarged the depraved Clinton policy of using depleted uranium on the battlefield; a policy bound to cause massive suffering and death to Americans and others for generations to come.

You could be right, I've never read on this.

22. He has alienated our traditional allies and more than a billion Muslims around the world. He has ransacked the good will extended to the nation after the 9/11 attacks, leading a crusade of vengeance and reprisal, most often against innocents, judging without sufficient evidence, arrogating to himself a crooked, self-righteous Texas sheriff's power to execute without justice.

You need to back off the rhetoric there partner. None of that post made any sense, and even less of it was true.

23. Under his watch, millions more Americans have been added to the ranks of the uninsured while health-care costs have exploded. His answer to these and other pressing social problems appears to be faith-based charities-in other words, preaching to the choir while stealing from the pews.

????

24. Under his watch, the North Koreans have, apparently, developed eight nuclear weapons and Israel has continued to increase and refine its arsenal-now estimated as high as five hundred.

I don't agree with Bush's handling on North Korea, I'll give you that. But Isreal is an extension of our own policies in the Middle East. It's important that they have the weapons with which to protect themselves against the threats of extremists to maintain stability in that region. I really don't understand your point here.

25. He has murdered the English language.

Whatever, now you're just being stupid.

26. Bush texas land deal equal to clinton whitewater

?

How many times has the Clinton Admin. gone up against the grand jury? Its only fair G.W.Bush gets his. 

You did not point out any crimes that Bush committed. Clinton went up for a crime my friend, and he deserved it. I would have had less issue with him until he lied to all of America. Your side is still bitter because they lost in 2000 and 2004...but give up on impeachment. I may not be a big fan of Bush, but there is no clear evidence for impeachment, only questionable ethics and unsound reasoning. He's made mistakes, big ones, but it's the American people who elected him, and reaffirmed this decision in 04. Your side should have put up a better alternative that was electable, instead of Kerry and Gore.



-------------


Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 02 March 2007 at 4:10pm
Not to say anyone should, but wasn't true that in WWII and further on I just dont remember, there were laws set up so if people dissagreed or something with the war that they were fined or put in jail or something? I am probly wrong with that but Why don't they do that now? just wondering? Not so say anyone should but Just wondering. 

-------------


Posted By: FlimFlam
Date Posted: 02 March 2007 at 4:31pm
Originally posted by welcome guest welcome guest wrote:

Whats wrong with these reasons.

They're mostly nonsensical?  Wow, I'd have rather read something from the Smitty's.  At least their propaganda is loosely based on facts...



-------------



Posted By: welcome guest
Date Posted: 02 March 2007 at 7:37pm

Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

Originally posted by welcome guest welcome guest wrote:

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

Bush has not done anything in most cases as bad as Nixon has done.

26. Bush texas land deal equal to clinton whitewater

?

How many times has the Clinton Admin. gone up against the grand jury? Its only fair G.W.Bush gets his. 

You did not point out any crimes that Bush committed.

Yet Bush and his partners used Arlington's powers to condemn the land for the stadium, and relied on taxpayers to repay the bonds sold to build the Ballpark -- receiving what amounts to a direct $135-million subsidy. Now, after tripling the amount they paid for the Rangers, Bush and his partners won't re-pay the city a measly $7.5 million.

Originally posted by lilsully4 lilsully4 wrote:

I just dont remember, there were laws set up so if people dissagreed or something with the war that they were fined or put in jail or something?

There is a thing called freedom of speach. But if you torture!

 Is America above the Geneva Conventions?

Because the United States is bound by the Geneva Convention governing prisoners of war, and by the 1987 Convention Against Torture with its prohibitions.



-------------
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml - http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.


Posted By: welcome guest
Date Posted: 19 April 2007 at 8:35am

SENATE BILL REPORT

SJM 8016

As of March7, 2007

Brief Description: Requesting an impeachment investigation into actions by President Bush and

Vice President Cheney.

Sponsors: Senators Oemig, Regala, Kohl-Welles, Kline, Spanel, Fairley, Kauffman, Fraser and

Prentice.

Brief History:

Committee Activity: Government Operations & Elections: 3/01/07.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ELECTIONS

Staff: Sharon Swanson (786-7447)

Background: Impeachment is a process authorized by the United States Constitution to bring

charges against certain officials of the federal government for misconduct while in office.

Article 2, Section 4, specifies that, "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the

United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason,

bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." Civil officers include federal judges and

cabinet members.

Article 1, Section 2, of the Constitution specifies that the House of Representatives has the

sole power of impeachment. Impeachment requires a majority vote in the House. Once

impeached, officials are tried by the Senate. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote by the

Senate. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice of the Supreme

Court presides.

Article 1, Section 3, specifies that, "Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend

further than removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor,

trust, or profit under the United States: but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and

subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, according to law."

Summary of Bill: It is requested that, in order to preserve confidence in the office of the

Presidency and the Executive branch, our senators and representatives in the United States

Congress determine whether there is sufficient evidence to charge President George W. Bush

and Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and if so, to follow the Constitutional process of

impeachment.

Appropriation: None.

This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members

in their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a

statement of legislative intent.

Senate Bill Report - 1 - SJM 8016

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.

Staff Summary of Public Testimony: PRO: President Bush has led this country into a

criminal war of aggression against the country of Iraq. The President has supported torture

and war crimes. The actions that led our country into this illegal war must be investigated.

The current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, has said that impeachment is off the table.

Our leaders refuse to lead. Perhaps a grass roots effort from each state, such as this memorial

calling for impeachment, will get the attention of Congress. There have been no

consequences for this administration. President Bush must be made to face the consequences

of his dishonesty and his criminal conduct. Seventeen thousand citizens in Washington State

have already signed a petition for impeachment. Fully 60 percent of the country is against the

war in Iraq. Three thousand young Americans have died along with tens of thousands of Iraqi

citizens. Billions of dollars have been spent. The current administration must be investigated

for its crimes.

Persons Testifying: PRO: Thomas McClure, Terry Fernsler, Lois Walker, Travis Johnson,

Randolph Gordon, Philip Burk, Col. Ann Wright, Geor Parrish, Sharon Fasnacht, Bob Barnes,

Alice Woldt, Susan Harmon, Ed Mays, Citizens; Gene Marx, Vietnam Veteran / Father of

2-Tour Iraq veteran; Arnold Neal Troeh, Vietnam Veteran / Ambassador of Peace; Michael

Settles, Concerned Citizen / Father; Linda Boyd, Washington For Impeachment; James

Hauser, Kate Hunter, Vashon Islanders for Peace & Justice; Dennis Mason, LaRouche

Political Action Committee; Christopher Jadatz, Executive Intelligence Review; Carol

Davider-Waller, Washington for Impeachment; Cheryl Crist, Thurston County Democrats;

Elaine Phelps, Progressive Caucus; Ross Anderson, Salt Lake City Mayor; Rep. Marilyn

Chase, State Representative; Rep Bob Hasegawa, State Representative; Paul Richmond,

Michael Tivana, Washington For Impeachment; Maggie Lawless, World Can't Wait; Doris

Kent, Gold Star Mother; Ellen Murphy, Veterans for Peace; Janet Jordan, Chris Stegman,

Green Party; Talitha Thalya, Citizen's Movement; Maggie Lawless, Drive Out the Bush

Regime; Senator Eric Oemig, Washington State Senate.

Senate Bill Report - 2 - SJM 8016

http://www.leg.wa.gov/pub/billinfo/2007-08/Pdf/Bill%20Reports/Senate/8016.SBR.pdf - http://www.leg.wa.gov/pub/billinfo/2007-08/Pdf/Bill%20Report s/Senate/8016.SBR.pdf



-------------
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml - http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.


Posted By: c4cypher
Date Posted: 19 April 2007 at 9:29am


-------------
'Bring the rain!'
http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=165531&PN=5 - New to the game?


Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 19 April 2007 at 9:35am

Yeah, cypher, that's a fail...



-------------
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."

-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.

Yup, he actually said that.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net