Print Page | Close Window

My Paradox...

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=167257
Printed Date: 04 February 2026 at 5:49pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: My Paradox...
Posted By: __sneaky__
Subject: My Paradox...
Date Posted: 23 May 2007 at 11:58pm
Infinity has no finite relation to any number, i measures nothing, and represents nothing since we cannot ralate anything to it, all other numbers have a set and finite amount, where as Infinity is in fact infinite. but since there is nothing else infinite it represents nothing and is comparable to nothing, thus showing, Infinity doesnt exsist.

But how can that be true you ask? my math teacher told me it exsists, well it does... numbers are infinite, but with the argument given above infinity CANNOT exsist. confused yet? well thats why we call it a paradox.
-My paradox of infinity

I know most of you dont care, but I'm a nerd. i cant help it.


-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum



Replies:
Posted By: Styro Folme
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:00am
Infinite isn't really an amount.  It's more of a word that is to describe an amount.

-------------
X


Posted By: Cedric
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:02am
Defeated.

-------------



Posted By: Jack Carver
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:04am
Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

my math teacher told me it exsists, well it does... numbers are infinite, but with the argument given above infinity CANNOT exsist. 

Numbers are finite. Infinity is for stuff like limits. It's just a symbol that tells you that the number that could be there is getting infinitely big.
I choose to think of infinity as being approximately 1 ba-zillion. It helps me visualize stuff like that.


Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:04am
Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 


-------------


Posted By: ANARCHY_SCOUT
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:09am
X <- theres your infinity.

-------------
Gamertag: Kataklysm999


Posted By: FROG MAN
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:13am
not entirely true, infinity can be a limit, 1/infinity=0

also, most of math you cant relate to anything after you get into calculus and complex algebra.


-------------
<1 meg sig = bad>


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:16am

I do agree that it does exsist, but at the same time how can it as in infinity in relation to numbers? infinity is sposed to represent an uncountably high number that goes on forever, but all numbers are finite they can all be counted and measured in relation to other numbers. so how can it exsist *at least in relation to other numbers*



-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:24am
Infinity is an approach

Or if you take a stats class, it's roughly the same as 1E99. :D


-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: Jack Carver
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:24am
Well it's definitely not a number. It's like a concept that crossdresses as a number on weekends.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:27am
Originally posted by Jack Carver Jack Carver wrote:

Well it's definitely not a number. It's like a concept that crossdresses as a number on weekends.
lol thats an interesting way of putting it.

-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: FROG MAN
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:30am
Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

I do agree that it does exsist, but at the same time how can it as in infinity in relation to numbers? infinity is sposed to represent an uncountably high number that goes on forever, but all numbers are finite they can all be counted and measured in relation to other numbers. so how can it exsist *at least in relation to other numbers*



if you really think about it, everything in the world relates to numbers, one way or another.

also, we are the wrong people to be talking about this, we got maybe 3 or 4 ppl with grade 11 or 12 math, and maybe a couple first or second year university math, no real mathematicians here,


-------------
<1 meg sig = bad>


Posted By: Styro Folme
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:32am
hmm.  this thread amuses me.

i would put it in the more common terms such as the words "several, few, and many"..  Words that describe a value, but give no definite value.


-------------
X


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:33am
lol well that being true... but a lot of you guys are pretty smart, so all my semi-intelligent questions, i bring here.

-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: Roll Tide
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:35am
Were you stoned when you thought of this?

My buddy thought of the exact same thing under those conditions.


-------------
<Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:36am
Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 


Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:39am
Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 

sneaky, your argument sucks.

bork the thread


Posted By: BARREL BREAK
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:41am
Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:


Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 
sneaky, your argument sucks. bork the thread
FOR THE HORDE!


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:42am
no! i wasnt stoned when i came up with this! why do i seem to be getting asked that question more and more these days... and i know my argument sucks, but i dont like to give up... its an ego thing... even if i do look/sound retarded

-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: FROG MAN
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:44am
Originally posted by Styro Folme Styro Folme wrote:

hmm.  this thread amuses me.

i would put it in the more common terms such as the words "several, few, and many"..  Words that describe a value, but give no definite value.


the most ironic part is, oh great scholar of Stryo, your comment is 100% completely wrong, infinity is a limit actually used in math, few and many is never used...


-------------
<1 meg sig = bad>


Posted By: Styro Folme
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:53am
Originally posted by FROG MAN FROG MAN wrote:

Originally posted by Styro Folme Styro Folme wrote:

hmm.  this thread amuses me.

i would put it in the more common terms such as the words "several, few, and many"..  Words that describe a value, but give no definite value.


the most ironic part is, oh great scholar of Stryo, your comment is 100% completely wrong, infinity is a limit actually used in math, few and many is never used...
  sarcasm was uncalled for.

But you're right. 

i know infinity is used in math, but how much is it used in the every-day common math?  not much.  It is used more to describe a number, than an actual number, kinda like imaginary numbers. 

the amusing part is the comparisons.  Infinity=Cross dresser made me smile.


-------------
X


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:55am

Originally posted by Styro Folme Styro Folme wrote:

the amusing part is the comparisons.  Infinity=Cross dresser made me smile.



-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 1:25am
Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:


Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 
sneaky, your argument sucks. bork the thread
FOR THE HORDE!
BLOOD AND THUNDER


-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 2:32am
tl;dr


Posted By: c4cypher
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 7:49am
I guess that in practical terms, that you could argue for the impossiblility of infinity for a number. However, for mathematics, it still needs to be defined for certain situations, even if it isn't a normal value.

-------------
'Bring the rain!'
http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=165531&PN=5 - New to the game?


Posted By: procarbinefreak
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 8:22am
are you one of those kids who tries to prove the teacher wrong with your wack-job theories that are so easily proved wrong, but yet you won't give it up?

There always seems to be one of those in classes... it's especially funny in college, when a kid is arguing with a person who has spent the majority of their life teaching and studying these concepts.


Posted By: reifidom
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 8:22am
On the other end of the spectrum, 0 is a relatively new concept.

Mystery has its own mysteries, and there are gods above gods. We have ours, they have theirs. That is what's known as infinity.
—Jean Cocteau (1889-1963), French author and filmmaker

Limits and things of that nature were devised to avoid infinity.

-------------



Posted By: -ProDigY-
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 10:12am
Holy cow, that was the stupidest thing I've ever read.

-------------


Posted By: Razgriz Ghost
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 10:32am
For after all what is man in nature?


Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 10:35am
Originally posted by Razgriz Ghost Razgriz Ghost wrote:

For after all what is man in nature?
The sum of all his parts...

-------------


Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 10:40am
Since we are on the subject of math, acn anyone here tell me why 1^(infinity) does not equal 1?

I missed the discussion on that in Cal 2.

-------------


Posted By: Razgriz Ghost
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 10:50am
a central point between nothing and all infinitly far from understanding either.


Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 11:38am

 

Oh wait.......paraDOX



Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 12:52pm
Originally posted by Benjichang Benjichang wrote:

Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:


Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 
sneaky, your argument sucks. bork the thread
FOR THE HORDE!
BLOOD AND THUNDER

Avast, ye scurvy cur!!


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 1:22pm

Originally posted by procarbinefreak procarbinefreak wrote:

are you one of those kids who tries to prove the teacher wrong with your wack-job theories that are so easily proved wrong, but yet you won't give it up?

There always seems to be one of those in classes... it's especially funny in college, when a kid is arguing with a person who has spent the majority of their life teaching and studying these concepts.
only in bible *being an athiest i just cant help it* and besides my wack-job theories are'nt any worse the the retarded stuff he comes up with... like Adam and Eve couldnt have had belly buttons because that would be evidence that they where given birth too, and thats a contradiction... but god gave them memories of things that never happened and gave them skills they never learned so that they could survive and that WAS'NT a contradiction to what really happened... Silly preachers...

P.S. I give up on this infinity thing, I know I'm wrong, as you all know it sure isnt the first time... so carry on good sirs.



-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 1:48pm
Originally posted by Jack Carver Jack Carver wrote:

Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

my math teacher told me it exsists, well it does... numbers are infinite, but with the argument given above infinity CANNOT exsist. 

Numbers are finite. Infinity is for stuff like limits. It's just a symbol that tells you that the number that could be there is getting infinitely big.
I choose to think of infinity as being approximately 1 ba-zillion. It helps me visualize stuff like that.


No. A NUMBER is finite.  NUMBERS are infinite.  Sneaky didn't even write that, I've seen it a number of times.


-------------
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo


Posted By: FROG MAN
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 3:30pm
Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

Originally posted by procarbinefreak procarbinefreak wrote:

are you one of those kids who tries to prove the teacher wrong with your wack-job theories that are so easily proved wrong, but yet you won't give it up?

There always seems to be one of those in classes... it's especially funny in college, when a kid is arguing with a person who has spent the majority of their life teaching and studying these concepts.
only in bible *being an athiest i just cant help it* and besides my wack-job theories are'nt any worse the the retarded stuff he comes up with... like Adam and Eve couldnt have had belly buttons because that would be evidence that they where given birth too, and thats a contradiction... but god gave them memories of things that never happened and gave them skills they never learned so that they could survive and that WAS'NT a contradiction to what really happened... Silly preachers...

P.S. I give up on this infinity thing, I know I'm wrong, as you all know it sure isnt the first time... so carry on good sirs.

again that made no sense at all



-------------
<1 meg sig = bad>


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 3:51pm
Originally posted by FROG MAN FROG MAN wrote:

Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

Originally posted by procarbinefreak procarbinefreak wrote:

are you one of those kids who tries to prove the teacher wrong with your wack-job theories that are so easily proved wrong, but yet you won't give it up?

There always seems to be one of those in classes... it's especially funny in college, when a kid is arguing with a person who has spent the majority of their life teaching and studying these concepts.
only in bible *being an athiest i just cant help it* and besides my wack-job theories are'nt any worse the the retarded stuff he comes up with... like Adam and Eve couldnt have had belly buttons because that would be evidence that they where given birth too, and thats a contradiction... but god gave them memories of things that never happened and gave them skills they never learned so that they could survive and that WAS'NT a contradiction to what really happened... Silly preachers...

P.S. I give up on this infinity thing, I know I'm wrong, as you all know it sure isnt the first time... so carry on good sirs.

again that made no sense at all

it was his theory not mine...

-------------
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl


Forum Vice President

RIP T&O Forum


Posted By: dmp4892.
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 4:14pm
Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:

Originally posted by Benjichang Benjichang wrote:

Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:


Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 
sneaky, your argument sucks. bork the thread
FOR THE HORDE!
BLOOD AND THUNDER

Avast, ye scurvy cur!!

ALLIANCE WILL PREVAIL!


-------------
<FOUR MEGS for a sig? Are you kidding me?!>


Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 24 May 2007 at 4:22pm
Originally posted by dmp4892. dmp4892. wrote:

Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:

Originally posted by Benjichang Benjichang wrote:

Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by evillepaintball evillepaintball wrote:


Originally posted by BARREL BREAK BARREL BREAK wrote:

Originally posted by Da Hui Da Hui wrote:

Originally posted by Cedric Cedric wrote:

BORK THE THREAD 
sneaky, your argument sucks. bork the thread
FOR THE HORDE!
BLOOD AND THUNDER

Avast, ye scurvy cur!!

ALLIANCE WILL PREVAIL!

AYE!!! FOR SPARTA!!!


-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net