Thanks Canada
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=173722
Printed Date: 03 December 2025 at 2:44pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Thanks Canada
Posted By: WGP guy2
Subject: Thanks Canada
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 12:44pm
For making the mistake before we do.
http://www.freemarketcure.com/brainsurgery.php - http://www.freemarketcure.com/brainsurgery.php
|
Replies:
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 12:46pm
Right..
-------------
|
Posted By: Snake6
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 12:50pm
Risks vs Gains...
-------------
|
Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 12:52pm
Eww that ladies neck looks like it is talking.
-------------
|
Posted By: scotchyscotch
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 12:58pm
|
Why is private healthcare outlawed? Seems silly.
|
Posted By: .636
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 2:08pm
Wow Ontario is full of suck. Does not take that long to get an MRI in BC. Mind you I live in a small town and we have a MRI machine so you can get a scan with in the same week.
-------------
|
Posted By: Funky
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:04pm
What about a blue collar American worker who needs brain surgery?
Is he going to immigrate to Canada to be able to afford the surgery without going bankrupt?
-------------
"Don't you hate pants?"
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:12pm
People have no clue how the healthcare really is here outside of what things like this show. I would take the healthcare here over the US any day.
It really isin't as bad as it is said, waiting times are often shoreter than in hospitals in the US. All citizens get free healthcare so they don't have to worry about being too poor or screwed by their insurance company to not get that surgery they need or they will die.
.636 wrote:
Wow Ontario is full of suck. Does not take that long to get an MRI in BC. Mind you I live in a small town and we have a MRI machine so you can get a scan with in the same week.
|
BC blows, face it. Now run along and play with your... trees.
Within the same week kinda blows actually. I live in a larger town and a mri can recieved within a few days or even that day if necessary.
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:22pm
So you go nuts on us when one guy waits an unacceptable amount of time. What about the thousands of Americans who have undoubtedly died due to undiagnosed brain tumors? A medical system based on private payment is completely absurd. Most people get treatment on a timely basis. These isolated incidences are hardly worse that death due to inability to afford treatment.
I can't stop laughing at the narrator saying "the system that has failed so miserably". I now believe Canadian and American definitions of "fail" and "miserable" are very different...
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:47pm
|
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:56pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities.
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 4:59pm
Carl, agreed. Though we're admittedly biased, medicare is pretty shweet.
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:00pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. |
So how much experience do you actually have dealing with health insurance companies carl?
-------------
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:08pm
High Voltage wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. | So how much experience do you actually have dealing with health insurance companies carl? |
Any how much experience do you have dealing with free healthcare High Voltage?
If you are to base your opinion on what you have heard and read, than why can't I?
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:10pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. |
Sure, maybe you can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top quality.
|
Posted By: scotchyscotch
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:12pm
|
Ok clear something up for me please.
In Ontario, could you get private healthcare if you wanted to? I can't think why it would be "outlawed" as the narator put it.
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:25pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
High Voltage wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. | So how much experience do you actually have dealing with health insurance companies carl? |
Any how much experience do you have dealing with free healthcare High Voltage?
If you are to base your opinion on what you have heard and read, than why can't I? |
Why do you always try to turn questions around on everyone? It really does make you look stupid. I said nothing about your healthcare system, I really know nothing about it, nor do I care. So answer the question carl, how much experience do you have dealing with health insurance companies?
-------------
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:32pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. |
Sure, maybe you can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top quality.
|
What do you mean not top quality? Are you implying Canadian physicians are poorly trained? Are you implying our medical staff don't care as much as their American colleagues do? I can assure you medical care in Canada is of at least equal "quality" to that in the states. We don't turn down care because of a bad credit card. You, in many cases, do. (You of course not referring to you personally, but the american system).
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: WGP guy2
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:35pm
|
I think I take medical care for granted for the most part. I almost always bypass triage if there is any room, and care immediately there is a room.
|
Posted By: JohnnyCanuck
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:36pm
|
carl_the_sniper wrote:
People have no clue how the healthcare really is here outside of what things like this show. I would take the healthcare here over the US any day.
It really isin't as bad as it is said, waiting times are often shoreter than in hospitals in the US. All citizens get free healthcare so they don't have to worry about being too poor or screwed by their insurance company to not get that surgery they need or they will die.
.636 wrote:
Wow Ontario is full of suck. Does not take that long to get an MRI in BC. Mind you I live in a small town and we have a MRI machine so you can get a scan with in the same week.
|
BC blows, face it. Now run along and play with your... trees.
Within the same week kinda blows actually. I live in a larger town and a mri can recieved within a few days or even that day if necessary.
|
One of the best parts about living in BC, you don't live here.
------------- Imagine there’s a picture of your favourite thing here.
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:36pm
Are you actually from Ireland, or is that a joke of some kind? If so (which I assume to be the case), are you guys covered by NHS?
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:38pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
People have no clue how the healthcare really is here outside of what things like this show. I would take the healthcare here over the US any day.
It really isin't as bad as it is said, waiting times are often shoreter than in hospitals in the US. All citizens get free healthcare so they don't have to worry about being too poor or screwed by their insurance company to not get that surgery they need or they will die.
.636 wrote:
Wow Ontario is full of suck. Does not take that long to get an MRI in BC. Mind you I live in a small town and we have a MRI machine so you can get a scan with in the same week.
|
BC blows, face it. Now run along and play with your... trees.
|
You're so wrong it's hilarious. Ontario is crap compared to BC. I'd even take the east coast over ontario. It's just so boring and lame.
|
Posted By: WGP guy2
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:39pm
Posted By: Smitty
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:47pm
|
It seems like Canada has a great idea, but with a few flaws for a few people. I'm sure most people can get the healthcare that they need fairly quickly, maybe just as quick as us in the United States. I'm sure there are always a few cases where some people get something screwed up and it creates for a prolonged wait for certain people. I believe that we should try to find a middle ground between the Canadian and US systems. We should be allowed personal healthcare, but with limited government aid. That way, people in the US could be paying exactly what they pay now, but get better healthcare due to the government aid. I don't know a lot, or much at all about either healthcare system, as I'm not old enough to have had much experience with it, but this seems like the logical path to me. Of course, due to my limited prior knowledge, I could be completely off.
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 5:48pm
Ilford Rule wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. |
Sure, maybe you can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top quality.
|
What do you mean not top quality? Are you implying Canadian physicians are poorly trained? Are you implying our medical staff don't care as much as their American colleagues do? I can assure you medical care in Canada is of at least equal "quality" to that in the states. We don't turn down care because of a bad credit card. You, in many cases, do. (You of course not referring to you personally, but the american system).
|
I'm not implying that Canadian physicians are poorly trained, but I am implying that for free health care, you're not going to be put under the care of the best doctors in your area. However, if you pay for a good, private health insurance company, you can rest assured that you will be under the care of the best doctors around.
And as for the poorer people, it all depends on where you live. Many poor people with little or no health insurance in inner-city St. Louis get excellent care at Barnes Hospital, where top doctors from around the nation train Washington University medical students (Wash U. ranks 3rd in the US for medical school), and Saint Louis University Hospital, another great medical university, is also in downtown St. Louis and available to the poor. Both these hospitals have top-quality doctors and medical research is done right there.
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:11pm
um... yeah, you will be given the best doctors in your area. because money isnt a factor. so any doctor treats any patient. simple. your second paragraph doesnt remedy the fact that many cant afford vital medical care.
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:20pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. | Sure, maybe you can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top quality. |
From what i've read and heard, the US healthcare system is far from high quality.
High Voltage wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
High Voltage wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. | So how much experience do you actually have dealing with health insurance companies carl? |
Any how much experience do you have dealing with free healthcare High Voltage?
If you are to base your opinion on what you have heard and read, than why can't I? | Why do you always try to turn questions around on everyone? It really does make you look stupid. I said nothing about your healthcare system, I really know nothing about it, nor do I care. So answer the question carl, how much experience do you have dealing with health insurance companies? |
Only what i've heard/read.
What actualy experience do you have in a similar situation to what I was talking about?
JohnnyCanuck wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
People have no clue how the healthcare really is here outside of what things like this show. I would take the healthcare here over the US any day. It really isin't as bad as it is said, waiting times are often shoreter than in hospitals in the US. All citizens get free healthcare so they don't have to worry about being too poor or screwed by their insurance company to not get that surgery they need or they will die.
.636 wrote:
Wow Ontario is full of suck. Does not take that long to get an MRI in BC. Mind you I live in a small town and we have a MRI machine so you can get a scan with in the same week. | BC blows, face it. Now run along and play with your... trees. Within the same week kinda blows actually. I live in a larger town and a mri can recieved within a few days or even that day if necessary. |
One of the best parts about living in BC, you don't live here. |
So seriosuly, what does BC have to offer besides endless forests. (well... soon they will be endless fields with stumps) Same question to you choopie.
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Ilford Rule wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance companies screwing customes over technicalities. | Sure, maybe you can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top quality. | What do you mean not top quality? Are you implying Canadian physicians are poorly trained? Are you implying our medical staff don't care as much as their American colleagues do? I can assure you medical care in Canada is of at least equal "quality" to that in the states. We don't turn down care because of a bad credit card. You, in many cases, do. (You of course not referring to you personally, but the american system). | I'm not implying that Canadian physicians are poorly trained, but I am implying that for free health care, you're not going to be put under the care of the best doctors in your area. However, if you pay for a good, private health insurance company, you can rest assured that you will be under the care of the best doctors around.And as for the poorer people, it all depends on where you live. Many poor people with little or no health insurance in inner-city St. Louis get excellent care at Barnes Hospital, where top doctors from around the nation train Washington University medical students (Wash U. ranks 3rd in the US for medical school), and Saint Louis University Hospital, another great medical university, is also in downtown St. Louis and available to the poor. Both these hospitals have top-quality doctors and medical research is done right there. |
Yes you can be. Canada has a record for amazing feats in healthcare. The children's hospital in Toronto is world renowned.
Not necessarily, what is to stop your insurance company from giving you cheap doctors? Or denying you based on a technicality?
|
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:22pm
http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/08/17/news/state/55-quads.txt - Link
-------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:23pm
|
You've never been to BC have you carl... Vancouver was voted the best city to live in a while ago...
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:29pm
choopie911 wrote:
You've never been to BC have you carl... Vancouver was voted the best city to live in a while ago... |
Still, what does it have to offer?
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:33pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
You've never been to BC have you carl... Vancouver was voted the best city to live in a while ago... |
Still, what does it have to offer?
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. |
Well tell us what makes boring ontario so amazing.
|
Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:37pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. | That right there is pretty much Ontario too there champ. You must be blind to the world around you.
-------------
|
Posted By: .636
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:37pm
Coastal life in BC is just laid back and not uptight like everywhere else. Its beautiful here, mild winters, nice warm summers, tons of outdoor things to do like hunt, fish, hike.
Mountain biking here is top notch. The North Shore is crazy, same with Whistler.
Whats so bad about BC
-------------
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:40pm
|
I thought French v. Scottish deathmatch was going to be cool, but this All-Canuck gangbang is getting me all hot and bothered.
I am torn as to which province I should be cheering for.
------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:44pm
choopie911 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
You've never been to BC have you carl... Vancouver was voted the best city to live in a while ago... |
Still, what does it have to offer?
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. |
Well tell us what makes boring ontario so amazing. |
-Better capital city
-Less fear of being murdered for cocaine
-Tourist site are superior. (banff is a commericalized joke)
Now you go
Tical2.0 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. | That right there is pretty much Ontario too there champ. You must be blind to the world around you. |
The drug trade of Ontario is no where close to that of BC.
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:47pm
T-DOT REPURZENT! I'm terribly sorry. I actually must say it's pretty lame here. Montreal kicks ass, but the rest of that province... beautiful place, but the whole speaking french thing bugs me.
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:49pm
Ilford Rule wrote:
T-DOT REPURZENT!I'm terribly sorry. I actually must say it's pretty lame here. Montreal kicks ass, but the rest of that province... beautiful place, but the whole speaking french thing bugs me.
| Quebec bars are sketchy.
|
Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:49pm
Oh its on a steady increase I tell you that. Along with Gun Running Human Trafficking, Murders.
Don't try to act like Ontario is all Holy and amazing/
-------------
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:49pm
Ilford Rule wrote:
um... yeah, you will be given the best doctors in your area. because money isnt a factor. so any doctor treats any patient. simple. your second paragraph doesnt remedy the fact that many cant afford vital medical care.
|
I highly doubt that. Theres 50,000 just in my small city outlying St. Louis. If health care was free, and everyone was on the same health care, you're telling me the few top doctors in my area are going to serve all 50,000 people? No, some random people will be stuck with other doctors. St. Louis county has over one million residents. It's not possible for everyone to be placed under the care of the best doctors.
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay
for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if
anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever
treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may
have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get healthcare immediately also. I gurantee that anyone
in Canada can get full healthcare immediately if it is required right
away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance
companies screwing customes over technicalities. | Sure, maybe you
can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top
quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you
top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top
quality. |
From what i've read and heard, the US healthcare system is far from high quality.
|
From what I've experienced, our health care is high quality. I could
get an MRI tomorrow if need be. Last time I was sick, I went to the
doctor, and he suggested I get x-rays and blood tests to check for
pneumonia. Within one hour of leaving the doctor's office that day, I
went and had x-rays taken, blood drawn, and the results send back to my
doctor that day.
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Ilford Rule wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay
for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if
anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever
treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may
have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
And? I can get health care immediately also. I guarantee that anyone
in Canada can get full health care immediately if it is required right
away. Also, I have heard more than enough stories of insurance
companies screwing customes over technicalities. | Sure, maybe you
can get some sort of care immediately, but I can guarantee it isn't top
quality. Like I said, you get what you pay for. Free doesn't get you
top quality, and when I'm dealing with my own health, I want top
quality. | What do you mean not top quality? Are you implying
Canadian physicians are poorly trained? Are you implying our medical
staff don't care as much as their American colleagues do? I can assure
you medical care in Canada is of at least equal "quality" to that in
the states. We don't turn down care because of a bad credit card. You,
in many cases, do. (You of course not referring to you personally, but
the american system). | I'm not implying that Canadian physicians
are poorly trained, but I am implying that for free health care, you're
not going to be put under the care of the best doctors in your area.
However, if you pay for a good, private health insurance company, you
can rest assured that you will be under the care of the best doctors
around.And as for the poorer people, it all depends on where you live.
Many poor people with little or no health insurance in inner-city St.
Louis get excellent care at Barnes Hospital, where top doctors from
around the nation train Washington University medical students (Wash U.
ranks 3rd in the US for medical school), and Saint Louis University
Hospital, another great medical university, is also in downtown St.
Louis and available to the poor. Both these hospitals have top-quality
doctors and medical research is done right there. |
Yes you can be. Canada has a record for amazing feats in healthcare. The children's hospital in Toronto is world renowned.
Not necessarily, what is to stop your insurance company from giving you cheap doctors? Or denying you based on a technicality?
|
Like I said, you sign with a good insurance company. Do the research,
and get to know your doctor. Although not completely accurate, price is
a good indicator to the quality of what you're buying. If something is
free, it's probably not the best of quality. If you're paying good
money for something, you're probably paying it for a reason. Do the
research and find out what you're paying for.
As for technicalities, know your policy. And even then, stuff happens.
Theres not avoiding it, and no system is perfect. There will always be
trade-offs, you just have to weigh them against each other and decide
which is best.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 6:56pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Like I said, you sign with a good insurance company. Do the research,
and get to know your doctor. Although not completely accurate, price is
a good indicator to the quality of what you're buying. If something is
free, it's probably not the best of quality. If you're paying good
money for something, you're probably paying it for a reason. Do the
research and find out what you're paying for.
|
I can get to know my doctor also...
That only applies if there is free vs not free. Since there is just free, all the good doctors are spread out across the healthcare system. You have to wonder though if there really are doctors that you wouldn't want working on you with all the restrictions we currently have.
I like it run as a service rather than a moneymaking business, it serves the public better.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:02pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
You've never been to BC have you carl... Vancouver was voted the best city to live in a while ago... |
Still, what does it have to offer?
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. |
Well tell us what makes boring ontario so amazing. |
-Better capital city
-Less fear of being murdered for cocaine
-Tourist site are superior. (banff is a commericalized joke)
Now you go
Tical2.0 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
Besides high crime rate and being a huge player in the world drug trade. | That right there is pretty much Ontario too there champ. You must be blind to the world around you. |
The drug trade of Ontario is no where close to that of BC. |
Toronto isn't that great...
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:02pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Like I said, you sign with a good insurance company. Do the research,
and get to know your doctor. Although not completely accurate, price is
a good indicator to the quality of what you're buying. If something is
free, it's probably not the best of quality. If you're paying good
money for something, you're probably paying it for a reason. Do the
research and find out what you're paying for.
|
I can get to know my doctor also...
That only applies if there is free vs not free. Since there is just free, all the good doctors are spread out across the healthcare system. You have to wonder though if there really are doctors that you wouldn't want working on you with all the restrictions we currently have.
I like it run as a service rather than a moneymaking business, it serves the public better. |
Well, if you only want the top doctors working on you, then I'm sure there are doctors in the system that you don't want working on you. Theres no way that the best doctors can serve everyone. It's impossible, there are just too many people and too few top quality doctors.
Sure, running it as a service may be better for the public as opposed to running it as a business, but if you can already afford good health insurance, it's worse for you.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:07pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Like I said, you sign with a good insurance company. Do the research,
and get to know your doctor. Although not completely accurate, price is
a good indicator to the quality of what you're buying. If something is
free, it's probably not the best of quality. If you're paying good
money for something, you're probably paying it for a reason. Do the
research and find out what you're paying for.
|
I can get to know my doctor also...
That only applies if there is free vs not free. Since there is just free, all the good doctors are spread out across the healthcare system. You have to wonder though if there really are doctors that you wouldn't want working on you with all the restrictions we currently have.
I like it run as a service rather than a moneymaking business, it serves the public better. | Well, if you only want the top doctors working on you, then I'm sure there are doctors in the system that you don't want working on you. Theres no way that the best doctors can serve everyone. It's impossible, there are just too many people and too few top quality doctors.Sure, running it as a service <span style="font-style: italic;">may </span>be better for the public as opposed to running it as a business, but if you can already afford good health insurance, it's worse for you. |
I could easily afford it if I had the option of privatized healthcare but I wouldn't. The healthcare here is great anyways.
You can still choose your doctor here.
Choopie: you still haven't give reasons yet.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:10pm
|
I dont know, I'm just not much of a fan? I prefer the layout of Vancouver, or even Edmonton to that of Toronto. I don't like the transit as much, or even just the feel of the city. As andy said, it's a more laid back/ relaxed attitude here it seems, and a beautiful place to be. The outdoors are great, but theres something for everyone.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:13pm
choopie911 wrote:
I dont know, I'm just not much of a fan? I prefer the layout of Vancouver, or even Edmonton to that of Toronto. I don't like the transit as much, or even just the feel of the city. As andy said, it's a more laid back/ relaxed attitude here it seems, and a beautiful place to be. The outdoors are great, but theres something for everyone. |
Been to Toronto?
What specifically about the layout don't you like?
It probably is more laid back, that's why I will never live in Toronto. I live visiting for the faster pace once in a while, you can spend a whole day downtown doing nothing and not be bored.
The outdoors are amazing here. We have just as many amazing sights as BC does especially in the less urban areas.
|
Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:14pm
Lol Canadians fighting. It's almost as bad us arguing the South is better than the north. Tee hee.
------------- Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:16pm
DeTrevni wrote:
Lol Canadians fighting. It's almost as bad us arguing the South is better than the north. Tee hee.
|
The north is obviosuly better.
Les blak peopa killin ya know?
|
Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:20pm
We don't kill so much anymore. We just hate. And it's shifting from blacks to Mexicans. What with their stealing of my jobs that I've never wanted and their cheap labor keeping housing prices low.
Dern Mex'cans.
------------- Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:22pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
I dont know, I'm just not much of a fan? I prefer the layout of Vancouver, or even Edmonton to that of Toronto. I don't like the transit as much, or even just the feel of the city. As andy said, it's a more laid back/ relaxed attitude here it seems, and a beautiful place to be. The outdoors are great, but theres something for everyone. |
Been to Toronto?
What specifically about the layout don't you like?
It probably is more laid back, that's why I will never live in Toronto. I live visiting for the faster pace once in a while, you can spend a whole day downtown doing nothing and not be bored.
The outdoors are amazing here. We have just as many amazing sights as BC does especially in the less urban areas.
|
I've been all over Canada, so yes I have a decent basis for comparison. And their transit system is just less intuitive than other places I've been. It may be fine for people who use it every day, but it's not exactly new-user friendly, which I think Vancouver and especially Edmonton are. Have you been to Vancouver?
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:30pm
choopie911 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
I dont know, I'm just not much of a fan? I prefer the layout of Vancouver, or even Edmonton to that of Toronto. I don't like the transit as much, or even just the feel of the city. As andy said, it's a more laid back/ relaxed attitude here it seems, and a beautiful place to be. The outdoors are great, but theres something for everyone. |
Been to Toronto?
What specifically about the layout don't you like?
It probably is more laid back, that's why I will never live in Toronto. I live visiting for the faster pace once in a while, you can spend a whole day downtown doing nothing and not be bored.
The outdoors are amazing here. We have just as many amazing sights as BC does especially in the less urban areas.
|
I've been all over Canada, so yes I have a decent basis for comparison. And their transit system is just less intuitive than other places I've been. It may be fine for people who use it every day, but it's not exactly new-user friendly, which I think Vancouver and especially Edmonton are. Have you been to Vancouver? |
No, I've never really had an interest in going to vancouver for some reason.
Just wondering, how is it more intuitive?
And I agree though, the ttc isin't exactly user friendly unless if you have a guide. I still have to ask people almost every time I go. Granted, i only go a few times a year (including this wednesday for my pilot's license medical exam)
|
Posted By: Ilford Rule
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:41pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Ilford Rule wrote:
um... yeah, you will be given the best doctors in your area. because money isnt a factor. so any doctor treats any patient. simple. your second paragraph doesnt remedy the fact that many cant afford vital medical care.
|
I highly doubt that. Theres 50,000 just in my small city outlying St. Louis. If health care was free, and everyone was on the same health care, you're telling me the few top doctors in my area are going to serve all 50,000 people? No, some random people will be stuck with other doctors. St. Louis county has over one million residents. It's not possible for everyone to be placed under the care of the best doctors.
| [/QUOTE What makes you deserve a "better" doctor? They all graduated. They all have to uphold a certain standard. Also, here you DO still have some choice in terms of your doctor. You still go to the doctor of your choice. The difference is that the government pays for it. Emergency care is obviously different, but in emergency care you probably wont have much of a say anyways.
------------- CPro (w/ polished internals)
14" Bigshot
BT SBS
Various Rails
NcSTAR D4B
Macro
AA 68/45
CCI Phantom
45 Grips
|
Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 7:57pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
-Tourist site are superior. (banff is a commericalized joke)
|
You have but a single tourist site?
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:23pm
Ahem! Here we go.....
Personally, I would far rather live in a country where equality isn't based on the "what if" of the wallet. The odds of getting a great or "bad" doctor is equal here, just based on odds. You DO have every opportunity to meet your potential doctor in an interview long before any work gets done. We have a large pool of surgeons at every hospital so you may meet with a surgeon before an operation. I like know that if i slip and break an arm or get the flu or need a vaccination, I won't need to dish out any cash for it.
The standard for practicing medicine IS EXACTLY THE SAME for US and Canada. Even considering that many greedy doctors and even more RN's move to the states when they graduate so they can cash in on the sickness.
------------------------------------------------
And as a very well travelled Canadian, who has LIVED in many of the provinces(except manitoba and saskatchewan), I will list my personal preference in order from best(top) to least favorite).
-Newfoundland(screech, 'nuff said)
-Nova Scotia
-Quebec (i'm from montreal and learned both official languages like any good canadian should)
-Alberta
-BC (kind of a weird bizarro world version of the east coast)
-New-Brunswick
-Ontario
Ontario is the worst because of a huge lack of culture, snobbiness, and the most boring drive in the north.
Then again, this is my personal view, but I have lived everywhere for minimum a month and have sampled the local cultures.
But i would sooner live in Stupid ontario than even consider the very thought of even vacationing in the states. That's a matter of principle.
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:26pm
Thor wrote:
huge lack of culture |
... yeah... ooookay.
-------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:31pm
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
choopie911 wrote:
I dont know, I'm just not much of a fan? I prefer the layout of Vancouver, or even Edmonton to that of Toronto. I don't like the transit as much, or even just the feel of the city. As andy said, it's a more laid back/ relaxed attitude here it seems, and a beautiful place to be. The outdoors are great, but theres something for everyone. |
Been to Toronto?
What specifically about the layout don't you like?
It probably is more laid back, that's why I will never live in Toronto. I live visiting for the faster pace once in a while, you can spend a whole day downtown doing nothing and not be bored.
The outdoors are amazing here. We have just as many amazing sights as BC does especially in the less urban areas.
|
I've been all over Canada, so yes I have a decent basis for comparison. And their transit system is just less intuitive than other places I've been. It may be fine for people who use it every day, but it's not exactly new-user friendly, which I think Vancouver and especially Edmonton are. Have you been to Vancouver? |
No, I've never really had an interest in going to vancouver for some reason.
Just wondering, how is it more intuitive?
And I agree though, the ttc isin't exactly user friendly unless if you have a guide. I still have to ask people almost every time I go. Granted, i only go a few times a year (including this wednesday for my pilot's license medical exam) |
Come check it out, it's a good time. And the transit system here makes sense, and it's clearly marked on major stops. The skytrain operates in a clear loop with well marked paths/ titling so you know which way you're going easily, and "B-Line" busses run from major stops for quick bussing too. Edmonton is even easier, since the city is set up essentially like a grid (damn flatlands) so you can practically get an address, and just figure it out from there, as all the streets progress how they should.
Either way, come check out Vancouver sometime and see how mistaken you are.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:43pm
Hysteria wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
-Tourist site are superior. (banff is a commericalized joke)
| You have but a single tourist site? |
No we have many, what was your point?
Thor: Where in Ontario did you go?
Choopie: Toronto is a grid also.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:47pm
|
Well then their transit makes poor use of it unfortunately.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:57pm
choopie911 wrote:
Well then their transit makes poor use of it unfortunately. |
Not really.
The subway runs up and down through the streets.
|
Posted By: Evil Elvis
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 8:57pm
Rambino wrote:
I thought French v. Scottish deathmatch was going to be cool, but this All-Canuck gangbang is getting me all hot and bothered.
I am torn as to which province I should be cheering for. |
-------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 9:01pm
Thor wrote:
Ahem! Here we go.....
Personally, I would far rather live in a country where equality isn't based on the "what if" of the wallet. The odds of getting a great or "bad" doctor is equal here, just based on odds. You DO have every opportunity to meet your potential doctor in an interview long before any work gets done. We have a large pool of surgeons at every hospital so you may meet with a surgeon before an operation. I like know that if i slip and break an arm or get the flu or need a vaccination, I won't need to dish out any cash for it.
The standard for practicing medicine IS EXACTLY THE SAME for US and Canada. Even considering that many greedy doctors and even more RN's move to the states when they graduate so they can cash in on the sickness.
------------------------------------------------
And as a very well travelled Canadian, who has LIVED in many of the provinces(except manitoba and saskatchewan), I will list my personal preference in order from best(top) to least favorite).
-Newfoundland(screech, 'nuff said)
-Nova Scotia
-Quebec (i'm from montreal and learned both official languages like any good canadian should)
-Alberta
-BC (kind of a weird bizarro world version of the east coast)
-New-Brunswick
-Ontario
Ontario is the worst because of a huge lack of culture, snobbiness, and the most boring drive in the north.
Then again, this is my personal view, but I have lived everywhere for minimum a month and have sampled the local cultures.
But i would sooner live in Stupid ontario than even consider the very thought of even vacationing in the states. That's a matter of principle. |
Nova Scotia is way better than Newfoundland....
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 9:51pm
^Absolutely WRONG choop.
I've been all over ontario cause i have lived here for almost 3 years now....Toronto to cornwall to Ste-Saint Marie.
And i say lack of culture because you can readily identify someone from Alberta, Newfoundland, Maritimes, BC, or quebec....but people from ontario are just like robots or they end up being retarded rednecks.
Like i said it's just personal experience and if you don't like it you can suck a lemon.
And I currently reside in Kingston, ON....but am trying desperately to get posted to Gagetown, NB to be closer to NS or NFLD
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 9:52pm
|
Pschh, no way Thor. Newfie's are entertaining to watch, but actively being there/ interacting Nova Scotia is way cooler. From Halifax to Antigonish, its all good across the board.
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 9:55pm
I disagree....even my wife, who is from NS agress with me on this.
Newf's are best kind, more welcoming, more of a closed culture with good kitchen parties and even friendlier communities.
NS is only good(and by my standards, it is close to being perfect) in the fishing communities (where my wife's from.... Shelburne, NS...look it up, don't get much smaller lol).
I could have just easily said Quebec over anything else, but the political situation ruins it right now.
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: little devil
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:01pm
|
I live in Hamilton like 30-45 minutes away from carl and I dont know what hes smoking saying ontarios better. And you cant knock Banff at all, its one of the most layed back ski bum work to ride and live places around. Plus the scenery over there kills anything including the falls over here. Needless to say, I owuld pick Alberta/B.C. any day over Ontario.
Real Talk.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:01pm
Thor wrote:
^Absolutely WRONG choop.
I've been all over ontario cause i have lived here for almost 3 years now....Toronto to cornwall to Ste-Saint Marie.
And i say lack of culture because you can readily identify someone from Alberta, Newfoundland, Maritimes, BC, or quebec....but people from ontario are just like robots or they end up being retarded rednecks.
Like i said it's just personal experience and if you don't like it you can suck a lemon.
And I currently reside in Kingston, ON....but am trying desperately to get posted to Gagetown, NB to be closer to NS or NFLD |
Ahh.
I will either be in Kingston, Toronto, or sault ste marie next year.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:02pm
little devil wrote:
I live in Hamilton like 30-45 minutes away from carl and I dont know what hes smoking saying ontarios better. And you cant knock Banff at all, its one of the most layed back ski bum work to ride and live places around. Plus the scenery over there kills anything including the falls over here. Needless to say, I owuld pick Alberta/B.C. any day over Ontario.
Real Talk. |
Hamilton is ten minutes from me...
And Hamilton doesn't count. Anything looks bad when compared to Hamilton.
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:03pm
Well, if I'm still in kingston, drop me a line and we'll meet up face to face....so we can argue like adults. LOL
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:05pm
Thor wrote:
Well, if I'm still in kingston, drop me a line and we'll meet up face to face....so we can argue like adults. LOL |
I'm legal
|
Posted By: Man Bites Dog
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:07pm
Canawho?
-------------
|
Posted By: Bunkered
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:14pm
Thor wrote:
Well, if I'm still in kingston, drop me a line and we'll meet up face to face....so we can argue like adults. LOL |
Will you beat the hell out of him for me?
-------------
|
Posted By: little devil
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:14pm
|
You live in Grimsby, what is there to do in grimsby? we at least have Hess. Aswell as other pubs and clubs to hit up on the weekends.
|
Posted By: scotchyscotch
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:16pm
|
So let me get this right...
You guys are arguing what part of Canadia sucks the least?
|
Posted By: jerseypaint
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:17pm
scotchyscotch wrote:
So let me get this right...
You guys are arguing what part of Canadia sucks the least? |
I know....I laughed too.
-------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:20pm
scotchyscotch wrote:
So let me get this right...
You guys are arguing what part of Canadia sucks the least? |
Naw, we're arguing what part is best, and what part is worst. I'm still happy I live here :)
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:21pm
Well, americans wouldn't understand because they don't have a culture....Their country is more vapid and boring than ontario is.
And i don't beat anyone up unless they are commiting a crime. How many times do i have to go to court for assault before i learn that one.
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: Bunkered
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:26pm
Thor wrote:
Well, americans wouldn't understand because they don't have a culture....Their country is more vapid and boring than ontario is.
And i don't beat anyone up unless they are commiting a crime. How many times do i have to go to court for assault before i learn that one. |
Just go hang out with him.
Then, if he breaks even the most minute law (IE: jaywalking), tackle him and break a clavicle.
Just tell the police you knocked him out of the way of an oncoming car if all else fails.
-------------
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:32pm
Nah, fair's fair. He gets one chance to make an impression...
Just kidding dude, your safe for now :)
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 10:55pm
little devil wrote:
You live in Grimsby, what is there to do in grimsby? we at least have Hess. Aswell as other pubs and clubs to hit up on the weekends. |
Gribsy sucks, so?
Dude, hamilton is the scariest place ever. Someone told me that the basketball team at he school got hacked up by kids who brought machette's to school.
Not to mention how I can taste the smog.
Hamilton is the scum of the earth.
|
Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 11:20pm
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 25 February 2008 at 11:44pm
She told me that, then like a year later, someone else told me the exact same story.
|
Posted By: pb125
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 1:10am
carl_the_sniper wrote:
She told me that, then like a year later, someone else told me the exact same story. |
Oh so it MUST be true! 
-------------
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 1:44am
pb125 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
She told me that, then like a year later, someone else told me the exact same story. |
Oh so it MUST be true! 
|

|
Posted By: little devil
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 7:30am
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 10:42am
jerseypaint wrote:
scotchyscotch wrote:
So let me get this right...
You guys are arguing what part of Canadia sucks the least? |
I know....I laughed too. |
Isn't that like arguing about which cow pie you'd rather step in?
-------------
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 10:45am
|
This is quickly headed for an All Time Top Ten Thread nomination. Oustanding stuff.
Keep it up, Canuckies.
------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 10:47am
Ask MBRO = #1
-------------
|
Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 10:56am
Rambino wrote:
This is quickly headed for an All Time Top Ten Thread nomination. Oustanding stuff.
Keep it up, Canuckies. |
I especially like the part where that one guy keeps demanding specifics from the people he's arguing with, but never supplies anything more than broad generalities himself.
------------- ?
|
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 11:07am
Reb Cpl wrote:
Rambino wrote:
This is quickly headed for an All Time Top Ten Thread nomination. Oustanding stuff.
Keep it up, Canuckies. |
I especially like the part where that one guy keeps demanding specifics from the people he's arguing with, but never supplies anything more than broad generalities himself.
|
That one guy? You mean the one that made that post about that stuff on that one page?
-------------
|
Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 11:10am
Mack wrote:
Reb Cpl wrote:
Rambino wrote:
This is quickly headed for an All Time Top Ten Thread nomination. Oustanding stuff.
Keep it up, Canuckies. |
I especially like the part where that one guy keeps demanding specifics from the people he's arguing with, but never supplies anything more than broad generalities himself.
|
That one guy? You mean the one that made that post about that stuff on that one page?
|
I don't want to specify. He gets cranky.
------------- ?
|
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 11:15am
Ooooooh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . him.
-------------
|
Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 11:20am

back to topic:
An American's Two cents: I've been to Montreal, and it was god-awful. I disliked the city, as well as the people we met. They were stuffy and unfriendly. Even the tour guide we had assigned to us on the trip was an a-plug. I'm hoping he wasn't indicative of all of the residents of that particular area.
------------- ?
|
Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 11:23am
Lol
The dispute stemmed fom a foosball game.
------------- Que pasa?
|
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 3:26pm
foosball--serious business.
-------------
|
Posted By: DzXs
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 4:02pm
¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:
Exactly why I'm against universal health care. You get what you pay for. I have great health insurance, and I can rest assured that if anything were to happen or pop up out of nowhere, I can get whatever treatment I need immediately. If my doctor and I suspect that I may have a brain tumor, I could go get an MRI tomorrow morning.
|
because you can pay for it moron, thats the point, alot of people cant.
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 4:33pm
pb125 wrote:
carl_the_sniper wrote:
She told me that, then like a year later, someone else told me the exact same story. | Oh so it MUST be true!  |
Wrong and proven!
Reb Cpl wrote:
back to topic:An American's Two cents: I've been to Montreal, and it was god-awful. I disliked the city, as well as the people we met. They were stuffy and unfriendly. Even the tour guide we had assigned to us on the trip was an a-plug. I'm hoping he wasn't indicative of all of the residents of that particular area.
|
That is quebec. Try to avoid them.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 4:36pm
Reb Cpl wrote:
back to topic:An American's Two cents: I've been to Montreal, and it was god-awful. I disliked the city, as well as the people we met. They were stuffy and unfriendly. Even the tour guide we had assigned to us on the trip was an a-plug. I'm hoping he wasn't indicative of all of the residents of that particular area.
|
Go to Halifax, Nova Scotia, then come to Vancouver, BC. Halifax is just a gong show of a good time, and we already went over Vancouver.
|
Posted By: Thor
Date Posted: 26 February 2008 at 7:34pm
Yeah he shoulda gone to Halifax.
The problem is that alot of people hear about montreal and think it will be nice. As someone who grew up in montreal i can say that it takes some getting used before you can truly enjoy it.
But for all travellers from the states, try to avoid Quebec, it's like a different country with a chip on it's shoulder, especially against you anglo's.
------------- A second class drive is always better than a first class walk.
|
|