New Rules
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=174989
Printed Date: 26 January 2026 at 2:38am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: New Rules
Posted By: Rambino
Subject: New Rules
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:46pm
|
In response to user demand, we have developed new sig guidelines. They can be found in the announcement above. Please read, and remove any non-compliant signatures. These new guidelines will be strictly enforced. ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Replies:
Posted By: You Wont See Me
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:49pm
|
I'm not sure what to say
------------- A-5 E-Grip JCS Dual Trigger DOP X-CORE 8 stage x-chamber Lapco Bigshot 14" Beadblasted Optional setup: R/T Dead on Blade trigger |
Posted By: AfricanAmerican
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:49pm
|
first
------------- Do it again, and you're banned. |
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:50pm
|
Epic win.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:50pm
|
Oh you guys are fun-nay.
-------------  irc.esper.net #paintball |
Posted By: sinisterNorth
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:51pm
|
I lol'd.
------------- Pumpker'd; (V.) When a pump player runs up and shoots you at point blank range because you thought 20bps made you good. |
Posted By: Roll Tide
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 7:54pm
|
Ok... ------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules> 
|
Posted By: Jack Carver
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 8:08pm
Hahaha, love it
|
Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 8:18pm
|
rofl
------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules> |
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 8:20pm
|
I love these new rules.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Uncle Rudder
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 8:22pm
|
I get it, haha. ------------- 
|
Posted By: oreomann33
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:00pm
|
Honestly, how long did that take you?
------------- 
|
Posted By: procarbinefreak
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:05pm
| probably not as long as you think. |
Posted By: Snake6
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:07pm
|
Rambs, that has got to be the most awesome thing I have read all week. EDIT: I move that PaintballChat.Org related sigs be added as an exception to clause 3 sentence 2. All in favor? ------------- 
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:11pm
|
I'm not gonna lie, I got a kick out of it. edit: Opposed. Motion to amend said guidelines to strike those with all paintball-related IRC chat signatures in accordance with the new "Ha-ha you pretentious yet ignorant dingbats" clause? ------------- 
|
Posted By: Roll Tide
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:14pm
|
These rules should not be retroactive.
------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules>
|
Posted By: -ProDigY-
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:17pm
|
------------- 
|
Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:23pm
|
I don't have any problems with them.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:26pm
|
Sadly, this is true. ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
procarbinefreak wrote:Posted By: Snake6
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:26pm
I oppose your proposal. And I move to have the name "gatyr" and all variations thereof added to the swear filter and immediately IP banned. -------------
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:27pm
|
Epic Win
I'll be in the bathroom making art... ------------- <just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs> |
Posted By: sporx
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:29pm
------------- 
|
Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:35pm
Hear hear! |
Posted By: AfricanAmerican
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:36pm
|
LAME
------------- Do it again, and you're banned. |
Posted By: Enos Shenk
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:42pm
|
I guess it hasnt sunk in yet.
------------- 
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 9:48pm
|
Upon further review, this opponent to the new sig guidelines requests
that stare decisis be enacted for all previous signatures, and that the
writ of sua sponte be reviewed for all guidelines not pertaining to the
original call for signature size with regards to height and width aspects. Furthermore, corpus delecti is to be viewed as mandatory, with full explanations as to what offenses said signatory of the signature the "mod" deemed in violation of agreed upon guidelines. Malfeasance is not to be grounds for signature removal; the moderator shall keep in mind the reputation certain forumers hold (and any detrimental effects that may be had by reprimanding said forumer) and allow for a correction period of one internet millennium (or one normal day), after which the moderator is to take into account the mens rea of the infraction. Upon deeming the signature, it is advised that the moderator review the abstract of title and confer with an appellate moderator (those moderators with more stars than the moderator questioning the legality of the signature) to confirm that there has indeed been an infraction. It is then the decision of the moderators what to do with the signature. Should no appellate moderator be conferred with, the infraction is to be thrown out, and stricken from the records, never to be considered again for future infractions. K? -------------
|
Posted By: Bolt3
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 10:59pm
Veni, vidi, vici? ------------- <Removed sig for violation of Clause 4 of the New Sig Rules> |
Posted By: xteam
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 11:11pm
|
THERE IS A SIG VIOLATION ON THIS PAGE.
-------------  |
Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 11:12pm
|
bat signal
------------- irc.esper.net #paintball |
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 11:49pm
|
Mr. Gatyr, that is a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out objection.
Overruled. ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Posted By: sporx
Date Posted: 21 April 2008 at 11:53pm
-------------
|
Posted By: xteam
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 4:20am
|
I LOVE THESE NEW RULES. ------------- |
Posted By: Snipa69
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 4:31am
|
It's 1:30AM and I just put down one of my law textbooks and come to read this. I'm convinced, there is no escaping it. I need to change my major... ------------- http://imageshack.us - [IMG - http://img456.imageshack.us/img456/857/sig9ac6cs1mj.jpg - |
Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 8:29am
Your sig barely escapes violation of Section 3. ------------- ? |
Posted By: FlimFlam
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 8:56am
Well played sir. Did you say yoots? ------------- 
|
Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 3:00pm
|
lol nice...
------------- 
|
Posted By: sinisterNorth
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 3:14pm
------------- Pumpker'd; (V.) When a pump player runs up and shoots you at point blank range because you thought 20bps made you good. |
Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 3:21pm
I'm glad somebody is paying attention. My comedic genius doesn't get the attention it deserves. ------------- [IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg"> |
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 3:34pm
|
So is section 13 serious?
Can my sig actually contain a tastefull depiction of fecal matter? ------------- <just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs> |
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 3:44pm
Haha, I love how one simple word supersedes all of the latin terms and legal jargon I had to google. Touche'. -------------
|
Posted By: xXK1CK1NVV1NGXx
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 5:56pm
|
I tried reading the sticky and it hurt me head.
------------- <Sig violation, Section 1> |