Should she stay or should she go?
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=175012
Printed Date: 22 January 2026 at 11:13am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Should she stay or should she go?
Posted By: .Ryan
Subject: Should she stay or should she go?
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:30pm
So, tonight is the Pennsylvania primary. Some are saying that Clinton has to win this to stay in the game and has to win by a lot to have it help her chances at all, being so far behind in delegates, states, and money. So, my question, mainly to the Dems out there cause we know the other side's opinion, is should Hillary stay in if she doesn't do well tonight?
My thoughts are thus: I used to not mind her too much, I just thought she was too Washington, too conservative, and too corporate. Now I am pretty much to the point that I don't like her at all. Firstly, as she goes she shows more and more of the side of her that I hate. She is showing her ruthlessness, conservatism, untrustworthiness, and simple dirtiness more and more and I don't think this nation can afford this type of politician anymore. We are facing a war that should have never started and needs stopped as soon as possible, a climate crisis that is already effecting the world and that should have had action taken on it years ago, an building energy crisis caused by our reliance on oil that literally holds the possibility of the degradation or even fall of western civilization if we don't give the crap up and move on, and a government that no longer represents its people and only feeds the disgusting economic inequities in this country. We can't afford conservatism anymore. Secondly, and I guess lastly, I believe in the Democratic Party and its principles. What she is doing can only end one of three ways. She can drop out and let Obama catch up to McCain in general election efforts, she can keep going and lose in the end making the convention dramatic and possibly hurting the Dems a lot in the general election, or she can keep going and have the Super Delegates(which I think should be abolished) overrule the will of the majority of Dems in America. This last possibility will make me hate her. Not only is it undemocratic, but it could lead this country into another 4 years of Republican rule when all the Dems she disenfranchised stay home in November. That might even include this time, though I don't know if I could resist voting against McCain. But we definitely can not afford 4 more years of Republican rule due to the urgency of our current problems. This all seems so selfish on her part, and I even want to call it unpatriotic when I'm cranky....She has to quit.
Oh and please don't turn this into a right v. left debate, beyond maybe rather Hillary is too conservative. I really want to discuss the topic as I posted it. Thanks.
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:34pm
Definitely a war that never should have been started.
God Damn America!!!
-------------
|
Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:38pm
I would hate seeing her get the nomination. I'm for Obama all the way.
-------------
 irc.esper.net #paintball
|
Posted By: Da Hui
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:40pm
Benjichang wrote:
I would hate seeing her get the nomination. I'm for Obama all the way.
|
She is bad for the entire party. Her and her endless nonsense are making the Dems look bad. As long as She is still in the race She is bad for the Democrats. From what I heard on the Radio an hour ago She is ahead in the polls right now 
-------------
|
Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:42pm
Yeah I heard that too. /sigh
-------------
 irc.esper.net #paintball
|
Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:42pm
Polls in Pennsylvania close in 17 minutes.
Should be interesting.
|
Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 7:59pm
Also, my editorial for tomorrow:
Fifty-two minutes.
That is the excruciatingly long time that it took for the hosts of the televised Democratic debate last week to finally get around to asking an important question.
Instead of getting to hear responses about what the candidates think about, oh, say the war or the economy, we got to hear Barack Obama questioned about why he doesn't wear an American flag pin on his lapel. That's right, stop the presses; hold the phone. Barack Obama was not wearing a flag pin. For anyone who actually cares about what is going on with the race to the Oval Office, it was painful to watch.
However, this stance is not going to deride that single televised debate. No, that debate was simply a showcase of just how ground down in the muck this Democratic race for nomination has become.
We have such an exciting crossroads between potentially the first female or first black president, and it all started off pretty well. Both candidates would actually talk about the real issues when asked.
Everything has broken down though, and we are at a level of mudslinging usually reserved for high school class presidents.
We get it. Hillary Clinton fudged her experience in Bosnia. There were no snipers. She lied about it. How many more times during this campaign are we going to have to hear her explain that? Should she just go ahead and wear a scarlet letter "L" for everyone in the land to see?
The ridiculous claims take an all new level with Obama.
The whole thing kicked off with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright "scandal," when Obama's pastor made some racially negative comments. Everyone jumped on it and declared it to be the death of Obama's campaign. All those jumping never seemed to take into account that Obama could possibly manage to go to the church and still not feel the same way Wright did.
Things have only degraded from there. We should not be at the point where the main topic of debate with a presidential candidate is if they flipped the other candidate off in a concealed manner. That is the fresh new controversy. Supposedly, Obama, under the guise of scratching his face, raised his middle finger toward Clinton.
It is ridiculous and unnecessary and is working negatively for everyone involved.
We are in a very crucial time for this country. We are involved in a war with not much of an ending in sight. Our economy is toeing the fine line of recession. Our international relations and position in the world are sinking.
What we need is for the Democratic candidates to start focusing on the important answers. The pundits in the media need to be asking how they are going to fix those things but instead are too busy wondering if Obama was trying to be Jay-Z when he "brushed the dirt off his shoulder" at a recent speech.
The media needs to stop focusing so heavily on nitpicking and trying to find gossip and get back to the true issues here, the things that will end up affecting everyone.
The potential voters on both sides of the coin need to understand where the candidates lie on the core issues that are going to be affecting them if they are elected. If one of the two Democratic contenders is elected, nobody is going to care if Obama shot Clinton the bird. What people are going to care about is national security, or the housing market, or any of the dozens of other things that are crucial to the life of the average American.
The attitude with this race has to change for the sake of everyone involved, the candidates and the people they could one day represent.
|
Posted By: Panda Man
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 8:15pm
wow Obama is actually doing better then I thought he would.
-------------
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:05pm
52/48- Clinton, so far.
Edit: And of course, the media is already calling for her...
Oh and, dig the article Whale.
-------------
|
Posted By: Enos Shenk
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:10pm
Da Hui wrote:
She is bad for the entire party. Her and her endless nonsense are making the Dems look bad. As long as She is still in the race She is bad for the Democrats. From what I heard on the Radio an hour ago She is ahead in the polls right now 
|
Duh, the republicans are voting in the primaries too, and they want to fight Hillary. They think shes easier to beat.
I cant wait until Indiana primaries. Id be proud if it was my state that got to bury her.
-------------
|
Posted By: cdacda13
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:15pm
Hillary is too conservative. McCain is too liberal. This election has something for everyone.
I really want the dem convention to be split. First time in a long time for that to happen.
|
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:22pm
YAH, CUZ THE DEMS ARE 'MERICAS ONLY CHANCE, AMIRIGHT?
------------- Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
Posted By: .Ryan
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:37pm
Well, if they actually do what they say they want to, and go a little further...yeah.
-------------
|
Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:38pm
Enos Shenk wrote:
Duh, the republicans are voting in the primaries too, and they want to fight Hillary. They think shes easier to beat.I cant wait until Indiana primaries. Id be proud if it was my state that got to bury her. | Penn is a dem only primary
-------------
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 22 April 2008 at 9:43pm
.Ryan wrote:
Well, if they actually do what they say they want to, and go a little further...yeah.
|
Politicians following through, I'd love to see that.
-------------
|
Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 23 April 2008 at 12:11am
agentwhale007 wrote:
<said a bunch of liberal stuff> |
Had to get the obligatory anti-lefty shot in. 
It was actually a very well written and balanced article that outlined the problems with this primary in general and, to a certain extent, the problems with the politics in the nation as a whole.
On the original topic, I thought .Ryan described the problems with Hillary perfectly. My issues aren't with her as a liberal or democrat but with her as a politician.
-------------
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 23 April 2008 at 12:40pm
.Ryan wrote:
Well, if they actually do what they say they want to, and go a little further...yeah.
|
lol
-------------
|
Posted By: Bunkered
Date Posted: 23 April 2008 at 5:17pm
I personally would prefer if she died in a fire over either of those choices.
-------------
|
Posted By: Savage93fvss
Date Posted: 24 April 2008 at 10:42pm
|
Almost all our problems lie within congress, and since it would take congress to fix it, it's never going to happen.
|
Posted By: jubba
Date Posted: 14 June 2008 at 9:19pm
Bunkered wrote:
I personally would prefer if she died in a fire over either of those choices. | Wow thats ruff! You still have your bush/channey 04 bumper sticker, on your big ass imbread pick-up with calvin peeing on a chevy logo don't you.
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 14 June 2008 at 9:24pm
jubba wrote:
Bunkered wrote:
I personally would prefer if she died in a fire over either of those choices. | Wow thats ruff! You still have your bush/channey 04 bumper sticker, on your big ass imbread pick-up with calvin peeing on a chevy logo don't you. |
Why did you bump this just to be an idiot?
Imbread? christ...
|
Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 14 June 2008 at 9:24pm
jubba wrote:
Bunkered wrote:
I personally would prefer if she died in a fire over either of those choices. | Wow thats ruff! You still have your bush/channey 04 bumper sticker, on your big ass imbread pick-up with calvin peeing on a chevy logo don't you. |
That's rough, completely forgetting about Obama, you black hating racist.
Don't bump old threads.
------------- <just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
|
Posted By: l3uLL3t
Date Posted: 14 June 2008 at 10:43pm
i hate politics
-------------
|
|