Print Page | Close Window

Why have only one?

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=176099
Printed Date: 07 March 2026 at 2:38pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Why have only one?
Posted By: bishopisback
Subject: Why have only one?
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:25pm
Why have just one AR-15 when you can have two? My picnic table is packing some pretty heavy fire power.


-------------



Replies:
Posted By: Savage93fvss
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:29pm
I plan on purchasing one this summer. What brand are those?


Posted By: notXXscared
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:30pm
The one on top is 10x more sexy.

-------------

Previously DYE PLAYA


Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:31pm
gotta get one before an assault weapons ban comes back

-------------


Posted By: Savage93fvss
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:32pm
Yeah they might ban everything that looks scary.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 09 June 2008 at 11:51pm
Because there are no zombies coming to get you so you don't need to arm the neighbors and they both shoot the same?

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: rockerdoode
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 3:56am
So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything

-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata


Posted By: Heres To You
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:03am
Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Why do some people have trucks when everyone could use less pollution causing cars?  Who says it's for self defense?  He may just enjoy shooting them, hell I would.

And if there was an intruder in my house, I would want an assault rifle over a 9 anyday...  Matter of fact, I want the 7.62 just to make sure.


-------------
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse."


Posted By: rockerdoode
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:19am
Originally posted by Heres To You Heres To You wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Why do some people have trucks when everyone could use less pollution causing cars?  Who says it's for self defense?  He may just enjoy shooting them, hell I would.

And if there was an intruder in my house, I would want an assault rifle over a 9 anyday...  Matter of fact, I want the 7.62 just to make sure.


Dually noted, i too would like to shoot big guns. That being said it's still excessive. While everyone would rather have an assault rifle, a pistol more than does the job. They all do the same thing.


I'm glad you brought that up.
We shouldn't drive trucks. It just gives gas companies more of a reason to charge such high prices. Supply and demand. If we all drove more fuel efficient cars we would be in control of the market again. Or at least in more control.




-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata


Posted By: Reb Cpl
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 7:17am
Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

Originally posted by Heres To You Heres To You wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Why do some people have trucks when everyone could use less pollution causing cars?  Who says it's for self defense?  He may just enjoy shooting them, hell I would.

And if there was an intruder in my house, I would want an assault rifle over a 9 anyday...  Matter of fact, I want the 7.62 just to make sure.


Dually noted, i too would like to shoot big guns. That being said it's still excessive. While everyone would rather have an assault rifle, a pistol more than does the job. They all do the same thing.


I'm glad you brought that up.
We shouldn't drive trucks. It just gives gas companies more of a reason to charge such high prices. Supply and demand. If we all drove more fuel efficient cars we would be in control of the market again. Or at least in more control.




So.....exactly what color IS the sky in the world you live in?


No one said anything about 'needing' assault rifles. I'm sure you have plenty of things that you don't 'need.' We've got the ability to purchase, own, and shoot them, so why not take advantage of that?
Its like any other hobby- unless you're into it, you probably just don't get it.



-------------
?



Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:18am
Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

Originally posted by Heres To You Heres To You wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Why do some people have trucks when everyone could use less pollution causing cars?  Who says it's for self defense?  He may just enjoy shooting them, hell I would.

And if there was an intruder in my house, I would want an assault rifle over a 9 anyday...  Matter of fact, I want the 7.62 just to make sure.


They all do the same thing.






exactly.  so why does it matter if picks the assault rifle?


-------------


Posted By: Snake6.
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:21am
Why do you have a shroud for a M203 on the lower one, but no M203? Lame.

-------------

http://paintballchat.org - Paintball Chat
I'm at work, Leave me alone!!!


Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:26am
Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.


-------------


Posted By: holysmartone
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:35am
Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.

Heh, relatively... Some do a bit more damage than others...


Posted By: PaiNTbALLfReNzY
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:43am
Originally posted by holysmartone holysmartone wrote:


Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:


Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything
Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.
Heh, relatively... Some do a bit more damage than others...


I'd rather have a .45 than an AR-15 for home protection. An AR-15 at close range will just go through the target, a .45 will knock 'em down good.

But I wouldn't mind having some assault rifles, in case China invades. Then I could create a bad ass militia. If I wasn't still in the military.


Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 11:48am
Originally posted by holysmartone holysmartone wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.

Heh, relatively... Some do a bit more damage than others...


Guns kill people. Dead is dead. Some are larger than some other guns but for the most part not. .223 is a mouse gun IMO. Now a .308 will do some damage.


-------------


Posted By: PaiNTbALLfReNzY
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:03pm
If I really wanted to keep people away from my house, I'd get a bunch of those black powder musket-pistols that pirates used. Just have to make sure you hit the target


Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:14pm

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

While everyone would rather have an assault rifle, a pistol more than does the job.

That depends on what "the job" is.  For killing baddies, sure a pistol will probably do fine for most folk.

But for collecting, showing off on the interwebz, looking at, holding, caressing...  Each gun is different.  Taking a completely utilitarian approach to these things is not helpful.  Kind of like explaining why I have more than a dozen paintball guns.  They all also can "do the job", but I still love them all the same.



-------------
[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">


Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:19pm
If you also have to go outside to shoot coyotes, hunt small critters, or want a modular platform for everything from target shooting to moose hunting, an AR-15 is a good choice. Parts and knowhow are also widely available and no doubt will be for for some time. AR's also have good ergonomics and in a pinch would make a better club than a pistol. 


Posted By: Tical2.0
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:23pm
I wish I could legally own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.

-------------


Posted By: little devil
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:57pm
Originally posted by Tical2.0 Tical2.0 wrote:

I wish I could legally own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.
I'm saying thank god for these Canadian laws, keep that crap legal over there.


Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 12:58pm
Originally posted by little devil little devil wrote:

Originally posted by Tical2.0 Tical2.0 wrote:

I wish I could legally own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.
I'm saying thank god for these Canadian laws, keep that crap legal over there.

agreed


-------------


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 1:27pm
I own 3. One for shooting match, one for plinking, and the 3rd is assault for collection purposes

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: Styro Folme
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 1:30pm
Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by holysmartone holysmartone wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.

Heh, relatively... Some do a bit more damage than others...


Guns kill people. Dead is dead. Some are larger than some other guns but for the most part not. .223 is a mouse gun IMO. Now a .308 will do some damage.
"When two bullets hit you, it really doesn't matter if 48 more come after it."-Tim Wilson


Posted By: rockerdoode
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 1:44pm
Originally posted by Styro Folme Styro Folme wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by holysmartone holysmartone wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


Who said he needed it to defend himself ? It's a gun, no different than the others. They all kill people the same way.

Heh, relatively... Some do a bit more damage than others...


Guns kill people. Dead is dead. Some are larger than some other guns but for the most part not. .223 is a mouse gun IMO. Now a .308 will do some damage.
"When two bullets hit you, it really doesn't matter if 48 more come after it."-Tim Wilson


That's really all I'm saying.

I'm not in any way denying that it's fun to be able to say "oh yeah?" and whip out a buttload of assault rifles, but at the same time it's just ridiculous to say you're getting all those rifles to defend your home. It's just a bad excuse. Just say it how it is, you collect them because you like them. I'd be totally okay with that answer.

I would like to retract my statement all together, however, as soon as I have a family of my own I too will buy a pistol or shotgun for the house just in case. While I never plan on using it, you can never be too safe.

And to whoever asked what color my sky was:
Green.


-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 1:47pm
Stag Arms and a Bushmaster. Correct??

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: .636
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 2:18pm
Originally posted by rockerdoode rockerdoode wrote:

So...why do you need an assault rifle in the first place? I mean, i'm all for right to bear arms...but I highly doubt you'll ever need more than a handgun to protect yourself and your family from an intruder. An assault rifle is completely excessive. It's not like Al Qaeda is invading or anything


For recreation? Having an assault rifle does not mean your out to use it for self defense.


Originally posted by little devil little devil wrote:

Originally posted by Tical2.0 Tical2.0 wrote:

I wish I could legally own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.
I'm saying thank god for these Canadian laws, keep that crap legal over there.


We can get them over here. They are just restricted so you need restricted PAL which is not hard to get.

If you want to keep owning fun toys like a AR or handgun in Canada. Vote conservative



-------------


Posted By: evillepaintball
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 2:40pm
considering the gov't doesnt know about my guns, as they aren't registered, i'll be fine either way.

-------------


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 3:42pm
Hey Bishop, was I correct? Stag and Bushmaster?

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: Snipa69
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 3:45pm
he'll be here soon enough cees, give him time.

-------------
http://imageshack.us - [IMG - http://img456.imageshack.us/img456/857/sig9ac6cs1mj.jpg -


Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 3:52pm
Regarding that quote about the 48 next rounds, you do know these guns aren't full auto correct ?

-------------


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 4:09pm
Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Regarding that quote about the 48 next rounds, you do know these guns aren't full auto correct ?
how can you tell without looking inside?

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 4:16pm
They are NOT assault weapons. They are semi automatic rifles. Yes there is a BIG difference. Assaualt weapons fire semi and full auto. Anyhow now that I got that out of my system, nice carbine(the stag).


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 4:27pm
You should look into the BATF rules regarding the addition of parts from anything they classify as an assault weapon the moment you install them on the rifle. collapsible stocks, flash suppressors/muzzle comps, clawed hammers, etc..

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:21pm
What the hell, I thought you weren't allowed to militarize after your surrender in the first great mbro v bishop war?

There were legally binding terms in the armistice that we signed in that train car.

-------------

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:45pm
 Owning fire arms is nice, if you have a thing against guns, more power to you, but theres a saying, Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it.

 We have a Ruger 40. SKS rifle "Yugoslovian, not no chinese piece..." Taurus 9mm. four 30/30s one 30.6 and a 7.62x39 bolt action..

 I will soon be purchasing a Ruger 45. after I get my T.v paid off...

 Taking weapons out, having fun and shooting them, if you don't enjoy that, then thats fine, but I enjoy the hell out of it, and thats my excuse for having alot of guns.

 A Police officer, told us at our work, we should start carrying pistols, he said the crime rate has gone up so much in the past year its insane.
 When a cop tells you, you need to get a concealed liscense and a pistol, I think its time to get a pistol, My brother now carrys his
Ruger 40. at work at all times, its on a quick release holster attached to his belt.

 When I get my pistol, I won't even bother getting a concealed weapons permit, I personally would prefer "Atleast" one year of getting used to firing, loading, and handling it before I go and wear it on me, a pistol is not something you want to second guess when something goes down.

 /rant over...

p.s also just a note, if someone broke into your home, say your married and got acouple kids, you go blasting away with any kind of assault rifle indoors, theres a chance one of those rounds could go through the bad guy, through the wall behind him, and strike someone you love, a lower calibur is better off.
 


Posted By: Savage93fvss
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:53pm
Actually I read a review of which bullet is best for not going through the walls and killing your family, they said a .223 is better for indoor use than buckshot, and .45 acp. The .223 just breaks in so many pieces when they impact that if they did go through the "bad guy" and the wall the peices that made it wouldnt be big enough/ have enough velocity to do much damage.


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:56pm
 Thats good to know, but I know some of us "me" would prefer a AK47 over a bushmaster, M4 variant, being its a larger cal more punch, but better chance of it going through the wall.
 I really figured a 223. would go through some concrete, is it really that weak?  

p.s I take it 40.'s and 9mm's are pretty decent on not going through walls?


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 5:59pm
Originally posted by Tical2.0 Tical2.0 wrote:

I wish I could legally own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.


Actually, you can own an AR style rifle.

I used to not think so but it turns out that you can actually but some decent guns here in Canada. (including a G-36)



-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: .636
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 6:07pm
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

Originally posted by Tical2.0 Tical2.0 wrote:

I wish I could legally�own a sweet gun. Damn these Canadian laws.


Actually, you can own an AR style rifle.

I used to not think so but it turns out that you can actually but some decent guns here in Canada. (including a G-36)



You can own some AK style guns too. Like the Valmet hunter. There are also a handfull of full autos in Canada too. Just need a imposible to get 12.3 licence


-------------


Posted By: XtremeBordom
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 6:59pm
Originally posted by PaiNTbALLfReNzY PaiNTbALLfReNzY wrote:



I'd rather have a .45 than an AR-15 for home protection. An AR-15 at close range will just go through the target, a .45 will knock 'em down good.


What do you think a bayonet is for?


-------------


Posted By: ctchofday
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 7:35pm
Originally posted by notXXscared notXXscared wrote:

The one on top is 10x more sexy.


respect the M203 shroud... RESPECT!!!!!!

i still agree though, the carbine is much more sexier...

i loved shooting my friends AR15 so smooth. so accurate.


-------------
Xbl:PhantomReign97

'99 Snpr II, ½d Karni, E-Orracle, 2k4 Spstk, 2k5 Prstk, PMR SE, A5, 98


Posted By: SSOK
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 7:35pm

Originally posted by Snake6. Snake6. wrote:

Why do you have a shroud for a M203 on the lower one, but no M203? Lame.

Do you have any M203's laying around Snake?

 



-------------


Posted By: ANARCHY_SCOUT
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 8:01pm
I got AK-47 but mine doesn't use bullets.

-------------
Gamertag: Kataklysm999


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 8:05pm
Originally posted by SSOK SSOK wrote:

Originally posted by Snake6. Snake6. wrote:

Why do you have a shroud for a M203 on the lower one, but no M203? Lame.


Do you have any M203's laying around Snake?



Bushmaster made a flare launcher that resembled a 203, my guess is thats what it is.


Posted By: sinisterNorth
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 8:21pm
Originally posted by Snake6. Snake6. wrote:

Why do you have a shroud for a M203 on the lower one, but no M203? Lame.


Word.


-------------
Pumpker'd; (V.) When a pump player runs up and shoots you at point blank range because you thought 20bps made you good.


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 9:56pm
I've never understood owning an AK or AR-15. Good looking gun but it only fires semi-auto. Seems to me a pretty expensive rifle for only firing semi. If I get a rifle it will usually be a classic or historic weapon. As for home protection, AK's and any assault looking rifle are too cumbersome indoors. A good pistol and shotgun (which you don't have to be too accurate with) are the best pieces for the home. High powered rifles have a way too powerful bullet to be flying through my dry wall and into my child's room. Good pistol ammo and low powered shotgun rounds won't have that same effect.


Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:09pm
Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Regarding that quote about the 48 next rounds, you do know these guns aren't full auto correct ?
how can you tell without looking inside?


You don't need to look inside, and because I know it's an AR-15.

And to the wraith I think it was who said they have a yugo sks no Chinese "junk" We have a yugo and a Chinese, the Chinese are actually becoming worth something now.


-------------


Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:20pm
I still want one of these,




Ruger Super Redhawk .44 Mag


-------------


Posted By: XtremeBordom
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:47pm
Originally posted by Dune Dune wrote:

I've never understood owning an AK or AR-15. Good looking gun but it only fires semi-auto. Seems to me a pretty expensive rifle for only firing semi. If I get a rifle it will usually be a classic or historic weapon. As for home protection, AK's and any assault looking rifle are too cumbersome indoors. A good pistol and shotgun (which you don't have to be too accurate with) are the best pieces for the home. High powered rifles have a way too powerful bullet to be flying through my dry wall and into my child's room. Good pistol ammo and low powered shotgun rounds won't have that same effect.


Once again... What do you think a bayonet is for?

-------------


Posted By: Evil Elvis
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:48pm
Im in the process of saving up for a Fulton Arms M1A.

I own a Bushmaster Disapator Carbine and it's been one of my favorite guns of all times.

-------------


Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:50pm
I'm sorry but the video game induced belief that you don't need to aim a shotgun is just silly.

-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: Dune
Date Posted: 10 June 2008 at 10:52pm

Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

I'm sorry but the video game induced belief that you don't need to aim a shotgun is just silly.

I'm pretty certain I have used a shotgun on numerous occasions. When I compare shoulder firing an AK accurately at an intruder, it's much easier to do the same with a shotgun.



Posted By: Pariel
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 12:35am
Originally posted by carl_the_sniper carl_the_sniper wrote:

I'm sorry but the video game induced belief that you don't need to aim a shotgun is just silly.


Spray and pray.

Works every time--although they told me 11 shots was kind of a lot for skeet.


Posted By: DeTrevni
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 12:50am
Well, if I jump up and down, they won't be able to hit me...

-------------
Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"



Posted By: rockerdoode
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:51am
Originally posted by DeTrevni DeTrevni wrote:

Well, if I jump up and down, they won't be able to hit me...


I like it when people try to bring the halo jump into CoD 4. As if they can simply jump over a frag grenade, or an m60 fully beaded in on them. Ye-hah. Have fun with that strategy.

Anyway, I can understand the points a perspective shared on this forum, I just feel like I've experienced scenarios where I ask someone why they have an assault rifle and they label it for protection far too many times. It's good that the people here are responsible and educated enough in such an important matter to know what needs to be used and where. It kind of slightly restores my faith in the whole "gun" issue.

Now...to the guy talking about a cop that told him to carry a gun:
If you're ever talking to a cop, and he comes right out and says the crime rate is so bad you need to carry a gun on you at all times when you leave the house, it's time to move, man. Come on. When even the police are throwing their hands up in the air and suggesting vigilante justice, theres a huge problem.

EDIT: Bayonet FTW


-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 9:06am

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by .357 Magnum .357 Magnum wrote:

Regarding that quote about the 48 next rounds, you do know these guns aren't full auto correct ?
how can you tell without looking inside?


You don't need to look inside, and because I know it's an AR-15.

And to the wraith I think it was who said they have a yugo sks no Chinese "junk" We have a yugo and a Chinese, the Chinese are actually becoming worth something now.

 

Don't need to look inside??? at the lower reciever's guts and the bolt carrier? Prove it.



-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: .357 Magnum
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 12:24pm
Look at the safety. And he said it was an AR

-------------


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 12:38pm

It looks like the safety on every AR. You can't tell until you remove the lower from the upper and then look. An M16 safety, hammer, and bolt carrier are different than that of an AR.  The safety from the outside looks like a typical AR safety, look at M16 safety and you'll notice an extra notch on it for moving to full auto or burst.  M16s have clawed hammers, ARs do not. AN M16 boltcarrier has more metal on the lower sleaving of the bolt carrier. An AR bolt carrier has had that removed to make it a little more difficult to turn it into a full auto weapon.   You can take M16 parts and put them into an AR, they will fit minus one little detail involving the lower reciever. and the law. Any AR can be made to an M16 if you have the know how and the tools to do so and still have the appearence of a legal AR.  to anyone who is thinking about converting their AR to M16, DO NOT DO THIS! YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW BY DO SO. Does 2 years in a fed pen seem worth it?

 



-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: .636
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:25pm
Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

It looks like the safety on every AR. You can't tell until you remove the lower from the upper and then look. An M16 safety, hammer, and bolt carrier are different than that of an AR.  The safety from the outside looks like a typical AR safety, look at M16 safety and you'll notice an extra notch on it for moving to full auto or burst.  M16s have clawed hammers, ARs do not. AN M16 boltcarrier has more metal on the lower sleaving of the bolt carrier. An AR bolt carrier has had that removed to make it a little more difficult to turn it into a full auto weapon.   You can take M16 parts and put them into an AR, they will fit minus one little detail involving the lower reciever. and the law. Any AR can be made to an M16 if you have the know how and the tools to do so and still have the appearence of a legal AR.  to anyone who is thinking about converting their AR to M16, DO NOT DO THIS! YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW BY DO SO. Does 2 years in a fed pen seem worth it?

 



Making a full auto AR-15 is perfectly legal if you have a full auto license.


-------------


Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:39pm
Originally posted by .636 .636 wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

It looks like the safety on every AR. You can't tell until you remove the lower from the upper and then look. An M16 safety, hammer, and bolt carrier are different than that of an AR.  The safety from the outside looks like a typical AR safety, look at M16 safety and you'll notice an extra notch on it for moving to full auto or burst.  M16s have clawed hammers, ARs do not. AN M16 boltcarrier has more metal on the lower sleaving of the bolt carrier. An AR bolt carrier has had that removed to make it a little more difficult to turn it into a full auto weapon.   You can take M16 parts and put them into an AR, they will fit minus one little detail involving the lower reciever. and the law. Any AR can be made to an M16 if you have the know how and the tools to do so and still have the appearence of a legal AR.  to anyone who is thinking about converting their AR to M16, DO NOT DO THIS! YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW BY DO SO. Does 2 years in a fed pen seem worth it?

 



Making a full auto AR-15 is perfectly legal if you have a full auto license.

yep

"a bullet sounds the same in every language"~ family guy



-------------
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:51pm
Originally posted by ammolord ammolord wrote:

Originally posted by .636 .636 wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

It looks like the safety on every AR. You can't tell until you remove the lower from the upper and then look. An M16 safety, hammer, and bolt carrier are different than that of an AR.  The safety from the outside looks like a typical AR safety, look at M16 safety and you'll notice an extra notch on it for moving to full auto or burst.  M16s have clawed hammers, ARs do not. AN M16 boltcarrier has more metal on the lower sleaving of the bolt carrier. An AR bolt carrier has had that removed to make it a little more difficult to turn it into a full auto weapon.   You can take M16 parts and put them into an AR, they will fit minus one little detail involving the lower reciever. and the law. Any AR can be made to an M16 if you have the know how and the tools to do so and still have the appearence of a legal AR.  to anyone who is thinking about converting their AR to M16, DO NOT DO THIS! YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW BY DO SO. Does 2 years in a fed pen seem worth it?

 



Making a full auto AR-15 is perfectly legal if you have a full auto license.

yep

"a bullet sounds the same in every language"~ family guy

Not True. even with a tax stamp and an FFL you can't.



-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 2:53pm
Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by ammolord ammolord wrote:

Originally posted by .636 .636 wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

It looks like the safety on every AR. You can't tell until you remove the lower from the upper and then look. An M16 safety, hammer, and bolt carrier are different than that of an AR.  The safety from the outside looks like a typical AR safety, look at M16 safety and you'll notice an extra notch on it for moving to full auto or burst.  M16s have clawed hammers, ARs do not. AN M16 boltcarrier has more metal on the lower sleaving of the bolt carrier. An AR bolt carrier has had that removed to make it a little more difficult to turn it into a full auto weapon.   You can take M16 parts and put them into an AR, they will fit minus one little detail involving the lower reciever. and the law. Any AR can be made to an M16 if you have the know how and the tools to do so and still have the appearence of a legal AR.  to anyone who is thinking about converting their AR to M16, DO NOT DO THIS! YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW BY DO SO. Does 2 years in a fed pen seem worth it?

 



Making a full auto AR-15 is perfectly legal if you have a full auto license.

yep

"a bullet sounds the same in every language"~ family guy

Not True. even with a tax stamp and an FFL you can't.

got that in writing??



-------------
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 3:01pm
Look it up on Google, you need a Type7 license and a SOT tax stamp.

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 3:08pm
Type 7 Manufacturers license and Special Occupational Tax

-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 3:21pm

couldent have edited the the first post??

and i dont exactly care.



-------------
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~


Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 3:38pm

Congrats on your apathy, ammolord.



-------------
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!




Posted By: Rambino
Date Posted: 11 June 2008 at 3:46pm
Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Congrats on your apathy, ammolord.

I lol'ed.



-------------
[IMG]http://i38.tinypic.com/aag8s8.jpg">



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net