One Centisecond
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=177471
Printed Date: 20 February 2026 at 10:32pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: One Centisecond
Posted By: lilsully4
Subject: One Centisecond
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:32pm
|
Is how much time Phelps won by in the 100m fly. He has the 7th gold, Comment?
Will he get the 8th medal? And beat the record?
Edit: oh and if you have been in a hole for 2 weeks, or are a poor college kid... we are talking about the olympics and Phelps' winning of his 7th gold
-------------
|
Replies:
Posted By: Akhmed
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:36pm
|
Comment: When one person can win so many events, that means that those events are too similar.
Notice how it is always swimmers that win a zillion medals? We should do away with about half or two-thirds of all swimming events.
------------- "Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. "
http://zombo.com/ - Most awesome site EVAR!
|
Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:37pm
The events are mostly different strokes! And yes there are to many. But it is almost like track.
-------------
|
Posted By: Akhmed
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:44pm
|
Sure the events are different strokes, but the evidence is pretty clear that skills translate very well across strokes. Why not add doggie-paddle and side-stroke while we are at it?
These events make sense in a swim-only meet (kind of, at least), but in a multi-sport event it is just way overkill.
And track is in many ways similar, but with some stark differences that illustrate my point. While some of the same guys can compete in the 100m and 200m, those guys are usually weak in 400m and useless in 800m and longer runs. Winning two running events is spectacular, winning three is astonishing. Winning seven is outright impossible.
Then look at the jumping events. Hardly anybody can win more than one of those, because they are all so different.
If we applied swimming theory to track and field, here are some of the events we would have:
50m run
150m run
250m run
100m run with your hands behind your back
150m run with your hands behind your back
1.5 mile run
2.5 mile run
3 mile run
standing long jump
1-legged standing long jump (left foot)
1-legged standing long jump (right foot)
high-jump (flop only)
high-jump (scissors only)
high-jump (dive only)
high-jump (freestyle)
------------- "Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. "
http://zombo.com/ - Most awesome site EVAR!
|
Posted By: Frozen Balls
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:46pm
Akhmed wrote:
Comment: When one person can win so many events, that means that those events are too similar.
Notice how it is always swimmers that win a zillion medals? We should do away with about half or two-thirds of all swimming events. |
Decathlon?
edit: I don't know where I'm going with this.
edit again: ^^^ hahaha standing long jump
-------------
|
Posted By: Akhmed
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 10:56pm
|
Frozen Balls wrote:
Decathlon?
edit: I don't know where I'm going with this.
edit again: ^^^ hahaha standing long jump
|
Decathlon is an excellent example. Notice how no decathlete in modern times has been even marginally competitive against the specialists in any single event.
And you laugh at standing long jump - that was an actual event at many track events back in the day, not so long ago. It was ditched mostly because it was deemed too similar to running long jump. Swimming should take some lessons.
------------- "Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. "
http://zombo.com/ - Most awesome site EVAR!
|
Posted By: RoboCop
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:16pm
Blah blah blah. The different types of strokes are different. Some of them are much slower than others. phelps is good when he is underwater off of a turn and that gives him a good advantage. He also finishes a lot stronger at the very end.
When i was watching that race, in my head i was thinking "NOO! How can he let the gold medal go away with that much of a length." Then all of a sudden he comes out of nowhere and takes the half stroke to win. Watching the video over and over, it still doesn't look like he won, but it was unbelievably close that you can't really watch both of them because it was so close.
|
Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:20pm
|
Robo Did you hear that The other coach sent in a challenge? It stayed the same, the watched through the slow-mo cams. msnbc kept me in touch on that.. i was suprised they can challenge
-------------
|
Posted By: Akhmed
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:27pm
|
RoboCop wrote:
Blah blah blah. The different types of strokes are different. Some of them are much slower than others. |
Blah blah blah indeed. The evidence is overwhelming. No other event(s) offers a single athlete a legitimate opportunity to win so many different races. Compared to all other events in the summer olympics (gymnastics being the next closest), the various swimming events are far too similar.
Either they should add more variations of other events, or eliminate some variations on swimming.
In a swim meet, by all means go nuts. Compete in doggie-paddle for all I care. But this isn't a swim meet.
------------- "Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. "
http://zombo.com/ - Most awesome site EVAR!
|
Posted By: Beil
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:27pm
lilsully4 wrote:
Robo Did you hear that The other coach sent in a challenge? It got turned after they went through the slow-mo cams. msnbc kept me in touch on that.. i was suprised..
|
so phelps didn't win that event? that's craziness....i think it's awesome that the competition was that close though...
------------- I do it fast, slow, hard, and easy. I sometimes even do it in the woods. Yeah, I'm a runner.
|
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:30pm
/waits for gatyr
------------- Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
Posted By: Frozen Balls
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:33pm
usafpilot07 wrote:
/waits for gatyr
|
He has some...unique...stories about swimming, if I recall.
-------------
|
Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:36pm
Beil wrote:
lilsully4 wrote:
Robo Did you hear that The other coach sent in a challenge? It got turned after they went through the slow-mo cams. msnbc kept me in touch on that.. i was suprised..
|
so phelps didn't win that event? that's craziness....i think it's awesome that the competition was that close though...
|
SORRY! he did!! i will edit that
-------------
|
Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:37pm
|
Frozen Balls wrote:
usafpilot07 wrote:
/waits for gatyr |
He has some...unique...stories about swimming, if I recall.
|
unique? the little i know about gatyr means that that is bad
-------------
|
Posted By: RoboCop
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:51pm
Beil wrote:
lilsully4 wrote:
Robo Did you hear that The other coach sent in a challenge? It got turned after they went through the slow-mo cams. msnbc kept me in touch on that.. i was suprised..
|
so phelps didn't win that event? that's craziness....i think it's awesome that the competition was that close though... | No, Phelps won. It was by like a fingernail. The glide that Cavic or whatever did at the very end slowed him down just enough for Phelps to explode at the very end and win.
|
Posted By: heliumman77
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:54pm
It annoys me how everyone calls him superman wouldn't aquaman represent him better.
-------------
|
Posted By: lilsully4
Date Posted: 15 August 2008 at 11:58pm
^ yes it would. They also compair him to Tiger Woods
-------------
|
Posted By: t_hop
Date Posted: 16 August 2008 at 1:01am
|
http://www.officetally.com/the-office-season-5-promos/4/ - http://www.officetally.com/the-office-season-5-promos/4/
murder checkers
------------- "I'm here to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and I'm all out of bubblegum."
|
Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 16 August 2008 at 2:05am
Posted By: Shub
Date Posted: 16 August 2008 at 3:11pm
t_hop wrote:
http://www.officetally.com/the-office-season-5-promos/4/ - http://www.officetally.com/the-office-season-5-promos/4/
murder checkers |
I lol'd.
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 16 August 2008 at 5:02pm
Akhmed wrote:
RoboCop wrote:
Blah blah blah. The different types of strokes are different. Some of them are much slower than others. |
Blah blah blah indeed. The evidence is overwhelming. No other event(s) offers a single athlete a legitimate opportunity to win so many different races. Compared to all other events in the summer olympics (gymnastics being the next closest), the various swimming events are far too similar. |
Fly and free use the same muscles, but that's about as close as it gets, and even then, the best butterfliers and freestylists at any distance are different people. If you look at any other dominant swimmer on the international stage, they are able to compete dominantly in three or maybe four events.
Ryan Lochte has made it to 3 individual finals and that would be a tremendous success for any non-Phelps Olympian. Aaron Peirsol, who has dominated the backstroke circuit for as long as I remember ever caring for swimming, has ONLY dominated backstroke. Brendan Hansen has only ever done well as a backstroker. Jason Lezak has never done anything other than the 100 and 50 free on the international level. None of the women in the past or present have ever stretched their skills across so many strokes and been successful.
I'll concede that you might get rid of the medley relay or one of the free relays, though.
-------------
|
Posted By: Bunkered
Date Posted: 17 August 2008 at 6:58am
lilsully4 wrote:
^ yes it would. They also compair him to Tiger Woods |
That's just because he dominates his sport, breaking records all the way.
Seems like a good comparison to me.
-------------
|
Posted By: RoboCop
Date Posted: 17 August 2008 at 8:12am
|
The only reason Phelps has done so well is because he trains all the time. Have you seen his diet. He has to consume a lot of calories to train as much as he does.
|
Posted By: Gatyr
Date Posted: 17 August 2008 at 9:04am
RoboCop wrote:
The only reason Phelps has done so well is because he trains all the time. Have you seen his diet. He has to consume a lot of calories to train as much as he does.
|
He really doesn't do that much yardage or out of water workouts given how fast he is. He only does 15,000 yards a day last I checked, and a bit of cardio/strength training.
That's still a bunch of swimming, but I would do 14,000 yards a day on a regular in-season day, and there are kids around here that do well over 16,000 on a regular basis.
-------------
|
Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 17 August 2008 at 10:58am
Gatyr wins this thread.
-------------
|
Posted By: Akhmed
Date Posted: 17 August 2008 at 8:40pm
Gatyr wrote:
Akhmed wrote:
RoboCop wrote:
Blah blah blah. The different types of strokes are different. Some of them are much slower than others. |
Blah blah blah indeed. The evidence is overwhelming. No other event(s) offers a single athlete a legitimate opportunity to win so many different races. Compared to all other events in the summer olympics (gymnastics being the next closest), the various swimming events are far too similar.
|
Fly and free use the same muscles, but that's about as close as it gets, and even then, the best butterfliers and freestylists at any distance are different people. If you look at any other dominant swimmer on the international stage, they are able to compete dominantly in three or maybe four events.
Ryan Lochte has made it to 3 individual finals and that would be a tremendous success for any non-Phelps Olympian. Aaron Peirsol, who has dominated the backstroke circuit for as long as I remember ever caring for swimming, has ONLY dominated backstroke. Brendan Hansen has only ever done well as a backstroker. Jason Lezak has never done anything other than the 100 and 50 free on the international level. None of the women in the past or present have ever stretched their skills across so many strokes and been successful.
I'll concede that you might get rid of the medley relay or one of the free relays, though. |
You obviously know a lot more about swimming than I do.
But my point is that your analysis is the type of thinking that would help decide WHICH events to eliminate. The decision that something needs to be eliminated is, to me, entirely results-based.
In any other branch of athletics, winning two or more Olympic gold medals in the same year is super-amazing. With swimming, it happens every four years without fail. This is conclusive evidence that swimming is out of whack with other Olympic events.
Phelps, for instance, is touted as the "greatest Olympian of all time". This is completely silly. The American women's beach volleyball team, for instance, is far more dominant than he is. Alexander Karelin, for instance, was a far greater Olympian than Phelps. And so are many, many others.
Phelps gets this silly comparison based solely on his inflated medal count because he happens to compete in the one event where they hand out medals by the handful instead of one at a time.
------------- "Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience. "
http://zombo.com/ - Most awesome site EVAR!
|
|