Print Page | Close Window

COD5 World At War.

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=179015
Printed Date: 25 May 2026 at 1:11pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: COD5 World At War.
Posted By: Ford
Subject: COD5 World At War.
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 11:59am
Anyone else have it ? Got it Friday night after work, played a little went to bed, then yesterday after work I played more and beat the game.

The whole zombie thing was weird.

I can't really describe it, the game wasn't disappointing, but it sure didn't deliver. IMO COD5 doesn't come close to touching COD4, I guess COD4 was just done really well.


-------------



Replies:
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 12:11pm
That would be because COD4 is produced by Infinity Ward which produced the original CoD and CoD2 while CoD: "The Big Red One",CoD 3,and CoD 5 are all produced by Treyarch which is a subsidiary of Activision's Blizzard holdings.

-------------
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 12:16pm
Infinity Ward did a much better job. It really shows on the graphics.

-------------


Posted By: DzXs
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 12:37pm
why doesnt anyone make pc demos anymore?


Posted By: xXK1CK1NVV1NGXx
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 1:23pm
I like it, in fact I played from like ten last night until 4 this morning.

-------------
<Sig violation, Section 1>


Posted By: TheDude
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 1:42pm
Zombies? Explain.

-------------
"According to Sue Johanson, theres nothing that can increase your manhood, trust me I've already looked into it for myself." -Zata

<keep the sigs friendly, please>


Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 1:46pm
played it, decided to trade it for need for speed undercover.

-------------
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~


Posted By: Destruction
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 1:51pm
I play it, and I love it. Although I have to agree with the general consensus that cod4 > cod5.

XBL- dustyspud

-------------
u dont know what to do ur getting mottor boatted

Men are from Magmar, women are from Venusaur.


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 2:05pm
Originally posted by TheDude TheDude wrote:

Zombies? Explain.


After you beat the game you unlock a zombie level with Nazi zombies.

-------------



Posted By: Tical3.0
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 2:27pm
Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by TheDude TheDude wrote:

Zombies? Explain.


After you beat the game you unlock a zombie level with Nazi zombies.


You are in a house. Start at Level 1 and a wave of zombies comes at you. You kill all the zombies, board back up all the windows they came through and then more zombies come. Gets boring after the 10th round. FlameThrower works good with that mode.

-------------
I ♣ hippies.


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 3:47pm
Originally posted by tallen702 tallen702 wrote:

That would be because COD4 is produced by Infinity Ward which produced the original CoD and CoD2 while CoD: "The Big Red One",CoD 3,and CoD 5 are all produced by Treyarch which is a subsidiary of Activision's Blizzard holdings.


I never understand that. You think they would learn.


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 4:47pm
So there are cheats for zombie mode ? Kind of. I start round 1, press the grenade trigger, it says no primary grenades as though you have none, well, release trigger, press and hold it again and wa-la, you have 2 sherman grenades. Mess with it and you'll get the hang of it.

-------------


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 5:06pm
 CoD5 owns...  It took the great CoD4 engine and turned it back to WW2, in my opinion, CoD5>CoD4, why? because it's practically the same game but with improvements everywhere, it's gory, like a War game should be, CoD4 no gore, it's WW2, the greatest war in history, gets points from that to.

 It doesn't feel like paintball anymore, like CoD4 did with everygun being automatic with a surpressor, in this game you actually have guns with Kick.

 IMO everything about this game is superior to CoD4.

 Zombie mode adds alot of replay value to, it also has War, Hardcore FFA, tanks, bayonets, limbs being blown off, the entire experience is just so much more real then CoD4, but then again we are talking about a "Arcade shooter" so realism only goes so far.

 I haven't had as much fun with a game in along time... oh and the Dogs rule... no more hiding in a building from a stupid helicopter pilot.



-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 5:22pm
WWII is so overdone on games.

Graphics are nothing like COD4

There are like, no dogs in COD5 ( I don't have cable Internet)

Guns are bigger in COD4, COD5 has pretty low caliber guns for the most part.




-------------


Posted By: jordanpischke
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 5:35pm
I love it. The nazi zombie mode is really fun. If you can get some friends to play together with it can really be fun especially with the new xbox live party system. If you had fun playing with your friends on COD4 then you will have fun playing on COD5. PLus every level on this game is perfectly setup for a game me and my friends like to play call the cat game. It's a hardcore private match where you have nine lives and the last person alive wins. You'd think it would just be a camp of, bt me and my friends get bored easily so its got alot of running around. My only complaint with COD5 is that sometimes the tanks can be annoying. They should have made a team deathmatch section with no tanks. And the dogs can be annoying if like me your and your internet has gotten worse lately and on somedays I cannot get over 1 bar of signal. Laggy dogs = Me pissed off.

-------------


Posted By: Captain Falcon
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 5:50pm

Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by tallen702 tallen702 wrote:

That would be because COD4 is produced by Infinity Ward which produced the original CoD and CoD2 while CoD: "The Big Red One",CoD 3,and CoD 5 are all produced by Treyarch which is a subsidiary of Activision's Blizzard holdings.


I never understand that. You think they would learn.

The Brilliant Minds of people.



Posted By: hoginds24
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 5:51pm
COD 5 is fun because its different from COD 4. Zombie mode is mad fun. I play on live with a friend that lives in the building next to me and I can hear him scream from here. I have mixed feelings on live play though. I feel COD 5 is much harder than the previous, ie more spawn killing, camping etc.


Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:01pm
Tanks take a big part of it away from me. Not that they are too good or anything, and I see the aspect they add, I just liked that there weren't tanks in C0D4.

CoD4 > CoD5


-------------
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:03pm
Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:

WWII is so overdone on games.

Graphics are nothing like COD4

There are like, no dogs in COD5 ( I don't have cable Internet)

Guns are bigger in COD4, COD5 has pretty low caliber guns for the most part.




 That's funny... so to all the people who have never played MOH, previous CoD games, Wolfenstein, all these great WW2 games, will still find CoDWaW OverDone? I don't think so, it may be "overdone" to you, but to me it will remain the greatest "War Enviroment" to date, thats why so many devolopers make WW2 games.

 Yea the Flamethrowers boring... "insert sarcasm here" yea the WW2 genre is overdone... the whole idea of the World going to war just..doesn't do it for me any more...

 So give me the Sci fi, the laser rifles, the motion bombs, the modern war which people are fighting right now, yea give me something I can relate to! Iraq! i wanna go to Iraq "well there little sonny you won't have to wait long! the Beta Iraq was just released all you have to do is head over to you're recruiter and sign up!

 To each their own, one feels it was overdone, and the other feels it wasn't told correctly, which is why we have the game WaW.

 Activision will most likely return to the "Modern" scene, so there ya go..

 But no war to date, will ever compare to WW2, Wars these days arn't even fought the same way as back then, today you ride down a road and get a IED.. back then you had a LT screaming at you to CHARGE the enemy posistion... yea...

 Two men stare at a messy painting, one man says I see nothing but blurry colors, the other man replies, "it's a Masterpiece"...


 P.S Get Cable Internet, you can't really critisize a game when you've never played the actual game, SP is here for us to have fun and fool around, MP is where the real game unfolds.

 And yea I agree the 12x7.108mm Anti tank rifle is pretty low Cal, same with the 357., 7.62x39 bolt action rifles, the 30 cal automatic machine guns, none of these compare to our 223. cal rifles, and 556mm SAW...

 Really?... no...

 Graphics are great, get a better T.v... they may seem more "Gritty" then CoD4 but thats because it was the style they were going for, not pretty and shinny, but dirty and gritty... it's WW2...




-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:11pm
Someone want to mail me a copy?


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:11pm
Wow... defensive much?

-------------



Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:13pm
 Some times... you say tamoto, I say tomato..

 Really neither WaW> CoD4 nor CoD4>WaW, its a opinion, some people like that, some people like this...

 Oh and Internet is Seriouz Buizness!!!


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:16pm
Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:



 Oh and Internet is Seriouz Buizness!!!


You can't say that when you're the one getting pissy.


-------------
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 6:18pm
 Bah...totally called me out... but atleast now that i've been called out, I can chill... RIGHT!???

 I think it's time to go play some WaW...


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 8:58pm
LOL

It's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?

Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 9:15pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 9:19pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4


Because people whine too much. Not to mention tanks that some people hate. I can see why though, because sometime I drive around in a tank for a whole game.

But seriously it's cod4 with different guns and new maps. Though Last Stand takes like 4 years for the person to die, and if you have last stand you can revive someone out of it. That is annoying.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 9:50pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by tallen702 tallen702 wrote:

That would be because COD4 is produced by Infinity Ward which produced the original CoD and CoD2 while CoD: "The Big Red One",CoD 3,and CoD 5 are all produced by Treyarch which is a subsidiary of Activision's Blizzard holdings.


I never understand that. You think they would learn.


Never understood what, and who are "they?"

Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:

 CoD5 owns...  It took the great CoD4 engine and turned it back to WW2, in my opinion, CoD5>CoD4, why? because it's practically the same game but with improvements everywhere, it's gory, like a War game should be, CoD4 no gore, it's WW2, the greatest war in history, gets points from that to.

 It doesn't feel like paintball anymore, like CoD4 did with everygun being automatic with a surpressor, in this game you actually have guns with Kick.


Improvements? The only improvement you stated was more gore (which I disagree with), and the fact that it's WWII (again, not an improvement). I'm not sure how you figure that CoD4 had no gore, considering everything you snipe someone with a headshot the bullet leaves a huge blood splat on the wall behind the person.

WWII is an improvement? It's more like a step backwards. Everyone knows WWII, everyone has played it, lets move on finally. Sure maybe every one in a while a WWII game would be nice, but do we want 2 more WWII games each year? Not I. Let's move on.

Also, not every CoD4 was automatic, and a lot of them have kick. Not sure what game you've been playing...

Originally posted by usafpilot07 usafpilot07 wrote:

Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:



 Oh and Internet is Seriouz Buizness!!!


You can't say that when you're the one getting pissy.


QFT


-------------


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:28pm
 Rapid... re-read my post, maybe a third time, and you will understand it.

 When I speak of the gore, I really mean the physics in which a body is torn apart, not the sense of gore, also I said not everyone has played WW2 games as much as you stated, not all of us are tired of the genre.

 Everyone knows it? thats why there are 100+ thousand people playing it right now.

 Ofcourse I know not all the weapons in CoD4 were automatic I was being sarcastic, sorry i'll spell it out for ya next time.

QFT is overused.

 if you read up alittle you will realise most of us have come to the conclusion that CoD4 and CoDWaW are both great games in their own way being CoDWaW is just a reskinned version of WW2 with new weapons, perks, and new maps, which are also an improvement by the size.
  Some like apples some like ...watermelon...


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:32pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4



Mainly because of the setting which has been done more then Spitzers call girl.

-------------



Posted By: ThatGuitarGuy
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:36pm
I want to see a Civil War game.


Or even better, a Revolutionary War game.

THERE is a war that's not visited enough in FPSs.


-------------
Skillet:     I've never been terribly fond of the look of a vagina


Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:40pm
Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:

 Rapid... re-read my post, maybe a third time, and you will understand it.

 When I speak of the gore, I really mean the physics in which a body is torn apart, not the sense of gore, also I said not everyone has played WW2 games as much as you stated, not all of us are tired of the genre.

 Everyone knows it? thats why there are 100+ thousand people playing it right now.

 Ofcourse I know not all the weapons in CoD4 were automatic I was being sarcastic, sorry i'll spell it out for ya next time.

QFT is overused.

 if you read up alittle you will realise most of us have come to the conclusion that CoD4 and CoDWaW are both great games in their own way being CoDWaW is just a reskinned version of WW2 with new weapons, perks, and new maps, which are also an improvement by the size.
  Some like apples some like ...watermelon...


The point is that your statement "CoD4 no gore" is inaccurate. And yes, if you would spell it out (literally, spell [correctly this time]) that would help immensely.

And as for "everyone knows it": I highly doubt those quoted 100,000+ people are playing WaW for it's awesome storyline as if they've never heard of what happened in WWII before.


-------------


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:43pm
 Those would be fun... the whole reason people prefer WW2 to other settings is it's variety, do we hate WW2 movies just because so many have been made? no... to say the same about a game means... you prefer Modern settings over WW2.

 The Civil War would be fun if done right, the first 3-5 vollys you can't move and it's just a game of luck in who gets shot, then the charge...


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:45pm
 No their playing it because it's a fun game and they don't mind it's gone back to WW2, and oh god the grammer Nazis are here... dude.. its the internet don't make this a spelling contest...

 CoD4 had no gore Compared to WaW, compared, it had absolutely Nothing, happy? thats my opinion just like you have you're opinion.


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: Sharon Needles
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:50pm
Meh, I still think CoD4 is better than WaW.

WaW is good tho for a change of pace. And Jmac is right, the dogs are sweet.


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:50pm
Actually, I do prefer modern era games as opposed to history games.

Though I am happy they went (mainly) to the pacific this time around... not AS visited as Normandy.

-------------



Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:53pm
 The Pacific campaign was fun, especially the flamethrower missions...

 I really don't care what era it is' Veitnam, WW2, Mordern, they are all great in their own ways.

 Veitnam...CoD Veitnam...


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 10:58pm
Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:


 CoD4 had no gore Compared to WaW, compared, it had absolutely Nothing, happy? thats my opinion just like you have you're opinion.


it's a dumb opinion. The only thing WaW has is you see limbs blown off in the killcam. Who watches the killcam anyway?


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 23 November 2008 at 11:45pm
Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4



Mainly because of the setting which has been done more then Spitzers call girl.


So Saving Private Ryan sucks because it's not the first WWII movie? No. Quality dictates if it's good, not if it's been done before.


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 12:26am
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4



Mainly because of the setting which has been done more then Spitzers call girl.


So Saving Private Ryan sucks because it's not the first WWII movie? No. Quality dictates if it's good, not if it's been done before.


And yet, did I say that? No. I just stated the common view on the matter.

-------------



Posted By: ThatGuitarGuy
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 12:32am
Having not played WaW, I can't comment on the game itself, but I can comment on the War games genre having over-done WWII.

You can only storm the beaches of Normandy so many times before it's just played out.  You can only go through so many German villages before it's played out.   The war gets tired.

Saving Private Ryan stands out because of it's content.  WWII games (theoretically) could also introduce something new, and therefore stand out on their own, but most of them don't, therefore they get placed with all the other games, in the "over-done" category.

I think maybe that is what Linus is getting too.


-------------
Skillet:     I've never been terribly fond of the look of a vagina


Posted By: TheWrAith
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 12:34am
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

LOLIt's just COD4 reskinned. Like an expansion pack. What could be wrong with that?Dogs are cool, I am a fan.


Thats what I don't understand, how the opinions are soooo hugely differing, when it's just a lightly tweaked COD4



Mainly because of the setting which has been done more then Spitzers call girl.


So Saving Private Ryan sucks because it's not the first WWII movie? No. Quality dictates if it's good, not if it's been done before.


 Even tho earlier in this thread I said it was overused... QFT...

 I blow peoples limbs off all the time, higher caliber weapons do it more often, also you can blow heads off in SP, don't think so in MP but then again i've never got a head shot with the PTRS in MP...

 It's much more then limbs to, depending on how close you are to the explosion can determine what happens to you I.E 10 feet you lose half you're hand part of you're forearm, 5 feet you lose you're entire arm.

 Can we atleast all agree this is a fun game... even if it's been done and done, even if it's just a reskinned version of CoD4 ... does that make it...any less fun...

I love this game... I haven't even unlocked the Flamethrower in MP and I'm telling myself I will prestige to 10 for the Gamerpic...


 * To above poster* this game is what I said... Gory...unlike almost everyother War shooter to date, the gore reminds me of Gears style.. no other War game has been this graphic before. I think thats why it stands out in my opinion...


-------------
Black*1* then*1* White Are*2* All I see*3* in my infancy*5* red and yellow then came to be*8* reaching out to me*5* lets me see*3*
Swing on the Spiral=
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,8,5,3,2,1


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 12:41am
Originally posted by ThatGuitarGuy ThatGuitarGuy wrote:

Having not played WaW, I can't comment on the game itself, but I can comment on the War games genre having over-done WWII.

You can only storm the beaches of Normandy so many times before it's just played out.  You can only go through so many German villages before it's played out.   The war gets tired.

Saving Private Ryan stands out because of it's content.  WWII games (theoretically) could also introduce something new, and therefore stand out on their own, but most of them don't, therefore they get placed with all the other games, in the "over-done" category.

I think maybe that is what Linus is getting too.



That's why WaW is good. You're in the pacific mostly. Even as a Russian going into Germany is pretty fun. I mean the beginning in Stalingrad is the same old sniper mission stuff, but after that its good.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: PaiNTbALLfReNzY
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 8:26am
Someone needs to develop a Vietnam game for a 3G Console that doesn't totally fail.


Posted By: DEVILDOGCOLLIER
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 10:31am

Originally posted by TheWrAith TheWrAith wrote:

 CoD5 owns...  It took the great CoD4 engine and turned it back to WW2, in my opinion, CoD5>CoD4, why? because it's practically the same game but with improvements everywhere, it's gory, like a War game should be, CoD4 no gore, it's WW2, the greatest war in history, gets points from that to.

 It doesn't feel like paintball anymore, like CoD4 did with everygun being automatic with a surpressor, in this game you actually have guns with Kick.

 IMO everything about this game is superior to CoD4.

 Zombie mode adds alot of replay value to, it also has War, Hardcore FFA, tanks, bayonets, limbs being blown off, the entire experience is just so much more real then CoD4, but then again we are talking about a "Arcade shooter" so realism only goes so far.

 I haven't had as much fun with a game in along time... oh and the Dogs rule... no more hiding in a building from a stupid helicopter pilot.

 

call of duty 5 was freakin horrible compared to cod4!!!!  and as far as realistic, good graphics, and great gameplay goes.......cod4 is one of the BEST war games ever made to this day!!!!!!    i returned cod5 3 hours after i got it!!!!



Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 4:36pm
Originally posted by PaiNTbALLfReNzY PaiNTbALLfReNzY wrote:

Someone needs to develop a Vietnam game for a 3G Console that doesn't totally fail.


-------------
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx


~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 9:09pm
COD in Vietnam would be cool.

And sure COD5 has gore, but it's fake. When you get shot with a shotgun, you don't actually fly backwards through the air. Your leg doesn't get blasted off either.


-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 9:34pm
**edited** ?


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Tical3.0
Date Posted: 24 November 2008 at 10:49pm
Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:


 Your leg doesn't get blasted off either.

Wanna put some money on that. 

-------------
I ♣ hippies.


Posted By: AoSpades
Date Posted: 25 November 2008 at 11:05am
The only thing I dont like is that it seems the artillery strikes are more of a stunner than a killer. although the replays of the kills from artillary strikes can be pretty funny at times...As well as the sticky grenades. I think I see a Halo3 sticky fight rooms in the near future.

-------------


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 25 November 2008 at 6:56pm
Originally posted by Tical3.0 Tical3.0 wrote:

Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:


 Your leg doesn't get blasted off either.

Wanna put some money on that. 


Have you done it in the game ? You shoot a dude in the leg and they are instantly vaporized.


-------------


Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 25 November 2008 at 7:00pm
Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:

Originally posted by Tical3.0 Tical3.0 wrote:

Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:


 Your leg doesn't get blasted off either.

Wanna put some money on that. 


Have you done it in the game ? You shoot a dude in the leg and they are instantly vaporized.


I've taken off legs before.


-------------


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 25 November 2008 at 9:12pm
In that game, a shotgun to the leg = vaporized leg, a grenade blowing up right under them = missing foot, thats not real.

-------------


Posted By: Skillet42565
Date Posted: 25 November 2008 at 10:12pm
Who cares about it being ultrarealistic?  Just be entertained and be quiet.


-------------


Posted By: PaiNTbALLfReNzY
Date Posted: 26 November 2008 at 8:56am
Originally posted by Skillet42565 Skillet42565 wrote:

Who cares about it being ultrarealistic?  Just be entertained and be quiet.


QFT


Posted By: adrenalinejunky
Date Posted: 26 November 2008 at 9:00am
Originally posted by PaiNTbALLfReNzY PaiNTbALLfReNzY wrote:

Originally posted by Skillet42565 Skillet42565 wrote:

Who cares about it being ultrarealistic?  Just be entertained and be quiet.


QFT


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 26 November 2008 at 9:06am
I don't care, but earlier someone said this games realistic.

-------------


Posted By: AoSpades
Date Posted: 26 November 2008 at 9:07am

Originally posted by Ford Ford wrote:

In that game, a shotgun to the leg = vaporized leg, a grenade blowing up right under them = missing foot, thats not real.

 

It just has to do with the games mechanics you whiney little child. I've thrown plenty of grenades under people in that game where they are missing both legs. Your grenades are just weak...like your arguement.



-------------


Posted By: Ford
Date Posted: 26 November 2008 at 9:18am
You're retarded, I'm not whining about the game, I'm talking to the persons who are whining about COD4 not being realistic 

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net