Print Page | Close Window

Healthcare for Immigrants

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=183090
Printed Date: 22 February 2026 at 9:38pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Healthcare for Immigrants
Posted By: stratoaxe
Subject: Healthcare for Immigrants
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 7:45am
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/liberals-seek-health-care-access-for-illegals/ - Healthcare for illegal immigrants?
 
Yeah, work is boring enough I'm reading Drudge and double posting Big smile
 
So kind of curious where the various political minds on the forum stand with this issue. The article raises a good point though, one that I've never thought of.
 
Undocumented aliens comprise alot of ER visits in this country, working in an ER  admissions department I see the mass quantities just in my small town area. So if illegal immigrants were provided the oppurtunity to buy into the universal healthcare that some on the left are desperately pushing, is there a chance that they would be willing to take their children to the local doc and incur significantly less cost to the healthcare system? As it stands there's mass abuse of the ER treatment facilities by illegal aliens (of course legal Americans do the same, but for the sake of discussion...), and bills incurred that the American tax payer is shouldering regardless.
 
That being said, the whole idea of extending nationalized insurance to undocumented, illegal aliens makes me shudder. Hell, nationalized healthcare makes me shudder. But I will concede, if the system does pass, this is a road we will inevitably cross.
 
Discuss.


-------------



Replies:
Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 10:59am
Problem is getting out of hand. Fix-em up, turn them in, enforce current laws, pack em up, and send them home. Problem will self correct. Obama says no funding in bill for illegals, more liberal in Congress pushing to get illegals covered, basically putting the nails into the coffin on this round of a universal healthcare system as approval rates of program keep dropping. Obama's dilemma: cater to the more radical left, or the more centrist majority that can keep him in office for another term. I can see Obama shelving this until his hopefull second term where he personally has nothing to lose. Americans have short political memories, bring this up again in 2012, and see if it carries better.

Short term problem is the massive influx of illegals, with a very ineffective system to control this illegal immagration. Government states can not find illegals easily, don't pay your taxes and see how fast they track you down. And the born in america defense is not a true issue, one or both parents are required to be a US citizen, this birth right manifestation comes from a warped legal system, catering to the illegal immagration support system lobbyists.

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 1:40pm
Make it easier to become legal. Put them in the system.

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:13pm
[citation needed]

-------------

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:18pm
There is a system in place to make them legal. And within that system there are standards that must be met. For generations millions used the system, met the standard and now are citizens. We need not lower the standard for political meed, but enforce the standards that are in place. The millions still waiting legally to enter the system should have priority over the millions who do not nor desire to meet the standards of the current laws, but expect you to lower the standards and place them at the head of the line.

Ship em home, let them re-enter the system and take the legal route, then as stated the problem self corrects. Keep lowering the standards and soon there will be no standard of law, and the soveign state desolves, and those here suffer by those who abuse our immagration system.

citation as requested: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/liberals-seek-health-care-access-for-illegals/ - http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/28/liberals-seek-health-care-access-for-illegals/

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:23pm
If someone had sent my and many other great grandparents home then their kids wouldn't have been born into being a citizen.

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:33pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

If someone had sent my and many other great grandparents home then their kids wouldn't have been born into being a citizen.
So your great grandparents were illegals? Mine all immigrated legally as far as I know.
 
Also: http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=182995 - http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=182995


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:35pm
And the point is, many others who waited in lines at Ellis Island, and other legal immagration points of the laye 1900's and early 1900's, and did it right would have very little sympathy for anyone who broke the law of the time to get an advantage over immagrating the legal way.

The 14th Amendment was meant to establish the slaves born in the US as citizens, not every border hopper hoping to drop a kid (anchor) in the US abusing the system as our current lawmakers basterdized the law and 14th Amendment for purely political and economic motives.

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

If someone had sent my and many other great grandparents home then their kids wouldn't have been born into being a citizen.
So your great grandparents were illegals? Mine all immigrated legally as far as I know.
 
Also: http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=182995 - http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=182995


Tell you the truth I don't know.

Nor do I care to find out. I said my because it sounded better. Point stands.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:51pm
So jmac3, you are willing to move into south central LA, among the illegal immagrant population there, and stand by your point, and share your money (one way or another), compete for employment, and none of the social economic forces will direstly effect you for you have the "simple" answer. Can't wait for the results of that social experiment.

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:53pm
I don't compete for employment now with people who are illegal, or at least can't speak English?

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:56pm
Your point does not stand considering that you do not know, although the Irish are the largest illegal group in MA, or were up until recently. Allowing illegals to pay into the system would be great, but I'd say the majority of them would have incomes too low to be required to pay into the system, but it'd probably still be cheaper than sending them to the ER. I thought the McCain-Kennedy Bill sounded good, new arrivals would be sent back and those who could verify that they'd been working here long enough would have to pay fines and learn English, I'd have to say fining them makes it leniency, not amnesty. Instead we do nothing, have cities that give them the boot and other that are told not to enforce federal law, and we still have Mexicans getting cooked in the desert or are running drugs into the country to pay off the coyotes, and thousands killed in drug wars in Mexico. 


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 2:59pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

I don't compete for employment now with people who are illegal, or at least can't speak English?
They're not capable of lifting boxes?

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 3:03pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

I don't compete for employment now with people who are illegal, or at least can't speak English?
They're not capable of lifting boxes?


Did I say that?

DO I NOT ALREADY COMPETE FOR EMPLOYMENT WITH ILLEGALS AND PEOPLE WHO DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH?

OS, told me to move to South Central and compete for a job. Learn to read.




-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 3:11pm
Ahh, actually did miss the question mark.  My bad. But I can imagine it would be even worse if 12mil + are suddenly legalized and bring their families in as well.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 4:34pm
Great... yet another benefit for doing something illegal... just what we need.

-------------



Posted By: God
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 5:28pm
Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

So jmac3, you are willing to move into south central LA, among the illegal immagrant population there, and stand by your point, and share your money (one way or another), compete for employment, and none of the social economic forces will direstly effect you for you have the "simple" answer. Can't wait for the results of that social experiment.

I do not understand your question or the point that you are asking were trying to illustrate, but I already live and compete for employment in Los Angeles and I do not have a problem with "illegal" immigrants, nor do I feel that they are a drain on society. If anything, most of them are a bigger benefit to our economy and society than many citizens are. Most are in the United States working (and paying taxes) to achieve the American Dream, while many citizens doing nothing and just are waiting for entitlements to be dropped in their laps.


Posted By: God
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 5:35pm
Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Great... yet another benefit for doing something illegal... just what we need.
So.. no health care for prisoners, speeders, insurance frauder, exc.... then? They get healthcare because they are human, not because of where they are born. 

I could use your argument to complain that that people speed on the highways tax dollars paid for. Therefore lets get rid of all highways. 


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 5:56pm
Originally posted by God God wrote:

I do not understand your question or the point that you are asking were trying to illustrate, but I already live and compete for employment in Los Angeles and I do not have a problem with "illegal" immigrants, nor do I feel that they are a drain on society. If anything, most of them are a bigger benefit to our economy and society than many citizens are. Most are in the United States working (and paying taxes) to achieve the American Dream, while many citizens doing nothing and just are waiting for entitlements to be dropped in their laps.
  I have found articles indicating that the taxes paid by immigrants illegal and legal is not even close to adequate to cover the healthcare and social costs that they incurr.  Legal immigrants are 43% more likely to take advantage of public assitance than non-aliens. What is to stop the newly legalized 12mil + from bringing their families over now? What impact is that going to have. 12mil turns into 36mil conservatively. Here is one such article:
 
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8 - http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
 
And yes, I know the article says that illegal immigrants do not account for as much public assitance, but only because they are not eligible. What happens when they are legalized? Will they suddenly start bucking the trend? Will they continue working when they are not eligible to sit on their butt and collect welfare rather than picking fruit in 100 degree weather?
 
As far as taxes, yes they pay sales tax, but truly how many of them pay income tax? And since the vast majority of them are most likely at or below the poverty line, what is their real impact in regards to sales taxes? Are they going out and buying new cars? 50" plasmas? Dining at LaScalas? Probably not. Further, they may or may not be paying local property taxes, but if their kids are born here they get to go to our schools. Since many states schools are funded by property taxes and/or state income taxes.....


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 6:02pm
Now there is a free healthcare for illegals alternative I never thought of. While we are waiting to deport them, while they are in the "camp", they can go to the daily "sick call" for all that free healthcare. And there are more than enough medical schools needing a "labrotory" enviornment to practice in. They get healthcare, out future doctors get the needed training, a total win/win. But giving a benifit for flaunting our laws and having panty wastes defend their "right" to healthcare is one of the reasons this universal healthcare initiative is circling the bowl as we speak. So if our illegals want to go into our penal system for free healthcare, and the right to it, I will be the first to offer that alternative, and they can join the others that violate our laws and get that same free healthcare, behind bars.

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 7:19pm
OS, they already get healthcare.

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 7:26pm
Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

So if our illegals want to go into our penal system for free healthcare, and the right to it, I will be the first to offer that alternative, and they can join the others that violate our laws and get that same free healthcare, behind bars.


So you want to feed, clothe AND provide healthcare for the illegals now?  OS! I never knew you were such a liberal!


-------------


Posted By: oldsoldier
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 7:31pm
Until we get a busload, then off to the TexMex Border, and dump em back into Mexico, with a dollar and a dream, and repeat as required till they are gone.

A realtime fence ala the East West German Border 1962-1989 would work, except we will point the guns out.

-------------


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 7:39pm
And free public transportation too!

-------------


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 8:27pm
Don't forget OS, we're already giving them free healthcare via the tangled web of HIPPA and EMTALA rights afforded to human beings. That means regardless of legal status, be you alien or escaped fugitive you can get treated by any emergency room around the country. And you're footing the bill.
 
I'm not advocating giving illegal immigrants insurance by any stretch, I think most of you know how I feel about illegal immigration status in this country, but don't kid yourself into believing that you're not already paying alot of money to keep illegal immigrants healthy.
 
In fact, I'll go as far as to say we really already have a form of universal healthcare. It's called the ER. Then we could get into indigent plans, Medicaid, Medicare, etc etc etc etc...
 
Nobody is paying their medical bills. Just because you don't have insurance, and you incur costly ER bills, doesn't mean you pay them. Because a massive majority do not. They come to my emergency room for a runny nose, complain to me about how unfair it is that they don't have universal healthcare, give me a story about how they're 27 and can't work, then hand me their medicaid card and I stare at them in utter confusion. Or else they just don't have insurance and flat out tell me they're not going to pay me anything because they know they don't have to.


-------------


Posted By: rednekk98
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 9:02pm
If they don't need immediate treatment I say we dump them off in Canada


Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 9:18pm
good one rednekk. Ermm


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 10:51pm
Originally posted by God God wrote:



Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Great... yet another benefit for doing something illegal... just what we need.
So.. no health care for prisoners, speeders, insurance frauder, exc.... then? They get healthcare because they are human, not because of where they are born. 
I could use your argument to complain that that people speed on the highways tax dollars paid for. Therefore lets get rid of all highways. 



Not the same thing.


You're rewarding someone for doing something illegal, as opposed to witholding something for doing an illegal act.

-------------



Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 11:04pm
People go to jail with no healthcare, and have it while in there.

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 11:54pm
Is still unsure why we havnt built a massive wall on the boarder...


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 11:57pm
Because it would be impossible to guard, easy to climb, and expensive to build and maintain.

-------------


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 29 September 2009 at 11:58pm
Originally posted by Eville Eville wrote:

Because it would be impossible to guard, easy to climb, and expensive to build and maintain.
put claymores on it.


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 12:00am
It would be cheaper for us to just deliver a truckload of them to the drug cartels .

-------------


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 12:07am
^ I guess we could do that too, its the US government, we spend money on all kinds of retarded things.


Posted By: Frozen Balls
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 12:32am
I am not a fan of giving health care to anyone that does not pay taxes.

-------------



Posted By: carl_the_sniper
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 12:41am

Originally posted by oldsoldier oldsoldier wrote:

And there are more than enough medical schools needing a "labrotory" enviornment to practice in..

Dear god really?



-------------
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 7:24am
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

People go to jail with no healthcare, and have it while in there.
They also get butt raped, perhaps, we should start pimping out illegals?

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: StormyKnight
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:38am
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

People go to jail with no healthcare, and have it while in there.
Thanks to the 8th Ammendment which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.


-------------


Posted By: StormyKnight
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:40am
Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

Is still unsure why we havnt built a massive wall on the boarder...
Because it would stop potential liberals from crossing into our country.


-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 1:12pm
Stormy and OLDpb.

That was in response to Linus saying you shouldn't reward people for doing illegal things.

Kthxdie


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 1:27pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Stormy and OLDpb.

That was in response to Linus saying you shouldn't reward people for doing illegal things.

Kthxdie
What no retard? You're slipping jMAC3.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 1:28pm
Originally posted by StormyKnight StormyKnight wrote:

Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

Is still unsure why we havnt built a massive wall on the boarder...
Because it would stop potential liberals from crossing into our country.
Considering Mexico is made up mostly of catholics...


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 1:43pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Stormy and OLDpb.

That was in response to Linus saying you shouldn't reward people for doing illegal things.

Kthxdie
What no retard? You're slipping jMAC3.


I should have called you a retard.

It was quite obvious what that was in response to.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 2:32pm
Y'all be nice to jmac3.  He balances the forum.  When you consider how much his posting behavior mirrors (in a Star Trek opposite universe kind of way) the very behavior* he castigates FE for,  it becomes obvious that he is the "FE of the left."  (Would that make him "EF" . . . actually, I guess it would be "esirpretnEeerF" wouldn't it?)

How would that be pronounced?   ("Eh-surp-ret-neerf" perhaps?)

(I say we put them in a room, place bets and yell "slap fight.")

*I.e. retroactively changing arguments when they don't work, lack of citations, questionable citations, inability to see own errors despite irrefutable evidence/logic, and creating bizarre definitions for common words/phrases to justify his positions.

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 2:58pm
I don't change arguments. I get citations if necessary.

I know my errors, none of you ever have irrefutable evidence.

What bizarre definitions have I ever created for common words?

Not to mention you people act like I am a crazy lefty opposite of FE and OS when I am not.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 3:27pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Not to mention you people act like I am a crazy lefty opposite of FE and OS when I am not.
Really? You really don't see it?

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 4:11pm
Really? You see it?

I am far more in the middle than you people seem to think. I just think people like FE make no sense.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 5:16pm
Pot . . . meet kettle.

-------------


Posted By: StormyKnight
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 7:33pm
Originally posted by Mack Mack wrote:

Pot . . . meet kettle.
Pott:  "Hello Kettle.  Hey!  You're black!"

-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 8:49pm
Originally posted by Mack Mack wrote:

Pot . . . meet kettle.


So you are saying FE makes sense now?

If I was saying people like you and Oldpb make no sense than maybe you would have a case.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 8:53pm
Dang, you're ignorant.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 8:55pm
I'm ignorant?

Lol@you


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:04pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Originally posted by Mack Mack wrote:

Pot . . . meet kettle.


So you are saying FE makes sense now?

If I was saying people like you and Oldpb make no sense than maybe you would have a case.
No, he is saying that you make about as much sense as FE sometimes, thus the experession.
 
NB4, " I was being sarcastic you retard!"


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:06pm
I know what he meant by his expression. RETARD RETARD RETARD.

I think I am going to use it more now just for you.

If you think I make as much sense as him, it is because you agree with his crazy ass half the time.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:20pm

Awesome, I knew you could do it.



-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 30 September 2009 at 9:21pm
...I have yet to realize why you're against me so much but cool dude. I like sigs devoted to me.

-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 1:57pm
I'm so glad we got this sorted out ages ago, because people like this shouldn't be allowed to have ANY influence over anything:

http://wonkette.com/411375/introducting-the-latest-health-care-lie-meme-starring-michele-bachmann


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 2:47pm

Yeah that woman's a nut.

 
But at the same time, I would like to knew that national healthcare does not extend to abortions, as dictated by federal law. Currently federal dollars may only go to an abortion if it's for rape, incest, or a life threatening situation for the mother. Anything other than that is unacceptable.


-------------


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 3:04pm
Why is that unacceptable?

Abortion isn't illegal.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 3:48pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Why is that unacceptable?Abortion isn't illegal.


Just because something is legal doesn't make it acceptable.



Should we offer free liver transplants to chronic alcoholics that have no intention in changing?   Lungs for smokers?


What, than, becomes the incentive to make good decisions and the punishment for poor ones?   

-------------



Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 3:57pm
Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Why is that unacceptable?Abortion isn't illegal.


Just because something is legal doesn't make it acceptable.



Should we offer free liver transplants to chronic alcoholics that have no intention in changing?   Lungs for smokers?


Yes....

Also, even if my answer was no getting pregnant by accident is hardly the same thing as being an alcoholic or smoker.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 3:59pm
Yes if there was national healthcare like he said. "No abortions for national healthcare".

My answer is no to those without national healthcare because it isn't free for everyone.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 4:08pm
^ Gotta tell ya, I'm not gunna pay for someone to kill themself.


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 4:17pm
Why not?  it is cheaper than treating them.

-------------


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 4:56pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:


Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Why is that unacceptable?Abortion isn't illegal.


Just because something is legal doesn't make it acceptable.



Should we offer free liver transplants to chronic alcoholics that have no intention in changing?   Lungs for smokers?
Yes....Also, even if my answer was no getting pregnant by accident is hardly the same thing as being an alcoholic or smoker.


How? You think people plan on becoming alcoholics or smokers like they plan on getting accidently preggo?

They made the decision to take the risk, and as such the money needed to "correct" it should be self supplied and not mandated to come from the public for an individuals decision.


Again: consequences come with decisions:   If you take away the risk, you make it "acceptable" to make dumb choices.

-------------



Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 4:56pm
Originally posted by Eville Eville wrote:

Why not?  it is cheaper than treating them.
I think you missunderstood my post.
If they did it to themselves and have no intentions of changing, why is it my responsability to pay for it? If you are determined to kill yourself, do it with your money, don't use mine to do it.


Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 5:10pm
Having sex and getting pregnant is an accident. This is a natural thing. Pregnancy can happen even when practicing safe sex.

Smoking a cigarette is not an accident. Smoking too many cigarettes can cause bad lungs, this is a known fact.

Drinking beer is not an accident. Drinking so much that you screw up your liver also isn't an accident.


-------------
Que pasa?




Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 5:55pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Having sex and getting pregnant is an accident. This is a natural thing. Pregnancy can happen even when practicing safe sex.

Smoking a cigarette is not an accident. Smoking too many cigarettes can cause bad lungs, this is a known fact.

Drinking beer is not an accident. Drinking so much that you screw up your liver also isn't an accident.
I will actually be siding with jmac on this one (sort of...) there are certain situations where getting pregnant is'nt your fault. (ie rape) which is understandable to not have to pay for that one.
 
However, in most cases, you do have a choice as to whether or not you have sex, realizing that even protected sex can get you pregnant. You SHOULD have to pay for that. Problem is, if you have to pay for one and not the other, everyone is just going to lie and scream rape.


Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 5:59pm
Having sex is not an accident. What happens AFTER sex may be, but the act is not, and just like every other instance I put, consequences stem from the act.    If you can't deal with consequences, you shouldn't be doing the act, but if you decide to do the act, don't expect others to fix it for you.



I've yet to hear of someone tripping into a girl, ejaculating, and a baby coming.


Sneaky. We're not talking rape here. We're talking consensual sex only.

-------------



Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 6:04pm
Originally posted by jmac3 jmac3 wrote:

Having sex and getting pregnant is an accident. This is a natural thing. Pregnancy can happen even when practicing safe sex.


This is true.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintended_pregnancy - Wiki .

Originally posted by Wiki Wiki wrote:

In the US it is estimated that 52% of unintended pregnancies result from couples not using http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_control - contraception in the month the woman got pregnant, and 43% result from inconsistent or incorrect contraceptive use; only 5% result from contraceptive failure, according to a report from the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guttmacher_Institute - Guttmacher Institute .


So, the accident involved in 95% of unintended U.S. pregnancies is of the "Oops, I forgot to use a condom" variety.  That's called being irresponsible.


-------------


Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 6:04pm
Originally posted by Linus Linus wrote:

Having sex is not an accident. What happens AFTER sex may be, but the act is not, and just like every other instance I put, consequences stem from the act.    
I'll have you know that sex can happen by accident. Trust me. It's like those old Recee's Peanut Butter Cups commercials, "Hey, your peanut butter is in my chocolate. Your chocolate is in my peanut butter." Only way more awkward.

-------------

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 01 October 2009 at 6:05pm
Thanks . . . I visualized that.

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net