Print Page | Close Window

$78,000,000.00 of your money, smashed in the moon.

Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=183197
Printed Date: 11 April 2026 at 5:24am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: $78,000,000.00 of your money, smashed in the moon.
Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Subject: $78,000,000.00 of your money, smashed in the moon.
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 12:31pm
Well, this morning at 7:30 am, the first craft smashed into the moon. It only cost $78 million of your tax dollars.
 
Then they smashed a second into the moon...
 
 
That is a great example of how the government wastes your tax dollars. I guess asking the guys on mythbusters to take a crack at it was out of the question... Gotta fund Nasa, especially when businesses are closing daily in America...


-------------
They tremble at my name...



Replies:
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 12:51pm
Actually, I've gotta say that this is a worthwhile use of taxpayer's dollars. Better to spend 156 million doing this kind of search than to send manned missions which cost much, much more.

At some point the human race is going to have to leave the earth behind us. And we're going to need to be orbiting some other star or stars in a relatively short amount of time if we wish to survive and carry on. Within 200 million years the earth isn't going to be habitable anymore. Our own sun will be too hot by that time and all the oceans will have boiled away leaving earth a hot, lifeless rock. If you can't have the foresight to see that space exploration is the only hope for the continued existence of our race, then perhaps you can understand that the gains made for the US economically from this research will trump the short-term gains that may have been made with what is, let's face it, a paltry sum of money in the grand scheme of things. More is spent repaving roads that don't need it in the US every DAY than was spent on this shot to find water to produce fuel on the moon.

-------------
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 12:53pm
Do you have any idea how many people NASA employs? 0ver 17,000, not including jobs created through contracts.  But you are right, we should probably just take the socialist approach and fund all of the small businesses.  

-------------


Posted By: mbro
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 12:55pm
They made the rocket out of money? That doesn't seem efficient. No wonder I couldn't see the explosion on tv.

-------------

Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Posted By: ParielIsBack
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 12:56pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

Well, this morning at 7:30 am, the first craft smashed into the moon. It only cost $78 million of your tax dollars.
 
Then they smashed a second into the moon...
 
 
That is a great example of how the government wastes your tax dollars. I guess asking the guys on mythbusters to take a crack at it was out of the question... Gotta fund Nasa, especially when businesses are closing daily in America...


Total mission cost =/= satellite cost.  Total mission cost was $79 million, I'm betting the spent more than a million on other things.

Also, hate to burst your bubble, but defense spending (since NASA works mostly with defense-related companies) makes huge numbers of jobs in this country.

*EDIT* Apparently I was sitting on this page for quite a while.


-------------
BU Engineering 2012


Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:00pm
I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 


Posted By: ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:02pm
Originally posted by tallen702 tallen702 wrote:

Actually, I've gotta say that this is a worthwhile use of taxpayer's dollars. Better to spend 156 million doing this kind of search than to send manned missions which cost much, much more.

At some point the human race is going to have to leave the earth behind us. And we're going to need to be orbiting some other star or stars in a relatively short amount of time if we wish to survive and carry on. Within 200 million years the earth isn't going to be habitable anymore. Our own sun will be too hot by that time and all the oceans will have boiled away leaving earth a hot, lifeless rock. If you can't have the foresight to see that space exploration is the only hope for the continued existence of our race, then perhaps you can understand that the gains made for the US economically from this research will trump the short-term gains that may have been made with what is, let's face it, a paltry sum of money in the grand scheme of things. More is spent repaving roads that don't need it in the US every DAY than was spent on this shot to find water to produce fuel on the moon.


This.


-------------


Posted By: ParielIsBack
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:03pm
Originally posted by ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ ¤ Råp¡Ð F¡rè ¤ wrote:

This.


Post whore.

Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 


Excuse me sir, I have detected some stereotyping in your post.


-------------
BU Engineering 2012


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:24pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 
Not sure myself...
 
Also, I don't think the ppl at mythbusters are rocket scientists... but I guess in FE's world, its all the same.


Posted By: WGP guy2
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:33pm
NASA's budget is not as big as most people are led to believe.  In fact, it is about half a percent of the federal budget.  The things NASA and the subsidized contractors have and are doing for humanity are worth far more than half a percent.

I guess it ultimately comes down to what you think is valuable; I personally think knowledge is the most valuable thing one can have.


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:33pm
There's no way FE could be that stupid you guys, I smell a troll.

-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:37pm
NASA did give us Tang and velcro after all.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: slackerr26
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:42pm
and im sure if the rocket was crashed during a republican presidency you would embrace it with open arms

-------------


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:45pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 

How is this even remotely a partisan issue? I'm sure there are Democrats that would have said the same thing. Generalizations aren't nice Whale.


-------------


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:48pm
Originally posted by NASA NASA wrote:

In April 2006, NASA selected the LCROSS proposal for a low-cost, fast-track companion mission to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).

Damn, guess we have to blame Bush for this waste of tax dollars.


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:52pm
Not to interrupt, but did I miss where FE blamed this on liberals or Obama? I think this was a general rant against, in his opinion, wasteful government spending. Which I will have to admit,  even with my general support of NASA, I find a little disturbing that we spent 79mil trying to figure out if there is water on the moon.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 1:58pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Not to interrupt, but did I miss where FE blamed this on liberals or Obama? I think this was a general rant against, in his opinion, wasteful government spending. Which I will have to admit,  even with my general support of NASA, I find a little disturbing that we spent 79mil trying to figure out if there is water on the moon.

That he blames on the left all the time.

My post wasn't super serious, calm down noob.


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:00pm
Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Not to interrupt, but did I miss where FE blamed this on liberals or Obama? I think this was a general rant against, in his opinion, wasteful government spending. Which I will have to admit,  even with my general support of NASA, I find a little disturbing that we spent 79mil trying to figure out if there is water on the moon.

That he blames on the left all the time.
So now we are generalizing? Isn't that what you often blame him for? Irony is ironic!
dang! missed NB4: I ws jst kding.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: slackerr26
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:00pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Not to interrupt, but did I miss where FE blamed this on liberals or Obama? I think this was a general rant against, in his opinion, wasteful government spending. Which I will have to admit,  even with my general support of NASA, I find a little disturbing that we spent 79mil trying to figure out if there is water on the moon.
 
 
because in FE's world, the government=obama and the radical lefties


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:05pm
And I normally think guys that drive Firebirds are mullet wearing rednecks, but you seem ok. Aren't generalizations great?

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: slackerr26
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:08pm
you can think that all you want. doesnt bother me. last time i checked i was born and raised in new jersey

-------------


Posted By: oreomann33
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:12pm
Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

There's no way FE could be that stupid you guys, I smell a troll.


Srsly. FE barely ever responds to his own threads. Probably just sits backs an lols.


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:14pm
*** Oh, so you're a guido? My bad.           And I AM kidding.
 
My point being you guys always jump all over FE for generalizing, yet turn around and do the same thing.
 
It must be a boring day if I am defending FE.  wow.


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:32pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Not to interrupt, but did I miss where FE blamed this on liberals or Obama? I think this was a general rant against, in his opinion, wasteful government spending. Which I will have to admit,  even with my general support of NASA, I find a little disturbing that we spent 79mil trying to figure out if there is water on the moon.

That he blames on the left all the time.
So now we are generalizing? Isn't that what you often blame him for? Irony is ironic!
dang! missed NB4: I ws jst kding.

You can stop trolling now. It doesn't suit you.


-------------


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 


Me neither, this was a totally reasonable, if not intelligent thing to do. And it's nice to see the space program doing something, and yet still some idiots think it's a slap in the face.
Just retarded.


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:49pm
I still fail to see how this issue comes down to republicans or democrats...?
 
A few conservatives make a statement and they're the representatives of their party?
 
And intelligent and reasonable doesn't always = financially sound.
 
I'm not saying I'm against it, I just don't understand turning this into a partisan political argument.


-------------


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 2:52pm
Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

I still fail to see how this issue comes down to republicans or democrats...?
 

A few conservatives make a statement and they're the representatives of their party?

 

And intelligent and reasonable doesn't always = financially sound.

 

I'm not saying I'm against it, I just don't understand turning this into a partisan political argument.


I agree, this is just people who think science is the devil, and people who aren't mouthbreathers.


Posted By: mod98commando
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:04pm
Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

I still fail to see how this issue comes down to republicans or democrats...?
 
A few conservatives make a statement and they're the representatives of their party?
 
And intelligent and reasonable doesn't always = financially sound.
 
I'm not saying I'm against it, I just don't understand turning this into a partisan political argument.


Here's the logic followed by the idiots who take part in this partisan crap:

I am part of the [insert party here] -> I don't like [insert other party here] -> Something happened -> How can I use this to make [insert other party here] look bad for no reason other than to make myself look/feel better?

It's incredibly stupid and infantile but that's our country now. It would be fine if the parties were just calling each other out when they did something that wasn't good for the people but it's gone way beyond that now and they just complain about everything and anything.

Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure I will ever understand modern conservatism's hatred of science and intelligence. 


Many conservatives tend to be very religious and neither science nor intelligence support religion and are therefore not favored. Intelligence also tends to get in the way when you want to do things that don't make much sense. Also, it's not just conservatives but I will agree that the worst of that group tends to lean right. I used to be more conservative but the whack-jobs made me really question things and that made me more of a moderate. Hardcore liberals are not much better though so I don't really like either side all that much.


-------------
oreomann33: Everybody invades Poland

Rofl_Mao: And everyone eats turkey

Me: But only if they're hungary

Mack: Yeah but hungary people go russian through their food and end up with greece on everyth


Posted By: slackerr26
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:07pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

*** Oh, so you're a guido? My bad.           And I AM kidding.
 
My point being you guys always jump all over FE for generalizing, yet turn around and do the same thing.
 
It must be a boring day if I am defending FE.  wow.
you're right...... and maybe because it wasnt a generalization, being as at least once a week he makes an anti-Obama thread.

-------------


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:18pm
Obama gets the Nobel peace prize and attacks the moon on the same day. These are strange times


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:23pm
^ i lol'd


Posted By: Frozen Balls
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:28pm
Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

There's no way FE could be that stupid you guys, I smell a troll.


Unfortunately for you, my planned response was:

FE, you're just stupid. (in the leroy jenkins video voice)


-------------



Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:41pm
I'm not sure where I used party lines in my post.

FE = conservative, who apparently going on his post, doesn't like science or intelligence.

Also, conservatives have largely been behind the anti-intelligence movement. From stopping stem-cell research to calling educated people "elitists" in a negative way, and everything in between.

It's not a generalization if it can be documented.
 


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 3:42pm
Originally posted by CarbineKid CarbineKid wrote:

Obama gets the Nobel peace prize and attacks the moon on the same day. These are strange times
 
/thread
 
I wanted to post the WKUK Moon Bears video, but it's NSFT. Look it up, you'll lol.


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:12pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure where I used party lines in my post.

FE = conservative, who apparently going on his post, doesn't like science or intelligence.

Also, conservatives have largely been behind the anti-intelligence movement. From stopping stem-cell research to calling educated people "elitists" in a negative way, and everything in between.

It's not a generalization if it can be documented.
 
Why is it that you can't be against something without being labeled ignorant? I am conservative and not against science or intelligence. I am also iffy regarding stem cell research, but that doesn't mean I am anti-intelligence. It's been a long time since I read into it, but I do remember some of the aspects of how the cells were harvested to be unsettling. And it has nothing to do with religious beliefs, just my own morality about potentially creating embryos to harvest them for cells. Which is fully a logical step if it were to be widely accepted.  I have never called educated people elitist, if I did, I would be insulting myself as I am college educated.  Also, as I mentioned, I am generally pro NASA and space research, but with the current state of the economy do find it a little bothersome that 79mil was spent crashing a satellite into the moon. Again, doesn't make me a bible hugging buffoon that thinks technology is the devil. Just makes me wonder what could have been done with that 79 million instead. There are a lot of times when I think perhaps we should spend a little more time solving the problems on this planet before going off finding new ones to solve on others.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:16pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

And it has nothing to do with religious beliefs, just my own morality about potentially creating embryos to harvest them for cells. Which is fully a logical step if it were to be widely accepted.


Are you kidding? We can't legalize a "harmless" drug but you expect us to begin farming humans no problem? And you say you're not anti-education? You DO know that umbilical cords are a great source of stem cells right?

http://www.virtualmedicalcentre.com/news.asp?artid=14238&title=Umbilical-cord-blood-as-a-source-of-stem-cells&odr=&page= - Article

Why would we begin harvesting people when we already have too many being born every day, and the cord/ blood gets discarded anyways. Regardless of that fact, people still oppose using stem cells, and it's ridiculous.


Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:18pm
I think it would have been worth the 79 mill if you could actually see the explosion. If you are gunna spend that much money you better use a freaking MOAB or something. Geez.


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:19pm
Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

Originally posted by CarbineKid CarbineKid wrote:

Obama gets the Nobel peace prize and attacks the moon on the same day. These are strange times

 

/thread

 

I wanted to post the WKUK Moon Bears video, but it's NSFT. Look it up, you'll lol.

I just looked it up, that was great. The Call of Duty one was even funny


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:20pm
Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

I think it would have been worth the 79 mill if you could actually see the explosion. If you are gunna spend that much money you better use a freaking MOAB or something. Geez.


I know you're kidding but the explosion wasn't the point.


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:33pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

And it has nothing to do with religious beliefs, just my own morality about potentially creating embryos to harvest them for cells. Which is fully a logical step if it were to be widely accepted.


Are you kidding? We can't legalize a "harmless" drug but you expect us to begin farming humans no problem? And you say you're not anti-education? You DO know that umbilical cords are a great source of stem cells right?

http://www.virtualmedicalcentre.com/news.asp?artid=14238&title=Umbilical-cord-blood-as-a-source-of-stem-cells&odr=&page= - Article

Why would we begin harvesting people when we already have too many being born every day, and the cord/ blood gets discarded anyways. Regardless of that fact, people still oppose using stem cells, and it's ridiculous.
Originally posted by wikepedia wikepedia wrote:

Controversy surrounding research

Main article: /wiki/Stem_cell_controversy - Stem cell controversy
See also: /wiki/Stem_cell_laws - Stem cell laws

There exists a widespread controversy over human embryonic stem cell research that emanates from the techniques used in the creation and usage of stem cells. /wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell - Human embryonic stem cell research is controversial because, with the present state of technology, starting a /wiki/Stem_cell_line - stem cell line requires the destruction of a /wiki/Embryo - human embryo and/or /wiki/Therapeutic_cloning - therapeutic cloning . However, recently, it has been shown in principle that adult stem cell lines can be manipulated to generate embryonic-like stem cell lines using a single-cell biopsy similar to that used in /wiki/Preimplantation_genetic_diagnosis - preimplantation genetic diagnosis that may allow stem cell creation without embryonic destruction. #cite_note-40 - [41] It is not the entire field of stem cell research, but the specific field of human embryonic stem cell research that is at the centre of an ethical debate.

Opponents of the research argue that embryonic stem cell technologies are a /wiki/Slippery_slope - slippery slope to /wiki/Reproductive_cloning - reproductive cloning and can fundamentally devalue human life. Those in the /wiki/Pro-life - pro-life movement argue that a human embryo is a human life that is entitled to protection.

Contrarily, supporters of embryonic stem cell research argue that such research should be pursued because the resultant treatments could have significant medical potential. It is also noted that excess embryos created for /wiki/Invitro_fertilization - in vitro fertilization could be donated with consent and used for the research.

The ensuing debate has prompted authorities around the world to seek regulatory frameworks and highlighted the fact that stem cell research represents a /wiki/Social - social and /wiki/Ethical - ethical challenge.

Perhaps, I should have been more specific. I am not 100% in favor of embryonic stem cell research.

 


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:42pm
Originally posted by CarbineKid CarbineKid wrote:

Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

Originally posted by CarbineKid CarbineKid wrote:

Obama gets the Nobel peace prize and attacks the moon on the same day. These are strange times

 

/thread

 

I wanted to post the WKUK Moon Bears video, but it's NSFT. Look it up, you'll lol.

I just looked it up, that was great.


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 4:52pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure where I used party lines in my post.

FE = conservative, who apparently going on his post, doesn't like science or intelligence.

Also, conservatives have largely been behind the anti-intelligence movement. From stopping stem-cell research to calling educated people "elitists" in a negative way, and everything in between.

It's not a generalization if it can be documented.
 
 
I rarely hear "educated" people called elitists, I hear people who think their bachelor's affords them the ability to dictate the definate standard of right and wrong contradicted. Elitism is incredibly prevalent on both sides of the debate, be it based on education, or moral beliefs / the lack thereof. There are plenty of people even on this forum that feel as soon as the issue involves the word God it becomes null and void, because duh, only morons have imaginary friends. And there are those on here that feel that the Bible somehow nulls out anything that disagrees with it. It's all equal.
 
And stem-cells =/= intelligence. It's not a black and white issue, there are nay sayers on both sides of the fence. There are very educated people for and against it. Myself I'm neutral, I see no moral wrong in it, and don't know enough about it scientifically to make a judgement. But that doesn't mean that there aren't both pros and cons, it just means I'm big enough to admit I'm not the final verdict.
 
The "anti-intelligence" movement has people on both sides. There are plenty of liberals who make little to no sense, and support ridiculous ideas. But I'll rename your movement for clarification-it's called the "partisan politics" movement. It's defending or condemning a party instead of the issue, and that is the very epitome of anti-intelligent. It's saying "well that's counter-productive, it must be a conservative idea", or that's the media, so it must be liberal. This crap has got to stop at some point, it's pushed to the point of silliness.
 
I'm not singling out your post, and I'm not throwing out any of these accusations at you necessarily, it's just this whole trend is making me crazy. Its honestly making me want to not care about politics.


-------------


Posted By: ParielIsBack
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 6:08pm
Frankly, I think there's a lot of condemnation necessary to overcome the people who think that science should not be taught in schools.

-------------
BU Engineering 2012


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 6:15pm
Originally posted by ParielIsBack ParielIsBack wrote:

Frankly, I think there's a lot of condemnation necessary to overcome the people who think that science should not be taught in schools.

Who thinks that?


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 6:22pm
^In before creationists!


Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 6:32pm
Science =/= Evolution
 
That's like saying I don't like a camaro so therefore I hate cars.
 
Creationism is a legitimate, even if far fetched in scientific, theory.
 
Oh and just an FYI, creationists can believe in evolution. Creationism simply states a Higher Power set things in motion, doesn't necessarily dictate what god or how it was done. So again, you can't generalize Creationists either, as that's a pretty broad blanket.
 
But then again, I don't want to take this thread into that debate :P.


-------------


Posted By: ThatGuitarGuy
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 6:43pm
Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

I think it would have been worth the 79 mill if you could actually see the explosion. If you are gunna spend that much money you better use a freaking MOAB or something. Geez.


I know you're kidding but the explosion wasn't the point.


Actually, it kind of was.  The point of smashing the satellite into the satellite was to send up a dust cloud (explosion) from the moon, and then send the second satellite into said dust cloud to see if there was possibly any ice or water in the cloud, which would mean there's water under the moon's surface.


-------------
Skillet:     I've never been terribly fond of the look of a vagina


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 7:06pm
Originally posted by ThatGuitarGuy ThatGuitarGuy wrote:


Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

I think it would have been worth the 79 mill if you could actually see the explosion. If you are gunna spend that much money you better use a freaking MOAB or something. Geez.


I know you're kidding but the explosion wasn't the point.
Actually, it kind of was.  The point of smashing the satellite into the satellite was to send up a dust cloud (explosion) from the moon, and then send the second satellite into said dust cloud to see if there was possibly any ice or water in the cloud, which would mean there's water under the moon's surface.


Yeah, exactly. The point wasn't "lets make a big boom" it had a scientific purpose. But still people whine


Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 9:12pm
You accuse people of whining about wanting a huge boom but you don't care? Are you a man?!


Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 9:40pm
Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

Science =/= Evolution
 
That's like saying I don't like a camaro so therefore I hate cars.
 
Creationism is a legitimate, even if far fetched in scientific, theory.
 
Oh and just an FYI, creationists can believe in evolution. Creationism simply states a Higher Power set things in motion, doesn't necessarily dictate what god or how it was done. So again, you can't generalize Creationists either, as that's a pretty broad blanket.
 
But then again, I don't want to take this thread into that debate :P.

No, creationism is NOT a scientific theory.  They have not tested their theories by scientific means.  They have not used the scientific method.  Their proof is the Bible and the Bible does not constitute a scientific document.

And no.  "Creationists" are those that think God created the world 6000 years ago.  That dinosaurs roamed with man.  That the Great Flood mixed up all the fossils in the geologic column to give an appearance of age.  One can not believe that we were put here in the advanced state we are in now, 6000 years ago and evolution (at least macroevolution) at the same time.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 9:45pm
Originally posted by stratoaxe stratoaxe wrote:

Science =/= Evolution
 
That's like saying I don't like a camaro so therefore I hate cars.
 
Creationism is a legitimate, even if far fetched in scientific, theory.
 
Oh and just an FYI, creationists can believe in evolution. Creationism simply states a Higher Power set things in motion, doesn't necessarily dictate what god or how it was done. So again, you can't generalize Creationists either, as that's a pretty broad blanket.
 
But then again, I don't want to take this thread into that debate :P.
Creationists try and explain by the use of miracles. Scientists dont do that... sure we use terms like dark matter/dark energy to talk about things we dont fully grasp yet, but we are working on it, we dont just say," jesus did it", then walk away.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 9:53pm
Originally posted by slackerr26 slackerr26 wrote:

and im sure if the rocket was crashed into a country in the mideast, during a republican presidency you would embrace it with open arms
fixed.


Posted By: Evil Elvis
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:23pm
the ship didn't crash... it was Moon Nazis.


-------------


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:42pm
Originally posted by mod98commando mod98commando wrote:

neither science nor intelligence support religion and are therefore not favored. Intelligence also tends to get in the way when you want to do things that don't make much sense. 

Where does this perspective come from that religion and science are rivals, or that one cannot be an intellectual and be a <religious affiliation here>?

Thats like saying a porcupine is competing with your blender.

Science is the study of the physical world around us.  Its testable, quantifiable, and based upon physical evidence.  Religion is philosophy, the study of the metaphysical world.  It cannot be proven or tested. The two have nothing to do with each other.  They only conflict when people try to explain ethics with science or the history of life with a book.  

I do agree to an extent with Whale, however.  As of late the Right seems to have sadly decided it needs to reject intellectualism, or at least only let that side of its body talk.


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: CarbineKid
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:44pm
Originally posted by ThatGuitarGuy ThatGuitarGuy wrote:


Originally posted by choopie911 choopie911 wrote:

Originally posted by Rofl_Mao Rofl_Mao wrote:

I think it would have been worth the 79 mill if you could actually see the explosion. If you are gunna spend that much money you better use a freaking MOAB or something. Geez.


I know you're kidding but the explosion wasn't the point.
Actually, it kind of was.  The point of smashing the satellite into the satellite was to send up a dust cloud (explosion) from the moon, and then send the second satellite into said dust cloud to see if there was possibly any ice or water in the cloud, which would mean there's water under the moon's surface.

Not to pick on you, but I gotta ask...why do we care if theres water on the moon. Our planet is 3/4 water as it is....I'm sure we have enough.


Posted By: ThatGuitarGuy
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:48pm
Because eventually, Man-kind will have to colonize other planets.  We plan to use the Moon as a stepping stone to reach them.   Water is vital to setting up colonies on the moon, for fresh drinking water, and for hydrogen for the rocket fuel.




-------------
Skillet:     I've never been terribly fond of the look of a vagina


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:53pm
Originally posted by CarbineKid CarbineKid wrote:


Not to pick on you, but I gotta ask...why do we care if theres water on the moon. Our planet is 3/4 water as it is....I'm sure we have enough.

Water can be split into hydrogen and oxygen via electrolysis, then compressed into liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen to be used to fuel space shuttles for return trips to Earth. It also allows us to take advantage of the moon's much smaller gravitational field and launch shuttles from the moon for much longer voyages, needing much less fuel to take-off. 

Then theres always the whole part where it would be nice to have water for the astronauts.


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: StormyKnight
Date Posted: 10 October 2009 at 3:45pm
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

I'm not sure where I used party lines in my post.

FE = conservative, who apparently going on his post, doesn't like science or intelligence.

Also, conservatives have largely been behind the anti-intelligence movement. From stopping stem-cell research to calling educated people "elitists" in a negative way, and everything in between.

It's not a generalization if it can be documented.
 
Conservatives have stopped ALL stem-cell research?


-------------


Posted By: brihard
Date Posted: 10 October 2009 at 8:43pm
I wonder if anyone at NASA thought to stop and make sure the sensors on the spacecraft were calibrated to detect cheese...

-------------
"Abortion is not "choice" in America. It is forced and the democrats are behind it, with the goal of eugenics at its foundation."

-FreeEnterprise, 21 April 2011.

Yup, he actually said that.


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 10 October 2009 at 8:57pm
Originally posted by brihard brihard wrote:

I wonder if anyone at NASA thought to stop and make sure the sensors on the spacecraft were calibrated to detect cheese...

Somewhere, some engineer in NASA is feeling really dumb right now


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: scotchyscotch
Date Posted: 10 October 2009 at 8:59pm
Originally posted by brihard brihard wrote:

I wonder if anyone at NASA thought to stop and make sure the sensors on the spacecraft were calibrated to detect cheese...


^^ <3  (I'm putting my money on Wensleydale.)

Seriously though, I love how this turned into a political debate just 'cos FE posted it.

 


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 9:32am

One post, and four pages of pontification results...

Now, I know how Obama feels with all this power!

-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 9:42am
Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

And no.  "Creationists" are those that think God created the world 6000 years ago.  That dinosaurs roamed with man.  That the Great Flood mixed up all the fossils in the geologic column to give an appearance of age.  One can not believe that we were put here in the advanced state we are in now, 6000 years ago and evolution (at least macroevolution) at the same time.
These would be referred to as Young Earth Creationists. Not all Creationists are as narrow in their beleifs:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism
 
Yay for gross generalizations!
 
 


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: Neothesmurf
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 10:04am
time planning mission: 6 months

mission cost: 156 million dollars

wiping that stupid grin off the moons face: priceless.


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 10:17am
66% of Americans believe that “God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.” according to a gallup poll this year...
 
http://www.icr.org/article/gallup-poll-two-thirds-americans-believe-god-creat/ - http://www.icr.org/article/gallup-poll-two-thirds-americans-believe-god-creat/
 
The rest were indoctrinated in school not to question "science", and their interpretation that eliminates god...
 
These same scientists now believe that life came from gene roddenberry, scuse me, from space... and poof we all appeared. over millions and millions of years of course...
 
Because we all know that if you leave a junkyard for millions of years, it will develop the latest green car when given enough time...
 
wait... that doesn't work... Oh, well, it just happened. yeah, thats it.
 
Is your worldview warped by evolution?...
 
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n3/are-you-evolutionized - http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n3/are-you-evolutionized
 
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n3/are-you-evolutionized-facts - http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n3/are-you-evolutionized-facts
 


-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:02am

^FE, I posted this mssg in a forum a long time ago, but it just seems so fitting for you FE. So here goes.

Originally posted by Sneaky Sneaky wrote:



Okay first off, you being condescending isn't going to make you any friends. I don't show up on your Christian forums and post a blog about how stupid Christians are for holding onto a blind faith.

As a scientist and an Atheist, I'm all about explaining what I think and why, but if you are going to ask me about it, don't be a jerk(wordchange to satisfy forum rules).

That said, the reason I don't believe in god is the same reason I don't believe in fairies or unicorns. No, nobody can prove them 100% nonexistent no matter how hard you try. But really, how likely is it? Yes, if you found me real evidence that there were fairies, unicorns, god, etc. I'd be the first to admit to being wrong. You can't say he exists because the bible says so. A movie deciding to put "This movie is based on a true story, these events actually took place." doesn't actually prove anything. I can write down on a piece of paper that god doesn't exist, why does that have any less weight than your book? Yours is older, so what? Mine is more recent, in science, that's usually a good thing, neither of us prove anything by having it written down on paper that we are correct.

Religious people explain the universe as a miracle, and bam, it's done. Erm, as a studying physicist, I can't do that... Religion is a great tool to have if science is too hard for you to understand. Yes as scientists, we use terms for things we don't fully understand yet, dark matter, dark energy, etc. But that's because we are still working to figure it all out, we don't just simply dismiss it as a miracle.

Why is it your god is the right one? sure you have "religious experiences" so do the Muslims, so do the Hindus. Same for Jews, Scientologists, etc. I'm going to assume you were raised Christian, why is it that your god is right? Other than your parents never told you that there was a possibility that they were wrong. If you were raised in ancient Greece, you would say the same about Athena, or Zeus, in Viking Norway, Thor or Wotan, Billions of people have died agonizing deaths for their gods, why do you feel yours is anymore special? What evidence do you have for me?


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:06am
53% also said the Evolution definitely was true and 25% answered that both Evolution and Creationism were definitley true.
 
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-07-evolution-debate_N.htm - http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-07-evolution-debate_N.htm
 
And for the record, I don't even remember evolution being taught until high school. I would argue that most people already have pretty defined beliefs by then. I know I did, so your indoctrination crap is exactly that. I would venture to guess that whether a person believes in one or the other depends heavily on whether they were raised in a household that attended church or not, not what the school taught.


-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:14am

Just as a side note FE, using a being that is more complex to explain the complexity of the universe kind of shoots itself in the foot... A being that complex would be less probable, as opposed to natural selection, which explains the complexity problem quite beautifully.

 

I know people like you will turn instantly to the, "God has always existed! Therefore never needed a creator!" argument. But how is it somehow more likely that the magical sky genie that condemns your thoughts, sins and sex lives being eternal, is somehow more likely than the singularity being eternal.

 

I'm not saying it was eternal, scientists don’t know yet. But we are working on it, what have you got?



Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:19am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

And no.  "Creationists" are those that think God created the world 6000 years ago.  That dinosaurs roamed with man.  That the Great Flood mixed up all the fossils in the geologic column to give an appearance of age.  One can not believe that we were put here in the advanced state we are in now, 6000 years ago and evolution (at least macroevolution) at the same time.
These would be referred to as Young Earth Creationists. Not all Creationists are as narrow in their beleifs:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism
 
Yay for gross generalizations!
 
 

My bad.  I didn't not realize there is one type of creationism that fully believes in evolution - Theistic Evolution.  I guess if 1 out of 10 different types of creationism believe in evolution that's better than nothin


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:28am
Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

And no.  "Creationists" are those that think God created the world 6000 years ago.  That dinosaurs roamed with man.  That the Great Flood mixed up all the fossils in the geologic column to give an appearance of age.  One can not believe that we were put here in the advanced state we are in now, 6000 years ago and evolution (at least macroevolution) at the same time.
These would be referred to as Young Earth Creationists. Not all Creationists are as narrow in their beleifs:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism
 
Yay for gross generalizations!
 
 
I

My bad.  I didn't not realize there is one type of creationism that believes the earth is less than 10,000 years old and excludes any possibitly of evolution. I apologize for generalizing in an attempt to make anyone that considers the existence of a God and whether he had a hand in our creation out to be a science hating nut.  
  Fixed and apology accepted.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:28am
I know God is real... Once you have witnessed His power first hand, you can't ignore it.
 
I've posted before about the time God healed my broken arm. I watched the bone straighten out. I felt the immense heat, and it was totally healed during the prayer. My grandfather who was a doctor and happened to be at our house when it occured and also witnessed it.
 
Of course you don't have to believe it, but for me, I will always believe as I saw firsthand (punny, I know) the power of God.
 
 
Here is a little test you can do yourself.
 
Why don't you ask God to prove himself to you...  If He is real, and sent his son to die on the cross to cover YOUR sins (mine too), and He Created the heavens and the earth, I think He can handle proving Himself to you.
 
Here is what you could say. "God, I know I don't believe in you, but if you are truly the "I am" God, please show me in my heart the truth of your word."
 
Then see what happens in your life. If you are sincere, (remember God looks at our hearts) I think you will be surprised at the way He would respond.


-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:35am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

53% also said the Evolution definitely was true and 25% answered that both Evolution and Creationism were definitley true.
 
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-07-evolution-debate_N.htm - http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-06-07-evolution-debate_N.htm
 
And for the record, I don't even remember evolution being taught until high school. I would argue that most people already have pretty defined beliefs by then. I know I did, so your indoctrination crap is exactly that. I would venture to guess that whether a person believes in one or the other depends heavily on whether they were raised in a household that attended church or not, not what the school taught.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-06-07-evolution-poll-results_N.htm?csp=34 - http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-06-07-evolution-poll-results_N.htm?csp=34

Not sure how USA Today got the wording wrong in your article since they wrote both, but whatever.  According to the poll its self, only 18% believe evolution is totally true while 36% believe creationism is totally true.  The 66% and 53% from FE's article and yours, respectively was "total true".

However, it should be pointed out that a whole 17% of the people polled know little to nothing about evolution.  That could easily explain why creationism has the lead by almost that exact amount.  And lets not forget the fact that supposedly 82% of people say they know at least a fair amount about evolution.  I am curious as to how many of those people actually know about evolution, not the narrow minded, half-explanation given to them by their pastors.

And FE, lets not forget about this:



Luckily for you, there won't be too many of them there dern foreigners takin' up yer space in Heaven.


Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:40am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Hysteria Hysteria wrote:

And no.  "Creationists" are those that think God created the world 6000 years ago.  That dinosaurs roamed with man.  That the Great Flood mixed up all the fossils in the geologic column to give an appearance of age.  One can not believe that we were put here in the advanced state we are in now, 6000 years ago and evolution (at least macroevolution) at the same time.
These would be referred to as Young Earth Creationists. Not all Creationists are as narrow in their beleifs:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism
 
Yay for gross generalizations!
 
 
My bad.  I didn't not realize there is one type of creationism that believes the earth is less than 10,000 years old and excludes any possibitly of evolution. I apologize for generalizing in an attempt to make anyone that considers the existence of a God and whether he had a hand in our creation out to be a science hating nut.  
  Fixed and apology accepted.

Lulz, that one really is my bad.  Before I posted that I read all that stuff about evolution and creationism and for some reason thought that was the point I was making in the first place.  When one thread ends up being about 3 completely different topics it gets a little confusing every now and then.  :)


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:47am
^ I must've missed that story, care to repost it for me real quick? And I really don't intend this to come off like I'm trying to be a jerk to you, because I don't feel like your above post was trying to be condescending in any way, I personally see that religious experiance as what I was basically talking about here.
 
Quote "Why is it your god is the right one? sure you have "religious experiences" so do the Muslims, so do the Hindus. Same for Jews, Scientologists, etc. I'm going to assume you were raised Christian, why is it that your god is right? Other than your parents never told you that there was a possibility that they were wrong. If you were raised in ancient Greece, you would say the same about Athena, or Zeus, in Viking Norway, Thor or Wotan, Billions of people have died agonizing deaths for their gods, why do you feel yours is anymore special? What evidence do you have for me?"
 
Like I said, I dont intend to be a jerk right now. And I don't yet know the story, which is why I ask before I pass too harsh a judgement.


Posted By: Hysteria
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:54am
Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

^ I must've missed that story, care to repost it for me real quick? And I really don't intend this to come off like I'm trying to be a jerk to you, because I don't feel like your above post was trying to be condescending in any way, I personally see that religious experiance as what I was basically talking about here.
 
Quote "Why is it your god is the right one? sure you have "religious experiences" so do the Muslims, so do the Hindus. Same for Jews, Scientologists, etc. I'm going to assume you were raised Christian, why is it that your god is right? Other than your parents never told you that there was a possibility that they were wrong. If you were raised in ancient Greece, you would say the same about Athena, or Zeus, in Viking Norway, Thor or Wotan, Billions of people have died agonizing deaths for their gods, why do you feel yours is anymore special? What evidence do you have for me?"
 
Like I said, I dont intend to be a jerk right now. And I don't yet know the story, which is why I ask before I pass too harsh a judgement.

http://tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=178749&KW=god+healed&PID=2550696#2550696 - http://tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=178749&KW=god+healed&PID=2550696#2550696


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 11:57am
I have always been really good at sports. Be it ball, bat, swimming, soccer, or biking. When I was a kid I played on a select soccer team. I was a forward and the leading goal scorer on our team. As a way of practicing my shots, I would often play goalie in practice to get the feel of what my opponents would do when presented with situations.

 

One of the guys on our team (who went on to get a full ride scholarship for soccer and he tried out for the Olympic team) was one of my favorite guys to train with as he had a very strong leg and was really quick. His name is Kevin Scott, and he still lives in Raleigh NC today.

 

Anyway I was playing goalie and he was trying to score on me.

 

He kicked it low and I dove down to block the shot and broke my arm. Everyone there heard the sound of the bones breaking. I stood up and my hand was sticking out at the wrong angle and you could see where the bone was almost sticking out of the skin...

 

My house was pretty close to the practice field so I went home first to get my folks to take me to the hospital. I don't remember who drove me, but it was a painful trip.

 

When we got home my grandfather was there (he is a medical doctor, Dr. Robert Beckley). He took one look at my arm and said we had to get to a hospital to have it reset, and a cast put on it.

 

My parents said we should pray first. And they all stood around me and prayed.

 

I felt a heat completely cover my arm, and I watched as my arm straightened out and all the pain left...

 

It was amazing.

 

I don't know why God chose to heal me. I struggle with the question of "why me" often. Especially when I see small children with severe diseases.

 

But, I never question that God can heal.

 

He healed me.

 

Glenn M

 

 

ps, you should have seen the guys faces when I showed up for the soccer game two days later... They were convinced that I would be out for the rest of the season.



-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: Eville
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 12:09pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

66% of Americans believe that “God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.” according to a gallup poll this year...
 
 


And 36% believed that 9/11 was an inside job.
And 85% believe that global warming is a threat.
And nearly 100% of humans on Earth believed the Earth was flat and at the center of the universe. 

Just because dumb Americans believe it is true, does not make it so.



-------------


Posted By: ParielIsBack
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 12:54pm
Originally posted by Eville Eville wrote:

Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

66% of Americans believe that “God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.” according to a gallup poll this year...
 
 


And 36% believed that 9/11 was an inside job.
And 85% believe that global warming is a threat.
And nearly 100% of humans on Earth believed the Earth was flat and at the center of the universe. 

Just because dumb Americans believe it is true, does not make it so.



Not so much on that last one.  Unless you want to get much more specific as to your time periods.  The earth's roundness was cataloged well before Columbus decided to come to America.


-------------
BU Engineering 2012


Posted By: Tolgak
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:20pm
I had stomach cramps. My grandma went all "ALLAH AKBAR!" on me. The cramps stopped right then and there.

PROOF!

Islam is the correct religion.

The difference between your story and mine is that mine happened and is likely a result of me having been relaxed for a few hours by the time my grammy came in to spew her mumbo jumbo. You were either dreaming or your arm was never really broken, just twisted funny.


-------------


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:24pm

FE, let’s say I did take that whole story to be a factual miracle (I don't, but we can pretend.)

 

Why you? Why not the millions of people dying of AIDS in Africa? Why not the kids who were born blind and deaf? Why not my little sister? She was born blind, deaf, with CP, clubfoot, the only part of her brain that formed was the brainstem, and the rest was water. She had seizures every 10 minutes or so, was in extreme pain throughout her entire life. She spent 3 years in agony. She never left the house, was fed with a feeding tube her whole life, was on oxygen and half a dozen monitors, as well as being under nurse watch in our home 24/7. She had numerous surgeries and trips to the hospital, just to keep her alive for the 3 years we managed.

 

Why the hell would 'god' feel it urgent to fix your arm for soccer practice in a few days, yet I got to watch my sister slowly die in agony? Yup, sure sounds loving and fair to me!



Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:29pm
Oh and uh, this was also back several years ago, while I was still under my parents indoctrination of christianity. I did honestly believe in god, and so did the rest of my family. So why didn't he pick us to be healed? We prayed out hearts out... funny thing about prayer tho, It does'nt really work.
 
(still not trying to be an ass, thats just a really really touchy subject for me)


Posted By: Tolgak
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:30pm
INB4 God gave your sister a torturous existence to test your faith.

-------------


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:34pm
^ saw that coming and prepared to jump down the Censored's throat that says it.


Posted By: Darur
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:53pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:


The rest were indoctrinated in school not to question "science", and their interpretation that eliminates god...

Originally posted by __sneaky__ __sneaky__ wrote:

Religious people explain the universe as a miracle, and bam, it's done. Erm, as a studying physicist, I can't do that... Religion is a great tool to have if science is too hard for you to understand. Yes as scientists, we use terms for things we don't fully understand yet, dark matter, dark energy, etc. But that's because we are still working to figure it all out, we don't just simply dismiss it as a miracle.

Seriously, people, this is getting stupid.  Religion and Science aren't even talking about the same things.  Why is this still being brought up as if its Science OR Religion: Pick?


-------------
Real Men play Tuba

[IMG]http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1859/newsmall6xz.jpg">

PH33R TEH 1337 Dwarf!

http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/log_off_user.asp" rel="nofollow - DONT CLICK ME!!1


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 1:56pm

I don't know why He healed me... I am sure there are millions of people that are more worthy. But, because He chose to heal me, I can't be silent. Maybe that is why He chose to heal me of such a trivial thing, because He knew that throughout my life I would share my experience with tons of people, and maybe it will help just one person to rethink their relationship with God...

 
I don't know, but when I have a question like that I go to scripture.
 
2 Samuel 12 has something interesting.
 

 15 After Nathan had gone home, the LORD struck the child that Uriah's wife had borne to David, and he became ill. 16 David pleaded with God for the child. He fasted and went into his house and spent the nights lying on the ground. 17 The elders of his household stood beside him to get him up from the ground, but he refused, and he would not eat any food with them.

 18 On the seventh day the child died. David's servants were afraid to tell him that the child was dead, for they thought, "While the child was still living, we spoke to David but he would not listen to us. How can we tell him the child is dead? He may do something desperate."

 19 David noticed that his servants were whispering among themselves and he realized the child was dead. "Is the child dead?" he asked.
      "Yes," they replied, "he is dead."

 20 Then David got up from the ground. After he had washed, put on lotions and changed his clothes, he went into the house of the LORD and worshiped. Then he went to his own house, and at his request they served him food, and he ate.

 21 His servants asked him, "Why are you acting this way? While the child was alive, you fasted and wept, but now that the child is dead, you get up and eat!"

 22 He answered, "While the child was still alive, I fasted and wept. I thought, 'Who knows? The LORD may be gracious to me and let the child live.' 23 But now that he is dead, why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I will go to him, but he will not return to me."

So, something so difficult like losing your sister can have many effects. It can drive you away from God, where you won't see her again when you die. Or it can drive you closer to Him, because of the promise that all His children will see Him, and live in eternity.
 
Based on your description of your sister, I know where she is... Not to be harsh, but to throw all of that back in Gods face and consider yourself an unbeliever just points out that you don't believe she is in heaven... Otherwise, why would you want to NOT see your sister whole, in the afterlife?
 
God Created us with the ability to make choices. And those choices affect us, and sometimes others.
 
At the end of the day, God sent His Son to die for all of our sin. Any one of us can choose to believe. Or not.
 
Its our choice.
 
Nothing we do can "earn" eternal life, it is just an act of accepting Christ as our personal savior to let his blood cover our sin.
 
Pretty amazing if you ask me, and very different from all "other" religions out there...
 


-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 2:13pm

The Egyptians had a story remarkably close to the one about Jesus. There was also a guy walking around at that time named Apollonius (sp?) He had followers, said he was Christ, was said to heal the blind, raise the dead, was put to death, and came back again. He just doesn’t have a book written about him. That’s about the only difference.

 

We prayed plenty, trust me, before and after her death. I would imagine if she had been healed out of her state of being, as opposed to a broken arm, that would help a lot more people rethink their relationships.

Also, why is it that somehow our lives were more important than hers? I've been told countless times that she was here to teach us something. Why is it that my baby sister had to suffer from womb to when we buried her, just to make me learn something? If I am wrong, and god really does exist. sure I'd admit to being wrong, but I have no desire to worship such a egotistical being that finds it acceptable to watch that many people suffer, when they never did anything wrong. Job, in the bible, that whole book was to test his faith... Read it, I recommend it to everyone here on the forum. Why was Job's entire family so worthless to god? He didn't seem to care about the strength of their faith, or their lives to begin with. Only Job was important, and he was put through hell and back again, just to stroke god's ego.

 
EDIT: Also, most any muslim, jew, athenian, viking raider, apache warrior, celtic monk, etc. will tell you that their religion is unique from all others.


Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 2:26pm
Again, you are viewing life as only this existence here on earth.
 
Think about this for a moment.
 
What if we are spiritual beings. We currently reside in a body that typically lasts about 80 years...
 
Back when this body was Created and was close to perfection this same body lived for hundreds of years. Since we can agree that the result of sin is death, then according to that statement, anything that is given life, will die here on earth.
 
But, if we all have a spirit, that spirit lives on. Forever, and this life is just a blink compared to eternity.
 
So God chose to take your sister to the afterlife, after a time of suffering. Now she is able to live without the issues she was born with, for eternity.
 
You see that as God being mean, I see that as God bringing her home. Same with Job, I see a man who worshiped God in the good times, AND the bad times.
 
Life isn't a bed of roses, (or it is, if they are thorned) as life is hard. Bad stuff happens.
 
We can put our trust in God, or our trust in mans ability to "understand" God.
 
I'd rather trust God. But, we all get to choose.
 
If your sister were in heaven right now, and wanted to tell you how great it is... so you could join her when your life here on earth was finished.
 
Would it be "mean" of me to point out that I believe that is exactly what she would tell you if she could?...
 
But, its your choice, you can chose to be bitter about the horrors of life, or you can move on, and learn from the lessons life gives us. And be the best we can be each and every day, while trying to help others.
 
 


-------------
They tremble at my name...


Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 2:44pm
Wait how did this get from a discussion of science and advancement to a study of imaginary friends?


Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 2:56pm
I felt a great hunger

And yea did I proceedeth to the kitchen cupboard

From whence I tooketh a tomato-based sauce and many small stick-like things

Then water runneth from my faucet

I combineth these gifts in a pan upon the stove

and Lo!

I feasteth upon spaghetti . . .

. . . and my hunger was abated



Pastafarianism is the true religion


Edit:  I was short one needed "eth."


-------------


Posted By: oldpbnoob
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 3:06pm
^^ hehe.

-------------
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.


Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 3:18pm
And the sig becomes relevant yet again.

I'm with choop, how did we stray this far from discussing NASA smashing a small craft into the moon?


-------------


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 3:23pm
I blame obama.


Posted By: Tical3.0
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 3:38pm

Wow. FE I knew you were crazy. But damn dude you need padded walls



Posted By: slackerr26
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 4:19pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

I know God is real... Once you have witnessed His power first hand, you can't ignore it.
 
I've posted before about the time God healed my broken arm. I watched the bone straighten out. I felt the immense heat, and it was totally healed during the prayer. My grandfather who was a doctor and happened to be at our house when it occured and also witnessed it.
 


that is the biggest load of crap i have ever heard in my life. i feel sorry for your children.

Originally posted by Tical3.0 Tical3.0 wrote:

Wow. FE I knew you were crazy. But damn dude you need padded walls




-------------


Posted By: Benjichang
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 4:31pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

I know God is real... Once you have witnessed His power first hand, you can't ignore it.
 
I've posted before about the time God healed my broken arm. I watched the bone straighten out. I felt the immense heat, and it was totally healed during the prayer. My grandfather who was a doctor and happened to be at our house when it occured and also witnessed it.
 
B.S.


-------------

irc.esper.net
#paintball


Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 5:03pm
Originally posted by Tical3.0 Tical3.0 wrote:

Wow. FE I knew you were crazy. But damn dude you need padded walls

Despite the fact that we were carrying on a civil conversation, I still lol'd at this.


Posted By: Rofl_Mao
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 5:24pm
A great book on faith is called Letters from a Skeptic. It is written by Dr. Gregory A. Boyd and he has a letter conversation with his dad who is not a Christian and he explains to his dad almost all of the most common questions that a non-Christian asks because his dad asked him them. So they threw all of the letters together as a book and it answered alot of questions I needed answered.

"Greg Boyd is a former atheist who surrendered his life to Christ in 1974. After his conversion, he discovered that the faith he embraced failed to address many questions and objections to Christianity. Greg’s search for a well-grounded and intellectually defensible faith led him to study philosophy at the University of Minnesota (B.A.), followed by studies in philosophical theology at Yale Divinity School (M.Div) and Princeton Theological Seminary (Ph.D). He then became a professor of theology for 16 years at Bethel University and is currently the senior pastor of Woodland Hills Church in St. Paul, Minnesota." - from his website.


Posted By: procarbinefreak
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 5:42pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

 
Life isn't a bed of roses
 




Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 6:11pm
Good to see that this thread ended up going in a good direction. 


Posted By: Mack
Date Posted: 12 October 2009 at 6:14pm
Yes, it is.  Otherwise I would have considered it my duty, as a concerned forumer, to toss in some lame, yet amusing, puns to help things along.  Fortunately PCF saved me the effort.

All hail PCF! Thumbs Up


-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net