CCW: "The Gun Thread"
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=186082
Printed Date: 14 November 2025 at 2:10pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: CCW: "The Gun Thread"
Posted By: Magoo
Subject: CCW: "The Gun Thread"
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:21pm
Okay, so I finally got my CCL in. I can now carry a concealed handgun. Now, I don't want this to be a "political and civil ramifications of giving Magoo/DeTrevni a handgun" thread, but I mentioned I wanted a PPK in another thread, and people weren't so keen on that idea. I didn't want to hijack that thread, so I started my own.
I have an FNP-9. I love that gun tremendously, but due to the width of its frame, it's not easily concealed. So I'm using that as an excuse to get another gun. I'm looking for something .380 or similar. I want something small, but not "micro." Really, I see nothing wrong with the PPK, and indeed I've heard more good than bad in regards to it. The new models have an extended beavertail, so the slide-bite that haunts older PPKs has been reduced. What makes it "underpowered?" Especially if I'm looking for a .380.
Just some thoughts I'm tossing out there. That, and I like gun threads.
|
Replies:
Posted By: usafpilot07
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:24pm
Don't get a beretta .380, a buddy of mine got one recently and it sucks.
------------- Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:26pm
I saw those. I wasn't too impressed...
Really, I like the design of the PPK. Bersa Thunders, Makarovs, P-64s, etc. Of all those, however, I just like the looks, feel and features of the PPK the best.
|
Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:47pm
You know, a 9mm is basically in design very similar to .380, and the ammo is easier to find.
That said, I'll talk to my uncle, he does SWAT training, and ask him about pistols chambered for it. I have only limited experience with it.
|
Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:49pm
9mm is a popular caliber, if you go for a 9, consider some specialty ammo for it, something in hollow point.
------------- Innocence proves nothing FUAC!!!!!
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 9:57pm
Yeah, my FN is a 9mm, and I quite like it. I just can't find a gun I'd like to carry in 9mm. :(
|
Posted By: Impulse.
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 10:25pm
Try the G26 and XD9SC
------------- [IMG]http://www.word-detective.com/berry.gif">
|
Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 10:33pm
You like glocks? My dad CC's a G17.
------------- PSN Tag: AmmoLord XBL: xXAmmoLordXx
~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~
|
Posted By: ctchofday
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 10:40pm
My dad had a PPK in 380. Nice little gun. He traded it for a 38 Special.... Fail IMO. I loved the PPK, very reliable and easy to maintain.
------------- Xbl:PhantomReign97
'99 Snpr II, ½d Karni, E-Orracle, 2k4 Spstk, 2k5 Prstk, PMR SE, A5, 98
|
Posted By: Yomillio
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 10:53pm
My dad has an older PPK. I'll put a handful of rounds through it and already have slide rash. Nice gun otherwise though, IMO, so if they took care of that and you're set on .380, then I don't see why not.
-------------
http://www.tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=172327 - Forum XBL Gamertag Collection
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:08pm
ammolord wrote:
You like glocks? My dad CC's a G17. |
Not particularly a Glock fan. Price is right on 'em though.
|
Posted By: Shub
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:29pm
|
My dad just bought a Ruger LCP. It is a .380 as well, but it is very small and lightweight. It's supposed to be a good shooter, very accurate. But I haven't shot it yet.
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:39pm
My concerns stem more from .380 Auto and 9mm "kurtz" than from the PPK. The platform of the PPK is fantastic, I have a slightly larger version with my PA-63, but the ammo is simply unreliable when it comes to stopping an assailant. Of course, the trade-off is that anything chambered for a more powerful round is going to be bigger, and thus limit your concealment options. Also, you should take into consideration that the PPK is heavier than most LCP style pistols out there right now.
http://www.americanrifleman.org/ArticlePage.aspx?id=2074&cid=4 - American Rifleman has a really nice article which compares the different .380 Auto conceal-carry weapons out there right now. Most, if not all, are going to be a lot less expensive than the PPK as well.
However, if you can swing it with your body type and clothing choices, I'd shoot for something with a little more "oomph" even if it means going to a revolver. Remember, revolvers are more reliable when it comes to conceal carry as they simply do not jam, and there are fewer moving parts to get caught, especially with shaved/hammerless designs.
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:42pm
Shub wrote:
My dad just bought a Ruger LCP. It is a .380 as well, but it is very small and lightweight. It's supposed to be a good shooter, very accurate. But I haven't shot it yet. | Well, someone was lied to! Accuracy with an LCP is non-existent. of course, with most of the clones it's the same way. The sights are crap btw. My buddy is looking to get rid of his in favor of the Walther PK380.
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:49pm
Well, revolvers did come to mind. I really like the http://www.snubnose.info/docs/m642.htm - S&W Model 642 as well. .38 special +P, reliable, covered hammer, and about $200 cheaper than the PPK.
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 29 June 2010 at 11:52pm
Magoo wrote:
Well, revolvers did come to mind. I really like the http://www.snubnose.info/docs/m642.htm - S&W Model 642 as well. .38 special +P, reliable, covered hammer, and about $200 cheaper than the PPK. |
I think Shorty has two of those. If so, the ones I've shot have been nice CCW weapons. The ability to carry +P makes it even better imho.
Check around and see if anyone you know owns any of the guns you are looking at and give them a try. It's always best to shoot them before you commit.
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 12:02am
|
Revolver = Taurus Judge
My buddy has one, and im thinking about picking it up.
------------- PSN Tag: AmmoLord XBL: xXAmmoLordXx
~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 12:15am
ammolord wrote:
Revolver = Taurus Judge
My buddy has one, and im thinking about picking it up. |
Ugh...
Man, I'm tired of the hype those things have developed. Unless you live on a farm or are worried about being jumped by wild dogs, these guns are just not good! The rifling is too shallow for the bullets, and the .410 shotgun shell is a joke for defense on anything bigger than a dog. The gun itself is too big to effectively carry, and it's just not that great.
That said, I kinda want to go clay shooting with one...
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 12:43am
Magoo wrote:
ammolord wrote:
Revolver = Taurus Judge
My buddy has one, and im thinking about picking it up. | Ugh...Man, I'm tired of the hype those things have developed. Unless you live on a farm or are worried about being jumped by wild dogs, these guns are just not good! The rifling is too shallow for the bullets, and the .410 shotgun shell is a joke for defense on anything bigger than a dog. The gun itself is too big to effectively carry, and it's just not that great.That said, I kinda want to go clay shooting with one... |
Clay shooting would be better done with the http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/taurus_circut_judge-tfb.jpg - Circuit Judge than the Judge.
And I wouldn't even trust .410 for a wild dog, snakes yes, anything bigger than that? No.
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 12:51am
Yeah, I saw that. Bringin' back the wheel-rifle seems like a good move to me. But still, shooting clays with a handgun would be very fun!
Now if someone would just bring back the LeMat in an awesome, modern version...
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 3:03am
The shooting someone with a PPK in .380 is like hitting a stain glass window with a brick.
Did I just date myself?
Honestly? IF you want a PPK, GET a PPK.
There is nothing wrong with the ,380, if you can shoot. Honestly? I like little extra oomph a 9x19mm will give me.
If you want a CCW, then smaller is better, for concealment. IF you are going with a rolly, even a super light weight Scandium or something, you may as well get the heavier Glock, or the mini M&P. The width is about the samem for 100% more bullets.
IF you want a "better" gun than a .380 PPK, then the Khar in 9x19mm is a good option.
IF you want a .380 and aren't too set on the gun, the NAA Guargian and the Kel-tek P3A-T are both good guns.
Personally I don't like any .380 pistol. They ARE just too damn small.
I find gripping them is too hard, shooting them is too finiky, and throw in the loss of co-ordination and small motor control you get during an adrenaline dump, and a mini pistol isn't a good thing anymore.
Anything big enough to overcome those is chambered in 9x19mm.
|
Posted By: Heres To You
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 4:46am
|
To further extend on what kayback said... Why are you so deadset on a .380? Everyone has their favorite caliber, but is there a reason you want one that small? Ammo for a 9mm will be much easier to find.
Not to beat a dead horse, but I've heard quite a few stories of off-duty police officers getting into a shootout and the "bad guy" got hit with 3 or 4 9mm shots and ran away. 95% of us will never use our CCW, but if you do you want it to work. You got a spending limit or anything?
I will disagree with kayback on the kahr and kel-tec though. Reliability is huge for me, and I've heard alot of bad things. Kahr has the PM9 which is modeled after the Glock 36. They have had numerous magazine drop issues and Kahr has done hardly anything to fix the problems and their customer service is almost non existant.
http://forum.pafoa.org/general-2/5354-kahr-pm9.html - http://forum.pafoa.org/general-2/5354-kahr-pm9.html
^More info on the PM9.
I personally carry the Glock 36. It's a single stack grip, so it holds 6+1 of .45. It's one of the smallest glocks ever made, so on my 6'2" 205 lb frame it's not noticable at all.
I'm looking at picking up a Ruger Sr9C. Beautiful gun and it has been getting great reviews in alot of mags.
We need more info though, how much you looking to spend and other than ppk what models do you like?
------------- "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse."
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 7:34am
I should mention that my experience with the Khar and the Kel tec has been about 15 rounds each on a flat range. The NAA I shot was a 32.
But my experience with a PPk is about 50 rounds. So nothing really to speak of. Take what I say with lots of salt.
|
Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 9:40am
|
As a conceal carry fan... And I love guns... And shoot a lot (I have not one, but two shooting ranges on my property) One right off the porch for pistols, and another long range in the woods behind my house.
I carry a Kel-Tec 32 all the time.
It is small, lightweight, and very reliable. I have shot over a thousand rounds through it with zero jams, and for the size it is very accurate, if you know how to handle a pistol.
But, when I say accuracy, I am figuring 20 feet or less. As a conceal carry, anything further away than that is just illegal in most instances.
I can hit a 8 inch target with just about every shot from 20 feet with my kel tec 32. (plus it holds 8 bullets, instead of 7 like the 380) And trust me, a hollow point 32 is nothing to sneeze at. It will drop you just as fast as a 380.
In our family we have had most of the conceal carry guns at one point.
My father in law sold me the kel tec because he wanted to get a new gun, and he ended up with the walther pk380... which shoots just like the kel tec, and has only jammed a few times since it was new... But, it is too long, the hammer sticks out of your back pocket, making the whole "conceal" part moot.
Kel tec, very small, you can't even see it in your pocket. I have even switched my wallet to the other side a few years ago, and I don't even think about it anymore. Only problem is when you forget and reach back there and pull out your "wallet" and it isn't. Which I haven't done, but I have a friend who has...
My brother in law has a Taurus 9mm similar to the judge... hammerless. Hates it, it sits in a drawer, he only carried it a few times, WAY too heavy and bulky.
He got it to carry, but didn't like it and kept it to shoot, but it has such a big recoil, that he doesn't even shoot it that much. He just uses his XD 9mm, which is also a conceal carry gun, but too big to actually carry daily.
We have also had the kahr p380... bought new, it jammed on every load at least once, sometimes twice. shot it about 300 times, and it was still jamming. size was decent, little fat, and heavy if you have ever messed with a kel tec or lcp
sold it.
My brother in law ended up with a ruger lcp, which is 380, and he loves it. It shoots just like the kel tec, (actually it is almost identical to the kel tec 380, but with a fancier finish.
really nice gun, but to me I like the kel tec better, as I can draw it faster from my pocket holster than the ruger.
We also have a glock 27 40 which is a good bag gun, but again, too big to carry daily concealed. Nice shooter though, if you like glocks... Which I don't as they tend to point too high with my natural grip...
we also have a walther p22... Which is a really nice gun for shooting. In fact one of my favorites as it is cheap to shoot, and lots of fun, but I wouldn't recommend a 22 for a conceal carry gun, unless you are a good shot.
For me the biggest consideration is a gun with no safety, that I can carry without noticing it, and conceals easily, but enough firepower that if I ever needed it, I would have enough shots...
It is not a "home protection" gun, where you might use it for longer distances, I use a S&W SV9VE sigma for that... 17 rounds... all hollow point. no safety. I have hit a 8 inch target from 150 feet with that gun... Very accurate, and fun to shoot.
------------- They tremble at my name...
|
Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 10:00am
|
I love glocks.
And just my two cents-when you look at a concealed gun, you pretty much anticipate than you'll never have to use it (i.e. you want it light, and concealeable), but you plan on using it in the worst case scenario. To add to what FE was saying, I consider a good carry gun one that you can shoot accurately out to 25 yards, and very accurately at 15. That means anything in that range you'll be confident that you can shoot, even though legally you'll probably never get close.
So when you consider these things, or at least when I do, these are the qualifiers that come to mind-
-Profile. This is by far the most important for me. It's really just saying how a gun "points". For alot of people, this is why the 1911 style .45 / .380's are really the end all gun. They don't carry alot, but they're incredibly thin, and compacts are very light, and their 7-8 rounds (I think there are high caps out there now) pack all the punch you need. However, that said, I can't shoot a 1911 to save my life. For me, the Glocks are like a natural extension of my arm. I'd also be willing to trust my life to a USP or XD subcompact, but the taller rear profiles lower my reaction time.
-Sights. This is a biggie. Alot of the "old style" subcompacts have those godawful indentions in the barrel, or very small sights that are for concealed carry. For me, I can't aquire a target with those. I need the pronounced bright white sights, and at worst case, I'll use whiteout to create them :D
-Recoil. For me, I want a gun that allows to put a few bullets in the same spot. Some guns (see: Profile) will fit your hand better than others, and will allow you to handle the recoil better. Again, speaking for myself, the smaller the gun, the more unwieldy the recoil and therefore the longer it takes me to get back on sight.
As far as performance, I start at 15 yards and work my way back. I can tell almost instantly after shooting a handgun if I like it. Unlike rifles, with handguns it seems like I'm either really good in the first few shots, or else I'm just not gonna get it down.
And if you're looking at hammerless DOA guns like the Sigma, Ruger, or Sig, dry fire one first. I hate the incredibly heavy pulls these guns have, I far prefer the polymer styles of the XD and Glock, or the SA / DA Berettas, H&K's, Sigs, etc etc.
Again, if you can shoot one accurately and comfortably, you won't beat a 1911 sub compact. They're just great, high quality guns, especially the Kimbers and the like.
Oh, and my uncle doesn't shoot .380's, so no help there, lol.
|
Posted By: ShortyBP
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 11:03am
tallen702 wrote:
Magoo wrote:
Well, revolvers did come to mind. I really like the http://www.snubnose.info/docs/m642.htm - S&W Model 642 as well. .38 special +P, reliable, covered hammer, and about $200 cheaper than the PPK. |
I think Shorty has two of those. If so, the ones I've shot have been nice CCW weapons. The ability to carry +P makes it even better imho.
Check around and see if anyone you know owns any of the guns you are looking at and give them a try. It's always best to shoot them before you commit. |
I have a 638, which is very similar. It is my current "warm weather" carry piece, with 130gr +P JHPs. Very happy with it. It's tiny, it's light and it's fairly dummy-proof. No safety to fumble with, no worries of a magazine failure, or stovepipe jam.
In the winter, when I can wear layers and a heavy-belt... I carry a 3.5" 1911 in 45ACP.
I recently picked up a Glock 26 to try for warm-weather carry. I don't use it as a carry piece yet, as it's literally brand new and I need to get acquanted with it first. It is a small gun... about as small as my 3.5" 1911, but being a Glock, it has one big drawback: it's double-stack, so it's "wide". For some folks this is a non-issue. For someone like me, who seems to print ANYthing... it means that in shorts/t-shirt weather, I can't carry strong-side.
If you're looking at .380s, I'm in the crowd that says 'go for it'. It doesn't have the "stopping power" of the 3 standard carry calibers for semis these days (9, 40, 45)... but it should "do the job". 380 platforms tend to conceal better, but as stated: ammunition can be harder to find, AND more expensive. After the election "panic", 380 ammo became all but impossible to find, anywhere. I'm not sure if supplies have caught up yet. I reload, so ammunition availability isn't something I keep track of anymore. Although I did see when I went to Walmart last weekend, that they had no less than 48,000rds of 9mm available on the shelf. And no, that's not a typo.
Before I got the S&W 638, because everything else I had didn't conceal well (CZ P01, 1911) I used to carry a Beretta 21A in the warmer months. That's a 22LR pocket-auto. It's not gonna knock anyone down, but in a defensive situation, that's not my goal. I want to stop the attack, and bug out. My carry ammo ranges from 130gr +P in 38, 124gr +P in 9x19 and 230gr in 45... but I was perfectly fine carrying the dinky little rimfire for as long as I did.
If this is to be a conceal piece... really keep in mind the "conceal" part. Even "small" guns like the G26/27 series may not conceal well.
|
Posted By: Heres To You
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 12:57pm
|
^Shorty- You looked into the Glock36? Like I posted above, it's a single stack. It's the closest hybrid I've seen on a polymer/1911. I love it. If you like the dependability of a glock, and the slim profile of a 1911, you just met heaven haha.
OP- What's your height and weight? That helps alot on concealability. If your 5'5", 140 lb then a .380 is probably the best route to go.
------------- "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse."
|
Posted By: ShortyBP
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 1:28pm
Heres To You wrote:
^Shorty- You looked into the Glock36? Like I posted above, it's a single stack. |
G36 is about the same size as the G26. Only 0.05" thinner, it's over half an inch taller and half an inch longer. Weight is about the same (loaded). But while I'm a fan of 45ACP, I opted for the higher mag capacity of 9x19. I'm not in the "9mm is inadequate" camp.
I was also considering a [yet to be released] 9x19 carbine that uses Glock mags, so that played a part in my decision process. Mag interchangability. I can use G19/G17/G18 mags in the G26. And even though this carbine will also allow for caliber swap to 45ACP... it'll be with G21 mags, not G36.
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 3:26pm
My daily carry is a Glock 26. I don't get why people say it is too big. I know people who carry Beretta Elites and 92's and I think those are too big.
While the 26 does have a slightly short barrel and sight radius, it conceals brilliantly. The main bit that prints is the 90 degree angle where the grip ends. The Glock 26 has a grip similar to a "Bobtail" 1911. The sticking out bit is cut off, and it runs 13 rounds.
I would love a Glock 26 grip mated to a 19 frame, with a 19 slide. The length of the slide doesn't affect concealability of a weapon. It is mainly grip. The Glock is slightly wide, but nothing too bad.
I personally carry a 12+1 in the gun and a 19 round spare mag. 9x19 with quality ammo is fine. .380 is fine as well, but pricey for the performance.
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 4:11pm
Lessee, for price, I figure I can do anywhere up to about $600, so really, the PPK is at the high-end of my pricing point.
For build, I'm 6'3", 260. I'm not little.
|
Posted By: ThatGuitarGuy
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 4:21pm
Kayback, The 92/M9 is a lot easier to conceal with winter clothes, as you're adding bulk anyway. It's harder in summer, but not impossible. 9mm though, DeTrev, so if you're looking at .380 you're already away from those.
Got the girlfriend a PPK for her purse, as her ex-husband has been a little harassing as of late, even though it clearly states in the divorce papers he's only supposed to be around when he's picking up or dropping off their son. Fortunately for him, he doesn't know where I live, because I've got an extremely long driveway, and a Remington 700 zeroed to about 500 yds.
She enjoyed the PPK, as did I, so I ended up swiping it, and alternate the PPK and the M9 depending on the days schedule and what I'm wearing.
Replaced hers with the P99, as she liked the Walther name for whatever reason. I think it's the whole James Bond thing.
------------- Skillet: I've never been terribly fond of the look of a vagina
|
Posted By: Beil
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 4:59pm
IDK why everyone's so worried about the size of the gun when it comes to CCW. I'm 5'6'' weigh 160ish and carry a service model 4'' Springfield XD in .40 S&W. Never had anyone notice. actually one of my friends who also carries has asked me multiple times if i'm carrying or not, so he can't spot it.
honestly, concealing it is all in the holster. if it doesn't fit your form, and isn't somewhat comfortable, it defeats the purpose of carrying one in the first place.
------------- I do it fast, slow, hard, and easy. I sometimes even do it in the woods. Yeah, I'm a runner.
|
Posted By: Impulse.
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 10:10pm
|
Your worried about shooting out to 15 yards? Seeing over 90 percent of self defense is 5 yards or less?
Get something that you can train with often. Revolvers are always favored. Point and shoot. No FTF's, no weak magazines etc.
But the bottom line, get what you want. ( Not that you like in your head). Go to a range, rent a few different guns in different calibers. Pick the one that is the most comfortable, buy it, shoot it, CARRY IT. I amazed at the amount of people who have CCW's and don't carry ALL the time.
------------- [IMG]http://www.word-detective.com/berry.gif">
|
Posted By: ShortyBP
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 10:40pm
Kayback wrote:
I would love a Glock 26 grip mated to a 19 frame, with a 19 slide. The length of the slide doesn't affect concealability of a weapon. It is mainly grip. |
Ever think about getting a G19 and having the frame shortened? Seems to be increasingly popular these days for folks to send their G19s to a smith to have it done. Guy I know locally did it to his G17! A bit awkward for me, but it is interesting to see a G17 that accepts G26 mags.
Beil wrote:
IDK why everyone's so worried about the size of the gun when it comes to CCW. I'm 5'6'' weigh 160ish and carry a service model 4'' Springfield XD in .40 S&W. Never had anyone notice. actually one of my friends who also carries has asked me multiple times if i'm carrying or not, so he can't spot it.honestly, concealing it is all in the holster. if it doesn't fit your form, and isn't somewhat comfortable, it defeats the purpose of carrying one in the first place.
| While I agree that the holster is extremely important... size of piece does matter to some folks. I'm roughly your height and weight, and concealing your XD would prove to be very tough for me. Obviously, our frames differ. Or I need to start wearing baggier clothes.
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 10:48pm
Impulse. wrote:
Your worried about shooting out to 15 yards? Seeing over 90 percent of self defense is 5 yards or less? |
AAAAANNNNDDDD in many states anything over 7 yards is no longer considered self defense.
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Ceesman762
Date Posted: 30 June 2010 at 10:49pm
ThatGuitarGuy wrote:
Got the girlfriend a PPK for her purse, as her ex-husband has been a little harassing as of late, even though it clearly states in the divorce papers he's only supposed to be around when he's picking up or dropping off their son. Fortunately for him, he doesn't know where I live, because I've got an extremely long driveway, and a Remington 700 zeroed to about 500 yds. |
What have you got to stop him with if he gets inside the wire? The law of NY state says I can carry going to and from the range, not that I ever wanted to attempt it. But should I, I have a nice Bianchi profile hugging holster that conceals a 1911 very well under a loose fitting T-shirt. I wanted to be ready if the law should ever change here in NY and I can get CCW.
(or pigs fly first)..
------------- Innocence proves nothing FUAC!!!!!
|
Posted By: Impulse.
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 12:24am
tallen702 wrote:
Impulse. wrote:
Your worried about shooting out to 15 yards? Seeing over 90 percent of self defense is 5 yards or less? |
AAAAANNNNDDDD in many states anything over 7 yards is no longer considered self defense. |
Yep.
------------- [IMG]http://www.word-detective.com/berry.gif">
|
Posted By: heyitsbeil
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 12:36am
ShortyBP wrote:
Kayback wrote:
I would love a Glock 26 grip mated to a 19 frame, with a 19 slide. The length of the slide doesn't affect concealability of a weapon. It is mainly grip. |
Ever think about getting a G19 and having the frame shortened? Seems to be increasingly popular these days for folks to send their G19s to a smith to have it done. Guy I know locally did it to his G17! A bit awkward for me, but it is interesting to see a G17 that accepts G26 mags.
Beil wrote:
IDK why everyone's so worried about the size of the gun when it comes to CCW. I'm 5'6'' weigh 160ish and carry a service model 4'' Springfield XD in .40 S&W. Never had anyone notice. actually one of my friends who also carries has asked me multiple times if i'm carrying or not, so he can't spot it.honestly, concealing it is all in the holster. if it doesn't fit your form, and isn't somewhat comfortable, it defeats the purpose of carrying one in the first place.
| While I agree that the holster is extremely important... size of piece does matter to some folks. I'm roughly your height and weight, and concealing your XD would prove to be very tough for me. Obviously, our frames differ. Or I need to start wearing baggier clothes.
 |
I guess i should've mentioned that I've always been a fan of loose-fitting clothing. nothing form-fitting, nothing that I could carry a sawed-off shotgun. somewhere in between. example: my actual waist is probably 32.5-33'', and i wear a 34'' waist with a belt + holster.
but like a co-worker told me when I first started carrying: The bottom line is---no matter what cartridge your carrying pistol is---being armed with anything is better than no pistol at all. So yes, I prefer my .40 over a 9mm or .380, but if i had to choose either .380, or heck, .22LR or nothing at all, you can bet i'll take a .22. you can still defend yourself with a .22.
------------- Swim, Bike, Run. Simple and easy to remember.
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 1:53am
Good call on the holster issue I kept meaning to mention it. Quality holsters are a must. Don't skimp on them. Personally I like leather. Not just because it is traditional, I find it holds closer to the body than any wonder plastic. It may take buying a couple and wearing them for a while to find the right one. I went through about 10 in the first couple of years. I currently have 3 leather holsters for the Glock, and one plastic one. They are all for different styles of pants.
Now that you mention it, i did recall seeing something about shortened Glocks. And should look into it again,. But I've carried my 26 for almost a decade and find it acceptable. I can easily shoot it minute of badguy at 75m. I was using it to break clays, walk some wood and take out a spray can. Not a good excuse but "back in my day" they didn't have shortened Glock frames, Now get off my property whippersnapper.
I used to carry a 1911, my brother carries a Goverment double stack 45. So i'm no stranger to carrying bigger guns, but when I settled on the Glock I stopped that. Kiss. There is no need to mix operating styles, trigger pulls, grips or such. I could understand switching a sub compact version for a full size, but anything else is complicating matters for no reason.
As for the 7 yard thing, you just need a better lawyer. i can maybe understand a guy armed with a knife, even though they can be dangerous outside 7m, what about a guy with a gun? They can be dangerous way outside 7m.
Remember even if 90Percent of shootings happen at close range, that leaves you 10% that don't. You have already blown the stats out the water if you are involved in a SD shooting already. Practice for the worst, hope for the best.
Who ever said revolvers don't jam needs to look at things again. They are definately more resistant to jams than auto's but they are by no means immune. They also have to rotate the cylinder before they will fire. With an auto you have one guarenteed shot. The others might be an issue and are influenced by the user, but you have that one shot.
Revolvers can also jam during shooting. It was mainly with large caliber guns with loose crimps causing bullet heads to unseat, but I've heard about it happening with these super light weight guns as well. The recoil is too sharp and the acceleration of the gun and momentum of the bullet head exceeds the crimp hold and the slightly longer rounds now jam up the action.
Revolvers are great weapons, but don't think they are totally jam proof.
|
Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:02am
|
As far as self defense, I'm not a revolver person. I don't like the overall width of the cylinder. I realize that's a petty gripe, just never was my thing.
I do love shooting cowboy guns though. I've been looking around for years to find a good deal on the discontinued Ruger birds head .32 magnums. Not for power, just that they were gorgeous guns. At this point I'd settle for almost any good birds head stainless cowboy gun.
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:23am
I was looking up single action revolverss for self defense for gits and shiggles. Turns out that a fair number of people actually carry single action revolvers. Mostly it's the western-type guys that can accurately fan the hammer as fast as a normal person can pull a trigger. I wouldn't do it, but it was impressive, and it goes on the "slow gun is better than no gun" principle.
Okay, another thing: My buddy wants to buy my FNP-9 for $600. I don't really want to sell it, but it would give me enough for a gun I can actually carry. Should I sell my FN for a quick turnaround, or just save up and buy a second gun? Bear in mind saving takes a while for me. I'm just a cashier, and I've got some hefty bills to pay. Obviously, I'd like both guns, but I'm wondering what the FNP-9 would do for me that a carry gun won't. I mean, it is 9mm and has 16+1 shots, so it's a good home gun, but I wouldn't be taking a loss with a small carry gun and a few extra mags, would I?
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:29am
Small guns =/= range guns. I do tend to work my little 26 quite hard, but it is more fun shooting full sized weapons.
Pretty much everyone who shoots it agrees the 26 is fantastic for SD but not so much for fun at the range.
How often do you just go blasting?
I have my 1911 for range work, and it is fantastic. Handloads cost about the same as premium .22 here, so the cost isn't an issue for me.
If you feel you need a CCW, I'd say sell the FN, you can always buy another one.
KBK
|
Posted By: Magoo
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:51am
I don't hit up the range as much as I'd like. Maybe once a month. That said, I don't really go to the range to enjoy the feeling of recoil in my hand, though it is quite satisfactory. I go to see how well I can shoot. For me, a great range gun would be a bull-barreled Ruger Mk. III with some aftermarket peep-sights and grips at the 20 yd. range.
When I bought the FN, I was fairly misinformed. I thought it would be a good carry gun, simply because the barrel length would qualify it as "compact." I was misinformed, and made the mistake of not doing proper research. That said, it's a terrific pistol, and I really do like it, hence my hesitation to sell it. However, I'd prefer a CCW than a range weapon.
It is slightly sentimental though. I bought it the day I turned 21. Since I don't drink, I wanted something else. :)
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 3:10am
Ah, if it has sentimental value, keep it.
That is really hard to replace or get over, IMHO.
KBK
|
Posted By: FreeEnterprise
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 7:34am
|
It depends on your mentality...
Lots of guys said I was crazy to sell my bikes... But, I could care less. I have pictures of them, and really what do I want with an old 20 year old bike, that is getting worn out, when someone will give me a grand for it!
If you can't use it the way you want. Sell it, and get what you want, having another gun sitting in a drawer does nothing for you.
Course, me personally I got my home protection gun first. Then my conceal carry gun. (and all of these after I got my target shooting guns, (ruger mark 1 and mark 2, which I shoot all the time...)
I shoot my home protection gun second most often, as it is 9mm and ammo is easy to find.
Another reason I went with the kel tec 32 is that 32 ammo is very easy to find... Wal-mart almost always has it, and they hardly ever have 380 ammo...
course you have to go to a gun show to get hollow point either way... But, you should only ever need one box of that, as that is what you keep in the gun when you don't actually shoot it... hopefully.
------------- They tremble at my name...
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:18pm
FreeEnterprise wrote:
It depends on your mentality...
Lots of guys said I was crazy to sell my bikes... But, I could care less. I have pictures of them, and really what do I want with an old 20 year old bike, that is getting worn out, when someone will give me a grand for it! |
True. However I will postulate that a 20 yeard old bike might be old technology? And hey, if you aren't going to use them.....
I've got an unfair advantage that my first pistol was a Norinco 1911. When it got retired in fairly short order for a Glock 26, I didn't want to part with it. It was also my first gun, bought when I was 18. Many happy shooting years later it is my project weapon.
I get that you can't do the same thing with a FNP-9, which is why I suggested dumping it in the first place. But if it has sentimenmtal value, and if it WILL get used as a range gun, why not keep it.
I agree another gun in the safe might be useless, but another gun in the rangebag isn't always a waste.
KBK
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 01 July 2010 at 2:49pm
Kayback, how can you even get away with using a Glock. Aren't you supposed to be running around with TZ-99's down there?
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 02 July 2010 at 12:21am
Well you see, I'm white, so no.
I've shot a TZ-99. What a piece of **GROWN UP WORD**. Talk about slide bite. The TZ 99 is definately the gang banger weapon of choice around here. They are cheap, plentiful and available on the black market. And they work. Unfortunately.
Glocks and Berettas are also used. There are a depressing number of police / military Z88 used in crimes. If you look at most of the headline crimes as well, you'll find full auto, military or police issue R4's and AK47/74's. Yet the gun control people insist it is civilian weapons that get used in crimes. :roll eyes:
I've had a guy offer me a Glock from a cardboard box in the boot of his car. He had about 25 or 30 gen 1 Glock 17's. Hmmm. (for those who don't know, there is about a 99.9999999% chance they are un registered, highly illegal weapons. You need to be a registered dealer, and the weapons need to be registered)
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 02 July 2010 at 1:10am
Kayback wrote:
I've had a guy offer me a Glock from a cardboard box in the boot of his car. He had about 25 or 30 gen 1 Glock 17's. Hmmm. (for those who don't know, there is about a 99.9999999% chance they are un registered, highly illegal weapons. You need to be a registered dealer, and the weapons need to be registered) |
So uh... how much did he want for them?
There's a guy down in Richmond VA who gets the used and abused police batches of 17's 18's and 22's that are sold off as surplus each year. They generally have enough rifling left to be decent and he usually dumps them for ~$260 - $300 depending on their cosmetic appearance.
Personally, I've just never liked Glocks. They feel weird in my hands, I guess it's the double-stack making the grip so wide.
Edit:
waiting for dune to come in and call you racist now....
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 02 July 2010 at 3:37am
|
Back then it was R500. Market value for a new Glock was around R5000 to R7000. It has gone up a bit by now.
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 02 July 2010 at 3:53am
$65 Glock? DAYAM!!!! Of course, that was when the ZAR was probably closer to parity with the USD I take it?
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: Kayback
Date Posted: 02 July 2010 at 5:52am
I can't recall, but the Rand did used to be closer to the Dollar, but it has been abysmal before as well.
This was in about 1998.
Bwahahaha I just Googled the 1998 exchange rate. 13.83 to the Dollar :) worst ever rate. Thats roughly $37 :)
It was towards the begining of the year so the rate wasn't that bad yet but you get the idea. If it wasn't that they were unregistered I'd have bought the whole case.
|
|