And yet... Most people have been manipulated by their poor education to believe that the democratic party was opposed to the KKK.

 

Look back at which party was against the civil rights movement.

 

Primarily the democrats.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

 

Well, after the NAACP came out and called the Tea party "racists" I figured as one of the most photographed members of the Cincinnati Tea party (I was on the front page of 4 local papers for one of our largest tea parties.)

 

It is time for the public to get educated about who started the resurgence of the KKK.

 

"Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) has falsely accused  the Tea Party of having ties to the Ku Klux Klan.  Speaking at the NAACP convention, she said: “All those who wore sheets a long time ago lifted them off to wear Tea Party clothing.”

Now is the time to speak some Truth to Power.

It would have been far more truthful for the congresswoman to have admitted the fact that all those who wore sheets a long time ago lifted them to wear Democratic Party clothing.  Yes, the Ku Klux Klan was established by the Democratic Party.  Yes, the Ku Klux Klan murdered thousands of Republicans — African-American and white – in the years following the Civil War.  Yes, the Republican Party and a Republican President, Ulysses Grant, destroyed the KKK with their Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

How did the Ku Klux Klan re-emerge in the 20th century?  For that, the Democratic Party is to blame.

It was a racist Democrat President, Woodrow Wilson, who premiered Birth of a Nation in the White House.  That racist movie was based on a racist book written by one of Wilson’s racist friends from college.  In 1915, the movie spawned the modern-day Klan, with its burning crosses and white sheets.

Inspired by the movie, some Georgia Democrats revived the Klan.  Soon, the Ku Klux Klan again became a powerful force within the Democratic Party.  The KKK so dominated the 1924 Democratic Convention that Republicans, speaking truth to power, called it the Klanbake.  In the 1930s, a Democrat President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, appointed a Klansman, Senator Hugo Black (D-AL), to the U.S. Supreme Court.  In the 1950s, the Klansmen against whom the civil rights movement struggled were Democrats.  The notorious police commissioner Bull Connor, who attacked African-Americans with dogs and clubs and fire hoses, was both a Klansman and the Democratic Party’s National Committeeman for Alabama.  Starting in the 1980s, the Democratic Party elevated a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), to third-in-line for the presidency.

Speaking more Truth to Power, the Republican Party has been a resolute enemy of the Ku Klux Klan, terrorist wing of the Democratic Party."

http://biggovernment.com/mzak/2010/07/16/the-ku-klux-klan-terrorist-wing-of-the-democratic-party/ - http://biggovernment.com/mzak/2010/07/16/the-ku-klux-klan-terrorist-wing-of-the-democratic-party/

 

 

My mother was teaching kindergarden in Fayetteville NC during this time, as my father was stationed at Ft. Bragg. She had three black children in her class, and the KKK terrorized their class as they tried to leave each day. The police were useless and my mother litterally took her life into her hands by walking these three boys home each day, past the taunts and violence that they used against her for teaching these children. She recognized the voices of one of the most violent and abusive klan members who was also a democratic leader in the area.  Crosses were burned in our yard monthly by these thugs. In fact, as a teenager, in the 80's I remember crosses being burned in my front yard as we always did things to help the poor, many of which were black.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_a_Nation - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_a_Nation

 

So when Democrats try and spin that republicans or tea party members are KKK members. Just look at the facts. The rebirth of the KKK was started in the white house by a democrat.

 

" /wiki/Thomas_Dixon,_Jr. - Thomas Dixon , author of the source play /wiki/The_Clansman - The Clansman , was a former classmate of /wiki/Woodrow_Wilson - President Woodrow Wilson at /wiki/Johns_Hopkins_University - Johns Hopkins University . Dixon arranged a screening at the /wiki/White_House - White House , for Wilson, members of his cabinet, and their families. Wilson was reported to have commented of the film that "it is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true". In Wilson: the new freedom, Arthur Link quotes Wilson's aide, Joseph Tumulty, who denied Wilson said this and also claims that "the President was entirely unaware of the nature of the play before it was presented and at no time has expressed his approbation of it." ^{#cite_note-12 - [13]} However, Woodrow Wilson's History of the American People explained the Ku Klux Klan of the late 1860s as the natural outgrowth of /wiki/Reconstruction_era_of_the_United_States - Reconstruction , a lawless reaction to a lawless period. Wilson noted that the Klan "began to attempt by intimidation what they were not allowed to attempt by the ballot or by any ordered course of public action." ^{#cite_note-13 - [14]} In the film, approbation for the Klan, citing Wilson's History, is directly quoted.

Relentless in publicizing the film, Dixon was apparently the source for the quotation. It has been repeated so often in print that it has taken on a separate life. Dixon went so far as to promote the film as "Federally endorsed". After controversy over the film had grown, Wilson wrote that he disapproved of the "unfortunate production." ^{#cite_note-14 - [15]} D. W. Griffith responded to the film's negative critical reception with his next film /wiki/Intolerance_%28film%29 - Intolerance ."

 

 

Clearly, the Republican party would accept these throngs of African Americans with open arms. If only they could see the error of their political leanings. 

 

This just goes back to my post a couple weeks ago, the right is the new left.

 

Now, if you want to get into the victimization of minority cultures that was popular on the left a few years ago, there's alot of truth to be had there. 

 

There's a basic truth here, that bears mention in this thread though-

 

Conservative=Little Change

 

Liberal=Lots of Change

 

A very simplified way to look at two terms. There are times when conservatism is necessary (i.e. far reaching change with unknown results) and times when liberalism is necessary (i.e. the civil rights movement).

 

To attempt to credit either term to Republican or Democrat is silly. While Democrats have been notoriously liberal, while Republicans have been notoriously conservative, there are those in both who excercise the proper ideology at the proper time. 

 

Realignment is a long documented occurence in political science. It has nothing to do with rewriting history. Research all the way back to the Whigs...this is basic political stuff. Of course, if you want to get complex about it, you're welcome to dive into the hundreds of thousands of pages of research that have been done on it in the past fifty years or so.

 

Again, read my post on the real meanings of conservative and liberal. It's all really basic when you get down to bare facts.

 

oldsoldier wrote: Vast Left Wing, and Vast Right Wing are the same political animal, with differant agendas. When Democrats are in power it is the role of the opposition party (GOP)to maintain a balance, not agree whole heartedly with political agendas thier voters do not approve of, and vice versa when the GOP is in power.

 

This much, for certain, is very true. One party in full power sets the system back, and is detrimental to keeping the system as central as possible.

 

 

Sounds familiar from the last two elections from both sides. The only worthwhile candidate I've seen in almost a decade is Obama...and being conservative, you can imagine my frustration at that fact.

 

Politics have become a media / advertising game like some form of the entertainment industry. Sell an image rather than a politician.

 

I guess we can thank the 60's and the first televised debates, where form began to take the place of fact. I think Palin is the shining example of this media-induced fallacy (insert joke)-tell peopel what they want, then sell it to them with a personality so cartoonish and overplayed that it could be the star of a Coen brothers flick.

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Yet again, the juxtaposition of the real video evidence shown here versus the mainstream media’s straight faced reportage of the NAACP’s baseless accusations demonstrates that, once again, the American main stream media has asserted itself as the number one enemy of the truth, when the facts don’t fit the left-wing narrative. Like the NAACP, it has become no better than Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson in its willingness to exploit race for political ends and their unflinching support of the Obama’s left-wing agenda."

 

crickets...

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/19/clip-shows-usda-official-admitting-withheld-help-white-farmer/ - http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/19/clip-shows-usda-official-admitting-withheld-help-white-farmer/

 

and the NAACP was forced to issue a statement....

 

http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/20/naacp-statement-on-resignation-of-shirley-sherrod/ - http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/20/naacp-statement-on-resignation-of-shirley-sherrod/

 

 

 

too bad abcnbccbs didn't cover it... wow, it is weird how they ignore so many stories that would help the right, while pouncing on any story that hurts the right...

 

strange.

 

 

Oh, and looks like breitbart got the journolist data... This should get VERY interesting. Already stories are coming out about the manipulation from the journalists who used journolist...

 

 

heh, heh, heh.

Just waiting for the sand to clear out.

 

 

 

Here is the problem. We have an administration that acts without the facts. Here is a video that was obviously edited, watching it, (I posted it on the previous page) you come to the conclusion that she is going somewhere with the story.

 

Or she is a huge racist.

 

I would guess she was going somewhere, according to breitbart he only had this footage, and hasn't seen any more...

 

 

But, what happened.

 

according to the lady, the white house called her three times, as soon as the video dropped... She was FORCED into "resigning", according to her interview on cnn.

 

THEN the NAACP dropped a bomb on her and called her a racist... (now they have pulled that statement, and are going to do an investigation).

 

She said the white house said she was going on glenn beck, therefore she had to resign right then, pull over on the side of the road and send in your resignation...

 

 

 

THis is the same administration that feels it is OK to murder American citizens located not in war zones, but anywhere they find them...

 

No trial, no chance for evidence to be shown, just an administration that will decide, yup, they are a terrorist... wait, a "Pending man caused disaster"... And Obama can have them killed.

 

...

 

somewhere in there is the truth. But on the tails of the NAACP calling the tea party racist, while allowing the black panther party to go free.

 

 

 

 

Instead we have a new dictator that is allowed to fire people without due process, and kill people without using the courts.

 

shocking.

 

 

 

But, will the "media" cover any of this?... Or will they just tow the democratic party line. Too bad Journolist isn't up anymore cause they could hash it out before hand.

 

but, right wing outlets are covering it, and that is why the media is dead in our country. Questions should be asked.

 

The white house is now denying any involvement.

 

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/20/white-house-we-didnt-pressure-sherrod-to-resign/ - http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/20/white-house-we-didnt-pressure-sherrod-to-resign/

 

Transparency of hope for change.

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7089899.ece - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7089899.ece

 

hey lookie a leftist organization nails it... And you thought I would never agree with the left...

 

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations - http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations

 

 

 

This is just another case of someone "acting stupidly"...

 

jackwagon.

 

NAACP just released the tape of the event, (with an edit at 21:00... hmm)

 

16:30 to 25:00 is the pertinent part.

 

 

 

If a member of the NCAAP is shown to be a racist, then the sitting president is disqualified and the vice presidential candidate from the losing side of the previous election is appointed leader of the U.S. 

It's in the Constitution somewhere. 

 

 

 

Oh right, that stuff only applies when it goes along with your personal opinions.

Also, to reiterate, it was conservatives who supported the KKK, Jim Crowe and other such racially divisive ideals. 

At the time, the Democratic Party was the conservative ideological party, while the Republican party was the progressive, liberal-leaning party (Although "progressive" and "liberal" back then meant "Hey we should let black people be part of our society,"). 

So yes, you are correct. The Democratic Party was the one who supported the KKK. 

But you ignore the whole party ideological switch that has happened. 

It was the conservatives who supported the KKK.

Those same conservatives, after the realignment, roundly switched party affiliation to the Republican Party. 

Thus is why your deep south states: Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, etc., are all considered to be unwavering red states now. 

Trying to say that the Democratic Party is still the same party as the KKK is quite silly. And ignoring history. 

Looks like you guys have something in common, then.

 

You guys have cited a perfect example...

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd

 

 

See, what is sad, is that you judge not based on the content of character, but the color of their party.

 

Democrats are still the party that promotes racial divides. They are the party that wants certain groups to be put above other groups. (example giving loans to people who can't afford loans... because of the color of their skin, or their political party, or in business awarding contracts to one company over another because of the color of the skin of the owner or their political party, or in schools, giving scholarships to one person over another because of the color of their skin, or to meet some racially motivated "standard").

 

All examples of modern day racism, perpetrated by the democratic party.

 

 

And a good reason why labels are so bad. Look at character.

 

Tallen put a ton of words in my mouth to make me look bad. And as usual, whale is acting like I called him a liberal...

 

I didn't. He is doing the same thing liberals do, by making stuff up and putting it in my mouth. But we are all smart enough to recognize that is all he is doing, trying to destroy my character by inventing speech... that I never said.

 

Who cares if he is liberal or conservative. He is lying plain and simple, based on that, we should judge him by the content of his character...

 

 

Just like we should judge our President by his actions.

 

90 days to send more troops to Afghanistan.

 

a few hours to force a "subject" to resign...

 

And a media that is complicit.

 

Yes, and as we all discussed, there were some who did not make the switch to the Republican Party. 

And, so we can clear this up, in your mind, the political party realignment of the Republican and Democratic Parties, as they connect to a liberal and conservative voting base, is revisionist history?   

 

Is lindsey Graham a good "conservative"?...

 

He voted to put Kagan on the supreme court. When she is going to be an activist judge, no question. Especially with the way she manipulated the partial birth abortion issue...

 

I wouldn't vote for him if my if my life depended on it.

 

 

What we are so used to doing is voting (R) or (D) instead of looking at the character of the people.

 

That is why I am part of the tea party. I am sick of the way (R) are so similar to (D) both are grasping for more power. Period.

 

 

 

Does that answer your question?...

 

The character of the democratic party is the same before as it is now... and both parties act the same in many cases.

 

But, to pretend that the democratic party isn't the party of the KKK is silly. No matter if it was then or now. They own that part of history, just like the democrat party voted against civil rights. The way your schooling pushed a "change" that now they are saintly is revisionist. The content of their character is the same...

 

 

 

Better question is, was it wrong for Tallen to put words in my mouth? Words that he clearly made up and I never said, all to drag my reputation through the mud?

 

While being patted on the back by his fanboys who see no problem with this as the ends justify the means?...

 

 

 

 

seems awfully similar to this story...(notice the party responsible...)

 

http://biggovernment.com/smahoney/2010/07/21/democrats-attack-small-business-owner-for-speaking-out-against-obamas-policies/ - http://biggovernment.com/smahoney/2010/07/21/democrats-attack-small-business-owner-for-speaking-out-against-obamas-policies/

 

 

but, they've "changed"...

 

 

not.

No. 

You started this thread. Answer the question, sir: 

Was the realignment of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party, and the respective liberal and conservative voting bases, simply a matter of "Revisionist history?"

Ignore Skillet and other trolls and just answer this question. 

 

 

But, according to true "conservative" values, a real conservative believes in smaller government. So if they get elected and vote for any new spending and anything that increases our debt... they were lying, and if you judge them by the content of their character that will tell you if you should vote for them again.

 

The government is just a reflection of our society.

 

WE vote them in, and allow the "media" to manipulate us into thinking that our choices are who they want us to pick by not thinking when we watch someone get railroaded...

 

Just look at the evidence and make your own decision. Don't let someone tell you what you should do.

Hmm, so legislature passed by one party in congress over the filibuster of the other party doesn't matter, the President gets all the credit?... I'll remember that.

So the countless documentation, study and research done by political scientists on both sides of the political spectrum are not correct? The information about this taught in both public and private, religious high schools (As was my case) is false? 

And the switching of Republican controlled states being in the northeast U.S. while the southeast was largely Democratic, to the current state of being nearly opposite, that is just coincidence? 

The tangible evidence is simply a fabrication? Yes or no? 

so legislature passed by one party in congress over the filibuster of the other party doesn't matter, the President gets all the credit?...

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38344940/from/RSS/ - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38344940/from/RSS/

 

notice how they never link the White house to the pressure to resign... Yet the last line makes no sense because they massaged the story to protect the white house.

 

Perfect example of the media "journolisting" a story.

 

 

"After the grainy clip began circulating in conservative circles online and was picked up by Fox News, Sherrod said she was pressured to step down from her post as director of rural development in Georgia. "

 

Actually, she said on CNN that the white house called her 3 times, and told her to pull over on the side of the road and resign. Nice job twisting the facts to cover up for the white house, as usual.

 

The media is part of the democratic party. Liars and manipulators.

 

"Breitbart said he was surprised by how the media “misconstrued” the tapes of Sherrod and that he did not expect that the White House “would throw her under the bus.” "

 

any reader that didn't know about this wouldn't get it because of the story "massage".

 

 

 

 

Also ignored is the way the crowd at the NAACP agrees and laughs while obviously agreeing with her statements, that are clearly racist... But, that is completely left out.

 

I love how the "unedited" video NAACP cut at 21:00 and cut back in with the audience laughing. Clearly another racist example that they took out (wait isn't that editing?...) Don't worry the "media" won't ask.

 

 

 

Yes, it is a manipulation of the truth.

 

 

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16500 - http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16500

 

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

 

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that "n-word"er preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity."

 

 

 

And it continues to this day, where democrats are still manipulating blacks, for example.

 

http://biggovernment.com/bdarling/2010/07/21/bank-bailout-bills-potentially-unconstitutional-racial-and-gender-quotas/ - http://biggovernment.com/bdarling/2010/07/21/bank-bailout-bills-potentially-unconstitutional-racial-and-gender-quotas/

 

and where schools are racially designed...

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100720/ap_on_re_us/us_busing_fuss - http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100720/ap_on_re_us/us_busing_fuss

 

I grew up in wake county schools, in fact, I went to sanderson High school the year they decided to bus in black kids from the inner city to our "rich" white school. I was attacked on numerous occasions because I was white, during this time. My car was jumped on by gangs of black kids on the way to their bus. I was called every race baiting name in the book. We had race riots.  And nothing was ever done. Our school became a war zone for a few years, but the media didn't cover it... By the time I graduated, our school looked and acted like the inner city schools these kids left, grades suffered, and the school went downhill fast.

 

 

All the brilliance of the liberals who were "fixing" things... when in fact they just made a mess.

 

 

at least they had "good intentions"... right?

We're getting there. 

So, to follow up, the Republican Party has always been the party of conservative ideology, while the Democratic Party has always been the party of liberal ideology? 

Also, I was hoping you could explain why exactly the traditional Democratic and Republican held U.S. states, when referring to elections, switched so rapidly in the 1960s and 1970s? 

Look at their signs. Clearly liberal. 

 

I'm probably going to regret saying this...

 

That made me lol.

 

 

Did your education cover any of this? Or is it another example of Bias of Omission in your education?

 

 

"It baffles me that we're taught that Democrats are the civil rights champions.  They are absolutely the opposite.

First of all, the Republican party was created to be the party against slavery because the Democrats were pro-slavery, and good people knew it was un-Christian and morally wrong.  Lincoln was a Repblican, and not in "name only" as so-called scholars are teaching on campuses across the country.  You'd never know it by how Republicans are portrayed now, but we were THE anti-slavery party, and we still are.

 

The Klu Klux Klan was created by the Democrats for the express reason of terrorizing blacks and Republicans in the South to prevent them from voting, and that every known Klansman that were members of Congress have been Democrats.

...imagine if you will, what a far different nation the United States would be had not the Republicans been around to block the Democrats’ efforts.

Further, the first grand wizard of the KKK was honored at the 1868 Democratic National Convention, no Democrats voted for the 14th Amendment to grant citizenship to former slaves and, to this day, the party website ignores those decades of racism....

Three years after Appomattox, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, granting blacks citizenship in the United States, came before the Congress: 94 percent of Republicans endorsed.

"The records of Congress reveal that not one Democrat -- either in the House nor the Senate -- voted for the 14th Amendment...Three years after the Civil War and the Democrats from the North as well as the South were still refusing to recognize any rights of citizenship for black Americans. [David Barton]

 

March 20, 1854 Opponents of Democrats’ pro-slavery policies meet in Ripon, Wisconsin to establish the Republican Party

May 30, 1854 Democrat President Franklin Pierce signs Democrats’ Kansas-Nebraska Act, expanding slavery into U.S. territories; opponents unite to form the Republican Party

June 16, 1854 Newspaper editor Horace Greeley calls on opponents of slavery to unite in the Republican Party

July 6, 1854 First state Republican Party officially organized in Jackson, Michigan, to oppose Democrats’ pro-slavery policies

February 11, 1856 Republican Montgomery Blair argues before U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of his client, the slave Dred Scott; later served in [Republican] President Lincoln’s Cabinet

February 22, 1856 First national meeting of the Republican Party, in Pittsburgh, to coordinate opposition to Democrats’ pro-slavery policies

March 27, 1856 First meeting of Republican National Committee in Washington, DC to oppose Democrats’ pro-slavery policies

May 22, 1856 For denouncing Democrats’ pro-slavery policy, Republican U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (R-MA) is beaten nearly to death on floor of Senate by U.S. Rep. Preston Brooks (D-SC), takes three years to recover

March 6, 1857 Republican Supreme Court Justice John McLean issues strenuous dissent from decision by 7 Democrats in infamous Dred Scott case that African-Americans had no rights “which any white man was bound to respect”

June 26, 1857 Abraham Lincoln declares Republican position that slavery is “cruelly wrong,” while Democrats “cultivate and excite hatred” for blacks

October 13, 1858 During Lincoln-Douglas debates, U.S. Senator Stephen Douglas (D-IL) states: “I do not regard the Negro as my equal, and positively deny that he is my brother, or any kin to me whatever”; Douglas became Democratic Party’s 1860 presidential nominee

October 25, 1858 U.S. Senator William Seward (R-NY) describes Democratic Party as “inextricably committed to the designs of the slaveholders”; as President Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of State, helped draft Emancipation Proclamation

June 4, 1860 Republican U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (R-MA) delivers his classic address, The Barbarism of Slavery

April 7, 1862 President Lincoln concludes treaty with Britain for suppression of slave trade

April 16, 1862 President Lincoln signs bill abolishing slavery in District of Columbia; in Congress, 99% of Republicans vote yes, 83% of Democrats vote no

July 2, 1862 U.S. Rep. Justin Morrill (R-VT) wins passage of Land Grant Act, establishing colleges open to African-Americans, including such students as George Washington Carver

July 17, 1862 Over unanimous Democrat opposition, Republican Congress passes Confiscation Act stating that slaves of the Confederacy “shall be forever free”

August 19, 1862 Republican newspaper editor Horace Greeley writes Prayer of Twenty Millions, calling on President Lincoln to declare emancipation

August 25, 1862 President Abraham Lincoln authorizes enlistment of African-American soldiers in U.S. Army

September 22, 1862 Republican President Abraham Lincoln issues Emancipation Proclamation

January 1, 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, implementing the Republicans’ Confiscation Act of 1862, takes effect

February 9, 1864 Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton deliver over 100,000 signatures to U.S. Senate supporting Republicans’ plans for constitutional amendment to ban slavery

June 15, 1864 Republican Congress votes equal pay for African-American troops serving in U.S. Army during Civil War

June 28, 1864 Republican majority in Congress repeals Fugitive Slave Acts

October 29, 1864 African-American abolitionist Sojourner Truth says of President Lincoln: “I never was treated by anyone with more kindness and cordiality than were shown to me by that great and good man”

January 31, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. House with unanimous Republican support, intense Democrat opposition

March 3, 1865 Republican Congress establishes Freedmen’s Bureau to provide health care, education, and technical assistance to emancipated slaves

April 8, 1865 13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support, 63% Democrat opposition

June 19, 1865 On “Juneteenth,” U.S. troops land in Galveston, TX to enforce ban on slavery that had been declared more than two years before by the Emancipation Proclamation

November 22, 1865 Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “black codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination

December 6, 1865 Republican Party’s 13th Amendment, banning slavery, is ratified

February 5, 1866 U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves

April 9, 1866 Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto; Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law

April 19, 1866 Thousands assemble in Washington, DC to celebrate Republican Party’s abolition of slavery

May 10, 1866 U.S. House passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens; 100% of Democrats vote no

June 8, 1866 U.S. Senate passes Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens; 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no

July 16, 1866 Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of Freedman's Bureau Act, which protected former slaves from “black codes” denying their rights

July 28, 1866 Republican Congress authorizes formation of the Buffalo Soldiers, two regiments of African-American cavalrymen

July 30, 1866 Democrat-controlled City of New Orleans orders police to storm racially-integrated Republican meeting; raid kills 40 and wounds more than 150

January 8, 1867 Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867 Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans

March 30, 1868 Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”

May 20, 1868 Republican National Convention marks debut of African-American politicians on national stage; two – Pinckney Pinchback and James Harris – attend as delegates, and several serve as presidential electors

September 3, 1868 25 African-Americans in Georgia legislature, all Republicans, expelled by Democrat majority; later reinstated by Republican Congress

September 12, 1868 Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in Georgia Senate, every one a Republican, expelled by Democrat majority; would later be reinstated by Republican Congress

September 28, 1868 Democrats in Opelousas, Louisiana murder nearly 300 African-Americans who tried to prevent an assault against a Republican newspaper editor

October 7, 1868 Republicans denounce Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”

October 22, 1868 While campaigning for re-election, Republican U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who organized as the Ku Klux Klan

November 3, 1868 Republican Ulysses Grant defeats Democrat Horatio Seymour in presidential election; Seymour had denounced Emancipation Proclamation

December 10, 1869 Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs FIRST-in-nation law granting women right to vote and to hold public office

February 3, 1870 After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race

May 19, 1870 African-American John Langston, law professor and future Republican Congressman from Virginia, delivers influential speech supporting President Ulysses Grant’s civil rights policies

May 31, 1870 President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights

June 22, 1870 Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South

September 6, 1870 Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell

February 28, 1871 Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters

March 22, 1871 Spartansburg Republican newspaper denounces Ku Klux Klan campaign to eradicate the Republican Party in South Carolina

April 20, 1871 Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans

October 10, 1871 Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands

October 18, 1871 After violence against Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan

November 18, 1872 Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”

January 17, 1874 Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate government

September 14, 1874 Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg; 27 killed

March 1, 1875 Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition

September 20, 1876 Former state Attorney General Robert Ingersoll (R-IL) tells veterans: “Every man that loved slavery better than liberty was a Democrat… I am a Republican because it is the only free party that ever existed”

January 10, 1878 U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919

July 14, 1884 Republicans criticize Democratic Party’s nomination of racist U.S. Senator Thomas Hendricks (D-IN) for vice president; he had voted against the 13th Amendment banning slavery

August 30, 1890 Republican President Benjamin Harrison signs legislation by U.S. Senator Justin Morrill (R-VT) making African-Americans eligible for land-grant colleges in the South

June 7, 1892 In a FIRST for a major U.S. political party, two women – Theresa Jenkins and Cora Carleton – attend Republican National Convention in an official capacity, as alternate delegates

February 8, 1894 Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote

December 11, 1895 African-American Republican and former U.S. Rep. Thomas Miller (R-SC) denounces new state constitution written to disenfranchise African-Americans

May 18, 1896 Republican Justice John Marshall Harlan, dissenting from Supreme Court’s notorious Plessy v. Ferguson “separate but equal” decision, declares: “Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens”

December 31, 1898 Republican Theodore Roosevelt becomes Governor of New York; in 1900, he outlawed racial segregation in New York public schools

May 24, 1900 Republicans vote no in referendum for constitutional convention in Virginia, designed to create a new state constitution disenfranchising African-Americans

January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal to permit voting by African-Americans

October 16, 1901 President Theodore Roosevelt invites Booker T. Washington to dine at White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%

February 12, 1909 On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the NAACP

June 18, 1912 African-American Robert Church, founder of Lincoln Leagues to register black voters in Tennessee, attends 1912 Republican National Convention as delegate; eventually serves as delegate at 8 conventions

August 1, 1916 Republican presidential candidate Charles Evans Hughes, former New York Governor and U.S. Supreme Court Justice, endorses women’s suffrage constitutional amendment; he would become Secretary of State and Chief Justice

May 21, 1919 Republican House passes constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of Republicans would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no

April 18, 1920 Minnesota’s FIRST-in-the-nation anti-lynching law, promoted by African-American Republican Nellie Francis, signed by Republican Gov. Jacob Preus

August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures

January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster

June 2, 1924 Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans

October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention

December 8, 1924 Democratic presidential candidate John W. Davis argues in favor of “separate but equal”

June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country

August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden until after confirmation

June 24, 1940 Republican Party platform calls for integration of the armed forces; for the balance of his terms in office, FDR refuses to order it

October 20, 1942 60 prominent African-Americans issue Durham Manifesto, calling on southern Democrats to abolish their all-white primaries

April 3, 1944 U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Texas Democratic Party’s “whites only” primary election system

August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry Truman's surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that "[t]he use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul."

February 18, 1946 Appointed by Republican President Calvin Coolidge, federal judge Paul McCormick ends segregation of Mexican-American children in California public schools

July 11, 1952 Republican Party platform condemns “duplicity and insincerity” of Democrats in racial matters

September 30, 1953 Earl Warren, California’s three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education

December 8, 1953 Eisenhower administration Asst. Attorney General Lee Rankin argues for plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education

May 17, 1954 Chief Justice Earl Warren, three-term Republican Governor (CA) and Republican vice presidential nominee in 1948, wins unanimous support of Supreme Court for school desegregation in Brown v. Board of Education

November 25, 1955 Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

October 19, 1956 On campaign trail, Vice President Richard Nixon vows: “American boys and girls shall sit, side by side, at any school – public or private – with no regard paid to the color of their skin. Segregation, discrimination, and prejudice have no place in America”

November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President

September 9, 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

June 23, 1958 President Dwight Eisenhower meets with Martin Luther King and other African-American leaders to discuss plans to advance civil rights

February 4, 1959 President Eisenhower informs Republican leaders of his plan to introduce 1960 Civil Rights Act, despite staunch opposition from many Democrats

May 6, 1960 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

July 27, 1960 At Republican National Convention, Vice President and eventual presidential nominee Richard Nixon insists on strong civil rights plank in platform

May 2, 1963 Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

June 1, 1963 Democrat Governor George Wallace announces defiance of court order issued by Republican federal judge Frank Johnson to integrate University of Alabama

September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School

June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate

June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirkson, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed.

June 20, 1964 The Chicago Defender, renowned African-American newspaper, praises Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) for leading passage of 1964 Civil Rights Act

March 7, 1965 Police under the command of Democrat Governor George Wallace attack African-Americans demonstrating for voting rights in Selma, AL

March 21, 1965 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson authorizes Martin Luther King’s protest march from Selma to Montgomery, overruling Democrat Governor George Wallace

August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose

August 6, 1965 Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

July 8, 1970 In special message to Congress, President Richard Nixon calls for reversal of policy of forced termination of Native American rights and benefits

September 17, 1971 Former Ku Klux Klan member and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black (D-AL) retires from U.S. Supreme Court; appointed by FDR in 1937, he had defended Klansmen for racial murders

February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII

September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs

June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

August 10, 1988 President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR

November 21, 1991 President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation

August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

April 26, 1999 Legislation authored by U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI) awarding Congressional Gold Medal to civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks is transmitted to President

January 25, 2001 U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee declares school choice to be “Educational Emancipation”

March 19, 2003 Republican U.S. Representatives of Hispanic and Portuguese descent form Congressional Hispanic Conference

May 23, 2003 U.S. Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduces bill to establish National Museum of African American History and Culture

February 26, 2004 Hispanic Republican U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-TX) condemns racist comments by U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL); she had called Asst. Secretary of State Roger Noriega and several Hispanic Congressmen “a bunch of white men...you all look alike to me”

 

 

May I add that one of the most insidiously racist issues supported by the Democrats is abortion.  Abortion was pushed as a way to decrease the black population in the US and they've succeeded at it by putting the majority of abortion clinics in black neighborhoods and teaching the people that it's a civil rights issue for them to be able to obtain abortions.  Actually it's a civil rights issue that they are targeting the black population with abortions and murdering them before they're even born."

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is almost time to vote. And with every vote you put into power someone with an agenda. Judge them carefully, as they have an impact on the future generations.

 

 

 

The funny bit is you've already completely forgotten that on page one of this thread the public education kids educated you about the democratic realignment of the 1960s and 1970s. Surely as a good Christian who espouses the teachings of the New Testament over the inexcusable barbarity of Deuteronomy and Leviticus you must be sympathetic to the notion of an ideology or culture shifting significantly at some point in such a way that makes their previous beliefs no longer particularly relevant to their current incarnation? Or is it more fun to ignore everyone else and chew on a lawn sprinkler?

 

Nice lemming.

 

 

So, abortion was started to eliminate blacks in the country, and the party that started that phenomenum has now changed their position, and removed all those abortion clinics out of the hood because they aren't racist anymore...

 

And they don't penalize the black family and promote welfare to the degree that black men are no longer needed, which has also destroyed the black family unit, and replaced it with food stamps and public housing.

 

I am sure glad they stopped all that destruction of the black race in America.

 

oh wait.

 

 

 

What were you saying?

Unless the Census is a Liberal plot too.

Again, though, nice red herring- Your attribution of racist policies or beliefs to the historical members of the Democratic party is irrelevant to its positions or members today.

 

Aborting blacks to reduce their numbers is not a red herring, but an actual democratic ideology vocalized by Margaret Sanger founder of Planned parenthood.

 

 

 

 

 

Has planned parenthood had an increase or decrease in revenue under the current majority control of our government by the democratic party?

 

Here it is...

 

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-systems/files/Health-Systems/PPHS2009AnnualReport_-_web_version.pdf - http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-systems/files/Health-Systems/PPHS2009AnnualReport_-_web_version.pdf

 

"Planned Parenthood Health Systems (PPHS) has succeeded in greatly advancing the Planned Parenthood mission during the past twelve months."

 

 

 

Guess the best way to judge them is to look at the content of their character instead of the color of their skin...

 

http://www.lifenews.com/nat4978.html - http://www.lifenews.com/nat4978.html

 

 

Why? You guys are saying that todays democrat doesn't view abortion the same way that Sanger did back when she founded Planned parenthood.

 

I disagree with your position, and I can prove my position. Just look at how much money the democratic party is now funnelling toward Planned parenthood and abortion.

 

And campare that with the words of a liberal democrat on the supreme court... (Which is the final say in the land... and she is pretty clear her position).

 

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/medicaid/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier - Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them.

 

also in the same interview...

 

Q: The case ties together themes of women’s equality and reproductive freedom. The court split those themes apart in Roe v. Wade. Do you see, as part of a future feminist legal wish list, repositioning Roe so that the right to abortion is rooted in the constitutional promise of sex equality?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Oh, yes. I think it will be.

 

New York Times, 2009

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

 

 

 

Yes. I contend that the normal person who identifies as democrat, and/or the normal person who identifies as Liberal, does not view abortion rights as favourable because it is a way to reduce the number of black people in society.

The 'groups we don't want to have too many of', of course, refers to those of very low socioeconimic status who are unable to support children that they don't want and don't intend to have. Black people, of course, are on average poorer than others, and consequently are more represented in such demographics.

Let's make sure you don't drag this tangent away from your original thesis: you contended, and apparently still do, that the democrats promote abortion access and rights so that they can get rid of black people.

Just so we've got things straight and prioritized. I'll not have this idiotic assertion stand either unchallenged, or glossed over when you make your next leap form the topic at hand to something else that's equally inane.

The thread where FE said that a shift in spectrum didn't occur between the political parties, despite decades of documentation and general consensus.  

I forgot how much I liked this one. 

He actually thinks the moern Democrat party is motivated in their policies by a desire to reduce the number of black people. He thinks the Democrats are trying to abort the black population away.

I still can't wrap my head around someone actually being such a sheep to his ideology as to be deluded enough to believe that in order to justify his irrational hatred of an alternative political view.

So rape is consensual?