An eye for an eye
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=186524
Printed Date: 12 June 2026 at 5:06am Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: An eye for an eye
Posted By: choopie911
Subject: An eye for an eye
Date Posted: 21 August 2010 at 7:28pm
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11045848 - A spine for a spine
|
Replies:
Posted By: MeanMan
Date Posted: 21 August 2010 at 9:28pm
He wont be attacking anyone anytime soon.... problem solved?
-------------
hybrid-sniper~"To be honest, if I see a player still using an Impulse I'm going to question their motives."
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 21 August 2010 at 9:33pm
Hippocratic oath would prevent this one would think....
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 22 August 2010 at 1:10am
tallen702 wrote:
Hippocratic oath would prevent this one would think.... |
Not from me, just saw this in the comments:
hashmalech wrote:
Hippocratic Oath has no legal value and a lot of doctors don't even take oath. What matters, however, is the deontology code, which (if I remember well) has legal value.
|
|
Posted By: DaveEllis
Date Posted: 22 August 2010 at 1:21am
|
in before religion of peace mongers
|
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 22 August 2010 at 2:16am
I've always been a proponent for eye-for-an-eye punishments when it comes to intended violent crimes.
Honestly, if I was paralyzed for life from someone fighting me, I'd be pissed if they were able to literally walk out of jail a few months later.
What I DON'T like is that his original punishment, no matter how lite, HAS been served, and they're going back to re-punish.
-------------
|
Posted By: tallen702
Date Posted: 22 August 2010 at 2:26am
DaveEllis wrote:
in before religion of peace mongers
|
Hammurabi would like to have a word with those whom you are referring to....
------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
|