Wait wait wait.... Which Anonymous is this now?
Printed From: Tippmann Paintball
Category: News And Views
Forum Name: Thoughts and Opinions
Forum Description: Got something you need to say?
URL: http://www.tippmannsports.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=187760
Printed Date: 02 February 2026 at 3:57am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Wait wait wait.... Which Anonymous is this now?
Posted By: tallen702
Subject: Wait wait wait.... Which Anonymous is this now?
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 9:26am
|
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20033942-501465.html - http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20033942-501465.html
About time someone got fed up with their crap. The only question is whether this is the same homophobic /b/ Anonymous, or someone else.... ------------- <Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.> |
Replies:
Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 9:38am
|
Fed up with whose crap? WBC's? I hope someone does something even if 10 idiots go to jail for it. I really would love to see WBC destroyed. Wawawa I'm un-American prohibiting freedom of speech, but seriously they should die. Since when is /b/ homophobic anyway? ------------- Que pasa? 
|
Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 10:12am
|
It's not /b/. /b/'s version of anonymous is the one that should come to mind when you hear about all the cyber bullying stories. The Anonymous that you think of in relation to the Scientology protests, recent support of Wikileaks, and such is a separate entity that for the most part has separated itself from /b/. ------------- "I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl Forum Vice President RIP T&O Forum |
Posted By: Brian Fellows
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 1:16pm
That's exactly what they want. They want to offend enough people that someone assaults them, and then they sue. |
jmac3 wrote:Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 1:35pm
Yup.
And I knew that wasn't /b/ when they expressed distate at WBC's lack of Christ-likeness.
|
Posted By: jmac3
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 2:33pm
/b/ and anonymous is not a single entity. Anonymous is whoever feels like doing something and then claiming they represent ANONYMOUS LEGION. You know like blowing up vans and such. /b/ is half 12 year olds. Point being, who cares who it is. Every person(maybe single person) who wrote that to WBC could frequent /b/ everyday or not, who knows. ------------- Que pasa?
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 3:23pm
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Anonymous doesn't have separate sects nor is it confined to one site. Anonymous isn't homophobic, many gays are part of anon. Just stay out of this one newb. ------------- 
|
Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 3:38pm
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 3:40pm
Agreed, you're trying to add hierarchy and divisions that simply do not exist. |
Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 4:24pm
 ------------- "I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl Forum Vice President RIP T&O Forum |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 5:30pm
|
I'm tired of anonymous. They are hypocritical fat-ass geeks that live in their parents basement and have no real-world social abilities. Did I mention they are hypocritical?
Having said that, I fully expect an attack on my computer and personal life. You'll find me bankrupt and in a homeless shelter soon. ------------- 
|
Posted By: stratoaxe
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 5:52pm
You'll be working at John Peter Smith?
 |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 6:10pm
No way! Parkland Memorial. JPS is the Hamptons when compared to Parkland. -------------
|
Posted By: ammolord
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 6:13pm
Or in a Prius:
------------- PSN Tag: AmmoLord XBL: xXAmmoLordXx ~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~ |
Posted By: GroupB
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 6:32pm
You seem to know an awful lot about people you can't name. For all you know they could be living in their parent's attic or shed. ------------- 
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 7:28pm
I can just taste the ignorance. |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 10:58pm
How so? They claim to be advocates of free speech, yet attack private companies that exercise their own free speech. If that's no hypocritical, I don't know what is. -------------
|
Posted By: __sneaky__
Date Posted: 20 February 2011 at 11:44pm
------------- "I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl Forum Vice President RIP T&O Forum |
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 12:02am
|
Let's see:
Amazon Bank Of America Visa MasterCard Paypal Also attacked private security firms for ousting the criminals that are anonymous. Et cetera and so forth. -------------
|
Posted By: choopie911
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 12:32am
| My ignorance comment wasn't about them being hypocritical, but your blatantly oblivious stereotyping. Also, I'm not sure a non-group-group can be hypocritical when they don't really have core values to start with. They are everyone and nobody and anybody who participates. The construction of the participants will vary from time to time, as will the aspects and values of those involved. Yes, I agree they are contradictory, but its sort of the nature of how they work. |
Posted By: You Wont See Me
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 1:09am
|
I was on WG earlier today looking for new wallpapers and browsed my way over to /b/ for awhile and they had tons of WBC threads. Their "plan" was to send them thousands of those free flat rate boxes. ------------- A-5 E-Grip JCS Dual Trigger DOP X-CORE 8 stage x-chamber Lapco Bigshot 14" Beadblasted Optional setup: R/T Dead on Blade trigger |
Posted By: Shub
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 11:27am
|
So apparently, WBC has responded with "Bring it"...
The behavior of the WBC is reprehensible, but I'm really not sure I like the methods of Anonymous either... |
Posted By: jerseypaint
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 11:39am
|
Not anon?
http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=494 - http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=494 ------------- 
|
Posted By: Linus
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 12:00pm
Stereotyping? No. A blantently obvious joke you missed? Yup. Did you also miss the "Having said that, I fully expect an attack on my computer and personal life. You'll find me bankrupt and in a homeless shelter soon."? I highly doubt they'll ruin my life for calling them out. Anyway, yes, they are hypocritical, even if it was just that ONE group at that ONE time with that ONE mission. The reason they attacked those businesses is because they support the "freedom of speech" that WikiLeaks was doing, yet are hypocritical for attacking private businesses deciding not to do business with/for them. -------------
|
Posted By: agentwhale007
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 12:04pm
|
The unabashed corporatist Linus vs. the 6-year-old's tree-house of the Internet supporters. It's like a battle over which can be more irritating, nails on a chalk board of the sound an egg carton makes.
|
Posted By: High Voltage
Date Posted: 21 February 2011 at 12:04pm
Again, you have to look at Anon as a whole. And the homophobic bit was in response to tallen calling them homophobic, not you. -------------
|