Qloader Question

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Yes I did search & found some info from people who researched the Q-loader. I want info from people who have USED the Q-loader, specifically in a high rate of fire marker.
I have heard a complaint that the Q-loader does not feed well in full-auto, or specifically in long bursts from an R/T equipped marker. This brings me to need some additional information myself:

What is the average / common RoF from a M-98 with R/T? 
Has anyong else who OWNS a Q-loader experienced problems with high RoF?
I still like the Q-loader, don't get me wrong. The ability to fire independant of hopper position / angle is a great benefit. But I NEED a hopper capable of high rates of full-auto fire for my 68-Special modification so I am asking people to please focus on answering just the above questions.
Edit - And yes I did read the "100bps" post in another thread & have seen the video. I want to know how well it does when actually in use on a marker by people who USE it.

Edited by Arbites

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Arbites Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Gold Member Soon to be Gold Joined: 11 April 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1286	Topic: Qloader Question Posted: 06 June 2004 at 11:15am
	Yes I did search & found some info from people who researched the Q-loader. I want info from people who have USED the Q-loader, specifically in a high rate of fire marker. I have heard a complaint that the Q-loader does not feed well in full-auto, or specifically in long bursts from an R/T equipped marker. This brings me to need some additional information myself: What is the average / common RoF from a M-98 with R/T? Has anyong else who OWNS a Q-loader experienced problems with high RoF? I still like the Q-loader, don't get me wrong. The ability to fire independant of hopper position / angle is a great benefit. But I NEED a hopper capable of high rates of full-auto fire for my 68-Special modification so I am asking people to please focus on answering just the above questions. Edit - And yes I did read the "100bps" post in another thread & have seen the video. I want to know how well it does when actually in use on a marker by people who USE it. Edited by Arbites
	A-5: 12" Ceramic, Egrip/WAS/Duel, HPA, MP5 sliding stock SMG-68: 12" Ceramic 68-Specials(8): 12"&14" Ceramic, 12V Revy *** 1 Tip-n-Strip, 1 Blue, 1 FA w/Qloader SL-68: 14" Ceramic SMG-60 Ext. Line

bigearstallman Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Member Joined: 08 May 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7	Posted: 06 June 2004 at 11:27am
	The q-loader is all about personal preference. Just try it out and see if it works well for you.

PaintbalChrisA5 Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Member Joined: 01 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 378	Posted: 06 June 2004 at 12:19pm
	The average rot for the 98c or model 98 w/ r/t is about 13bps, the q-loader is capable of feeding 30bps, there should be no feeding problems at all. Edited by PaintbalChrisA5
	www.pbvids.com