![]() |
what is the difference |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
theMAN
Member
Joined: 18 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: what is the differencePosted: 27 May 2005 at 11:19pm |
|
I now this sounds stupid but I am a newbie. What is the difference between CO2, comp air, and the other type(sorry I cant think of the name) Edited by theMAN |
|
|
ANWSER THE QUESTON
|
|
![]() |
|
Strife_17
Member
Joined: 18 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 May 2005 at 11:57pm |
|
comp air and the like is more effiecient wont liquify and the tanks are more expensive.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pariel
Platinum Member
Guested - language. Joined: 06 October 2003 Location: New Caledonia Status: Offline Points: 5140 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2005 at 12:13am |
|
It's not more efficient, it's just that it's pressurized gas, so it's more consistent, as it's not busy changing states from liquid to solid like CO2, and it's regulated right out of the bottle, so overall, you shoot better.
|
|
![]() |
|
hybrid-sniper
Moderator Group
I feel violated. Joined: 09 June 2004 Location: San Mateo, CA Status: Offline Points: 10109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2005 at 2:44am |
|
C02= liquid in a tank that vaporizes into a gas. The gas powers the marker. When you shoot fast, the gas can't vaporize quickly enough, and the tank gets cold. Then, you start sucking liquid C02. Not good at all for the markers internals. Nitro/HPA/Comp-Air= all the same thing, when it comes to paintball, at least. I'll call it HPA. HPA is a true gas; compressed air we breathe. Due to the fact that a gas doesn't have to change forms, you can lay down some serious paint and never suck liquid (because there is none |
|
![]() |
|
P!NK panther
Member
Strike 2 - vulgar material (2/2) Joined: 23 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1935 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2005 at 8:15am |
|
anti-syphon is the cheap is the way to do it
|
|
![]() |
|
Pariel
Platinum Member
Guested - language. Joined: 06 October 2003 Location: New Caledonia Status: Offline Points: 5140 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2005 at 8:57am |
|
Not nearly as effective. HPA owns all.
|
|
![]() |
|
theMAN
Member
Joined: 18 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2005 at 10:44am |
|
thanks
|
|
|
ANWSER THE QUESTON
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |