![]() |
A-5 Flatline Accuracy- Any Ideas |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |||||
Savage A-5
Member
Joined: 29 June 2007 Status: Offline Points: 19 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: A-5 Flatline Accuracy- Any IdeasPosted: 08 July 2007 at 6:47pm |
||||
|
I was just wondering how I can make my A-5 with Flatline more accurate. Please tell me how I can improve this.
Edited by Savage A-5 - 08 July 2007 at 7:46pm |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
StormyKnight
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2007 at 8:01pm |
||||
|
Accuracy up to what range? There really isn't much you can do other than getting the right bore paint (small to medium) and tuning the marker to the optimum velocity (250-280fps). |
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
- robbo -
Member
Joined: 11 September 2006 Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 July 2007 at 8:42am |
||||
yea ^^^^^ when i had my flatty i found becasuse of the back spin for distance and no porting, the accuracy seemed to suffer a lil compared to 'normal' barrels. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
StormyKnight
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 July 2007 at 8:36pm |
||||
I sincerely doubt porting the Flatline barrel would not increase the accuracy. Most likely it would screw up the 'flatline effect'. |
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mod98commando
Platinum Member
Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4432 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 July 2007 at 11:12pm |
||||
|
I don't think it would screw up the backspin too much if it were ported. The ball just has to make contact with a decent amount of the surface in order to start rolling and after that it'll just continue that whether there's porting or not. If the porting was towards the end I don't think it would hurt performance. In fact, it would probably just make it a little quieter.
|
|||||
|
oreomann33: Everybody invades Poland
Rofl_Mao: And everyone eats turkey Me: But only if they're hungary Mack: Yeah but hungary people go russian through their food and end up with greece on everyth |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
RoboCop
Moderator Group
Aw man, my butt is rusted... Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 July 2007 at 12:16am |
||||
|
If the ball touches porting while still creating backspin, I think you would result in more barrel breaks. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
- robbo -
Member
Joined: 11 September 2006 Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 July 2007 at 3:27am |
||||
|
im not on about putting porting in the flat line, im saying accuracy is lost due to it not having porting, which is not needed to get the back spin affect...... ......reason porting is on barrels is for the ball to gradually come into contact with the outside air and gradually release some pressure build up from behind the ball, which can cause it to off spin with no porting when it pops out the end, hence the porting hole of barrels are towards the end, and some have more at the tip etc, this gradually introduces the ball into 'the outside world' instead of it suddenly hitting a 'brick air wall' with high pressure behind it. Edited by - robbo - - 10 July 2007 at 3:29am |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
StormyKnight
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 July 2007 at 7:56am |
||||
From www.directpaintball.com:
From http://paintball.about.com:
What are ported paintball barrels? What do ported paintball barrels do? Some people also think porting also help decrease the air turbulence behind a paintball, allowing it to have a straighter trajectory. However, this is mostly a myth, particularly if you have a good gun/gas system and use quality paintballs.
What are the downsides to ported paintball barrels? By allowing gas to escape early, porting decreases gas efficiency. That means you need to use more gas for a paintball to reach the same velocity with a ported barrel than a nonported barrel. From Wikipedia:
From www.paintball-galaxy.com:
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
- robbo -
Member
Joined: 11 September 2006 Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 July 2007 at 11:01am |
||||
|
lol.......ive used barrels with no porting, accuracy.....a mess.....spin off all over. |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
StormyKnight
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 July 2007 at 1:24pm |
||||
And yet another victim of marketing hype. |
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Stormcharger
Member
Joined: 10 September 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 394 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 July 2007 at 8:50pm |
||||
|
In fine tuning the accuracy for a flatline barrel, you must find the match of paint size, brand, and velocity. This is where practice comes in. If you don't experiment with different types of paint and velocity settings, then you will never get any reasonable accuracy out of your marker. By taking the time to test what works and what doesn't, you will find the right combination and hone your shooting skills without having to rely on sheer luck to hit something. I can currently group shots into an 8 inch circle, on the move at 90 feet, and 5 inches on a good day. But that is what I can do with every marker I own, and is the product of more than 150,000 rounds of paint in the last 25 years. In any case, most of the A5 flatlines I have worked on have better accuracy in the lower range of velocity, about 250 to 265fps. And usually cheap paint is just that, cheap. There is a reason it costs less. The flatline is an excellent barrel for its intended purpose, and if kept clean and tuned properly, will provide exccellent accuracy. Good luck.
Edited by Stormcharger - 12 July 2007 at 8:51pm |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
mod98commando
Platinum Member
Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4432 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 July 2007 at 11:40pm |
||||
I've also found 260 fps to be ideal when using the flatline on my A5. |
|||||
|
oreomann33: Everybody invades Poland
Rofl_Mao: And everyone eats turkey Me: But only if they're hungary Mack: Yeah but hungary people go russian through their food and end up with greece on everyth |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
- robbo -
Member
Joined: 11 September 2006 Status: Offline Points: 28 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 July 2007 at 7:46am |
||||
Slow motion video showed that the air would exit and re-enter reverse porting as the ball would pass by the porting. We believe the ball is most likely pushing air out of the barrel as it moves down the length of the barrel, and is drawing air in behind it as the ball passes the reverse porting. As air enters in the porting behind the ball, the pressure adjacent to the ball comes closer to atmospheric, allowing the ball to regenerate to its original shape before the ball exits the barrel if the angle and the size of the porting is adequate. Edited by - robbo - - 13 July 2007 at 7:59am |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Bruce A. Frank
Platinum Member
KRL Reincarnated? Joined: 27 March 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3063 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 July 2007 at 2:52pm |
||||
|
Porting with a Flatline: With properly shaped ports there shouldn't be any problem with contact to the ball that might cause breakage. BUT, the properly sized ball (small diameter) leaves a significant part of the bore open to gas blow by. It is just a fact of the design. Accuracy: My tests have been run with a 98C Flatline, but I think the results are relevant. With well matched paint and a well regulated air supply (Stabilizer with HPA) at "normal" (60 to 80 ft) distances I found virtually no difference in accuracy between my Flatline and a J&J Ceramic, a Hammerhead Pro(kit), a Stonecold II(17"), Stiffi Switch (kit), and an Apex.(the Apex was tested both in backspin and non-backspin mode) My tests were done off a rest with sand bag supports and a red dot sight. Test was done indoors to eliminate wind caused inaccuracies. 100 shots were fired with each barrel. Several different brands of premium paint was sized and exclusively used with barrels whose bore diameter was no more than .0015" larger than the diameter of the paintball. All the barrels would hold 10 shots on a ten inch diameter paper plate at 80 ft. Indoors with no wind, both the Flatline and the Apex would put ten shots on a ten inch plate at 120 ft...a distance where the arc trajectory from the other barrels began to make hitting the target significantly more difficult. The J&J, the Stonecold II and the Stiffi when sand bagged solidly in place, rather than sighted and fired from the shoulder, would still keep 10 shots on the plate at 120 ft. But, the upward angle of the barrel needed to make those shots exceeded the the easy hand held compensation of the sights. At 190 ft the Flatline and Apex still maintained a relatively flat trajectory, but accuracy became more problematic with groups opening up to about 18" to 24" depending on the brand of paint. The most significant factor was roundness and seam uniformity of the paintballs. Even the J&J, touted as the best by many people, shot 36" groups at 80 ft with low quality (low priced) paint. (there is high priced paint that is also just as poor due to inconsistency of diameter from ball to ball and out of round with pronounced seams) Edited by Bruce A. Frank - 13 July 2007 at 2:52pm |
|||||
![]()
|
|||||
![]() |
|||||
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |