Anyone remember this?

 Dude, where's my jet?

the way this country is going im surprised he didnt get the jet. Some of the things ppl are awarded is unbeleivable.

Chad

lol wow he must of really wnated the Jet

I'd sell it to Russia.

so what happens to the $700,000? is he getting it back or what? 

blackdeath7 if he drank that much pepsi im sure he wouldnt be alive plus where would he store all the cans, and bottles?

cadet_sergeant wrote: so what happens to the $700,000? is he getting it back or what? blackdeath7 if he drank that much pepsi im sure he wouldnt be alive plus where would he store all the cans, and bottles?

That was nine years ago.

WGP guy wrote: It annoys me when people refer to things as "jet" or "fighter plane."  I prefer people to refer to things as their call sign (or whatever its called). Such as AV-8 Harrier, F-15 Eagle, AH-64 Apache, B-2 Spirit, F-105 Thunderchief, P-50D Mustang, ect.  You get the point.  Funny anyways, and I wouldn't want a harrier.  They are too unstable (while hovering, they can easily slip to the side, gain momentum (sp?) and then "slide" into the ground).  They also can't even go mach 1.  I would much rather have an F-14 or F-15 which go in excess of 1,400 mph.

you sound like a ghey

WGP guy wrote: It annoys me when people refer to things as "jet" or "fighter plane."  I prefer people to refer to things as their call sign (or whatever its called). Such as AV-8 Harrier, F-15 Eagle, AH-64 Apache, B-2 Spirit, F-105 Thunderchief, P-50D Mustang, ect.  You get the point.  Funny anyways, and I wouldn't want a harrier.  They are too unstable (while hovering, they can easily slip to the side, gain momentum (sp?) and then "slide" into the ground).  They also can't even go mach 1.  I would much rather have an F-14 or F-15 which go in excess of 1,400 mph.

actually F-14's are being decomissioned from US forces.  While the F-15's maneuvarability(sp?) far surpassed the other planes of its general "era" its speed cannot stand up next the the F-16, which in turn is being improved upon with the F-22 Raptor(for the USAF) and the JSF, joint strike fighter,(for the other branches) which also have internal weapons bays and supposedly hit well over mach two.


course if you are going for pure speed, go with the SR-71 Blackbird, unclassified at Mach 3.5, which means it can probably hit at least Mach 3.8(yes, thats a BIG difference, really)

usafpilot07 wrote: WGP guy wrote: It annoys me when people refer to things as "jet" or "fighter plane."  I prefer people to refer to things as their call sign (or whatever its called). Such as AV-8 Harrier, F-15 Eagle, AH-64 Apache, B-2 Spirit, F-105 Thunderchief, P-50D Mustang, ect.  You get the point.  Funny anyways, and I wouldn't want a harrier.  They are too unstable (while hovering, they can easily slip to the side, gain momentum (sp?) and then "slide" into the ground).  They also can't even go mach 1.  I would much rather have an F-14 or F-15 which go in excess of 1,400 mph.   actually F-14's are being decomissioned from US forces.  While the F-15's maneuvarability(sp?) far surpassed the other planes of its general "era" its speed cannot stand up next the the F-16, which in turn is being improved upon with the F-22 Raptor(for the USAF) and the JSF, joint strike fighter,(for the other branches) which also have internal weapons bays and supposedly hit well over mach two. course if you are going for pure speed, go with the SR-71 Blackbird, unclassified at Mach 3.5, which means it can probably hit at least Mach 3.8(yes, thats a BIG difference, really)

Psh, you want speed. Id be kicking yalls "a" with my scram jet.