![]() |
question |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
kuhndog599
Gold Member
Strike 1, Language 5/4 Joined: 13 December 2004 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 1015 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: questionPosted: 16 August 2005 at 1:12pm |
|
|
why is the tommy gun classified as a sub machine gun and not an assault rifle |
||
|
model 98 - homemade handguard
solid stock - opsgear mag polished internals homemade sling - paintjob operator barrel progressive barrel opsgear mag - stock |
||
![]() |
||
Predatorr
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Rules 1 and 2 Joined: 28 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:16pm |
|
|
because it doesnt have variable rates of fire. Its either semi, or automatic. Thats my guess anyway
|
||
![]() |
||
Hades
Moderator Group
Joined: 10 May 2003 Location: Virgin Islands Status: Offline Points: 13014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:18pm |
|
|
Good Marketing?
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
holysmartone
Gold Member
1 strike- language in posted image 6/9 Joined: 07 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1043 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:27pm |
|
|
Im assuming it also has something to do with size and ammo caliber. The
tompson is only .45 caliber, short bullets, M16s are 5.56, but longer
ammo. I may just be making up a reason, but it seems logical to me. May
also have to do, like pred said, with the fire rates.
|
||
![]() |
||
Random_Person
Gold Member
Official Forum Haiku Honorable Mention Joined: 24 June 2004 Location: Micronesia Status: Offline Points: 1668 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:34pm |
|
|
Because it is a .45 caliber. It does not fire a round large enough to classify it as an "Assult Rifle." Plus in the early 19-hundreds when the Tompson was first invented, the term "Assult Rifle" did not exist (the term "Assult Rifle" was coined in the early 90's by the Clinton admisistration, to give the misconception that certain rifles were only used for violent purposes).
That's why. |
||
![]() |
||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member
Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:36pm |
|
|
I hereby dub the Tommygun an "Assault Rifle". Feel better now? |
||
![]() |
||
hashi2008
Gold Member
Strike 1 - Racial Slur Joined: 14 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1267 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:36pm |
|
|
Try shooting a Thomson a someone just once from 100 yrds away. I'm willing to be that you don't hit them very often. The M16 however, can hit a target 5/5 times at 200 yrds.
|
||
|
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.
|
||
![]() |
||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member
Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:38pm |
|
|
100 yards? Heck, try hitting something with a Tommy from 20 yards. That thing is impossible to control.
|
||
![]() |
||
PlentifulBalls
Platinum Member
Tons of em Joined: 14 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9800 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:41pm |
|
.45 cal is bigger than a 5.56mm. Alot bigger. 5.56 is .223 cal if I'm not mistaken. The cartridge is bigger on the 5.56 though. |
||
sporx wrote: well...ya i prolly will be a virgin till i'm at least 30. |
||
![]() |
||
usafpilot07
Moderator Group
FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4626 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:44pm |
|
I love you |
||
|
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||
![]() |
||
bluemunky42
Member
Guested. Middle Finger post. Joined: 19 December 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1311 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:45pm |
|
hence the huge clip. you've gotta hit the target a few times with that many bullets
|
||
![]() |
||
Random_Person
Gold Member
Official Forum Haiku Honorable Mention Joined: 24 June 2004 Location: Micronesia Status: Offline Points: 1668 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:50pm |
|
In diameter yes, but as far as power,range, and speed are concerned, no. The .223 has a much smaller and lighter bullet, and much more powder in the case than the .45, and more powder means more power. The size of the bullet is not the major determining factor in the power of the cartridge.
P.S. I love you to usaf Edited by Random_Person |
||
![]() |
||
hashi2008
Gold Member
Strike 1 - Racial Slur Joined: 14 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1267 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:51pm |
|
|
Well, the term "assault rifle" describes a gun that is, in a sense, half rifle and half sub machine gun. They were designed to be able to fire rapidly, but still have a decent accuracy. Ideally, you should be able to use an "assualt rifle" as both rifle and sub-machine gun. At least, this is what the Military channel told me.?.
|
||
|
Founder of the "Forumers Against the Ugly Woman Sigs" also known as FAUWS.
|
||
![]() |
||
Hairball!!!
Moderator Group
Strike #4 Joined: 12 June 2002 Location: Snow (again) Status: Offline Points: 6941 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 1:53pm |
|
|
Read the word. Sub-machine gun. It's shooting a round that's less than a machine gun. IE: pistol round.
|
||
![]() |
||
Predatorr
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Rules 1 and 2 Joined: 28 January 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3795 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 3:21pm |
|
|
somebody go to wikipedia and settle this...
|
||
![]() |
||
Monk
Moderator Group
Joined: 23 October 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 3:26pm |
|
Ill wiki your pedia. Im sorry, I just want to fit in. |
||
![]() |
||
DBibeau855
Platinum Member
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK Joined: 26 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 3:36pm |
|
|
That gun was meant to be like a broom rather than a true asault riffle. It was meant to put down a lot of fire in very little time. The thompson sub machine gun is also very very inacurate. Its a terrible weapon to use offensivly. Its more suited for CQB(close quarter battle) origionaly it was used as a trench sweeper.
|
||
![]() |
||
southernboy51
Member
Joined: 13 August 2005 Status: Offline Points: 687 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 4:52pm |
|
|
yeah the tompson is not good for trying to flank or something but for holding off the enemy like just charging that is the gun i would have wanted
|
||
![]() |
||
DBibeau855
Platinum Member
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK Joined: 26 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 4:56pm |
|
|
Were you listening at all? The thompson wasnt good for much of anything. It jammed all the time, the reciever rusted and it had terrible acuracy. The only thing it was good for was laying down a lot of fire at close ranges.
|
||
![]() |
||
southernboy51
Member
Joined: 13 August 2005 Status: Offline Points: 687 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 August 2005 at 4:59pm |
|
|
that is what i mean if someone is charging at me i would have wanted a thompson
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |