![]() |
Response and Cyclone.... |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |||
doyoufeelityet
Member
Joined: 02 March 2006 Location: Japan Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Response and Cyclone....Posted: 07 March 2006 at 4:39am |
||
|
i have a response and a cyclone...does that have anything to do with my C02 running out of gas faster....i need to know what i can do to make my shots as strong as the beginning of the co2....would a expansion chamber work or do i need a regulator????????
they say the cyclone and the R/T uses excess air.....i wonder if that is really true.... Edited by doyoufeelityet - 07 March 2006 at 4:39am |
|||
|
"holla at ya booooy!!!"
|
|||
![]() |
|||
pwned!!!
Member
Strike 1 - Rudeness 6/30 Joined: 13 January 2006 Status: Offline Points: 443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 7:49am |
||
|
an expanison chamber converts liquid co2 into gas so youll get more shots per tank and it will be better for your gun, you only need a regulator if your using HPA. alot of people will say that the cyclone and r/t do use excess air and and alot of people will say they dont |
|||
![]() |
|||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 7:54am |
||
A Palmers Stabilizer is a regulator and it works better for CO2 than a Expansion Chamber. I would definatly recomend one. The A-5 itslef is a gas-hog, the cyclone has ntohing to do with it. I have tested A-5's with and without R/Ts and they have both proformed about the same. Part of the problem with CO2 is that with high ROF liqiud CO2 will get into the valve causeing velocity spikes and fewer shots per tank. |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
pwned!!!
Member
Strike 1 - Rudeness 6/30 Joined: 13 January 2006 Status: Offline Points: 443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 7:58am |
||
|
^ i find that with my r/t installed , it uses up more air
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 8:03am |
||
It will, because at the higher ROF of ~15bps you are getting liquid CO2 into the valve thus decreasing the shots per tank. |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
pwned!!!
Member
Strike 1 - Rudeness 6/30 Joined: 13 January 2006 Status: Offline Points: 443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 8:08am |
||
|
^but i use HPA
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 8:22am |
||
Have you done any scentific test to this conclusion? Or are you just going by unfounded observations? You have to do some research before coming to conclusions. |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
TRAVELER
Gold Member
Vulcan Logic Academy Graduate Joined: 30 January 2004 Location: Japan Status: Offline Points: 1503 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 9:59am |
||
|
Polishing your gun's internals will reduce drag on the moving parts, and should give you a few more (not many) shots per tank. You shouldn't be running anything smaller than a 20 oz Co2 bottle, you aren't going to get anywhere with a 9 oz.
You should do the anti syphon mod to your Co2 tank. It's cheap, it'll make your gun more consistent, and if you add an expansion chamber, it'll only work better. Hpa is really the way to go. It's cheaper and easier to refill, it won't freeze up your gun, and it gives better shot to shot consistency without needing extra regulators or expansion chambers. For an A5 you'll want at least a 68 3000 size tank. |
|||
|
For I will wander to and fro,
I'll go where I no one do know, |
|||
![]() |
|||
pwned!!!
Member
Strike 1 - Rudeness 6/30 Joined: 13 January 2006 Status: Offline Points: 443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 2:47pm |
||
|
im saying that i cant get liquid co2 in my gun if im using HPA |
|||
![]() |
|||
SuzukiRider987
Platinum Member
Joined: 15 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5643 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 3:46pm |
||
Ok... Your shots per tank with HPA depend a lot of the quality of the fill. And I doubt it uses a noticable more amount of air, if any. Back to the original thread... When a CO2 tank nears empty, the internal pressure drops, dropping your velocity. Theres nothing you can do about it.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Ashdawg
Member
Official Forum Drama Queen of the Night Joined: 01 February 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 March 2006 at 3:55pm |
||
|
don't forget the fact that you are just plain shooting faster...so it
will seem that you run out of air faster...like and illusion or
something.
|
|||
|
"Too close for missles, switching to guns..."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |