![]() |
PPS Stabilizer Vs. X-Core |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
MilSimBaller
Member
1 strike, language. 6/7 Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 433 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: PPS Stabilizer Vs. X-CorePosted: 19 September 2006 at 9:40pm |
|
So I'm one of those people who doesnt believe HPA is all that great, at least when it comes to tippmanns. I have an A-5 and am putting an E-Grip on it with Rampage board. I use a 20 oz. C02 and more often then not i use a remote. would you say a good x-core chamber would be good enough, or should i spring for a palmsers stabilizer? If you suggest an x-core, which brand is good?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
RoboCop
Moderator Group
Aw man, my butt is rusted... Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 September 2006 at 10:02pm |
|
It's always nice to have a regulator on your gun. You could pass with an x-chamber just because you aren't using an electro-pneumatic gun. Depends if you can spare the extra cash for a reg. |
|
![]() |
|
hybrid-sniper
Moderator Group
I feel violated. Joined: 09 June 2004 Location: San Mateo, CA Status: Offline Points: 10109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 September 2006 at 10:49pm |
|
X-core is made by Dead On. Apparently it's one of the better X-chambers. I'd go for the reg, because I view the X-chamber as a band-aid. |
|
![]() |
|
Styro Folme
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Rules 1 and 2 Joined: 28 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 September 2006 at 10:55pm |
|
go stabilizer if you can afford it. x-chambers don't work too great in my experiance...
|
|
|
X
|
|
![]() |
|
Tippmania
Member
No, IM right! Joined: 13 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 September 2006 at 11:09pm |
|
......X-Chambers work fine, only if you use the good ones though. The Tippmann X-Chamber isn't all that good.. it's four stages just like the stock Spyder Expansion Chambers.. you want ATLEAST 6 or 8, right now I'm pretty sure the X-Core is the only one that offers 8... it WILL "most" likely break up more liquid than a Stabalizer. Stabalizer (correct me if I'm wrong) is six stages + regulation.... X-Core is alot cheaper and will fix almost all your problems w\ C02. Heck, my gun never freezes up with Anti-Siphon alone.. I just added the X-Core for even more "protection"
|
|
|
Tippmann A-5
- Shocktech Drop + On\Off - Super R\T - Q.E.V. - Red Hot Powertube - Stock - Flatline + Metadyne Shroud - R.I.S. Foregrip - X-Core - Macro - BT Fixed Sight Rail |
|
![]() |
|
StormyKnight
Moderator Group
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3129 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 7:58am |
|
If you can afford a Palmer Stabilizer, go for it. But if you want to go on the cheap, the DOP X-Core 8 stage expansion chamber is a great addition. They're only $20 give or take and do a great job. If you stick with C02, an antisiphon tube compliments the expansion chamber nicely.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
RicWhic414
Gold Member
Bitter multiple time Ion-ownage victim Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1791 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 8:30am |
|
Go with the stab... its not all about just freezing up its also about spikes when you regulate the air it puts a big stop to most of the spikes... but with co2 you will have a lot of shoot down because co2 doesnt recharge fast enough for an egrip
|
|
|
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF |
|
![]() |
|
Clark Kent
Platinum Member
Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 10:41am |
|
A friend of mine runs his A-5 with CO2. He has a remote and a good x-chamber. He has left his E-Grip on full auto, max ROF since he bought it. He never freezes. Based on that sample of 1, I would think you would be fine with the x-chamber. That said, the Stabilizer does provide additional regulation benefits, although they are minimal without the LPK. |
|
![]() |
|
MilSimBaller
Member
1 strike, language. 6/7 Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 433 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 3:14pm |
|
will i really get shoot down? i thaught co2 had better recharge rates?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Tippmania
Member
No, IM right! Joined: 13 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:07pm |
|
You should NOT get shoot-down if you Anti-Siphon and X-Core it.. heck you could ever do TWO X-Cores get a adapter to screw INTO your tank then gun, then one in the vertical adapter place, you would NEVER have shoot-down then
|
|
|
Tippmann A-5
- Shocktech Drop + On\Off - Super R\T - Q.E.V. - Red Hot Powertube - Stock - Flatline + Metadyne Shroud - R.I.S. Foregrip - X-Core - Macro - BT Fixed Sight Rail |
|
![]() |
|
RicWhic414
Gold Member
Bitter multiple time Ion-ownage victim Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1791 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:09pm |
|
with high rates of fire everythin has shootdown it just depends how well your tank is... nitro tanks are better more not having shootdown
|
|
|
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF |
|
![]() |
|
MilSimBaller
Member
1 strike, language. 6/7 Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 433 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:10pm |
|
will i get shoot down using co2 with a palmers stab?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
RicWhic414
Gold Member
Bitter multiple time Ion-ownage victim Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1791 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:18pm |
|
i dont no for a fact but i would say yes... i would say take the move to hpa... you can get a ok crossfire tank for a 100 which is the same price of a stab... but for the co2 with stab you most likely will cuz co2 is a nonconsistant gas
|
|
|
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF |
|
![]() |
|
MilSimBaller
Member
1 strike, language. 6/7 Joined: 30 May 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 433 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:25pm |
|
for some reason i still find it hard to believe that co2's recharge rate is bad enough to give me shoot down with an e-grip. some second oppinions? no offense Ric
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Tippmania
Member
No, IM right! Joined: 13 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 4:27pm |
|
C02 recharge rate is FINE. The problems he is talking about (I am hoping) is w\o an X-Core or Anti-Siphon.... You should be fine. I'm pretty sure C02's recharge rate is faster than MOST HPA tanks.
|
|
|
Tippmann A-5
- Shocktech Drop + On\Off - Super R\T - Q.E.V. - Red Hot Powertube - Stock - Flatline + Metadyne Shroud - R.I.S. Foregrip - X-Core - Macro - BT Fixed Sight Rail |
|
![]() |
|
pattison
Member
Joined: 30 August 2002 Location: Korea, North Status: Offline Points: 384 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 5:31pm |
|
i think that c02 will actually recharge faster for short bursts than hpa. this is with anti siphon or remote. just don't expect to shoot a whole tank off, it will eventually freeze. hpa should have the same shootdown whether you shoot 10 shots or 1000.
the reason co2 is underrated is because it sucks until you antisiphon or remote it. |
|
|
Eat The Brisket
|
|
![]() |
|
RicWhic414
Gold Member
Bitter multiple time Ion-ownage victim Joined: 22 November 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1791 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 5:52pm |
|
yes but they are making hpa tanks with almost no shootdown like the new crossfire tanks are in the top 3 i believe in least amount of shootdown... its in a magizine somewhere
"From the tests, the Centerflag, Crossfire and Pure Energy systems were found to have the best flow rates, with the Evil Scion producing very good results also. Of these the Crossfire is the group leader, which, although matched by the Pure Energy system in terms of recovery time, does not suffer from the same pressure fluctuations. The remaining systems all have regulators that start to close early in the recovery period, which has the effect of restricting airflow and extending the recovery time – the worst offenders being ACI Bulldog and the Dye Throttle with recovery times of over 10 times that of the Crossfire."
Edited by RicWhic414 - 20 September 2006 at 5:57pm |
|
|
Tuesday starts the weekend... YAYAYA!!!!
CHUFF CHUFF |
|
![]() |
|
RoboCop
Moderator Group
Aw man, my butt is rusted... Joined: 06 November 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5196 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 6:53pm |
|
Yah, I have a scion. When I use my custom pro E with female stabalizer, I got no shoot down or it was very little shoot down that it wasn't noticeable. Yes, I was using co2. Palmers is known for their great regulators and very good recharge. In cold weather, the palmers kept my gun from freezing and kept giving me consistent shots. I love that thing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Shadowminion
Gold Member
Strike 1 - Language, 3/20 Joined: 06 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1625 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 8:32pm |
|
Yes, its possible , shootdown happens when the CO2 cant convert to a gas from a liquid fast enough , and the temperature of the liquid drops , lowering the gas pressure , causing "Shootdown" , even if you have guaranteed 100 percent conversion to a gaseous state with the CO2, Its possible at sustained High rates of fire . This is just a rough guesstimate , but if you do say,,, repeated bursts of 50+ ropes , with intermittent single shots , you WILL experience shootdown with CO2 , whereas , if you do mostly single shots ,or triplet bursts , and infrequent sustained bursts of "Supression " fire (aforementioned bursts of 50 plus rounds) , you'll most likely be fine with a reg or expansion chamber . My style of play more closely matches the latter , so I play with my 98C just as the air system came , and rarely if ever do I notice any shootdown . The most accurate answer depends on your intended style of play , Yeah , its possible . I lay out supression fire when its called for , but its really difficult to say "No, system X will never allow you to experience shootdown" , it depends too much on how you use it , almost like getting mileage from an automobile , you keep the pedal to the metal , you arent gonna get the most mileage , |
|
|
SL68-II , micro honed and polished .688" bore . Tuff Enuf .
Widowmaker , under construction |
|
![]() |
|
Tippmania
Member
No, IM right! Joined: 13 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 8:44pm |
|
Anyway, it simply comes down to this. IS IT WORTH IT? I personally would say no... seems others would beg to differ but that's fine. C02 has never given me problems (then again i've never used it w\o anti-siphon or an x-chamber) HPA is something I would only goto if I had a Smart Parts, Autococker, or any higher end gun like that. Tippmanns do FINE with C02 and even more so when you install the cheap, but very effective fixes.
|
|
|
Tippmann A-5
- Shocktech Drop + On\Off - Super R\T - Q.E.V. - Red Hot Powertube - Stock - Flatline + Metadyne Shroud - R.I.S. Foregrip - X-Core - Macro - BT Fixed Sight Rail |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |