Last "Limbaugh Post"

You know, given that I live in the south, and live extremely close to the fabled "free state of Winston" I can say that the fallout from that earlier war you mentioned is still felt. Even to this day, there are places that haven't climbed out of poverty, whose kids best bet is a trailer manufaucting plant, and who might be able to read at a fifth grade level by the time they reach graduation, because no good teachers will come to the schools because the pay is so low.

Tell me, do you know ANYTHING about American history, or that period of thime called Reconstruction, and the lasting economic, social, and political problems that have been widespread since?

Relating those two wars won't win anyone over to you that really knows what happened during and after the war between the states. I don't participate in arguments about the current war, but as far as your reference to the last war goes, you've failed to make the point you wanted to.

Dune wrote: Huh, I guess he took out his comparison? To those who may see this now, I did not create this topic, the previous post before my first has been taken out.

Good, I thought my brain was just working really slow for a minute.

for the record, the only reason Lincoln freed the slaves was to gain support from abolitionists, and for more forces. Much like the leaders of our Nation's Army did during the Revolutionary War.  Slaves were escaping and running to the British Army(where they were promised freedom and a chunk of land).  So, George and the boys decided to promise our slaves freedom as well for fighting....Of course, it was a lie, so when the war ended, the slaves were forced back into slavery....It was right, But its all in the past


-A proud Republican

Bugg wrote: Dune your arguement of Habeus corpeus is wrong, states aren't guranteed due process, succession is rebellion, and rebellion of states is considered an act of war, law has no room in war (cept Geneva...)

The state didn't invoke it, Lincoln did becuase it was a federal offense. Lincoln refused habeus corpus which is found in the body of the constitution and is granted to everyone regardless of time of war. Especially to the U.S.'s own citizens. Just because they did it doesn't mean it wasn't illegal.

And let me rephrase it so you can understand. He didn't refuse habeaus corpus to states, he refused it to many individuals, including protesters. That's who I am talking about, and that's why he isn't that great of a guy. You thought I meant states getting it? Come on, no one is that stupid to think you can imprison a state. Habeus corpus is not exactly due process either, close, but not the same.

Good point, I see now.

Yes, so due process

Maybe it's just me, but I can't take Bugg seriously when he's sporting a Limp Bizkit avatar

DBibeau855 wrote: [QUOTE=newport] Maybe it's just me, but I can't take Bugg seriously when he's sporting a Limp Bizkit avatar

anyway what the **EDITED** does Limp Bizkit have to do with my political affilation?

I catch flak all the time for loving Limp Bizkit

Las I checked, I don't care who you think I should like, they are MY favorite band, not YOURS

Wow some people in this world can be ignorant

I look at your sig and it says douche.. yeah thats classy...

I look at Hades sig, and I don't like it but do you see me flaming her? Uh-uh

So, I'll like my favorite band thank you very much jack

If you don't like my band, I don't care, it's called MY FAVORITE for a reason.. maybe couse of the word MY

Haha, I never noticed that.