Palmer or n2?

I currently own an A-5 with flatline and r/t. thinking about upgrading my air supply. i'm also running a remote line.

i'm trying to decided between getting an N2 tank or a palmer inline stablizers. Which one would prove to be the better option?

that is unless i'm being stupid and i need the palmer to use the N2 tank.... any suggestions?

Edited by aznsnoopy - 27 January 2006 at 2:41am

No get n2, You don't need a secondery reg hpa/n2 works fine as it is

SuzukiRider987 wrote: I'd get HPA (Nitro). Even with the Palmers, CO2 is still just that, CO2. Go HPA, and never look back.

exactly

you get hpa  as SR said co2 is and will all ways be crap.

Yeah tak the cold inot considiration do you play alot in the cold

A nitrogen tank comes with a built in regulator. It is definitely the single best upgrade you can make on any marker. It will make it much more consistent (therefore much more accurate), get rid of all the problems of CO2 (broken O rings, velocity spikes, weather inconsistency, etc...) and it's cheaper to fill. They're expensive, but completely worthwhile. I suggest a 68 ci 4500 psi. That will give you 1000+ shots, and its not too big as to be uncomfortable.

oh and, any recommendations as to brands? any brands to stay away from?

Having just gotten a palmer in hopes of consistency, I will definately be getting HPA right away.  The palmer's is nice, but in cold temps the co2 can be under 600 PSI, even full.  Varying temps causing huge pressure differences is a "Bad Thing"

I want 800 PSI and a good HPA valve minimum to move the bolt and cyclone at a high rate of fire.  From all the recommendations I've seen, I think a Crossfire HPA tank is what I need.