![]() |
Scary thought |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | ||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Scary thoughtPosted: 27 February 2006 at 1:00pm |
|
|
Something just occurred to me sitting here at lunch: Terrorists do not need to sneak a nuclear weapon into the United States. They're already here. The greatest part of the US' nuclear arsenal is in missle silos scattered throughout the midwest, up and down the center of our mainland, buried under cornfields, hills, and other very public land. In the event of nuclear war, these silos would open and launch, but, pending war, they sit and wait.
If a terrorist knew what it took to penetrate a silo and had the know how to extract the core of the warhead, they would have a functioning nuclear weapon within the confines of our borders, and would be a simple drive from a major city. Further, with adequate preparation, the nuke could be prepared to go off at a moments notice, so it wouldn't matter if they were caught. A bomb like that going off anywhere inside the US, in or out of a major city, would cause mass chaos. The trick is knowing what kind of security these places have. There is no resident staff, and very few silos would be visible from the roads. I can't imagine that somebody in charge of this stuff hasn't thought of this by now, but it just occurred to me. Creepy. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
impulse!
Gold Member
Guested - Repeat Offender Joined: 05 September 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 1715 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:08pm |
|
|
I highly doubt a nuclear missle silo is sitting by itself with no security.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:10pm |
|
|
There are alot of factors involved with ICBM warheads, multiple saftey features to prevent this type of thing from happening. The security is amazing. If you want I could go into an in-depth analisys of what it would theoretically take to penertrate such a facility, and what the government reponse would be, and the complex logistics involved. But I really don't feel like going into it right now, maybe in a hour or two when I bored out of my mind.
|
||
![]() |
||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:13pm |
|
|
I'd be curious to know. I can imagine that they must have some fairly involved security, but with the amount of time you'd have to plan it might be possible.
I don't figure it's as easy as I stated above, but the idea seems like something a determined group could pull off. Edit: Ok, I see that the missles only remain in North Dakota and Montana, and that protestors and others have been arrested for trespassing or getting too close. It's good to know that it's not as haphazzard as I'd have originally thought. I'll have to find out more about the silos. And good to know the empty silos are going to good use. :) Retired silo here in Kansas Edited by reifidom - 27 February 2006 at 1:20pm |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
ShortyBP
Moderator Group
A G F Y Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:20pm |
|
|
I don't know specifics, but the silos are very secure.
My dad was assigned to Minuteman silos in the late 60s/early 70s. Long two-person shifts underground... nothing much to do... but I guess it was the perfect duty for one to work on their Masters Degree on the Air Force's dime. A determined group can pull off anything... but in this case, the group that constructed the silo system was determined themselves... and those assigned to defend the silo systems are determined as well. To gain access, one would need a lot of equipment, and a lot of time. Even with the necessary equipment... the time needed to put that equipment to use would not be sufficient to allow entry before multiple security detachments reached your position. Even if the outer defenses were breached... the doors and safeguards from within the silos themselves are substantial. If ever visiting in the Tucson area... you can tour an old [obsolete] Titan silo. Very impressive, and those pre-date current ICBM silos by quite a bit. Edited by ShortyBP - 27 February 2006 at 3:54pm |
||
![]() |
||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:22pm |
|
|
I'd love to tour one. I'd imagine it's every bit as impressive as you say. I was thinking it might be possible to dig down and burrow into the side.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:24pm |
|
|
A determined highly trained group of about 50 soldiers armed with heavy weaponry for penetration and perimeter security plus a group of 10-15 missle technicions with the proper equipment might be able to preform a warhead seperation in appoximatly a hour from the time the hatch is popped on the silo. Then you would have to transport the warhead to a secure location to reconfigure the weapon to allow it to be used in a truck-bomb type configuration. The reconfiguration would take anywhere from a day to 2 weeks, depnding on the type of weapon that you are trying to create. But w/e most likely by the time you forced entry into the base and popped the silo hatch there would be a fast reaction force composed of at least a battalion plus Close Air Support Aircraft and Bombers on the way to eliminate you. It is close to impossible to pull off. Theoretically possible, yes. Realistically, No.
|
||
![]() |
||
procarbinefreak
Moderator Group
Budget Medical Procedures Available Joined: 12 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 12920 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:29pm |
|
|
one of the most interesting threads in T&O i've seen in a while...
![]() and i would love to tour an old missle silo... would definitely be interesting |
||
![]() |
||
Panda Man
Platinum Member
I’ll feed you to my SNAKE!! METALFACE!! Joined: 25 July 2004 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 10605 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:32pm |
|
|
you also have to remember our own Nuclear Shootdown capabilities, if
one was launched from Montana going to DC or NY, The Armed forces would
pick that up in a matter of seconds, and it would be taken down within
minutes, don't know if that short of a range would need to leave our
atmosphere but I'd rather see some farmland in Ohio obliterated then
see millions of people disappear..
![]() Edit: Nukes, Bombs, etc... I don't think that would work anymore, that's too... Cold Warish, I say if you wanna really cripple America Drop us off a Virus like the one in Terminator 3, Americans are crippled without Electronic-Communications. Edited by Panda Man - 27 February 2006 at 1:35pm |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:36pm |
|
|
The launch would be too tricky I'd think. Reconfiguring it to a land based bomb would be more practical and more adaptable.
Also, the aim here would not necessarily be destruction. A nuclear bomb going off anywhere in the US would cause mass panic, whether in a big city or not. The very idea that a nuke made it into our heartland would be more than enough. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
ShortyBP
Moderator Group
A G F Y Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:37pm |
|
They'd know you were coming. Plus, keep in mind, these silos were built to withstand near-direct hits from incoming nuclear warheads. We're talking THICK reinforced construction, and not just on top.
|
||
![]() |
||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:40pm |
|
|
A more realistic way to execute a nuclear attack on the US would be to take over a derilcit ICBM facilty in Kakizstan or someplace like fire a old Soviet ICBM. Old ICBMs especially Soviet ones were lacking in safety features like remote detonation and such. That way it would look as if a nuclear attack was being excuted from the former USSR on the US. This would cuase a retalitory attack by the US, which would cause a retalitory strike by all of NATO, which would cuase a relatitory strike by Russia, which would make Isriel attack Iran.
Now thats Scary. |
||
![]() |
||
ShortyBP
Moderator Group
A G F Y Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 1:47pm |
|
What Nuclear Shootdown capabilities? I know of no such workable system in existance. As of now, they exist only in fictional novels and movies.
Even systems that you may think are workable systems, such as PAC-3 or SM-3, or even the Airborne Laser system in testing... only effective against shorter range tactical ballistics... not incoming ICBMs. GBI that we're pouring tons of cash into has failed consistantly. Basically, if it were ever a scenario where we had incoming MIRVs from an ICBM... say goodbye to whatever they're targeted against. Domestically, I don't foresee a self-targeted launch as a possibility. This would be more of a case of a foreign launched weapon. Much like Snake6's scenario. Edited by ShortyBP - 27 February 2006 at 1:48pm |
||
![]() |
||
amishman89
Member
Wow if I’d have a TITLE it woud be great Joined: 17 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 610 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:04pm |
|
|
This scernerio is indeed creepy it is very unlikely to happen. Could be a good story line for a Hollywood movie. I doubt someone could "sneak" in a silo. Very unlikely. |
||
|
Only Hugh can prevent florist friars.
|
||
![]() |
||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:10pm |
|
|
Hmm, a functioning, yet decrepit, missle silo from another country would be a pretty workable alternative, assuming you could work out the launch and targeting. Whatever wasn't automatic that is. The security probably would be a lot less of an issue.
Do we still have systems to auto-lauch retalitory strikes or did that end with the Cold War? I can see how they'd be a deterrent, but in this case it would be a horrible mistake, retalliating against an imagined strike by a nation instead of a terrorist act designed to provoke a massive response. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Snake6
Platinum Member
Outranked by guitarguy? Joined: 11 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:25pm |
|
|
The Targeting of a Soviet ICBM is auto configured. There were chip-sets that were custom for each missle that dealt with the targeting. Pretty much the Terrorist would have to find a working silo(because most derilict silos have fallen into disrepair, and ope tha tthe silo that they captured was targeted on US, where it doesn't matter because any missle targeted on the US would be cause of an immediate retalatory attack.
There was never an Automated response system. All nuclear launches had to ba approved by NCA no matter what. |
||
![]() |
||
reifidom
Platinum Member
Zatoichi Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7420 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:27pm |
|
|
That's good at least. No mutually assured destruction.
I remember an earlier show of Michael Moore's (back when I could still stand him sometimes) when he went to Russia to get a missle directed away from the area where he lived. He wanted it pointed at another city, and was trying to get in to see somebody at the missle site. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Hades
Moderator Group
Joined: 10 May 2003 Location: Virgin Islands Status: Offline Points: 13014 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:33pm |
|
|
Hah! Funny you should mention Mr. Moore.
Not to sidetrack your thread but I am personally more afriad of being locked in the same room with with Moore then a terrorist nuclear attack.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7112 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:46pm |
|
funny note about ground sensors... i had a buddy who spent time in the seabees. not sure if he was in quam or bosnia at the time but one day he and a group of his fellow enlisted men got bored and started rolling big 150-200lb rocks down the hill next to his base... about 3 mins later a string of M1A1s showed up at the gate locked and loaded ready to whoop some butt... i guess it looked like there was a large group of infentry moving around on the hill and freaked someone out... |
||
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
||
![]() |
||
DBibeau855
Platinum Member
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK Joined: 26 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 2:55pm |
|
|
Well, what should really concern all of you is that only something like 5% of all shipping containers listed on ship manifests are searched. Thats 95 percent getting into the country all willy nilly and ballywho, and thats not talking about the undeclaired containers..
From these unchecked containers we get sex slave workers, sweathshop workers, a small amount of illeagals, drugs and whatnot. It would be just, stupifyingly easy to get some sort of threat through, be it a bomb or an operator or whatever you want. |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |