![]() |
Industry Momentum |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Author | ||
tallen702
Moderator Group
Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Industry MomentumPosted: 04 December 2006 at 5:52pm |
|
|
Is is just me, or does it seem to others that the paintball industry as a whole as been becoming stagnant after what was a relatively short burst of ingenuity in the late 90's early 00's?
From 1980-2001, we saw the change in markers from the nelson system to the tippmann inline system, the mag blow-forward design, the re-birth of the nelson system from kingman and WGP, the adaptation of electronics to the same valve system by ICD and WDP, and finally the spool-valve of the Matrix series of markers. That's a lot of technology in markers alone for a mere 20 years. Not to mention the fact that paintballs have become more specialized to the types of environments in which the sport is played and vary according to the needs of the player. Clothing has gone from cammo and motocross gear to cammo and paintball-specific tournament uniforms. Loader technology has advanced from 10 round tubes to optical and audial sensor equiped hoppers. And the 12-gram co2 cartridge has been replaced first by bulk tanks and now by cheap and effective HPA/N2 tanks. What I saw from my four years in college alone would lead me to believe that these past 6 years would have seen far more innovations and advancement of technology based on the past trends. But much has stayed the same since I quit spending every day working with, selling, and playing paintball. Tank pressures and sizes are the same, the prices are stable. Markers still follow the same designs from 5 years ago. Either Nelson, Tippmann, or Matrix (AGD has aparently dropped off the face of the earth). Hoppers still use the same basic feeding system. And the clothing hasn't changed a whole lot. The funniest part of all of this is, the masks have actually REVERTED to older models! V-Force's wide-lense format is a throwback to the old B.E. masks. And JT pro-flex masks habe become a standard while the proteus is nowhere to be seen. The industry simply seems to have stagnated, or at least lost a lot of it's momentum. I just wonder what it will take for that momentum to pick back up again. |
||
|
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
||
![]() |
||
Evil Elvis
Moderator Group
Crusher of Dreams Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4250 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 5:57pm |
|
|
I wouldnt say so, look at how Tippmanns have evolved from the Carbines to the new X-7.
Then there is the whole Propane powered Pumps. The thing is if a technology is proven and reliable why would you change it for the sake of change? Why no perfect it and have reliable guns that everyone knows that work and how to maintain and operate them? Masks have changed a lot, tallen might look retro but its a whole diferent monster. From better lenses that dont fog up to a mix of hard and soft platics to protect and encourage bounces in some areas. Stagnant would be if they would just have keep making Carbones, Spiders, Mags and Cockers. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Santa Chewp
Member
Ninja Santa Joined: 24 December 2004 Status: Offline Points: 727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:06pm |
|
More or less, yeah |
||
|
[IMG]http://i9.tinypic.com/8f3jo8l.jpg">
|
||
![]() |
||
carl_the_sniper
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - 7/29, Bad Linky Joined: 08 April 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 11259 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:13pm |
|
|
i think it just seems like this i don't think we will be able to measure how fast we are moving today until a few years down the road. and though the c3 was a big innovation, i really doubt it will catch on, i can see other propane markers being made but... meh |
||
|
<just say no to unnecessarily sexualized sigs>
|
||
![]() |
||
tallen702
Moderator Group
Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:19pm |
|
|
This is an open ended discussion everyone, so please, chime in! No right or wrong answers.
|
||
|
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
||
![]() |
||
Boss_DJ
Moderator Group
hey bud, lets party! Joined: 29 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3039 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:44pm |
|
|
it needs to be cheaper
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Squishey
Gold Member
Joined: 22 May 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1657 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:47pm |
|
i agree, an angel is not worth 1,500$ when it doesnt shoot any farther or more accurate then my tippmann, faster but thats about it. |
||
|
Canadians do it on top.
|
||
![]() |
||
Enos Shenk
Platinum Member
~-o@ Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: A comfy chair Status: Offline Points: 14109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:49pm |
|
|
Business gets in the way. Innovation is discouraged when some money-hungry grabasses like smart parts will sue you and shut you down over some overblown patent claim.
Compare it to any other business venture. Look at video games, for the longest time games innovated, you had new styles of games like FPS and others appearing. You had cool unique packaging and manuals and other goodies. Now video games are so dominated by the big-name companies, and all they do is publish the safe bet. Yet Another WW2 Shooter. Yet Another Halo Game. Yet Another Frigging Sims Expansion. Its the same with the paintball industry. Most companies just roll with the safe bet. Yet Another Stacked Tube Spyder Clone. Yet Another Timmy Clone. etc etc ad nauseum. Edited by Enos Shenk - 04 December 2006 at 6:51pm |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
.Ryan
Platinum Member
Neither cool nor annoying Joined: 25 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4488 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 6:58pm |
|
Seriously. I know they say that if you want a cheaper sport play football or something, but I see the fact that, while prices of nearly every other technology have fallen in comparison to the quality and sophistication of the product, paintball products haven't really as probably one of the biggest signs of stagnation. I realize paint is a lot cheaper than it was back in the 80's but paint prices haven't really fallen much for probably the past decade....Same with markers and other equipment, especially on the higher end. Paintball as a sport has seen some progression, at least in the pro circuit, as I see the current Xball format and the general presentation of televised tournament paintball as probably about ready for mainstream, if in need of a little polishing. The technology...not so much. Edited by .Ryan - 04 December 2006 at 7:00pm |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
SSOK
Moderator Group
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5919 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 8:05pm |
|
|
If Field prices go down, Paintball will rise. I cant tell you how many people quit paintball due to field prices. That, and super chromiums w/o big als tent. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
.Ryan
Platinum Member
Neither cool nor annoying Joined: 25 June 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4488 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 10:21pm |
|
|
I personally fell off paintball a lot because the only field within 50 miles closed because they weren't making money.....It's pretty hard for these small field operators to keep their prices too low.
I keep telling my girlfriend that I'm going to get some free government money from Mathew Lasko and open a new field down here. I've got so many awesome ideas, and with a huge section of the state not being serviced....I think I could do well.... |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
CarbineKid
Moderator Group
Joined: 19 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3168 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 10:54pm |
|
|
I would say that the major problem may be the success of the paintball industry. The major object of the industry was to make the guns shoot more balls, and at a higher rate. They went for a 12 gram Co2 pump pistol to an electro monster that fires 20+ bps. The problem is where to go from here. The Propane pump is a cool idea, but one that's 15 years too late. The gun just doesn't have the firepower desired by most players(go ahead flame away). The paintball industry will have to re invent the wheel to make the next major leap in evolution of paintball.
|
||
![]() |
||
Razgriz Ghost
Gold Member
Guested - Implosion Joined: 21 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1567 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 10:56pm |
|
|
the paint itself needs to be cheaper. I can afford the gun once now I need money for paint.
|
||
![]() |
||
Kristofer
Platinum Member
Good Sport. Semper Fi! Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4658 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 10:59pm |
|
|
I have a proteus mask. bummer. i guess i am out of style.
|
||
![]() |
||
GI JOES SON
Platinum Member
Got me flowers for my birthday Joined: 10 July 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4946 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:06pm |
|
|
depends on the field you go to. everywhere ive been to on long island paint is always 100 a case, field paint only. yet you go to some places in SC,NC, PA, etc, paint is a lot cheaper. as for the industry, i think all the new angels and other electros that make one minor change in their markers every year and claim it almighty against the last years model is retarted, and it looks like tippmann is starting with it too with the custom pro and x7....you could easily take a 98c/m or a5 and upgrade it....they could probably find a way to make that fire selection on the x7 an upgrade |
||
![]() |
||
Monk
Moderator Group
Joined: 23 October 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:14pm |
|
How long did you have to wait to use that in a sentence? |
||
![]() |
||
ShortyBP
Moderator Group
A G F Y Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:16pm |
|
I agree with Enos. While I'm sure there are many other reasons... this is what I believe contributed most to any degree of stagnation. Big names got bigger. Little guys got stomped. Even if someone small did manage to develop something new and did not face the threat of lawsuit... would they be able to compete with a less innovative product pushed on by the big guys? Paintball is a volume business... you need to sell A LOT of something in order to make a profit. For a small company, competing with the marketing/hype ability of a big company is almost impossible, no matter how good the product is. A lot of small companies that were indeed innovative went under, simply because the volume sales weren't there. Made worse by companies that weren't diversified and tended to stick with one specific market. So if you're intent on being innovative and creating something great... if you cannot foresee selling umpty-thousand of them in a relatively short timespan before the next something great comes along, it isn't worth the time, effort, expense and legal headaches. Edited by ShortyBP - 04 December 2006 at 11:18pm |
||
![]() |
||
Monk
Moderator Group
Joined: 23 October 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6557 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:20pm |
|
|
Seriously.
http://www.vintagerex.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=database Look at all the companies back then. Now try and think of as many marker manufactures that are still in business, or recently founded. |
||
![]() |
||
ShortyBP
Moderator Group
A G F Y Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:21pm |
|
|
And the cost hasn't been stagnant at all.
Look at how much an electronic marker will cost you these days compared to the days of old. Someone could outfit themselves with a real nice setup for a fraction of what it would cost you for something similar only a few years ago. Paint costs have definitely gone down in the past decade. As for FIELD paint, different story... fields need to keep up with the rising costs of overhead. |
||
![]() |
||
tallen702
Moderator Group
Hipster before Hipster was cool... Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 11857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 December 2006 at 11:51pm |
|
|
yeah, paint has definately dropped. Rec-Sport used to cost us $35/case
back in '00. Now Pev's Sells it for almost that much. Field paint will always be expensive. I DO like what Jim does out at Pev's At AG though. It's FPO but only for rentals. If you own your stuff, you can buy it anywhere and bring it on in. The fact that DYE and JT are in bed together certainly doesn't help matters on the peripherals, and the fact that DYE is producing their own markers now makes Youngblood and friends a serious roadblock to new innovations. I honestly think that the Matrix will be the last new marker system we'll see for some time. The fact that the guys who built the industry are all bowing out or being forced out by shareholders doesn't help matter either. |
||
|
<Removed overly wide sig. Tsk, you know better.>
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |